Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Aile, İdeoloji ve Toplumsal Cinsiyet: Fransa ve İran’da Devlet Söylemlerinin Karşılaştırmalı Analizi

Yıl 2026, Cilt: 27 Sayı: 1, 582 - 604, 17.03.2026

Muhammed Ramazan Demirci

https://doi.org/10.17494/ogusbd.1714708
https://izlik.org/JA65RL28FZ

Öz

Bu çalışma, Fransa ve İran örnekleri üzerinden devlet söylemlerinin aile ve toplumsal cinsiyet rollerini nasıl yapılandırdığını karşılaştırmalı söylem analiziyle incelemektedir. Feminist teori ve eleştirel söylem kuramına dayanan araştırma, yasal düzenlemeler, politika belgeleri, medya içerikleri ve eğitim materyalleri üzerinden yürütülmüştür. Bulgular, İran’da devletin aileyi İslami-patriyarkal normlarla tanımladığını, Fransa’da ise toplumsal cinsiyet eşitliği vurgusu artsa da aileselciliğin sürdüğünü göstermektedir. Çalışma, siyasal rejimlerin toplumsal cinsiyet rejimlerini nasıl şekillendirdiğini ortaya koymakta ve eşitlikçi aile söylemlerinin geliştirilmesine katkı sunmayı amaçlamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Toplumsal Cinsiyet Aile Politikası Feminist Teori Fransa İran

