Scientific Management Approach as a Heritage Beyond Taylor: An In-Depth Look

Yıl 2024, , 73 - 109, 01.04.2024

Fettah Kayra

https://doi.org/10.17153/oguiibf.1326869

Öz

The scientific management approach, developed by Frederic Winslow Taylor and his close associates utilizing a scientific perspective, has made significant contributions to organizations with the principles it has developed. When the literature is examined, it has been determined that most of the names that Taylor was inspired by, benefited from in various ways, or worked with have not been adequately addressed. Building upon this idea, this study aims to establish a conceptual framework based on the pioneering figures and significant works of the scientific management approach and aimed to contribute to the studies carried out on the subject.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Classical Theory, Scientific Management, Efficiency, Productivity

Taylor’dan Ötesi Bir Miras Olarak Bilimsel Yönetim Yaklaşımı: Derinlemesine Bir Bakış

Öz

Frederic Winslow Taylor ve yakın çevresi tarafından bilimsel bakış açısından faydalanarak geliştirilen bilimsel yönetim yaklaşımı, geliştirdiği ilkelerle örgütlere önemli katkılar sağlamıştır. Alanyazın incelendiğinde başta ulusal düzeyde olmak üzere uluslararası alanda Taylor’ın esinlendiği, kendilerinden çeşitli şekillerde fayda sağladığı ya da birlikte çalıştığı çoğu ismin yeteri kadar ele alınmadığı saptanmıştır. Çalışma, bahse konu fikirden hareketle bilimsel yönetim yaklaşımının öncü isimlerini ve önemli çalışmalarını esas alarak kavramsal bir çerçeve oluşturmuş ve konu hakkında yürütülen çalışmalara katkı sunmayı amaçlamıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Klasik Kuram, Bilimsel Yönetim, Verimlilik, Üretkenlik

