Örgütler Arası İlişkilerde Bilginin Paylaşım Sürecinde Özgözlemciliğin Güvene Etkisi

Yıl 2012, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1, 75 - 95, 01.03.2012

Zuhal Şenyuva Özlem Öğütveren Gönül

Öz

Her ağ düzeneği kendi yapısı içinde sosyal sermaye olarak ifade edilen bir örtük bilgi birikimi taşımaktadır. Aracılar, bir ağın örtük bilgisini diğer ağ ya da ağlara taşıyarak farklı ağdüzenekleri arasında bilginin paylaşımını sağlar. Literatürde güveni etkileyen faktörler incelendiğinde, aracıların özgözlemcilik benzeri kişilik özelliklerini güvenin oluşumu sürecinde nasıl kullandıkları konusu ele alınmamıştır. Kendini ifade eden davranışları kontrol edebilme becerisi diğerleri tarafından güvenilir olma algısı yaratma açısından etkili olabilecek bir özellik olarak düşünüldüğü için bu çalışmada; örtük bilginin paylaşılması sürecinde özgözlemciliğin güvene etkisi tartışılmaktadır

Anahtar Kelimeler

Özgözlemcilik, güven, ağdüzeneği, bilgi paylaşımı

The Effect of Self-Monitoring on Trust During the Knowledge Sharing Process in Interorganizational Relationships

Öz

Each single network sustains in its own structure, an implicit accumulation of knowledge often referred to as social capital. Agents provide the sharing of knowledge between different networks by carrying one’s implicit knowlegde to the other. In the existing literature, factors effecting the formation of trust are debated, excluding how agents exploit personal charactersitics such as self-monitoring, in the formation of trust in their relationships. Self-monitoring is defined as the ability to control the behaviors predicting oneself. As it is a personal characteristic contemplated to be effective in the creation of trustfullness perception by others, in this study we will examine the effect of self monitoring in the formation of trust during the process of implicit knowledge sharing. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Self-monitoring, trust, networks, knowledge sharing

