Potansiyel Çalışanlarda Yapay Zekâ Kaygısı: Sektör Tercihi, Dijital Yetkinlik Düzeyi ve Demografik Özellikler Açısından Bir Değerlendirme

Selçuk Kılıç

doi:10.25287/ohuiibf.1721842

EN TR

Artificial Intelligence Anxiety Among Potential Employees: An Evaluation in Terms of Sector Preference, Digital Competence Level and Demographic Characteristics

Öz

This study aims to examine the levels of artificial intelligence (AI) anxiety among prospective employees (university students) in relation to sectoral preferences, digital competency levels, and demographic characteristics. AI technologies are perceived in diverse ways by individuals, either as a professional risk or as a career opportunity. This study evaluates how such perceptions are associated with individual and occupational variables through a quantitative research model. Data collected from 1,382 students at a public university in Turkey revealed that AI anxiety levels were higher among those who preferred to work in the public sector, had lower digital competency, and lacked work experience. Additionally, female participants and second-year students reported higher levels of AI anxiety. In contrast, participants with entrepreneurial career aspirations demonstrated significantly lower levels of AI anxiety. This finding suggests that entrepreneurial individuals tend to perceive AI more as a source of innovation and opportunity. Overall, the findings indicate that enhancing digital competencies may foster more positive attitudes toward AI and offer valuable insights for educational and career planning policies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Artificial Intelligence Anxiety, Digital Competence, Sector Preference, Potential Employees, Work Experience

Potansiyel Çalışanlarda Yapay Zekâ Kaygısı: Sektör Tercihi, Dijital Yetkinlik Düzeyi ve Demografik Özellikler Açısından Bir Değerlendirme

Öz

Bu çalışma, yapay zekâ teknolojilerinin iş gücü üzerindeki etkilerine ilişkin potansiyel çalışanların (üniversite öğrencileri) yapay zekâya yönelik kaygı düzeylerini; sektör tercihi, dijital yetkinlik düzeyi ve demografik özellikler bağlamında incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Yapay zekâ teknolojileri, bireyler tarafından mesleki risk veya kariyer fırsatı olarak farklı şekillerde algılanabilmektedir. Bu farklı algıların hangi bireysel ve mesleki değişkenlerle ilişkili olduğu nicel bir araştırma modeliyle değerlendirilmiştir. Türkiye’deki bir devlet üniversitesinin 1382 öğrencisinden elde edilen veriler yapay zekâ kaygısının özellikle kamu sektörü yönelimi olan, dijital yetkinlik düzeyi düşük ve iş deneyimi bulunmayan bireylerde daha yüksek olduğunu göstermiştir. Ayrıca kadın katılımcılar ile ikinci sınıf öğrencilerinin kaygı düzeylerinin daha yüksek olduğu belirlenmiştir. Buna karşılık, girişimcilik yöneliminde bulunan katılımcıların yapay zekâ kaygısı düzeylerinin daha düşük olduğu saptanmıştır. Bu sonuç, girişimci adaylarının yapay zekâyı daha çok bir yenilik ve fırsat kaynağı olarak değerlendirdiklerini düşündürmektedir. Bulgular dijital yetkinliğin geliştirilmesinin yapay zekâya yönelik olumlu tutumları destekleyebileceğini ortaya koymakta, eğitim ve kariyer planlaması açısından önemli öneriler sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Yapay Zekâ Kaygısı, Dijital Yetkinlik, Sektör Tercihi, Potansiyel Çalışanlar, İş Tecrübesi

Etik Beyan

Yazar, çalışmanın hazırlanma süreçlerinin tamamında etik kurallara uyduğunu açıkça beyan eder. Aksi bir durumun tespiti halinde ÖHÜİİBF Dergisinin hiçbir sorumluluğu bulunmamakta olup, bütün sorumluluk çalışmanın yazarına aittir. Bu çalışma Aksaray Üniversitesi İnsan Araştırmaları Etik Kurulunun 18.03.2025 tarihli 2025/116 sayılı kararıyla uygun bulunmuştur.

Teşekkür

Yayın sürecinde katkısı bulunan hakemlere ve editör kuruluna teşekkürler.

