Araştırma Makalesi
PDF Zotero Mendeley EndNote BibTex Kaynak Göster

Public Administration Scholarship Trends in Turkey: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Articles Published in AİD between 1990 and 2019

Yıl 2022, Cilt 17, Sayı 1, 1 - 28, 01.04.2022
https://doi.org/10.17153/oguiibf.949913

Öz

In this study, firstly, bibliometric studies in literature were evaluated to answer question of "What is general trend of public administration studies in Turkey?". Then, as a sample, 850 articles published between 1990-2019 in the Journal of Public Administration (AID), a well-established journal being indexed in SSCI since 2007, was examined by content analysis in context of “what” (research themes), “how” (methods) and “who” (authors) questions. Obtained data was divided into 3 periods by 10 years and classified bibliometrically. The relationship between bibliometric indicators and different periods was tested by chi-square method. Consequently, it was observed that current situation of public administration articles in Turkey are not in a sufficient level in terms of scientific merit and contributions to field compared to western countries, and recommendations are provided in consideration of obtained findings.

Kaynakça

  • Adams, W. C.; Infeld, D. L.; Minnichelli, L. F.; Ruddell, M. W. Ruddell (2014), “Policy Journal Trends and Tensions: JPAM and PSJ”, Policy Studies Journal, Vol.42, No.1: 118-137.
  • Adams, G. B.; White, J. D. (1994), “Dissertation Research in Public Administration and Cognate Field: An Assessment of Methods and Quality”, Public Administration Review, Vol.54: 565-576.
  • Al, U., İ. Soydal; Yalçın, H. (2010), “Bibliyometrik özellikleri açısından Bilig’in değerlendirilmesi”, Bilig, C.55: 1-20.
  • Ayhan, E.; Önder, M. (2017), “Yeni Kamu Hizmeti Yaklaşımı: Yönetişime Açılan Bir Kapı”, Gazi İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, C.3, S.2: 19-48.
  • Behn, R. D. (1995), “The Big Questions of Public Management”, Public Administration Review, Vol.55, No.4: 313-324.
  • Berkman, A. Ü. (1987), “Amme İdaresi Dergisi’nde Yayınlanan Makaleler ve Türk Yönetim Bilimi”, Amme İdaresi Dergisi, C.20, S.4: 19‐42.
  • Brintnall, M. (1999), “Research Funding Issues for Public Administration”, Journal of Public Affairs Education, Vol.5, No.2: 157-162.
  • Callahan, R. F. (2001), “Challenges of (Dis) Connectedness in the ‘Big Questions’ Methodologies in Public Administration”, Public Administration Review, Vol.61, No.4: 493-499.
  • Cameron, R. (2013), “The State of Public Administration as an Academic Field in South Africa”, Politikon, Vol.40, No.3: 565-583.
  • Corley, E. A.; Sabharwal, M. (2010), “Scholarly Collaboration and Productivity Patterns in Public Administration: Analysing Recent Trends”, Public Administration, Vol.88, No.3: 627-648.
  • Çelikkaya, S. (2020), “Dergipark Veri Tabanında Yer Alan İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergilerindeki Bölgesel Kalkınma Makaleleri Üzerine Bir İnceleme”, Akademik Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi, C.12, S.22: 27-44.
  • Denhardt, J.V.; Denhardt, R.B. (2000), “The New Public Service: Serving, Not Steering”, Public Administration Review, Vol.60, No.6: 549-559.
  • Denhardt, R. B., & Catlaw, T. J. (2014). Theories of public organization. Cengage Learning.
  • Demir, H.; Erigüç, G. (2018), “Bibliyometrik Bir Analiz İle Yönetim Düşünce Sisteminin İncelenmesi”, İş ve İnsan Dergisi, C.5, S.2: 91-114.
  • Forrer, J.; Kee, J.E.; Gabriel, S. (2007), “Not Your Father’s Public Administration”, Journal of Public Affairs Education, Vol.13, No.2: 265-280.
  • Forrester, J.P. (1996), “Public Administration Productivity: An Assessment of Faculty in PA Programs”, Administration and Society, Vol.27, No.4: 537-66.
  • Fisher, B. S.; Cobane, C.; Vander Ven, T.; Cullen, F.T. (1998), “How Many Authors Does It Take to Publish an Article?”, PS: Political Science & Politics, Vol.31, No.4: 847-56.
  • Gill, J.; Meier, K.J. (2000), “Public Administration Research and Practice: A Methodological Manifesto”, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol.10, No.1: 157-199.
  • Golembiewski, R. T. (1977), Public Administration as a Developing Discipline, Part I: Perspectives on Past and Present, New York: Marcel Dekker.
  • Green, K.; Wamsley, G. L.; Keller, L.F. (1993), “Reconstituting Profession of Public Administration”, Public Administration Review, Vol.53, No.6: 516-524.
  • Groeneveld, S.; Tummers, L.; Bronkhorst, B.; Ashikali, T.; Thiel, S.V. (2014), “Quantitative Methods in Public Administration: Their Use and Development Through Time”, International Public Management Journal, Vol.18, No.1: 61-86.
  • Gulick, L.; Urwick, L. (Eds.) (1937), Papers on the Science of Administration, New York: Institute of Public Administration.
  • Gulrajani, N.; Moloney, K. (2011), “Globalizing Public Administration: Today's Research and Tomorrow's Agenda”, Public Administration Review, Vol.72, No.1: 78-86.
  • Henry, N. (1995), Public Administration and Public Affairs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  • Houston, D. J.; Delevan, S.M. (1990), “Public Administration Research: An Assessment of Journal Publications”, Public Administration Review, Vol.50, No.6: 674-681.
  • Hung, L. C.; Yu, C.; Lin, M.W.; Su, Y.C. (2012), “Assessing Public Policy Research in Taiwan: An Analysis of Journal Publications: 1996–2007”, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, Vol.14, No.5: 431-448.
  • Jreisat, J. (2005), “Comparative Public Administration is Back in, Prudently”, Public Administration Review, Vol.65, No.2: 231-242.
  • Kellough, J. E.; Pitts, D. W. (2005), “Who Contributes to Public Administration Review? Examining the Characteristics of Authors Who Submit Manuscripts to the Journal?”, Public Administration Review, Vol.65, No.1: 3-7.