Kaynakça

  • Abbasi-Shavazi, M. J., McDonald, P., & Hosseini-Chavoshi, M. (2009). The fertility transition in Iran: Revolution and reproduction. Springer.
  • Abray, J. (1975). Feminism in the French Revolution. The American Historical Review, 80(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.2307/1859051
  • ADEP. (2021). Évolution du congé paternité. https://www.adep.com/evolution-du-conge-paternite.html
  • Afary, J. (2009). Sexual politics in modern Iran. Cambridge University Press.
  • Afary, J. (2022). From bedrooms to streets: The rise of a new generation of independent Iranian women. Freedom of Thought Journal, 11, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.53895/rgzg7213
  • Ahmadi, F. (2006). Islamic feminism in Iran: Feminism in a new Islamic context. Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion, 22(2), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.2979/FSR.2006.22.2.33
  • Allen, K. R. (2016). Feminist theory in family studies: History, reflection, and critique. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 8(2), 207–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/JFTR.12133
  • Aloosh, M., Tabriz, A. A., & Meysamie, A. (2016). Select public health policies in Iran: Recommendations for action. World Medical & Health Policy, 8(2), 201–207. https://doi.org/10.1002/WMH3.186
  • Althusser, L. (2001). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses (Notes towards an investigation). In B. Brewster (Trans.), Lenin and philosophy and other essays (pp. 85–126). Monthly Review Press.
  • Arretons Les Violences. (n.d.). La politique de lutte contre les violences sexistes et sexuelles faites aux femmes. https://arretonslesviolences.gouv.fr/l-etat-vous-protege/politique-de-lutte-contre-les-violences-faites-au-femmes
  • Asadisarvestani, K., & Sobotka, T. (2023). A pronatalist turn in population policies in Iran and its likely adverse impacts on reproductive rights, health and inequality: A critical narrative review. Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters, 31(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2023.2257075
  • Bacchi, C. (2009). Analysing policy: What’s the problem represented to be? Pearson Education.
  • Bacchi, C., & Goodwin, S. (2016). Poststructural policy analysis: A guide to practice. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Bahramitash, R., & Hooglund, E. (2011). Gender in contemporary Iran: Pushing the boundaries. Routledge.
  • Behjati-Ardakani, Z., Navabakhsh, M., & Hosseini, S. H. (2017). Sociological study on the transformation of fertility and childbearing concept in Iran. Journal of Reproduction & Infertility, 18(1), 153–161. https://www.jri.ir/documents/fullpaper/en/698.pdf
  • Bowen, J. R. (2008). Why the French don’t like headscarves: Islam, the state, and public space. Princeton University Press.
  • Butler, J. (1997). The psychic life of power: Theories in subjection. Stanford University Press.
  • Center for Human Rights in Iran. (2024). Hijab and chastity law: Final CHRI translation. https://iranhumanrights.org/wp-content/uploads/Hijab-Law-Final-CHRI-Translation.pdf
  • Cherlin, A. J. (2015). The marriage-go-round: The state of marriage and the family in America today. Vintage Books.
  • Civil Code of the Islamic Republic of Iran. (1928). Retrieved from https://www.refworld.org/legal/legislation/natlegbod/1928/en/102142
  • Commaille, J. (1993). Les stratégies des femmes: Travail, famille et politique. La Découverte.
  • Connell, R. W. (2005). Masculinities (2nd ed.). University of California Press.
  • Connell, R. W., & Pearse, R. (2009). Gender: In world perspective (3rd ed.). Polity Press.
  • Conseil supérieur de l’audiovisuel. (2019). La représentation des femmes à la télévision et à la radio: Exercice 2018. https://www.csa.fr/Informer/Collections-du-CSA/Rapports-au-gouvernement/La-representation-des-femmes-a-la-television-et-a-la-radio-Exercice-2018
  • Conseil supérieur de l’audiovisuel. (2021). La représentation des femmes à la télévision et à la radio: Rapport sur l’exercice 2020. https://www.csa.fr/Informer/Collections-du-CSA/Observatoire-de-la-diversite/La-representation-des-femmes-a-la-television-et-a-la-radio-Rapport-sur-l-exercice-2020
  • Constitution of France. (1946). Préambule de la Constitution du 27 octobre 1946. https://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/le-bloc-de-constitutionnalite/preambule-de-la-constitution-du-27-octobre-1946
  • Constitution of France. (1999). Constitutional Law No. 99-569 of July 8, 1999, on the equality between women and men. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/jorf/id/JORFTEXT000000396412
  • Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran. (n.d.). English translation. https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/4205c7/pdf
  • Dang, A., & Monnier, J. (2011). Gender regimes and welfare states in France: A historical perspective. Working Paper, Université de Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense. https://hal.science/hal-04140939v1
  • Dauphin, S., & Praud, J. (2002). Debating and implementing gender parity in French politics. Modern & Contemporary France, 10(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639480120107532
  • Dekeuwer-Défossez, F. (2003). Droit des personnes et de la famille: De 1804 au PACS (et au-delà...). Pouvoirs, 107, 37–53. https://doi.org/10.3917/pouv.107.0037
  • ESCAP. (2023). Iran (Islamic Republic of). https://www.population-trends-asiapacific.org/data/IRN
  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Polity Press.
  • European Commission. (2006). Gender inequalities in the risks of poverty and social exclusion for disadvantaged groups in thirty European countries. https://www.findevgateway.org/sites/default/files/publications/files/mfg-en-paper-gender-inequalities-in-the-risks-of-poverty-and-social-exclusion-for-disadvantaged-groups-in-thirty-european-countries-2006.pdf
  • Fagnani, J. (2005). Family policies in France: Old challenges, new tensions. CESifo DICE Report, 3(2), 40–44.
  • Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Polity Press.
  • Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Routledge.