Kaynakça

Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2020). Robots and jobs: Evidence from US labor markets. Journal of Political Economy, 128(6), 2188–2244. https://doi.org/10.1086/705716
Ahn, M. J., & Chen, Y.-C. (2022). Digital transformation toward AI-augmented public administration: The perception of government employees and the willingness to use AI in government. Government Information Quarterly, 39(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101664
Akçakanat, Ö. (2024). The impact of artificial intelligence anxiety on technology-induced unemployment concerns: A study on accounting professionals. Afyon Kocatepe University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 26(Özel Sayı), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.33707/akuiibfd.1458358
Akkaya, B., Özkan, A., & Özkan, H. (2021). Yapay zeka kaygı (YZK) ölçeği: Türkçeye uyarlama, geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Alanya Akademik Bakış, 5(2), 1125–1146. https://doi.org/10.29023/alanyaakademik.833668
Asad, M. M., & Ajaz, A. (2024). Impact of ChatGPT and generative AI on lifelong learning and upskilling learners in higher education: Unveiling the challenges and opportunities globally. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 41(5), 507–523. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-06-2024-0103
Autor, D. H. (2015). Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. Journal of economic perspectives, 29(3), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.29.3.3
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
Belber, B. G., & Özmen, M. H. (2024). Hizmet sektörü çalışanlarının yapay zekâ ile ilgili gelecek kaygıları. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 23(91), 1085–1101. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.1437531
Bessen, J. (2020). Automation and jobs: When technology boosts employment. Economic Policy, 34(100), 589–626. https://doi.org/10.1093/epolic/eiaa001
Bharadiya, J. P., Thomas, R. K., & Ahmed, F. (2023). Rise of artificial intelligence in business and industry. Journal of Engineering Research and Reports, 25(3), 85–103. https://doi.org/10.9734/jerr/2023/v25i3893