  • Köylü, M,; Önder, M. (2017). Başkanlık Sistemi ve Türk Kamu Yönetiminde Profesyonel Kent Yöneticiliğinin Uygulanabilirliği, Strategic Public Management Journal, 83-100
  • Kumar, R. (2005), Research Methodology, 2nd Ed., London: Sage Publication.
  • Lan, Z. Y.; Anders, K.K. (2000). “A Paradigmatic View of Contemporary Public Administration Research: An Empirical Test”. Administration & Society, Vol.32, No.2: 138-165.
  • Lasswell, H. D. (1970), “The Emerging Conception of the Policy Sciences”, Policy Sciences, V.1, N.1: 3-14.
  • Moon, M. J.; Kim, G.; Lee, M. J. (2013), “Korean Public Administration Research 1999-2009: Research Themes, Methodologies, and Scholarship”, The American Review of Public Administration, Vol.44, No.2: 151-167.
  • Neuman, W. L. (2014), Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, 7th Ed., Edinburg: Pearson Education Limited.
  • Osborne, D.; Gaebler, T. (1992), Reinventing Government: How The Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming The Public Sector, New York, N.Y: Plume.
  • Önder, M.; Nyadera, I. (2021), “The Trends in Public Administration and Policy Scholarship in the New Millenium”, Preprint: Researchgate.
  • Önder, M.; Gündoğdu, P.; Ayhan, E. (2019), “Türk Kamu Yönetimi Araştırmalarında Metodoloji Kullanımı”, Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, C.1: 105-122.
  • Önder, M.; Saygılı, H. (2018), “Yapay Zekâ ve Kamu Yönetimine Yansımaları”, Türk İdare Dergisi, C.90, S.487: 629-669.
  • Önder, M. (2017), “Mevzuat Yapımında Düzenleyici Etki Analizi ve Uygulama Sorunları”, Türk İdare Dergisi, C.89, S.485: 771-812.
  • Önder, M.; Brower, R. S. (2013), “Public Administration Theory, Research, and Teaching: How Does Turkish Public Administration Differ?”, Journal of Public Affairs and Education, Vol.19, No.1: 117-139.
  • Öngel, E. (1983), A Research Guide, Ankara: Gazi Üniversitesi Teknik Eğitim Fakültesi Basımevi.
  • Özer, M. A.; Önen, S. M. (2020), Yönetim PODSCORB, Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi.
  • Peters, B. G. (1994), “Theory and Methodology in The Study of Comparative Public Administration”, Comparative Public Management: Putting US Public Policy And İmplementation in Context, Westport, (Ed. R. Baker), CT: Praeger.
  • Perry, J. L.; Kraemer, K.L. (1986), “Research Methodology in the Public Administration Review: 1975-1984”, Public Administration Review, Vol.46: 215-226.
  • Pitts, D. W.; Fernandez, S. (2009), “The State of Public Management Research: An Analysis of Scope and Methodology”, International Public Management Journal, Vol.12: 399-420.
  • Polat, S. (2020), “Sosyoekonomi Dergisinde Yayınlanan Makalelerin Bibliyometrik Analizi: 2005-2019 Dönemi”, Sosyoekonomi Dergisi, C.28, S.45: 281-300.
  • Polat, C.; Sağlam, M.; Sarı, T. (2013), “Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi’nin Bibliyometrik Analizi”, Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, C.27, S.2: 273-288.
  • Pritchard, A. (1969), “Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics?”, Journal of Documentation, V.25: 348-9.
  • Raadschelders, J. C. N.; Lee, K. H. (2011), “Trends in the Study of Public Administration: Empirical and Qualitative Observations from ‘Public Administration Review’, 2000–2009”, Public Administration Review, Vol.71, No.1: 19-33.
  • Riccucci, N. (2010), Public Administration: Traditions of Inquiry and Philosophies of Knowledge, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
  • Sanina, A.; Balashov, A.; Kaysarova, V. (2016), “Public Administration Research in Contemporary Russia: An Analysis of Journal Publications, 2010–2014”, International Journal of Public Administration, Vol:40, No.12: 1036-1049.
  • Sevinç, E.; Zerem, E. (2015), “SSCI Kapsamındaki Dergilerin Kamu Yönetimi Alanına Katkısı Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme”, Optimum Ekonomi ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, C:2, S.2: 65-82.
  • Spicer, M. W. (1998), “The Science of Administration, The Founders, and Theories of Political Association”, International Journal of Public Administration, Vol.21, No.2-4: 299-321.
  • Stallings, R. A., Ferris, J. A. (1988), “Public Administration Research: Work in PAR, 1940-1984”, Public Administration Review, Vol.48, No.1: 580-587.
  • Strauss, A., Corbin, J. (1998), Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd Ed., Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage Publications.
  • Terry, L. D. (2005), “Reflections and assessment: Public Administration Review, 2000-05”, Public Administration Review, Vol.65: 643-645.
  • Üsdiken, B.; Pasadeos, Y. (1992), “Türkiye’de Yayınlanan Yönetimle İlgili Makalelerdeki Atıflar Üzerine Bir İnceleme”, Amme İdaresi Dergisi, C.25, S.2: 107-134.
  • Üstüner, Y. (1992), In Search of an Identity: Considerations on the Theory and the Discipline of Public Administration, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Ankara: Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi.
  • Yılmazel, Ö. (2019), “Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisinin Bibliyometrik Analizi”, Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Vol.20, No.19: 1-13.
  • Zikmund, W. G. (1999). Business Research Methods, 5th Ed., NewYork: Drayden Press.
  • Waldo, D. (1968), “Public Administration”, The Journal of Politics, Vol.30, No.2: 443-479.
  • Wright, B. E.; Manigault, L. J.; Black, T. R. (2004), “Quantitative Research Measurement in Public Administration: An Assessment of Journal Publications”, Administration & Society, V.35, N.6: 747-64.
  • Wilson, W. (1887), “The Study of Administration”, Political Science Quarterly, Vol.2, No.2: 197-222.
  • Wu, X., Y. He; Sun, M. T. (2013), “Public Administration Research In Mainland China And Taiwan: An Assessment Of Journal Publications, 1998-2008”, Public Administration, Vol.91, No.2: 261-280.