  • Farvardin, F. (2020). Reproductive politics in Iran: State, family, and women's practices in postrevolutionary Iran. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 41(2), 26–56. https://doi.org/10.5250/fronjwomestud.41.2.0026
  • Fernando, M. L. (2014). The republic unsettled: Muslim French and the contradictions of secularism. Duke University Press.
  • Firestone, S. (1970). The dialectic of sex: The case for feminist revolution. William Morrow.
  • Foroutan, Y. (2021). Institutionalization of state religion in the Islamic Republic of Iran: A socio-demographic perspective. Politics, Religion & Ideology, 22(1), 84–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/21567689.2021.1877668
  • Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977 (C. Gordon, Ed.). Pantheon Books.
  • Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality, Volume 1: An introduction (R. Hurley, Trans.). Vintage Books.
  • France Stratégie. (2014). Gender stereotypes and how to fight them: New ideas from France. https://www.strategie.gouv.fr/en/publications/lutter-contre-stereotypes-filles-garcons
  • Fraser, N. (1997). Justice interruptus: Critical reflections on the “postsocialist” condition. Routledge.
  • Fraser, N. (2016). Contradictions of capital and care. New Left Review, 100, 99–117. https://newleftreview.org/issues/ii100/articles/nancy-fraser-contradictions-of-capital-and-care
  • Gaillard, J. (2023). ‘Je te crois’ (‘I believe you’): Pragmatics of a feminist slogan, or silencing and the scene of address in post-#MeToo France. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 27(5), 965–984. https://doi.org/10.1177/13675494231199951
  • Gal, S., & Kligman, G. (2000). The politics of gender after socialism: A comparative-historical essay. Princeton University Press.
  • Ghamari-Tabrizi, B. (2013). Women’s rights, Shari‘a law, and the secularization of Islam in Iran. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 26, 237–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-013-9143-x
  • Haeri, S. (2014). Law of desire: Temporary marriage in Iran. Syracuse University Press.
  • Hanisch, C. (1970). The personal is political. In S. Firestone & A. Koedt (Eds.), Notes from the second year: Women’s liberation (pp. 76–78). New York Radical Women.
  • Hartmann, H. (1981). The unhappy marriage of Marxism and feminism: Towards a more progressive union. In L. Sargent (Ed.), Women and revolution: A discussion of the unhappy marriage of Marxism and feminism (pp. 1–41). Black Rose Books.
  • Hoodfar, H., & Assadpour, S. (2000). The politics of population policy in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Studies in Family Planning, 31(1), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4465.2000.00019.x
  • Impact Iran. (2024). Factsheet: Women and girls’ rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran. https://impactiran.org/2024/12/02/upr2025-women-and-girls-rights-in-the-islamic-republic-of-iran/
  • Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2003). Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change around the world. Cambridge University Press.
  • INSEE. (2025, January 14). In 2023, three out of ten children lived with only one of their parents (Insee Première No. 2032). Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques. https://www.insee.fr/en/statistiques/8334675
  • Islamic Penal Code of the Islamic Republic. (2013). The penal code and gender-based discrimination in Iran. Abdorrahman Boroumand Center for Human Rights in Iran. https://www.iranrights.org/library/document/3430
  • Jacobs, F. (2023). In these 11 European countries, births out of wedlock are in the majority. https://bigthink.com/strange-maps/births-out-of-wedlock-europe-us/
  • JBI Human Rights. (2023, September 14). Iran: One year after Mahsa Amini's killing, widespread human rights violations remain an urgent concern. Jacob Blaustein Institute for the Advancement of Human Rights.
  • Kandil, L., & Périvier, H. (2021). Sharing or not sharing? Household division of labor by marital status in France, 1985–2009. Population-E, 76(1), 149–184. https://doi.org/10.3917/popu.2101.0155
  • Kandiyoti, D. (1988). Bargaining with patriarchy. Gender & Society, 2(3), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124388002003004
  • Keddie, N. R. (2006). Modern Iran: Roots and results of revolution. Yale University Press.
  • Korteweg, A. C. (2008). The Sharia debate in Ontario: Gender, Islam, and representations of Muslim women's agency. Gender & Society, 22(4), 434–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243208319768
  • Law for the Protection of the Family and Youthful Population. (2021). قانون حمایت از جوانی جمعیت و خانواده مصوب ۱۴۰۰. https://www.ekhtebar.ir/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/قانون-حمایت-از-جوانی-جمعیت-و-خانواده-مصوب-1400.pdf
  • Legifrance. (2004). Loi n° 2004-228 du 15 mars 2004 encadrant, en application du principe de laïcité, le port de signes ou de tenues manifestant une appartenance religieuse dans les écoles, collèges et lycées publics. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/loda/id/JORFTEXT000000417977
  • Legifrance. (2010). LOI n° 2010-1192 du 11 octobre 2010 interdisant la dissimulation du visage dans l'espace public. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/loda/id/JORFTEXT000022911670
  • Legifrance. (2013). Loi n° 2013-404 du 17 mai 2013 ouvrant le mariage aux couples de personnes de même sexe. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/loda/id/JORFTEXT000027414540
  • Lelièvre, F., & Lelièvre, C. (1991). Histoire de la scolarisation des filles. Nathan.
  • Lewis, J. (2006). Work/family reconciliation, equal opportunities and social policies: The interpretation of policy trajectories at the EU level and the meaning of gender equality. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(3), 420–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760600560490
  • Lloyd, C., & Bassel, L. (2008). Bridging differences or building silences? Parité and the representation of ‘women’ in French political life. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 16(1), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782800801970359
  • Lockton. (2021, July 6). France to extend paternity leave in 2021. https://global.lockton.com/us/en/news-insights/france-to-extend-paternity-leave-in-2021