Bıyıklı, F., Bozdoğan, T., & Çetin, Ö. O. (2024). Kişilik özelliklerinin yapay zekâ tutumuna etkisinde statü kaygısının ılımlaştırıcı rolü: Muhasebe meslek mensupları üzerine ampirik bir çalışma. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 26(Özel Sayı), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.33707/akuiibfd.1462678
Bozkurt, A. (2023). ChatGPT, generative artificial intelligence and algorithmic paradigm shift. Journal of Critical Review of Educational Sciences, 4(1), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.59320/alanyazin.1283282
Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2024). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı: İstatistik, araştırma deseni, SPSS uygulamaları ve yorum (31 b.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
Cantas, Ç., Soyer, C., & Batur, Ö. (2024). Examination of undergraduate students’ artificial intelligence anxiety, multidimensional 21st century skills, and lifelong learning levels in terms of various variables. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 23(3), 29–53. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1434130.pdf
Carolus, A., Koch, M. J., Straka, S., Latoschik, M. E., & Wienrich, C. (2023). MAILS - Meta AI literacy scale: Development and testing of an AI literacy questionnaire based on well-founded competency models and psychological change- and meta-competencies. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 1(2), 100014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100014
Chen, C., Hu, W., & Wei, X. (2025). From anxiety to action: exploring the impact of artificial intelligence anxiety and artificial intelligence self-efficacy on motivated learning of undergraduate students. Interactive Learning Environments, 33(4), 3162–3177. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2440877
Chiu, Y.-T., Zhu, Y.-Q., & Corbett, J. (2021). In the hearts and minds of employees: A model of pre-adoptive appraisal toward artificial intelligence in organizations. International Journal of Information Management, 60, 102379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102379
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2 b.). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
Çetiner, N., & Çetinkaya, F. Ö. (2024). Çalışanların yapay zekâ kaygısı ile motivasyon düzeyleri arasındaki ilişki: Turizm çalışanları üzerine bir araştırma. Alanya Akademik Bakış, 8(1), 159–173. https://doi.org/10.29023/alanyaakademik.1297394
Diamantopoulos, A., Sarstedt, M., Fuchs, C., Wilczynski, P., & Kaiser, S. (2012). Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: A predictive validity perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 434–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0300-3
Enholm, I. M., Papagiannidis, E., Mikalef, P., & Krogstie, J. (2022). Artificial intelligence and business value: A literature review. Information Systems Frontiers, 24(5), 1709–1734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-021-10186-w
Eyüp, B., & Kayhan, S. (2023). Pre-service turkish language teachers’ anxiety and attitudes toward artificial intelligence. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 11(4), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.11n.4p.43
Ferrari, A. (2012). Digital competence in practice: An analysis of frameworks [EUR 25351 EN]. Seville, Spain: Joint Research Centre of the European Commission Publications Office. https://doi.org/10.2791/82116
Field, A. (2024). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (6 b.). London: SAGE.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 254–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019
Georgieff, A., & Hyee, R. (2021). Artificial intelligence and employment: New cross-country evidence. İçinde OECD social, employment and migration working papers no. 265. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/c2c1d276-en
Gogol, K., Brunner, M., Goetz, T., Martin, R., Ugen, S., Keller, U., Fischbach, A., & Preckel, F. (2014). “My questionnaire is too long!” The assessments of motivational-affective constructs with three-item and single-item measures. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(3), 188–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.04.002
Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045669
Göldağ, B. (2021). Investigation of the relationship between digital literacy levels and digital data security awareness levels of university students. E-International Journal of Educational Research, 12(3), 82–100. https://doi.org/10.19160/e-ijer.950635
Gryncewicz, W., Zygała, R., & Pilch, A. (2023). AI in HRM: Case study analysis. Preliminary research. Procedia Computer Science, 225, 2351–2360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.10.226
Haenlein, M., & Kaplan, A. (2019). A brief history of artificial intelligence: On the past, present, and future of artificial intelligence. California Management Review, 61(4), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619864925
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8 b.). China: Cengage Learning EMEA.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3 b.). Sage.
Hasırcı, I., & Örücü, E. (2024). Öz yeterlilik algısı ve örgütsel hazırlığın yapay zeka kaygısı üzerindeki etkileri: Bir araştırma. Sinop Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(2), 732–760. https://doi.org/10.30561/sinopusd.1384443
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Hopcan, S., Türkmen, G., & Polat, E. (2024). Exploring the artificial intelligence anxiety and machine learning attitudes of teacher candidates. Education and Information Technologies, 29(6), 7281–7301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12086-9
Hu, L. t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Huttayavilaiphan, R. (2025). Digital competence and anxiety in Thai university English education: Impacts on teachers and students. World Journal of English Language, 15(1), 225–251. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v15n1p225
Ilomäki, L., Paavola, S., Lakkala, M., & Kantosalo, A. (2016). Digital competence – an emergent boundary concept for policy and educational research. Education and Information Technologies, 21(3), 655–679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014-9346-4
Johnson, D. G., & Verdicchio, M. (2017a). AI anxiety. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(9), 2267–2270. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23867
Johnson, D. G., & Verdicchio, M. (2017b). Reframing AI discourse. Minds and Machines, 27(4), 575–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-017-9417-6