Kaynakça

• Adler, P. S. ve S. W. Kwon (2002), “Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept”, Academy of Management Review, 27 (1), 17-40.
• Alavi, M. ve D. E. Leidner (2001), “Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues”, MIS Quarterly, 25 (1), 107-136.
• Baker, W. E. ve R. T. Foulkner (2002), “Interorganizational Networks”, Ed. J. A.C. Baum, Companion to Organizations, Oxford: Blackwell, 520-540.
• Boisot, M. H. (1986), “Markets and Hierarchies in a Cultural Perspective,” Organization Studies, 7 (2), 135-158.
• Bosch-Sijtsema, P. M. ve T. J. B. M. Postma (2010), “Governance Factors Enabling Knowledge Transfer in Interorganisational Development Projects”, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 22 (5), 593 – 608.
• Bolino, M. C. ve W. H. Turnley (2003), “More Than One Way to Make an Impression: Exploring Profiles of Impression Management”, Journal of Management, 29 (2), 141-160.
• Bresman, H., J. Birkinshaw ve R. Nobel (1999), “Knowledge Transfer in International Acquisitions”. Journal of International Business Studies, 30 (3), 439- 462.
• Buğra, A. (2000), Devlet-Piyasa Karşıtlığının Ötesinde: İhtiyaçlar ve Tüketim Üzerine Yazılar, İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
• Burt, R.S. (1992), Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
• Burt, R. S. (1997), “The Contingent Value of Social Capital”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 339-365.
• Burt, R. S. (2000), Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital, New York: Oxford University Press.
• Burt, R. S. (2001), “Structural Holes versus Network Closure as Social Capital”, Ed. Lin, N., Cook, K. S., Burt, R.S., Social Capital: Theory and Research, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers, 31-56.
• Coulter, K. S. ve R. A. Coulter (2002), “Determinants of Trust in a Service Provider: The Moderating Role of Length of Relationship”, Journal of Services Marketing, 16 (1), 35-50.
• Davenport, T. H. ve L. Prusak (1997), Working Knowledge, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
• Day, D. V. ve D. J. Schleicher (2006), “Self-monitoring at Work: A Motive-based Perspective”, Journal of Personality, 74 (3), 685-714.
• Doney, P. M., J. P. Cannon, ve M. R. Mullen (1998), “Understanding the Influence of National Culture on the Development of Trust”, Academy of Management Review, 23 (3), 601-620.
• Erdem, F. ve J. Özen (2003), “Niklas Luhmann’ın Tanıdıklık, Emin Olma ve Güven Ayrımı”, Ed. Ferda Erdem, Sosyal Bilimlerde Güven, Ankara: Vadi Yayınları, 53-60.
• Fuller-Love, N. ve E. Thomas (2004), “Networks in Small Manufacturing Firms”. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 11 (2), 244-253.
• Granovetter, M. (1985), “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness”, American Journal of Sociology, 91 (3), 481-510.
• Gulati, R., D. A. Dialdin ve L. Wang (2002), “Organizational Networks”, Ed. Baum, J. A.C., Companion to Organizations, Oxford: Blackwell, 281-303.
• Hogg, M. A. ve D. Abrams (1988), Social Identifications: A Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations and Group Processes. London: Routledge.
• Ickes, W., R. Holloway, L. L. Stinson, ve T. G. Hoodenpyle (2006), “Self-monitoring in Social Interaction: The Centrality of Self-affect”, Journal of Personality, 74 (3), 659-684.
• Ke, W. ve K. K. Wei (2007), “Factors Affecting Trading Partners’ Knowledge Sharing: Using the Lens of Transaction Cost Economics and Socio-political Theories”, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 6, 297-308.
• Kilduff, M. ve D. V. Day (1994), “Do Chameleons Get Ahead? The Effects of Self- Monitoring on Managerial Careers”, The Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1047-1060.
• Korczynski, M. (2003), “Güvenin Ekonomi Politiği”, Ed. Ferda Erdem, Sosyal Bilimlerde Güven, Ankara: Vadi Yayınları, 61-88.
• Koskinen, K. U., P. Pihlanto ve H. Vanharanta (2003), “Tacit Knowledge Acquisition and Sharing in a Project Work Context”, International Journal of Project Management, 21 (4), 281-290.
• Kramer, R. M. (1996), “Divergent Realities and Convergent Disappointments in the Hierarchic Relation: Trust and the Intuitive Auditor at Work”, Ed. Kramer, Roderick M., Tyler, Tom R., Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, Thousand Oaks: Sage, 216-245.
• Leone, C. (2006), “Self-monitoring: Individual Differences in Orientations to the Social World”, Journal of Personality, 74, 633-658.
• Levin, D.Z. ve Cross, R. (2004), “The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer”, Management Science, 50(11), 1477-1490.
• Lewicki, R. J. ve B. B. Bunker (1996), “Developing and Maintaining Trust in Work Relationships”, Ed. Kramer, Roderick M., Tyler, Tom R., Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, London: Sage Publications, 114-139.
• Macneil, I. R. (1980), The New Social Contract: An Inquiry into Modern Contractual Relations. London: Yale University Pres.
• Mehra, A., Kilduff, M. ve Brass, D. J. (2001), “The Social Networks of High and Low Self-Monitors: Implications for Workplace Performance”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 46 (1), 121-146.
• Miller, J.S. ve Cardy, R.L. (2000), “Self-monitoring and Performance Appraisal: Rating Outcomes in Project Teams”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 609- 626.
• Nonaka, I. (1994), “A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation”, Organization Science, 5 (1), 14-37.
• Nonaka, I. ve H. Takeuchi (1995), The Knowledge Creating Company. How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation, Oxford: Oxford University Pres.
• Oba, B. ve F. Semerciöz (2005), “Antecedents of Trust in Industrial Districts: An Empirical Analysis of Inter-Firm Relations in a Turkish Industrial District”, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 17, 163-182.
• Özen, Ş. ve Z. Aslan (2006), “İçsel ve Dışsal Sosyal Sermaye Yaklaşımları Açısından Türk Toplumunun Sosyal Sermaye Potansiyeli: Ortadoğu Sanayi ve Ticaret Merkezi (OSTİM) Örneği”, Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, 12, 130-161.
• Polanyi, M. (1967), The Tacit Dimension, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
• Prusak, L. ve T. H. Davenport (1997), Information Ecology, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Quinn, J. B., P. Anderson, ve S. Finkelstein (1996), “Leveraging Intellect”, The Academy of Management Executive, 10 (3), 7-27.
• Ramasamy, B., K. W. Goh ve M. C. H. Yeung (2006), “Is Guanxi (relationship) a Bridge to Knowledge Transfer?”, Journal of Business Research, 59, 130-139.
• Renzl, B. (2008), “Trust in Management and Knowledge Sharing: The Mediating Effects of Fear and Knowledge Documentation”, Omega, 36 (2), 206-220.
• Sargut, A. S. (2003), “Kurumsal Alanlardaki Örgüt Yapılarının Oluşmasında ve Ekonomik İşlemlerin Yürütülmesinde Güvenin Rolü”, Ed. Ferda Erdem, Sosyal Bilimlerde Güven, Ankara: Vadi Yayınları, 89-124.
• Sargut, A. S. (2006), “Sosyal Sermaye: Yapının Sunduğu Bir Olanak mı, Yoksa Bireyin Amaçlı Eylemi mi?” Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, 12, 1-13.
• Sharif, K., S. Kalafatis ve P. Samouel (2005), “Cognitive and Behavioral Determinants of Trust in Small and Medium-sized Enterprises”, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 12 (3), 409-421.
• Simon, B. (1999), “A Place in the World: Self and Social Categorization”, Ed. Tyler, Tom R., Kramer, Roderick M., John, Oliver P., The Psychology of the Social Self, Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, 47-69.
• Snyder, M. (1974), “Self-monitoring of Expressive Behavior”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30(4), 526-537.
• Snyder, M. ve Copeland, J. (1989), “Self-monitoring Processes in Organizational Settings” Ed. Giacalone, R. ve Rosenfeld, P., Impression Management in the Organization NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, 7-19.
• Sydow, J. (1996), “Understanding the Constitution of Interorganizational Trust”. 8th International Conference on Socio-Economics, 12-14 July 1996, Geneva, Switzerland.
• Uzzi, B. (1997), “Social Stucture and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 35-67.
• Van de Ven, A. H. (1976), “On the Nature, Formation, and Maintenance of Relations Among Organizations”, Academy of Management Review, 1(4), 24-36. White, H. C. (1993), “Markets in Production Networks”, Ed. Richard Swedberg, Explorations in Economic Sociology, New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 161-175. Yang, S. C. ve C. K. Farn (2009), “Social Capital, Behavioural Control, and Tacit Knowledge Sharing- A Multi-informant Design”, International Journal of Information Management, 29, 210-218.
• Zander, U. (1991), “Exploiting a Technological Edge: Voluntary and Involuntary Dissemination of Technology”, Institute of International Business, Stockholm.
• Zander, U. Ve B. Kogut (1995), “Knowledge and the Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities. An Empirical Test”, Organization Science, 6 (1), 76-92.