Türkiye’deki Kamu Yönetimi Çalışmalarının Eğilimi: 1990-2019 Yılları Arasında AİD’de Yayınlanan Makalelerin Bibliyometrik Analizi

Yıl 2022, Cilt 17, Sayı 1, 1 - 28, 01.04.2022
https://doi.org/10.17153/oguiibf.949913

Öz

Bu çalışmada, “Türkiye’deki kamu yönetimi çalışmalarının genel eğilimi nedir?” sorusunu cevaplamak için öncelikle literatürdeki bibliyometrik çalışmalar incelenmiştir. Daha sonra, örneklem olarak 2007 yılından beri SSCI indeksinde taranan köklü bir dergi olan Amme İdaresi Dergisi’nde (AİD) 1990-2019 yılları arasında yayınlanan 850 makale; “ne” (araştırma temaları), “nasıl” (yöntemler) ve “kim” (yazarlar) soruları bağlamında içerik analiziyle değerlendirilmiştir. Elde edilen veriler 10’ar yıllık 3 döneme bölünerek bibliyometrik olarak sınıflandırılmıştır. Bibliyometrik göstergelerle farklı dönemler arasındaki ilişki ki-kare yöntemiyle test edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak, Türkiye’deki kamu yönetimi makalelerinin bilimsellik ve alana katkıları açısından mevcut durumunun batılı ülkelere göre yeterli düzeyde olmadığı gözlenmiş ve bulgular ışığında öneriler verilmiştir.