Kaynakça

• Abrahamson, E. (1996a). Technical and aesthetic fashion. Translating Organizational Change içinde (Editörler: B. Czarniawska ve G. Sevón), (ss. 117-137). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co.
• Abrahamson, E. (1996b). Management fashion. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 254-285.
• Asunakutlu, T. (2001). Klasik ve neo-klasik dönemde örgütsel güvenin karşılaştırılması üzerine bir deneme. Muğla Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (5).
• Alford, L. P. (1934). Henry Laurence Gantt: Leader in Industry. New York: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
• Babbage, C. (1832). On the Economy of Machinery and Manufactures. London.
• Barley, S. R., & Kunda, G. (1992). Design and devotion: Surges of rational and normative ideologies of control in managerial discourse. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(3), 363-399.
• Barrow, C. W. (1992). Corporate liberalism, finance hegemony, and central state intervention in the reconstruction of American higher education. Studies in American Political Development, 6(2), 420-444.
• Barrow, C. W. (2018). The Entrepreneurial Intellectual in the Corporate University. New York, NY: Springer International Publishing.
• Barth, C. (1903). Slide rules for the machine shop as a part of the Taylor system of management [Elektronik kaynak]. ASME, 49-62.
• Baumgart, A., & Neuhauser, D. (2009). Frank and Lillian Gilbreth: Scientific management in the operating room. BMJ Quality & Safety, 18(5), 413-415.
• Bennett, A. C. (1970). Developing scientific management in the hospital field: Focus on management methods. Hospital Topics, 48(1), 38-42.
• Besner, C., & Hobbs, B. (2008). Project management praction, generic or contextual: A reality check, Project Management Journal, 39(1), 16-33.
• Borrman, K. (2017). One standardized house for all: America's little house. Buildings & Landscapes: Journal of the Vernacular Architecture Forum, 24, 37 - 57.
• Burges, K. (1992). Organized production and unorganized labor: Management strategy and labor activism at the Link-Belt Company, 1900-1940. A Mental Revolution: Scientific Management since Taylor içinde (Editör: Daniel Nelson), (ss. 130-155). Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
• Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. Londra: Heinemann.
• Burrell, G. (2003). The future of organization theory: Prospects and limitations. The Oxford Handbook of Organization Theory: Meta-Theoretical Perspectives içinde (Editörler: H. Tsoukas ve C. Knudsen), (ss. 525-535). Oxford: Oxford University.
• Braverman, H. (1974). Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century. New York.
• Brown, P. S. (1925). The work and aims of the Taylor Society. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 119(1), 134–139.
• Caudill, H. L., & Porter, C. D. (2014). A historical perspective of reward systems: Lessons learned from the scientific management era. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 4(4), 127-142.
• Cooke, B. (2003). The denial of slavery in management studies. Journal of Management Studies, 40(8), 1895-1918.
• Cooke, M. L. (1910). Academic and Industrial Efficiency: A Report. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching Bulletin no. 5. Boston: Merrymount Press.
• Cooke, M. L. (1913). The spirit and social significance of scientific management. Journal of Political Economy, 21(6), 481-493.
• Cooke, M. L. (1918). Our Cities Awake: Notes on Municipal Activities and Administration. Doubleday, Page & Company.
• Cooke, M. L., & Murray, P. (1940). Organized Labor and Production: Next Steps in Industrial Democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers.
• Chamberlain, E. (2013). Carl Barth and his machine shop slide rules. Computing for Science, Engineering, and Production: Mathematical Tools for the Second Industrial Revolution içinde (Editör: Karl Kleine), (ss. 163-194). BoD–Books on Demand GmbH.
• Clark, W. (1938). The Gantt Chart. London: Sir Isaac Pitman and Sons, Ltd.
• Dar, S. A. (2022). The relevance of Taylor's scientific management in the modern era. Journal of Psychology and Political Science (JPPS), 2(06), 1-6.
• Davis, P. M. (1966). From scientific management to pert-an evolution. Nebraska Journal of Economics and Business, 5(2), 34-45.
• Derksen, M. (2014). Turning men into machines? Scientific management, industrial psychology, and the “human factor”. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 50(2), 148-165.
• Drucker, P. F. (1961). Fifty years of management—A look back and a look forward. ASME Open Journal of Engineering (AOJE), 83(3), 366-370.
• Emerson, H. (1912). The Twelve Principles of Efficiency. New York: The Engineering Magazine.
• Fry, L. (1976). The maligned F. W. Taylor: A reply to his many critics. Academy of Management Review, 1(3), 124–129.
• Fry, B. R. (1989). Mastering Public Administration: From Max Weber to Dwight Waldo. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
• Gantt, H. L. (1903). A graphical daily balance in manufacture. ASME Transactions, 24, 1322–1336.
• George, C. S. (1968). The History of Management Thought. First Edition, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Geraldi, J., & Lechter, T. (2012). Gantt charts revisited: A critical analysis of its roots and implications to the management of projects today. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 5(4), 578-594.
• Gilbreth, F. B. (1911). Motion Study: A Method for Increasing the Efficiency of the Workman. New York, NY: Sturgis and Walton.
• Gilbreth, F.B., & Gilbreth, L. M. (1919). Fatigue Study: The Elimination of Humanity’s Greatest Unnecessary Waste, A First Step in Motion Study. The Macmillan Company, New York, NY.