  • Mazur, A. G. (2001). Republican universalism resists state feminist approaches in France. In A. Mazur (Ed.), State feminism, women’s movements, and job training: Making democracies work in a global economy (pp. 155–182). Routledge.
  • McDonald, P. (2000). Gender equity in theories of fertility transition. Population and Development Review, 26(3), 427–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2000.00427.x
  • Meguro, Y. (1988). Gender and power in family theories. Japanese Sociological Review, 39(3), 238–249. https://doi.org/10.4057/JSR.39.238
  • Millett, K. (2016). Sexual politics. Columbia University Press.
  • Ministère de l'Éducation nationale. (2015, April 28). Arrêté du 21 avril 2015 relatif au programme d’enseignement moral et civique de l’école élémentaire, du collège et du lycée. Bulletin officiel de l'Éducation nationale, spécial n°6. https://www.education.gouv.fr/bo/15/Special6/MENE1511646A.htm
  • Mir-Hosseini, Z. (1999). Islam and gender: The religious debate in contemporary Iran. Princeton University Press.
  • Moghissi, H. (1999). Feminism and Islamic fundamentalism: The limits of postmodern analysis. Zed Books.
  • Moinipour, S. (2022). Iran’s educational system and the institutionalization of gender inequality. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs. https://gjia.georgetown.edu/2022/04/04/irans-educational-system-and-the-institutionalization-of-gender-inequality/
  • Morgan, K. J. (2006). Working mothers and the welfare state: Religion and the politics of work-family policies in Western Europe and the United States. Stanford University Press.
  • Murray, R. (2012). Parity in France: A ‘dual track’ solution to women’s under-representation. West European Politics, 35(2), 343–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2011.648010
  • Nashat, G. (2021). Women and revolution in Iran. Routledge.
  • OECD. (2023). Fertility rates and female employment: OECD Family Database. https://www.oecd.org/els/family/database.htm
  • Offen, K. (2000). European feminisms, 1700–1950: A political history. Stanford University Press.
  • Okin, S. M. (1989). Justice, gender, and the family. Basic Books.
  • Orloff, A. S. (1993). Gender and the social rights of citizenship. American Sociological Review, 58(3), 303–328. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095903
  • Osanloo, A. (2008). Whence the law. Radical History Review, 101, 42–58. https://doi.org/10.1215/01636545-2007-037
  • Paidar, P. (1995). Women and the political process in twentieth-century Iran. Cambridge University Press.
  • Pailhé, A., Rossier, C., & Toulemon, L. (2008). French family policy. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1553/populationyearbook2008s149
  • Paivandi, S. (2019). Gender representations in Iranian school textbooks. In G. M. Rezai-Rashti, G. Mehran, & S. Abdmolaei (Eds.), Women, Islam, and education in Iran (pp. 51–83). Routledge.
  • Pateman, C. (1988). The sexual contract. Stanford University Press.
  • Pateman, C. (1989). The disorder of women: Democracy, feminism, and political theory. Stanford University Press.
  • Povey, T., & Rostami-Povey, E. (2012). Women, power and politics in 21st century Iran. Ashgate.
  • Prost, A. (1984). L'évolution de la politique familiale en France de 1938 à 1981. Le Mouvement Social, 129, 7–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/3778858
  • Ramsay, R. (2008). Parity — From perversion to political progress. French Politics, 6(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.fp.8200141
  • Revillard, A. (2006). Work/family policy in France. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 20, 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebl009
  • Revillard, A. (2007). Stating family values and women’s rights. French Politics, 5, 210–228. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.fp.8200124
  • Rezai-Rashti, G. M. (2015). The politics of gender segregation and women’s access to higher education in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Gender and Education, 27(5), 469–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2015.1045457
  • Rogers, R. (2007). L'éducation des filles. Histoire de l’éducation, 115–116, 37–79. https://doi.org/10.4000/histoire-education.1422
  • Rose, N. (2007). The politics of life itself: Biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton University Press.
  • Salami, A., & Ghajarieh, A. (2016). Culture and gender representation in Iranian school textbooks. Sexuality & Culture, 20, 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-015-9310-5
  • SBS News. (2014, February 14). France succumbs to opponents of gender theory in schools. https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/comment-france-succumbs-to-opponents-of-gender-theory-in-schools/zxswjcezx
  • Scott, J. W. (2005). Parité! Sexual equality and the crisis of French universalism. University of Chicago Press.
  • Scott, J. W. (2007). The politics of the veil. Princeton University Press.
  • Shahidian, H. (2002). Women in Iran: Gender politics in the Islamic Republic. Greenwood Press.
  • Shavarini, M. K. (2005). The feminisation of Iranian higher education. Review of Education, 51, 329–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-005-7738-9
  • Smart, C. (1984). The ties that bind: Law, marriage and the reproduction of patriarchal relations. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • The Guardian. (2007, January 18). Why are French women so fertile? https://www.theguardian.com/world/2007/jan/18/france.health
  • Thévenon, O. (2011). Family policies in OECD countries. Population and Development Review, 37(1), 57–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00390.x
  • Vrain, C. (2015). La place des femmes dans les médias français. Thesis, 2, 53–65. https://dspace.aab-edu.net/handle/123456789/490
  • Walby, S. (1990). Theorizing patriarchy. Blackwell.
  • Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2016). Methods of critical discourse studies (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  • Zadeyeh, S. (2021). After #MeToo: France ignites its combat against sexual and domestic violence. Tulane Journal of International & Comparative Law, 29, 198–211.

