Psikolojik Sahiplik Kavramına İlişkin Bir Literatür İncelemesi

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 2, 59 - 82, 10.03.2016

Ümit Yeşil Ali Bancar Gönül Budak

https://doi.org/10.17494/ogusbd.57630

Cited By: 8

Öz

 

Özet Bireylerin, sahip olmak istedikleri maddesel veya maddesel olma-yan hedefi ya da bu hedefin bir parçasını kendilerininmiş gibi his-setmeleri durumu (Pierce vd., 2001; s. 299) olarak tanımlanan psikolojik sahipliğin temeli, sahiplenme hissine ve bir nesneye veya bir fikre psikolojik olarak bağlı olmaya dayanmaktadır. Psi-kolojik sahiplik, son yıllarda batılı akademisyenler tarafından sık-lıkla tartışılan bir konu haline gelmişken, ülkemizde bu olgu üze-rine yapılan çalışmalar oldukça sınırlı sayıdadır. Bu doğrultuda ça-lışmanın amacı; psikolojik sahiplik konusunda yapılan çalışmaları değerlendirerek, bugüne dek gelinen noktayı özetleyebilmek, mevcut çalışmalarda öne çıkan noktaları vurgulayarak, bu kavra-mın daha iyi anlaşılmasını sağlayabilmek ve ülkemizde bu konuda çalışmak isteyen araştırmacılar için bir başlangıç noktası oluştura-bilmektir. Bu bağlamda, psikolojik sahiplik üzerine ilgili yazın ta-ranmış olup, teorik ve/veya uygulamalı çalışmalar dikkatlice ince-lenerek, psikolojik sahiplik kavramının öncülleri ve çıktıları grup-landırılmış ve gelecekte yapılabilecek çalışmalara dair çeşitli öne-riler geliştirilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Psikolojik sahiplik, sahiplik, sahiplenme