Kang, J., Shin, H., & Kang, C. (2024). Hospitality labor leakage and dynamic turnover behaviors in the age of artificial intelligence and robotics. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 15(5), 916–933. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTT-12-2023-0411
Kappeler, K. (2024). A longitudinal perspective on digital skills for everyday life: Measurement and empirical evidence. Media and Communication, 12(Article 8159). https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.8159
Karaarslan, M. H., & Altuntaş, B. (2016). Kariyer tercihini etkileyen faktör düzeylerinin öneminin konjoint analizi ile belirlenmesi. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(7), 1972–1988. https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.259499
Kaya, F., Fatih, A., Astrid, S., Paul, R., Okan, Y., & and Demir Kaya, M. (2024). The roles of personality traits, ai anxiety, and demographic factors in attitudes toward artificial intelligence. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 40(2), 497–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2151730
Kaya, F., Yetişensoy, O., Aydın, F., & Demir Kaya, M. (2024). Yapay zekâ korkusu ölçeğinin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması. Ordu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 14(2), 554–567. https://doi.org/10.48146/odusobiad.1264103
Kaya, M. (2023). Havacılık yönetimi öğrencilerinin yapay zekâ kaygısı ve teknoloji kaynaklı işsizlik endişesi [Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Eskişehir Teknik Üniversitesi]. Ulusal Tez Merkezi, Tez No: 809085. Eskişehir.
Kerr, S. P., Kerr, W. R., & Dalton, M. (2019). Risk attitudes and personality traits of entrepreneurs and venture team members. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(36), 17712–17716. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1908375116
Kim, S. Y., & Fernandez, S. (2017). Employee empowerment and turnover intention in the U.S. federal bureaucracy. The American Review of Public Administration, 47(1), 4–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074015583712
Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling series: Methodology in the social sciences (4 b.). New York: The Guilford Press.
Koçer, S. (2024). Yapay zeka ve doğrulama. REFLEKTİF Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5(1), 103–114. https://doi.org/10.47613/reflektif.2024.147
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79–122. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (2002). Social cognitive career theory (4 b.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Li, J., Bonn, M. A., & Ye, B. H. (2019). Hotel employee’s artificial intelligence and robotics awareness and its impact on turnover intention: The moderating roles of perceived organizational support and competitive psychological climate. Tourism Management, 73, 172–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2019.02.006
Li, L., Bibi, M., Hussain, Y., & Xiao, D. (2025). Examining sustainable hospitality practices and employee turnover in Pakistan: The interplay of robotics awareness, mutual trust, and technical skills development in the age of artificial intelligence. Journal of Environmental Management, 373, 123922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123922
LimeSurvey. (2026). LimeSurvey: An open source survey tool. LimeSurvey GmbH. Erişim Adresi https://www.limesurvey.org
Loureiro, S. M. C., Guerreiro, J., & Tussyadiah, I. (2021). Artificial intelligence in business: State of the art and future research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 129, 911–926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.001
Lund, B. D., Mannuru, N. R., & Agbaji, D. (2024). AI anxiety and fear: A look at perspectives of information science students and professionals towards artificial intelligence. Journal of Information Science, 01655515241282001. https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515241282001
Manyika, J., Lund, S., Chui, M., Bughin, J., Woetzel, L., Batra, P., Ko, R., & Sanghvi, S. (2017). Jobs lost, jobs gained: Workforce transitions in a time of automation. McKinsey Global Institute. https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/future-of-work/jobs-lost-jobs-gained-what-the-future-of-work-will-mean-for-jobs-skills-and-wages#/
Minbaeva, D. (2021). Disrupted HR? Human Resource Management Review, 31(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2020.100820
Mutascu, M. (2021). Artificial intelligence and unemployment: New insights. Economic Analysis and Policy, 69, 653–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2021.01.012
Mutlu, T. (2023). Yapay zeka ve girişimcilik. İçinde G. Durmuş & M. Seyhan (Ed.), Yeni dünyada girişimcilik (ss. 1–18). Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi.
Nahar, A., Sharma, P., & Thakur, M. (2022). Preference for entrepreneurship as career: Exploring some aspects. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(6), 3192–3199. https://journalppw.com/index.php/jpsp/article/view/3819
Neumann, O., Katharina, G., & Steiner, R. (2024). Exploring artificial intelligence adoption in public organizations: a comparative case study. Public Management Review, 26(1), 114–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2048685
Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016
Nguyen, Q. P., & Vo, D. H. (2022). Artificial intelligence and unemployment: An international evidence. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 63, 40–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2022.09.003
Özbek, A. (2024). A study on artificial intelligence concerns of professional accountants and perceptions of future employability. Alanya Academic Review, 8(1), 254–267. https://doi.org/10.29023/alanyaakademik.1329511
Özkoç, H., Marangoz, M., & Aydın, A. E. (2018). Öğrencilerin kariyer alternatiflerini etkileyen faktörler ve girişimcilik eğitimi. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 4(1), 98–119. https://doi.org/10.29131/uiibd.413610
Pan, Y., & Froese, F. J. (2023). An interdisciplinary review of AI and HRM: Challenges and future directions. Human Resource Management Review, 33(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2022.100924
Paredes-Aguirre, M., Hernandez-Pozas, O., Ayala, Y., & Campoverde Aguirre, R. (2025). The stress-busting power of digital self-efficacy: Does training format matter for workers? Current Research in Behavioral Sciences, 8, 100161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crbeha.2024.100161