Family, Ideology, and Gender: A Comparative Analysis of State Discourses in France and Iran

Yıl 2026, Cilt: 27 Sayı: 1, 582 - 604, 17.03.2026

Muhammed Ramazan Demirci

https://doi.org/10.17494/ogusbd.1714708
https://izlik.org/JA65RL28FZ

Öz

This study examines how state discourses construct family and gender roles in France and Iran through a comparative discourse analysis. Grounded in feminist theory and critical discourse theory, the research draws on legal texts, policy documents, media content, and educational materials. Findings show that Iran defines the family through Islamic-patriarchal norms, limiting women to roles of motherhood and wifehood, whereas in France, despite a growing emphasis on gender equality, the legacy of familialism persists. The study highlights how political regimes shape gender norms and aims to contribute to the development of more egalitarian family discourses.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Gender Family Policy Feminist Theory France Iran

Kaynakça

  • Abbasi-Shavazi, M. J., McDonald, P., & Hosseini-Chavoshi, M. (2009). The fertility transition in Iran: Revolution and reproduction. Springer.
  • Abray, J. (1975). Feminism in the French Revolution. The American Historical Review, 80(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.2307/1859051
  • ADEP. (2021). Évolution du congé paternité. https://www.adep.com/evolution-du-conge-paternite.html
  • Afary, J. (2009). Sexual politics in modern Iran. Cambridge University Press.
  • Afary, J. (2022). From bedrooms to streets: The rise of a new generation of independent Iranian women. Freedom of Thought Journal, 11, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.53895/rgzg7213
  • Ahmadi, F. (2006). Islamic feminism in Iran: Feminism in a new Islamic context. Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion, 22(2), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.2979/FSR.2006.22.2.33
  • Allen, K. R. (2016). Feminist theory in family studies: History, reflection, and critique. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 8(2), 207–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/JFTR.12133
  • Aloosh, M., Tabriz, A. A., & Meysamie, A. (2016). Select public health policies in Iran: Recommendations for action. World Medical & Health Policy, 8(2), 201–207. https://doi.org/10.1002/WMH3.186
  • Althusser, L. (2001). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses (Notes towards an investigation). In B. Brewster (Trans.), Lenin and philosophy and other essays (pp. 85–126). Monthly Review Press.
  • Arretons Les Violences. (n.d.). La politique de lutte contre les violences sexistes et sexuelles faites aux femmes. https://arretonslesviolences.gouv.fr/l-etat-vous-protege/politique-de-lutte-contre-les-violences-faites-au-femmes
  • Asadisarvestani, K., & Sobotka, T. (2023). A pronatalist turn in population policies in Iran and its likely adverse impacts on reproductive rights, health and inequality: A critical narrative review. Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters, 31(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2023.2257075
  • Bacchi, C. (2009). Analysing policy: What’s the problem represented to be? Pearson Education.
  • Bacchi, C., & Goodwin, S. (2016). Poststructural policy analysis: A guide to practice. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Bahramitash, R., & Hooglund, E. (2011). Gender in contemporary Iran: Pushing the boundaries. Routledge.
  • Behjati-Ardakani, Z., Navabakhsh, M., & Hosseini, S. H. (2017). Sociological study on the transformation of fertility and childbearing concept in Iran. Journal of Reproduction & Infertility, 18(1), 153–161. https://www.jri.ir/documents/fullpaper/en/698.pdf
  • Bowen, J. R. (2008). Why the French don’t like headscarves: Islam, the state, and public space. Princeton University Press.
  • Butler, J. (1997). The psychic life of power: Theories in subjection. Stanford University Press.
  • Center for Human Rights in Iran. (2024). Hijab and chastity law: Final CHRI translation. https://iranhumanrights.org/wp-content/uploads/Hijab-Law-Final-CHRI-Translation.pdf
  • Cherlin, A. J. (2015). The marriage-go-round: The state of marriage and the family in America today. Vintage Books.
  • Civil Code of the Islamic Republic of Iran. (1928). Retrieved from https://www.refworld.org/legal/legislation/natlegbod/1928/en/102142
  • Commaille, J. (1993). Les stratégies des femmes: Travail, famille et politique. La Découverte.
  • Connell, R. W. (2005). Masculinities (2nd ed.). University of California Press.
  • Connell, R. W., & Pearse, R. (2009). Gender: In world perspective (3rd ed.). Polity Press.
  • Conseil supérieur de l’audiovisuel. (2019). La représentation des femmes à la télévision et à la radio: Exercice 2018. https://www.csa.fr/Informer/Collections-du-CSA/Rapports-au-gouvernement/La-representation-des-femmes-a-la-television-et-a-la-radio-Exercice-2018
  • Conseil supérieur de l’audiovisuel. (2021). La représentation des femmes à la télévision et à la radio: Rapport sur l’exercice 2020. https://www.csa.fr/Informer/Collections-du-CSA/Observatoire-de-la-diversite/La-representation-des-femmes-a-la-television-et-a-la-radio-Rapport-sur-l-exercice-2020
  • Constitution of France. (1946). Préambule de la Constitution du 27 octobre 1946. https://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/le-bloc-de-constitutionnalite/preambule-de-la-constitution-du-27-octobre-1946
  • Constitution of France. (1999). Constitutional Law No. 99-569 of July 8, 1999, on the equality between women and men. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/jorf/id/JORFTEXT000000396412
  • Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran. (n.d.). English translation. https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/4205c7/pdf
  • Dang, A., & Monnier, J. (2011). Gender regimes and welfare states in France: A historical perspective. Working Paper, Université de Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense. https://hal.science/hal-04140939v1
  • Dauphin, S., & Praud, J. (2002). Debating and implementing gender parity in French politics. Modern & Contemporary France, 10(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639480120107532
  • Dekeuwer-Défossez, F. (2003). Droit des personnes et de la famille: De 1804 au PACS (et au-delà...). Pouvoirs, 107, 37–53. https://doi.org/10.3917/pouv.107.0037
  • ESCAP. (2023). Iran (Islamic Republic of). https://www.population-trends-asiapacific.org/data/IRN
  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Polity Press.