Kaynakça

  • Adams, W. C.; Infeld, D. L.; Minnichelli, L. F.; Ruddell, M. W. Ruddell (2014), “Policy Journal Trends and Tensions: JPAM and PSJ”, Policy Studies Journal, Vol.42, No.1: 118-137.
  • Adams, G. B.; White, J. D. (1994), “Dissertation Research in Public Administration and Cognate Field: An Assessment of Methods and Quality”, Public Administration Review, Vol.54: 565-576.
  • Al, U., İ. Soydal; Yalçın, H. (2010), “Bibliyometrik özellikleri açısından Bilig’in değerlendirilmesi”, Bilig, C.55: 1-20.
  • Ayhan, E.; Önder, M. (2017), “Yeni Kamu Hizmeti Yaklaşımı: Yönetişime Açılan Bir Kapı”, Gazi İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, C.3, S.2: 19-48.
  • Behn, R. D. (1995), “The Big Questions of Public Management”, Public Administration Review, Vol.55, No.4: 313-324.
  • Berkman, A. Ü. (1987), “Amme İdaresi Dergisi’nde Yayınlanan Makaleler ve Türk Yönetim Bilimi”, Amme İdaresi Dergisi, C.20, S.4: 19‐42.
  • Brintnall, M. (1999), “Research Funding Issues for Public Administration”, Journal of Public Affairs Education, Vol.5, No.2: 157-162.
  • Callahan, R. F. (2001), “Challenges of (Dis) Connectedness in the ‘Big Questions’ Methodologies in Public Administration”, Public Administration Review, Vol.61, No.4: 493-499.
  • Cameron, R. (2013), “The State of Public Administration as an Academic Field in South Africa”, Politikon, Vol.40, No.3: 565-583.
  • Corley, E. A.; Sabharwal, M. (2010), “Scholarly Collaboration and Productivity Patterns in Public Administration: Analysing Recent Trends”, Public Administration, Vol.88, No.3: 627-648.
  • Çelikkaya, S. (2020), “Dergipark Veri Tabanında Yer Alan İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergilerindeki Bölgesel Kalkınma Makaleleri Üzerine Bir İnceleme”, Akademik Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi, C.12, S.22: 27-44.
  • Denhardt, J.V.; Denhardt, R.B. (2000), “The New Public Service: Serving, Not Steering”, Public Administration Review, Vol.60, No.6: 549-559.
  • Denhardt, R. B., & Catlaw, T. J. (2014). Theories of public organization. Cengage Learning.
  • Demir, H.; Erigüç, G. (2018), “Bibliyometrik Bir Analiz İle Yönetim Düşünce Sisteminin İncelenmesi”, İş ve İnsan Dergisi, C.5, S.2: 91-114.
  • Forrer, J.; Kee, J.E.; Gabriel, S. (2007), “Not Your Father’s Public Administration”, Journal of Public Affairs Education, Vol.13, No.2: 265-280.
  • Forrester, J.P. (1996), “Public Administration Productivity: An Assessment of Faculty in PA Programs”, Administration and Society, Vol.27, No.4: 537-66.
  • Fisher, B. S.; Cobane, C.; Vander Ven, T.; Cullen, F.T. (1998), “How Many Authors Does It Take to Publish an Article?”, PS: Political Science & Politics, Vol.31, No.4: 847-56.
  • Gill, J.; Meier, K.J. (2000), “Public Administration Research and Practice: A Methodological Manifesto”, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol.10, No.1: 157-199.
  • Golembiewski, R. T. (1977), Public Administration as a Developing Discipline, Part I: Perspectives on Past and Present, New York: Marcel Dekker.
  • Green, K.; Wamsley, G. L.; Keller, L.F. (1993), “Reconstituting Profession of Public Administration”, Public Administration Review, Vol.53, No.6: 516-524.
  • Groeneveld, S.; Tummers, L.; Bronkhorst, B.; Ashikali, T.; Thiel, S.V. (2014), “Quantitative Methods in Public Administration: Their Use and Development Through Time”, International Public Management Journal, Vol.18, No.1: 61-86.
  • Gulick, L.; Urwick, L. (Eds.) (1937), Papers on the Science of Administration, New York: Institute of Public Administration.
  • Gulrajani, N.; Moloney, K. (2011), “Globalizing Public Administration: Today's Research and Tomorrow's Agenda”, Public Administration Review, Vol.72, No.1: 78-86.