Patil, D. (2024). Impact of artificial intelligence on employment and workforce development: Risks, opportunities, and socioeconomic implications. Opportunities, And Socioeconomic Implications(November 12). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5057396
Pérez-Navío, E., Ocaña-Moral, M. T., & Martínez-Serrano, M. d. C. (2021). University graduate students and digital competence: Are future secondary school teachers digitally competent? Sustainability, 13(15), 8519. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158519
Priyadarshi, P., & Premchandran, R. (2022). Insecurity and turnover as robots take charge: impact of neuroticism and change-related uncertainty. Personnel Review, 51(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-06-2019-0310
Ratten, V. (2020). Coronavirus (covid-19) and entrepreneurship: Changing life and work landscape. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 32(5), 503–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2020.1790167
Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2024). SmartPLS 4. Bönningstedt: SmartPLS. Retrieved from https://www.smartpls.com
Ropohl, G. (1999). Philosophy of socio-technical systems. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 4(3), 186–194. https://doi.org/10.5840/techne19994311
Russo, C., Romano, L., Clemente, D., Iacovone, L., Gladwin, T. E., & Panno, A. (2025). Gender differences in artificial intelligence: the role of artificial intelligence anxiety. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1559457. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1559457
Sanguinetti, P., & Palomo, B. (2024). An alien in the newsroom: AI anxiety in European and American newspapers. Social Sciences, 13(11), 608. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13110608
Schein, E. H. (1992). How can organizations learn faster? The challenge of entering the green room. MIT Sloan Management Review, 34(2), 85–92. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/4380058.pdf
Schepman, A., & Rodway, P. (2020). Initial validation of the general attitudes towards artificial intelligence scale. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 1, 100014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2020.100014
Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research, 8(2), 23–74. https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.12784
Shandilya, E., & Fan, M. (2022). Understanding older adults’ perceptions and challenges in using AI-enabled everyday technologies. İçinde The Tenth International Symposium of Chinese CHI (Chinese CHI 2022) (ss. 105–116). Guangzhou and Online, China: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3565698.3565774
Şeker, C., Örücü, E., & Ercan Önbıçak, A. (2024). Örgütlerde inovasyon, örgütsel öğrenme ilişkisinde yapay zekâ kaygısının rolü. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 16(1), 328–345. https://doi.org/10.20491/isarder.2024.1793
Takıl, N., Erden, N. K., & Sarı, A. B. (2022). Farklı meslek grubu adaylarının yapay zekâ teknolojisine yönelik kaygı seviyesinin incelenmesi. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 25(48), 343–353. https://doi.org/10.31795/baunsobed.1165386
Tuomi, I. (2018). The impact of artificial intelligence on learning, teaching, and education. Policies for the future (Y. Punie, R. Vuorikari, & M. Cabrera, Ed.) [EUR 29442 EN]. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/12297
Uçar, M., Çapuk, H., & Yiğit, M. F. (2024). The relationship between artificial intelligence anxiety and unemployment anxiety among university students. WORK, 80(2), 701–710. https://doi.org/10.1177/10519815241290648
Ulukapı Yılmaz, H., & Yılmaz, A. (2024). Dijital çağın potansiyel çalışanlarının yapay zekâ kaygılarının belirlenmesi. Business and Economics Research Journal, 15(2), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.20409/berj.2024.440
Van Laar, E., Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., Van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & De Haan, J. (2017). The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 577–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.010
Van Laar, E., Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., Van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & De Haan, J. (2019). Determinants of 21st-century digital skills: A large-scale survey among working professionals. Computers in Human Behavior, 100, 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.06.017
Venkatesh, V., & Morris, M. G. (2000). Why don’t men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 115–139. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250981
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
Vuorikari, R., Kluzer, S., & Punie, Y. (2022). DigComp 2.2: The digital competence framework for citizens [EUR 31006 EN]. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/115376
Wang, Y.-M., Chung-Lun, W., Hsin-Hui, L., Sheng-Ching, W., & and Wang, Y.-S. (2024). What drives students’ AI learning behavior: A perspective of AI anxiety. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(6), 2584–2600. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2153147
Wang, Y.-Y., & Wang, Y.-S. (2022). Development and validation of an artificial intelligence anxiety scale: An initial application in predicting motivated learning behavior. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(4), 619–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1674887
Wirtz, B. W., C., W. J., & and Geyer, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence and the public sector: Applications and challenges. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(7), 596–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1498103
Yaşar, H., & Karagucuk, V. (2025). The effect of artificial intelligence anxiety on career decidedness among students in English-related departments at universities. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 5(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-025-00284-y
Zhang, B., & Dafoe, A. (2019). Artificial intelligence: American attitudes and trends. Oxford, UK: Center for the Governance of AI, Future of Humanity Institute, University of Oxford. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3312874
Zhao, H., & Seibert, S. E. (2006). The big five personality dimensions and entrepreneurial status: A meta-analytical review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 259. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.259