• Gilbreth, F.B., & Gilbreth, L. M. (1920). Motion Study for the Handicapped. Hive Publishing Company, Easton, PA.
• Gilson, M. (1940). Review of M. L. Cooke and P. Murray organized labor and production. Journal of Political Economy, 49(1), 142-144.
• Grachev, M., & Rakitsky, B. (2013). Historic horizons of Frederick Taylor's scientific management. Journal of Management History, 19(4), 512-527.
• Graham, L. D. (1999). Domesticating efficiency: Lillian Gilbreth's scientific management of homemakers, 1924-1930. Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 24(3), 633-675.
• Greenwood, R. (2015). A first look at the first 30 years of the first division: The management history division. Management History: Its Global Past & Present içinde (Editörler: Bradley Bowden ve David Lamond), (ss. 173-189). IAP.
• Griffin, M. B., Thomas, J. Y., & McMurtrey, M. E. (2022). The evolution of project management: The future is now?. Journal of Management Policy & Practice, 23(2), 75-83.
• Haber, S. (1964). Efficiency and Uplift. Scientific Management in the Progressive Era 1890–1920. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
• Hughes, O. E. (2003). Public Management and Administration: An Introduction. Palgrave Macmillan. http-1:https://www.uuworld.org/articles/thompson-forgotten-minister (Erişim tarihi: 07.06.2023)
• http-2:http://socialsciences.in/article/pioneers-public-administration-and-management-thinking (Erişim tarihi: 10.06.2023)
• http-3:https://www.newspapers.com/article/92780586/carl-georg-barth-1860-1939/ (Erişim tarihi: 21.06.2023)
• http-4:https://web.archive.org/web/20100626081021/http://www.stevens-tech.edu/ses/about_soe/history/frederick_winslow_taylor.html (Erişim tarihi: 21.06.2023)
• Joullié, J. E. (2018). Management without theory for the twenty-first century. Journal of Management History, 24(4), 377-395.
• Kara, A. (2020). Performansa Dayalı Ücret Sistemlerinin İş Tatmini Üzerine Etkisi: Bilişim Sektörü Üzerine Bir Alan Araştırması. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). İstanbul Üniversitesi (Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü), İstanbul.
• Kayra, F. (2021). AVM’ler: Kurumsal Kuram ve İskandinav Kurumsalcılığı Işığında Bir Çözümleme. (Editör: D. Taşcı). İzmir: Duvar Yayınları.
• Koumparoulis, D. N., & Solomos, D. K. (2012). Taylor's scientific management. Acta Universitatis Danubius: Œconomica, 8(4), 5-14.
• Kumar, P. P. (2005). Effective use of Gantt chart for managing large scale projects. Cost Engineering, 47(7).
• Krenn, M. (2011). From scientific management to homemaking: Lillian M. Gilbreth's contributions to the development of management thought. Management & Organizational History, 6(2), 145-161.
• Lancaster, J. (2004). Making Time: Lillian Moller Gilbreth, a Life Beyond “Cheaper by the Dozen.”. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
• Leblebici, D. N. (2008). Yönetim bilimi açısından klasik dönemi hatırlamaya ilişkin bir çalışma. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (21), 99-118.
• Ma, Q. G., & Wang, X. Y. (2006). Cognitive neuroscience, neuroeconomics, and neuromanagement. Management World, 10, 139-149.
• Ma, Q. G., Hu, L. F., Pei, G. X., Ren, P. Y., & Ge, P. (2014). Applying neuroscience to tourism management: A primary exploration of neurotourism. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 670–671, 1637–1640.
• Manning, F. M. (1943). Carl G. Barth, 1860-1939: A sketch. Norwegian-American Studies, 13(1), 114-132.
• Martin, D. (1990). The management classics and public productivity. Public Productivity & Management Review, 14(1), 35-52.
• Mousa, F. T., & Lemak, D. J. (2009). The Gilbreths' quality system stands the test of time. Journal of Management History, 15(2), 198-215.
• Muhs, W. F. (1982). Worker participation in the progressive Era: An assessment by Harrington Emerson. Academy of Management Review, 7(1), 99-102.
• Muhs, W. F. (1986, August). The Emerson engineers: A look at one of the first management consulting firms in the US. Academy of Management Proceedings içinde (Editörler: J. Pearce ve R. Robinson), (Vol. 1986, No. 1, ss. 123-127). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management.
• McKenna, C. D. (1995). The origins of modern management consulting. Business and Economic History, 24(1) 51-58.
• Myers, L. A. (2011). One hundred years later: What would Frederick W. Taylor say? International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(20), 8-11.
• Nadworny, M. J, (1955). Scientific Management and the Unions: 1900-1932. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Nelson, D. (1974). Scientific management, systematic management, and labor, 1880–1915. Business History Review, 48(4), 479-500.
• Nelson, D. (1975). Managers and Workers: Origins of the New Factory System in the United States 1880-1920. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
• Nelson, D. (1992a). Scientific management in retrospect. A Mental Revolution: Scientific Management since Taylor içinde (Editör: Daniel Nelson), (ss. 5-39). Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
• Nelson, D. (1992b). Scientific management and the transformation of university business education. A Mental Revolution: Scientific Management since Taylor içinde (Editör: Daniel Nelson), (ss. 77-101). Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
• Nyland, C., & Bruce, K. (2016). Democracy or seduction? The demonization of scientific management and the deification of human relations. The Right and Labor in America: Politics, Ideology, and Imagination içinde (Editörler: Nelson Lichtenstein ve Elizabeth Tandy Shermer), (ss. 42-76). University of Pennsylvania Press.