  • Henry, N. (1995), Public Administration and Public Affairs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  • Houston, D. J.; Delevan, S.M. (1990), “Public Administration Research: An Assessment of Journal Publications”, Public Administration Review, Vol.50, No.6: 674-681.
  • Hung, L. C.; Yu, C.; Lin, M.W.; Su, Y.C. (2012), “Assessing Public Policy Research in Taiwan: An Analysis of Journal Publications: 1996–2007”, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, Vol.14, No.5: 431-448.
  • Jreisat, J. (2005), “Comparative Public Administration is Back in, Prudently”, Public Administration Review, Vol.65, No.2: 231-242.
  • Kellough, J. E.; Pitts, D. W. (2005), “Who Contributes to Public Administration Review? Examining the Characteristics of Authors Who Submit Manuscripts to the Journal?”, Public Administration Review, Vol.65, No.1: 3-7.
  • Köylü, M,; Önder, M. (2017). Başkanlık Sistemi ve Türk Kamu Yönetiminde Profesyonel Kent Yöneticiliğinin Uygulanabilirliği, Strategic Public Management Journal, 83-100
  • Kumar, R. (2005), Research Methodology, 2nd Ed., London: Sage Publication.
  • Lan, Z. Y.; Anders, K.K. (2000). “A Paradigmatic View of Contemporary Public Administration Research: An Empirical Test”. Administration & Society, Vol.32, No.2: 138-165.
  • Lasswell, H. D. (1970), “The Emerging Conception of the Policy Sciences”, Policy Sciences, V.1, N.1: 3-14.
  • Moon, M. J.; Kim, G.; Lee, M. J. (2013), “Korean Public Administration Research 1999-2009: Research Themes, Methodologies, and Scholarship”, The American Review of Public Administration, Vol.44, No.2: 151-167.
  • Neuman, W. L. (2014), Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, 7th Ed., Edinburg: Pearson Education Limited.
  • Osborne, D.; Gaebler, T. (1992), Reinventing Government: How The Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming The Public Sector, New York, N.Y: Plume.
  • Önder, M.; Nyadera, I. (2021), “The Trends in Public Administration and Policy Scholarship in the New Millenium”, Preprint: Researchgate.
  • Önder, M.; Gündoğdu, P.; Ayhan, E. (2019), “Türk Kamu Yönetimi Araştırmalarında Metodoloji Kullanımı”, Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, C.1: 105-122.
  • Önder, M.; Saygılı, H. (2018), “Yapay Zekâ ve Kamu Yönetimine Yansımaları”, Türk İdare Dergisi, C.90, S.487: 629-669.
  • Önder, M. (2017), “Mevzuat Yapımında Düzenleyici Etki Analizi ve Uygulama Sorunları”, Türk İdare Dergisi, C.89, S.485: 771-812.
  • Önder, M.; Brower, R. S. (2013), “Public Administration Theory, Research, and Teaching: How Does Turkish Public Administration Differ?”, Journal of Public Affairs and Education, Vol.19, No.1: 117-139.
  • Öngel, E. (1983), A Research Guide, Ankara: Gazi Üniversitesi Teknik Eğitim Fakültesi Basımevi.
  • Özer, M. A.; Önen, S. M. (2020), Yönetim PODSCORB, Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi.
  • Peters, B. G. (1994), “Theory and Methodology in The Study of Comparative Public Administration”, Comparative Public Management: Putting US Public Policy And İmplementation in Context, Westport, (Ed. R. Baker), CT: Praeger.
  • Perry, J. L.; Kraemer, K.L. (1986), “Research Methodology in the Public Administration Review: 1975-1984”, Public Administration Review, Vol.46: 215-226.
  • Pitts, D. W.; Fernandez, S. (2009), “The State of Public Management Research: An Analysis of Scope and Methodology”, International Public Management Journal, Vol.12: 399-420.
  • Polat, S. (2020), “Sosyoekonomi Dergisinde Yayınlanan Makalelerin Bibliyometrik Analizi: 2005-2019 Dönemi”, Sosyoekonomi Dergisi, C.28, S.45: 281-300.
  • Polat, C.; Sağlam, M.; Sarı, T. (2013), “Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi’nin Bibliyometrik Analizi”, Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, C.27, S.2: 273-288.