  • European Commission. (2006). Gender inequalities in the risks of poverty and social exclusion for disadvantaged groups in thirty European countries. https://www.findevgateway.org/sites/default/files/publications/files/mfg-en-paper-gender-inequalities-in-the-risks-of-poverty-and-social-exclusion-for-disadvantaged-groups-in-thirty-european-countries-2006.pdf
  • Fagnani, J. (2005). Family policies in France: Old challenges, new tensions. CESifo DICE Report, 3(2), 40–44.
  • Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Polity Press.
  • Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Routledge.
  • Farvardin, F. (2020). Reproductive politics in Iran: State, family, and women's practices in postrevolutionary Iran. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 41(2), 26–56. https://doi.org/10.5250/fronjwomestud.41.2.0026
  • Fernando, M. L. (2014). The republic unsettled: Muslim French and the contradictions of secularism. Duke University Press.
  • Firestone, S. (1970). The dialectic of sex: The case for feminist revolution. William Morrow.
  • Foroutan, Y. (2021). Institutionalization of state religion in the Islamic Republic of Iran: A socio-demographic perspective. Politics, Religion & Ideology, 22(1), 84–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/21567689.2021.1877668
  • Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977 (C. Gordon, Ed.). Pantheon Books.
  • Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality, Volume 1: An introduction (R. Hurley, Trans.). Vintage Books.
  • France Stratégie. (2014). Gender stereotypes and how to fight them: New ideas from France. https://www.strategie.gouv.fr/en/publications/lutter-contre-stereotypes-filles-garcons
  • Fraser, N. (1997). Justice interruptus: Critical reflections on the “postsocialist” condition. Routledge.
  • Fraser, N. (2016). Contradictions of capital and care. New Left Review, 100, 99–117. https://newleftreview.org/issues/ii100/articles/nancy-fraser-contradictions-of-capital-and-care
  • Gaillard, J. (2023). ‘Je te crois’ (‘I believe you’): Pragmatics of a feminist slogan, or silencing and the scene of address in post-#MeToo France. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 27(5), 965–984. https://doi.org/10.1177/13675494231199951
  • Gal, S., & Kligman, G. (2000). The politics of gender after socialism: A comparative-historical essay. Princeton University Press.
  • Ghamari-Tabrizi, B. (2013). Women’s rights, Shari‘a law, and the secularization of Islam in Iran. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 26, 237–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-013-9143-x
  • Haeri, S. (2014). Law of desire: Temporary marriage in Iran. Syracuse University Press.
  • Hanisch, C. (1970). The personal is political. In S. Firestone & A. Koedt (Eds.), Notes from the second year: Women’s liberation (pp. 76–78). New York Radical Women.
  • Hartmann, H. (1981). The unhappy marriage of Marxism and feminism: Towards a more progressive union. In L. Sargent (Ed.), Women and revolution: A discussion of the unhappy marriage of Marxism and feminism (pp. 1–41). Black Rose Books.
  • Hoodfar, H., & Assadpour, S. (2000). The politics of population policy in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Studies in Family Planning, 31(1), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4465.2000.00019.x
  • Impact Iran. (2024). Factsheet: Women and girls’ rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran. https://impactiran.org/2024/12/02/upr2025-women-and-girls-rights-in-the-islamic-republic-of-iran/
  • Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2003). Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change around the world. Cambridge University Press.
  • INSEE. (2025, January 14). In 2023, three out of ten children lived with only one of their parents (Insee Première No. 2032). Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques. https://www.insee.fr/en/statistiques/8334675
  • Islamic Penal Code of the Islamic Republic. (2013). The penal code and gender-based discrimination in Iran. Abdorrahman Boroumand Center for Human Rights in Iran. https://www.iranrights.org/library/document/3430
  • Jacobs, F. (2023). In these 11 European countries, births out of wedlock are in the majority. https://bigthink.com/strange-maps/births-out-of-wedlock-europe-us/
  • JBI Human Rights. (2023, September 14). Iran: One year after Mahsa Amini's killing, widespread human rights violations remain an urgent concern. Jacob Blaustein Institute for the Advancement of Human Rights.
  • Kandil, L., & Périvier, H. (2021). Sharing or not sharing? Household division of labor by marital status in France, 1985–2009. Population-E, 76(1), 149–184. https://doi.org/10.3917/popu.2101.0155
  • Kandiyoti, D. (1988). Bargaining with patriarchy. Gender & Society, 2(3), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124388002003004
  • Keddie, N. R. (2006). Modern Iran: Roots and results of revolution. Yale University Press.
  • Korteweg, A. C. (2008). The Sharia debate in Ontario: Gender, Islam, and representations of Muslim women's agency. Gender & Society, 22(4), 434–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243208319768
  • Law for the Protection of the Family and Youthful Population. (2021). قانون حمایت از جوانی جمعیت و خانواده مصوب ۱۴۰۰. https://www.ekhtebar.ir/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/قانون-حمایت-از-جوانی-جمعیت-و-خانواده-مصوب-1400.pdf
  • Legifrance. (2004). Loi n° 2004-228 du 15 mars 2004 encadrant, en application du principe de laïcité, le port de signes ou de tenues manifestant une appartenance religieuse dans les écoles, collèges et lycées publics. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/loda/id/JORFTEXT000000417977
  • Legifrance. (2010). LOI n° 2010-1192 du 11 octobre 2010 interdisant la dissimulation du visage dans l'espace public. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/loda/id/JORFTEXT000022911670
  • Legifrance. (2013). Loi n° 2013-404 du 17 mai 2013 ouvrant le mariage aux couples de personnes de même sexe. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/loda/id/JORFTEXT000027414540
  • Lelièvre, F., & Lelièvre, C. (1991). Histoire de la scolarisation des filles. Nathan.
  • Lewis, J. (2006). Work/family reconciliation, equal opportunities and social policies: The interpretation of policy trajectories at the EU level and the meaning of gender equality. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(3), 420–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760600560490
  • Lloyd, C., & Bassel, L. (2008). Bridging differences or building silences? Parité and the representation of ‘women’ in French political life. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 16(1), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782800801970359