Kaynakça

• Asatryan, V. S., & Oh, H. (2008). Psychological ownership theory: An exploratory application in the restaurant industry. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 32: 363-386.
• Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. J., Crossley, C. D., & Luthans, F. (2009). Psychological ownership: Theoretical extensions, measurement and relation to work outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(2), 173-191.
• Avey, J. B., Wernsing, T. S., & Palanski, M. E. (2012). Exploring the process of ethical leadership: The mediating role of employee voice and psychological ownership. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(1), 21-34.
• Barki, H., Paré, G., & Sicotte, C. (2008). Linking IT implementation and acceptance via the construct of psychological ownership of information technology. Journal of Information Technology, 23(4), 269-280.
• Beggan, J. K., & Brown, E. M. (1994). Association as a psychological justification for ownership. (PROQUEST).
• Belk, Russell W. (1988). Possessions and the Extended Self. Journal of Consumer Research. Vol. 15, Sept. 1988, 139-168.
• Bernhard, F., & O'Driscoll, M. P. (2011). Psychological ownership in small family-owned businesses: Leadership style and nonfamily-employees’ work attitudes and behaviors. Group & Organization Management, 36(3), 345-384.
• Brown, G., Crossley, C., & Robinson, S. L. (2014). Psychological Ownership, Territorial Behavior, and Being Perceived as a Team Contributor: The Critical Role of Trust in the Work Environment. Personnel Psychology, 67(2), 463-485.
• Brown, G., Lawrence, T. B., & Robinson, S. L. (2005). Territoriality in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 30(3), 577-594.
• Chi, N. W., & Han, T. S. (2008). Exploring the linkages between formal ownership and psychological ownership for the organization: The mediating role of organizational justice. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 81(4), 691-711.
• Furby, L. (1980). The origins and early development of possessive behavior. Political Psychology, 30- 42.
• Ghafoor, A., Qureshi, T. M., Khan, M. A., & Hijazi, S. T. (2011). Transformational leadership, employee engagement and performance: Mediating effect of psychological ownership. African journal of business management, 5(17), 7391-7403.
• Han, T. S., Chiang, H. H., & Chang, A. (2010). Employee participation in decision making, psychological ownership and knowledge sharing: Mediating role of organizational commitment in taiwanese high-tech organizations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(12), 2218-2233.
• Kaur, D., Sambasivan, M., & Kumar, N. (2013). Effect of spiritual intelligence, emotional intelligence, psychological ownership and burnout on caring behaviour of nurses: a cross-sectional study. Journal of clinical nursing, 22(21-22), 3192-3202.
• Lee, Y., & Chen, A. N. (2011). Usability design and psychological ownership of a virtual world. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28(3), 269-308.
• Litwinski, L. (1947). The psychology of “mine”. Philosophy, 22(83), 240-251.
• Liu, J., Wang, H., Hui, C., & Lee, C. (2012). Psychological ownership: how having control matters. Journal of Management Studies, 49(5), 869-895.
• Mayhew, M. G., Ashkanasy, N. M., Bramble, T., & Gardner, J. (2007). A study of the antecedents and consequences of psychological ownership in organizational settings. The Journal of social psychology, 147(5), 477-500.
• Mulgan, R. (2000). ‘Accountability’: An Ever-Expanding Concept?. Public administration, 78(3), 555- 573.
• O’driscoll, M. P., Pierce, J. L., & Coghlan, A. M. (2006). The psychology of ownership work environment structure, organizational commitment, and citizenship behaviors. Group & Organization Management, 31(3), 388-416.
• Olckers, C. (2013). Psychological ownership: Development of an instrument.SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 39(2), 1-13.
• Olckers, C., & Du Plessis, Y. (2012). Psychological ownership: A managerial construct for talent retention and organisational effectiveness.
• Paré, G., Sicotte, C., & Jacques, H. (2006). The effects of creating psychological ownership on physicians' acceptance of clinical information systems. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 13(2), 197-205.
• Pierce, J. L., & Furo, C. A. (1991). Employee ownership: Implications for management. Organizational Dynamics, 18(3), 32-43.
• Pierce, J. L., Jussila, I., & Cummings, A. (2009). Psychological ownership within the job design context: revision of the job characteristics model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(4), 477-496.
• Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2001). Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations. Academy of Management Review,26(2), 298-310.
• Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2003). The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research. www. researchgate.net. (25/10/2014).
• Pierce, J. L., O'driscoll, M. P., & Coghlan, A. M. (2004). Work environment structure and psychological ownership: the mediating effects of control. The Journal of Social Psychology, 144(5), 507-534.
• Pierce, J. L., & Rodgers, L. (2004). The psychology of ownership and worker-owner productivity. Group & Organization Management, 29(5), 588-613.
• Pierce, J. L., Rubenfeld, S. A., & Morgan, S. (1991). Employee ownership: A conceptual model of process and effects. Academy of Management review,16(1), 121-144.
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Self-Regulation and the Problem of Human Autonomy: Does Psychology Need Choice, Self-Determination, and Will?.Journal of personality, 74(6), 1557- 1586.
• Sieger, P., Zellweger, T., & Aquino, K. (2013). Turning Agents into Psychological Principals: Aligning Interests of Non-Owners through Psychological Ownership. Journal of Management Studies, 50(3), 361-388.
• Van Dyne, L., Cummings, L.L., and Parks, J.M., (1995). Extra-role behaviors: In pursuit of construct and definitional clarity (A bridge over muddied waters). In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 17, pp. 215-285). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
• Van Dyne, L., & Pierce, J. L. (2004). Psychological ownership and feelings of possession: three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(4), 439-459.
• Vandewalle, D., Van Dyne, L., & Kostova, T. (1995). Psychological ownership: An empirical examination of its consequences. Group & Organization Management, 20(2), 210-226.
• Wagner, S. H., Parker, C. P., & Christiansen, N. D. (2003). Employees that think and act like owners: Effects of ownership beliefs and behaviors on organizational effectiveness. Personnel Psychology, 56(4), 847-871.
• Zhu, H., Chen, C. C., Li, X., & Zhou, Y. (2013). From Personal Relationship to Psychological Ownership: The Importance of Manager–Owner Relationship Closeness in Family Businesses. Management and Organization Review, 9(2), 295-318.