  • Pritchard, A. (1969), “Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics?”, Journal of Documentation, V.25: 348-9.
  • Raadschelders, J. C. N.; Lee, K. H. (2011), “Trends in the Study of Public Administration: Empirical and Qualitative Observations from ‘Public Administration Review’, 2000–2009”, Public Administration Review, Vol.71, No.1: 19-33.
  • Riccucci, N. (2010), Public Administration: Traditions of Inquiry and Philosophies of Knowledge, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
  • Sanina, A.; Balashov, A.; Kaysarova, V. (2016), “Public Administration Research in Contemporary Russia: An Analysis of Journal Publications, 2010–2014”, International Journal of Public Administration, Vol:40, No.12: 1036-1049.
  • Sevinç, E.; Zerem, E. (2015), “SSCI Kapsamındaki Dergilerin Kamu Yönetimi Alanına Katkısı Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme”, Optimum Ekonomi ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, C:2, S.2: 65-82.
  • Spicer, M. W. (1998), “The Science of Administration, The Founders, and Theories of Political Association”, International Journal of Public Administration, Vol.21, No.2-4: 299-321.
  • Stallings, R. A., Ferris, J. A. (1988), “Public Administration Research: Work in PAR, 1940-1984”, Public Administration Review, Vol.48, No.1: 580-587.
  • Strauss, A., Corbin, J. (1998), Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd Ed., Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage Publications.
  • Terry, L. D. (2005), “Reflections and assessment: Public Administration Review, 2000-05”, Public Administration Review, Vol.65: 643-645.
  • Üsdiken, B.; Pasadeos, Y. (1992), “Türkiye’de Yayınlanan Yönetimle İlgili Makalelerdeki Atıflar Üzerine Bir İnceleme”, Amme İdaresi Dergisi, C.25, S.2: 107-134.
  • Üstüner, Y. (1992), In Search of an Identity: Considerations on the Theory and the Discipline of Public Administration, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Ankara: Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi.
  • Yılmazel, Ö. (2019), “Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisinin Bibliyometrik Analizi”, Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Vol.20, No.19: 1-13.
  • Zikmund, W. G. (1999). Business Research Methods, 5th Ed., NewYork: Drayden Press.
  • Waldo, D. (1968), “Public Administration”, The Journal of Politics, Vol.30, No.2: 443-479.
  • Wright, B. E.; Manigault, L. J.; Black, T. R. (2004), “Quantitative Research Measurement in Public Administration: An Assessment of Journal Publications”, Administration & Society, V.35, N.6: 747-64.
  • Wilson, W. (1887), “The Study of Administration”, Political Science Quarterly, Vol.2, No.2: 197-222.
  • Wu, X., Y. He; Sun, M. T. (2013), “Public Administration Research In Mainland China And Taiwan: An Assessment Of Journal Publications, 1998-2008”, Public Administration, Vol.91, No.2: 261-280.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Sosyal
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Emrah AYHAN (Sorumlu Yazar)
BİNGÖL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İKTİSADİ VE İDARİ BİLİMLER FAKÜLTESİ
0000-0001-6152-7509
Türkiye


Ayşegül ÇOLAK
National Taipei Üniversitesi
0000-0001-6147-7302
Türkiye


Murat ÖNDER
ANKARA YILDIRIM BEYAZIT ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SİYASAL BİLGİLER FAKÜLTESİ
0000-0001-8300-862X
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Nisan 2022
Başvuru Tarihi 9 Haziran 2021
Kabul Tarihi 5 Ekim 2021
Yayınlandığı Sayı Yıl 2022, Cilt 17, Sayı 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Ayhan, E. , Çolak, A. & Önder, M. (2022). Türkiye’deki Kamu Yönetimi Çalışmalarının Eğilimi: 1990-2019 Yılları Arasında AİD’de Yayınlanan Makalelerin Bibliyometrik Analizi . Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi , 17 (1) , 1-28 . DOI: 10.17153/oguiibf.949913