  • Lockton. (2021, July 6). France to extend paternity leave in 2021. https://global.lockton.com/us/en/news-insights/france-to-extend-paternity-leave-in-2021
  • Mazur, A. G. (2001). Republican universalism resists state feminist approaches in France. In A. Mazur (Ed.), State feminism, women’s movements, and job training: Making democracies work in a global economy (pp. 155–182). Routledge.
  • McDonald, P. (2000). Gender equity in theories of fertility transition. Population and Development Review, 26(3), 427–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2000.00427.x
  • Meguro, Y. (1988). Gender and power in family theories. Japanese Sociological Review, 39(3), 238–249. https://doi.org/10.4057/JSR.39.238
  • Millett, K. (2016). Sexual politics. Columbia University Press.
  • Ministère de l'Éducation nationale. (2015, April 28). Arrêté du 21 avril 2015 relatif au programme d’enseignement moral et civique de l’école élémentaire, du collège et du lycée. Bulletin officiel de l'Éducation nationale, spécial n°6. https://www.education.gouv.fr/bo/15/Special6/MENE1511646A.htm
  • Mir-Hosseini, Z. (1999). Islam and gender: The religious debate in contemporary Iran. Princeton University Press.
  • Moghissi, H. (1999). Feminism and Islamic fundamentalism: The limits of postmodern analysis. Zed Books.
  • Moinipour, S. (2022). Iran’s educational system and the institutionalization of gender inequality. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs. https://gjia.georgetown.edu/2022/04/04/irans-educational-system-and-the-institutionalization-of-gender-inequality/
  • Morgan, K. J. (2006). Working mothers and the welfare state: Religion and the politics of work-family policies in Western Europe and the United States. Stanford University Press.
  • Murray, R. (2012). Parity in France: A ‘dual track’ solution to women’s under-representation. West European Politics, 35(2), 343–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2011.648010
  • Nashat, G. (2021). Women and revolution in Iran. Routledge.
  • OECD. (2023). Fertility rates and female employment: OECD Family Database. https://www.oecd.org/els/family/database.htm
  • Offen, K. (2000). European feminisms, 1700–1950: A political history. Stanford University Press.
  • Okin, S. M. (1989). Justice, gender, and the family. Basic Books.
  • Orloff, A. S. (1993). Gender and the social rights of citizenship. American Sociological Review, 58(3), 303–328. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095903
  • Osanloo, A. (2008). Whence the law. Radical History Review, 101, 42–58. https://doi.org/10.1215/01636545-2007-037
  • Paidar, P. (1995). Women and the political process in twentieth-century Iran. Cambridge University Press.
  • Pailhé, A., Rossier, C., & Toulemon, L. (2008). French family policy. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1553/populationyearbook2008s149
  • Paivandi, S. (2019). Gender representations in Iranian school textbooks. In G. M. Rezai-Rashti, G. Mehran, & S. Abdmolaei (Eds.), Women, Islam, and education in Iran (pp. 51–83). Routledge.
  • Pateman, C. (1988). The sexual contract. Stanford University Press.
  • Pateman, C. (1989). The disorder of women: Democracy, feminism, and political theory. Stanford University Press.
  • Povey, T., & Rostami-Povey, E. (2012). Women, power and politics in 21st century Iran. Ashgate.
  • Prost, A. (1984). L'évolution de la politique familiale en France de 1938 à 1981. Le Mouvement Social, 129, 7–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/3778858
  • Ramsay, R. (2008). Parity — From perversion to political progress. French Politics, 6(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.fp.8200141
  • Revillard, A. (2006). Work/family policy in France. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 20, 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebl009
  • Revillard, A. (2007). Stating family values and women’s rights. French Politics, 5, 210–228. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.fp.8200124
  • Rezai-Rashti, G. M. (2015). The politics of gender segregation and women’s access to higher education in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Gender and Education, 27(5), 469–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2015.1045457
  • Rogers, R. (2007). L'éducation des filles. Histoire de l’éducation, 115–116, 37–79. https://doi.org/10.4000/histoire-education.1422
  • Rose, N. (2007). The politics of life itself: Biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton University Press.
  • Salami, A., & Ghajarieh, A. (2016). Culture and gender representation in Iranian school textbooks. Sexuality & Culture, 20, 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-015-9310-5
  • SBS News. (2014, February 14). France succumbs to opponents of gender theory in schools. https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/comment-france-succumbs-to-opponents-of-gender-theory-in-schools/zxswjcezx
  • Scott, J. W. (2005). Parité! Sexual equality and the crisis of French universalism. University of Chicago Press.
  • Scott, J. W. (2007). The politics of the veil. Princeton University Press.
  • Shahidian, H. (2002). Women in Iran: Gender politics in the Islamic Republic. Greenwood Press.
  • Shavarini, M. K. (2005). The feminisation of Iranian higher education. Review of Education, 51, 329–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-005-7738-9
  • Smart, C. (1984). The ties that bind: Law, marriage and the reproduction of patriarchal relations. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • The Guardian. (2007, January 18). Why are French women so fertile? https://www.theguardian.com/world/2007/jan/18/france.health
  • Thévenon, O. (2011). Family policies in OECD countries. Population and Development Review, 37(1), 57–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00390.x
  • Vrain, C. (2015). La place des femmes dans les médias français. Thesis, 2, 53–65. https://dspace.aab-edu.net/handle/123456789/490
  • Walby, S. (1990). Theorizing patriarchy. Blackwell.
  • Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2016). Methods of critical discourse studies (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  • Zadeyeh, S. (2021). After #MeToo: France ignites its combat against sexual and domestic violence. Tulane Journal of International & Comparative Law, 29, 198–211.
Toplam 113 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Siyaset Bilimi (Diğer)
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Muhammed Ramazan Demirci 0000-0002-6726-7370