• Nyland, C., & McLeod, A. (2007). The scientific management of the consumer interest. Business History, 49(5), 717-735.
• Öztaş, N. (2015). Yönetim: Örgüt ve Yönetim Kuramları. Antalya: Otorite Yayınları.
• Petersen, P. B. (1991). The evolution of the Gantt chart and its relevance today. Journal of Managerial Issues, 3(2), 131-155.
• Peterson, P. (1990). Fighting for a better Navy: An attempt at scientific management (1905-1912). Journal of Management, 16, 151-166.
• Price, B. (1989). Frank and Lillian Gilbreth and the manufacture and marketing of motion study, 1908-1924. Business and Economic History, 18, 88-98.
• Quigel Jr, J. P. (2022). White shirts and stopwatches: The Emerson efficiency engineers and work reorganization within Pennsylvania firms, 1900–1920. The Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography, 146(3), 210-245.
• Rahman, M. H. (2012). Henry Fayol and Frederick Winslow Taylor’s contribution to management thought: An overview. ABC Journal of Advanced Research, 1(2), 94-103.
• Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of Innovations. New York: The Free Press.
• Sargut, A. S., & Özen, Ş. (2015). Örgüt kuramlarına genel bir bakış: karşılaştırmalı bir çözümleme. Örgüt Kuramları içinde (Editörler: A. Selami Sargut ve Şükrü Özen), (s. 11- 34). Ankara: İmge Kitabevi Yayınları.
• Sutcliffe, P. (1982). The role of labour variances in Harrington Emerson's ‘new gospel of efficiency’(1908). Accounting and Business Research, 12(46), 115-123.
• Scott, W. G., & Mitchell, T. R. (1989). The universal Barnard: His meta-concepts of leadership in the administrative state. Public Administration Quarterly, 13(3) 295-320.
• Shafritz, J. M., Ott, J. S., & Jang, Y. S. (2015). Classics of Organization Theory. Cengage Learning.
• Shives, G. K., & Scott, K. D. (2003). Gainsharing and EVA: The US postal service experience. The Journal of Total Rewards, 12(1), 21-30.
• Smith, A. (1776). The Wealth of Nations.
• Spriegel, W. R., & Myers, C. E. (1953). The Writings of the Gilbreths. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
• Tayanç, M., & Zeytin, G. (2000). Yüksek hız çeliklerinin iç yapı ve ısıl işlem özellikleri. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2(1), 103-122.
• Taylor, F.W., (1903). Shop management. ASME Transactions, 24, 1337–1480.
• Taylor, F. W. (1911). The Principles of Scientific Management. Harper and Brothers.
• Taylor, F.W., (1919). Shop Management. Harper, New York.
• Towne, H. R. (1886, May). The Engineer as an Economist. Transactions of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 7, 428–432. Paper presented at a meeting of the Society, Chicago, IL.
• Thompson, C. B. (1909). The Church and the Wage-Earners. New York: Scribner.
• Thompson, C. B. (1913). The relation of scientific management to the wage problem. Journal of Political Economy, 21(7), 630-642.
• Thompson, C. B. (1914a). The literature of scientific management. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 28(3), 506-557.
• Thompson, C. B. (1914b). The case for scientific management. The Sociological Review, 7(4), 315-327.
• Thompson, C. B. (1915). Scientific management in practice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 29(2), 262-307.
• Thompson, C. B. (1916). Relation of scientific management to labor. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 30(2), 311-351.
• Thompson, C. B. (1917). The Theory and Practice of Scientific Management. Houghton Mifflin.
• Tsutsui, W. M. (2001). The way of efficiency: Ueno Yoichi and scientific management in twentieth-century Japan. Modern Asian Studies, 35(2), 441-467.
• Uddin, N., & Hossain, F. (2015). Evolution of modern management through Taylorism: An adjustment of scientific management comprising behavioral science. Procedia Computer Science, 62, 578-584.
• Van De Water, T. J. (1997). Psychology's entrepreneurs and the marketing of industrial psychology. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(4), 486-499.
• Vitton, J. J., (2008). Management department history. UND Departmental Histories. 75, 1-33.
• Wilson, J. M. (2003). Gantt charts: A centenary appreciation. European Journal of Operational Research, 149(2), 430-437.
• Witzel, M. (2002). A short history of efficiency. Business Strategy Review, 13(4), 38-47.
• Witzel, M. (2012). A History of Management Thought. Routledge.
• Whitaker, R. (1979). Scientific management theory as political ideology. Studies in Political Economy, 2(1), 75-108.
• Wrege, C. D., & Stotka, A. M. (1978). Cooke creates a classic: The story behind FW Taylor's principles of scientific management. Academy of Management Review, 3(4), 736-749.
• Wren, D. A. (1971, August). Toward a school of management arts and sciences. Academy of Management Proceedings içinde (Vol. 1971, No. 1, pp. 91-94). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management.
• Wren, D. A. (1980). Scientific management in the USSR, with particular reference to the contribution of Walter N. Polakov. Academy of Management Review, 5(1), 1-11.
• Wren, D. A. (2011). The centennial of Frederick W. Taylor's the principles of scientific management: A retrospective commentary. Journal of Business & Management, 17(1), 11-22.
• Wren, D. A. (2015). Implementing the Gantt chart in Europe and Britain: The contributions of Wallace Clark. Journal of Management History, 21(3), 309-327.
• Wren, D. A., Greenwood, R. A., Teahen, J., & Bedeian, A. G. (2015). C. Bertrand Thompson and management consulting in Europe, 1917-1934. Journal of Management History, 21(1), 15-39.
• Zuffo, R. G. (2011). Taylor is dead, hurray Taylor! The “human factor” in scientific management: Between ethics, scientific psychology and common sense. Journal of Business & Management, 17(1), 23-42.