Gönderilme Tarihi 13 Haziran 2025
Kabul Tarihi 16 Şubat 2026
Yayımlanma Tarihi 17 Mart 2026
DOI https://doi.org/10.17494/ogusbd.1714708
IZ https://izlik.org/JA65RL28FZ
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2026 Cilt: 27 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Demirci, M. R. (2026). Family, Ideology, and Gender: A Comparative Analysis of State Discourses in France and Iran. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 27(1), 582-604. https://doi.org/10.17494/ogusbd.1714708
AMA 1.Demirci MR. Family, Ideology, and Gender: A Comparative Analysis of State Discourses in France and Iran. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2026;27(1):582-604. doi:10.17494/ogusbd.1714708
Chicago Demirci, Muhammed Ramazan. 2026. “Family, Ideology, and Gender: A Comparative Analysis of State Discourses in France and Iran”. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 27 (1): 582-604. https://doi.org/10.17494/ogusbd.1714708.
EndNote Demirci MR (01 Mart 2026) Family, Ideology, and Gender: A Comparative Analysis of State Discourses in France and Iran. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 27 1 582–604.
IEEE [1]M. R. Demirci, “Family, Ideology, and Gender: A Comparative Analysis of State Discourses in France and Iran”, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, c. 27, sy 1, ss. 582–604, Mar. 2026, doi: 10.17494/ogusbd.1714708.
ISNAD Demirci, Muhammed Ramazan. “Family, Ideology, and Gender: A Comparative Analysis of State Discourses in France and Iran”. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 27/1 (01 Mart 2026): 582-604. https://doi.org/10.17494/ogusbd.1714708.
JAMA 1.Demirci MR. Family, Ideology, and Gender: A Comparative Analysis of State Discourses in France and Iran. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2026;27:582–604.
MLA Demirci, Muhammed Ramazan. “Family, Ideology, and Gender: A Comparative Analysis of State Discourses in France and Iran”. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, c. 27, sy 1, Mart 2026, ss. 582-04, doi:10.17494/ogusbd.1714708.
Vancouver 1.Muhammed Ramazan Demirci. Family, Ideology, and Gender: A Comparative Analysis of State Discourses in France and Iran. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 01 Mart 2026;27(1):582-604. doi:10.17494/ogusbd.1714708