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

Yönetim Bilişim Sistemleri, Yapay Zeka (Diğer), Demografi (Diğer), İnsan Kaynakları ve Endüstriyel İlişkiler (Diğer), İşletme

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Selçuk Kılıç ^*
0000-0002-9287-4754
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

5 Nisan 2026

Gönderilme Tarihi

17 Haziran 2025

Kabul Tarihi

27 Mart 2026

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2026 Sayı: 19

DOI

https://doi.org/10.25287/ohuiibf.1721842

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA48ZB87DH

APA

Kılıç, S. (2026). Potansiyel Çalışanlarda Yapay Zekâ Kaygısı: Sektör Tercihi, Dijital Yetkinlik Düzeyi ve Demografik Özellikler Açısından Bir Değerlendirme. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 19, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.25287/ohuiibf.1721842

AMA

1.Kılıç S. Potansiyel Çalışanlarda Yapay Zekâ Kaygısı: Sektör Tercihi, Dijital Yetkinlik Düzeyi ve Demografik Özellikler Açısından Bir Değerlendirme. ÖHÜİİBFD. 2026;(19):1-27. doi:10.25287/ohuiibf.1721842

Chicago

Kılıç, Selçuk. 2026. “Potansiyel Çalışanlarda Yapay Zekâ Kaygısı: Sektör Tercihi, Dijital Yetkinlik Düzeyi ve Demografik Özellikler Açısından Bir Değerlendirme”. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, sy 19: 1-27. https://doi.org/10.25287/ohuiibf.1721842.

EndNote

Kılıç S (01 Nisan 2026) Potansiyel Çalışanlarda Yapay Zekâ Kaygısı: Sektör Tercihi, Dijital Yetkinlik Düzeyi ve Demografik Özellikler Açısından Bir Değerlendirme. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 19 1–27.

IEEE

[1]S. Kılıç, “Potansiyel Çalışanlarda Yapay Zekâ Kaygısı: Sektör Tercihi, Dijital Yetkinlik Düzeyi ve Demografik Özellikler Açısından Bir Değerlendirme”, ÖHÜİİBFD, sy 19, ss. 1–27, Nis. 2026, doi: 10.25287/ohuiibf.1721842.

ISNAD

Kılıç, Selçuk. “Potansiyel Çalışanlarda Yapay Zekâ Kaygısı: Sektör Tercihi, Dijital Yetkinlik Düzeyi ve Demografik Özellikler Açısından Bir Değerlendirme”. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 19 (01 Nisan 2026): 1-27. https://doi.org/10.25287/ohuiibf.1721842.

JAMA

1.Kılıç S. Potansiyel Çalışanlarda Yapay Zekâ Kaygısı: Sektör Tercihi, Dijital Yetkinlik Düzeyi ve Demografik Özellikler Açısından Bir Değerlendirme. ÖHÜİİBFD. 2026;:1–27.

MLA

Kılıç, Selçuk. “Potansiyel Çalışanlarda Yapay Zekâ Kaygısı: Sektör Tercihi, Dijital Yetkinlik Düzeyi ve Demografik Özellikler Açısından Bir Değerlendirme”. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, sy 19, Nisan 2026, ss. 1-27, doi:10.25287/ohuiibf.1721842.

Vancouver

1.Selçuk Kılıç. Potansiyel Çalışanlarda Yapay Zekâ Kaygısı: Sektör Tercihi, Dijital Yetkinlik Düzeyi ve Demografik Özellikler Açısından Bir Değerlendirme. ÖHÜİİBFD. 01 Nisan 2026;(19):1-27. doi:10.25287/ohuiibf.1721842

Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari-AynıLisanslaPaylaş 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.

Artificial Intelligence Anxiety Among Potential Employees: An Evaluation in Terms of Sector Preference, Digital Competence Level and Demographic Characteristics

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Potansiyel Çalışanlarda Yapay Zekâ Kaygısı: Sektör Tercihi, Dijital Yetkinlik Düzeyi ve Demografik Özellikler Açısından Bir Değerlendirme

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Etik Beyan

Teşekkür

Kaynakça

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Konular

Bölüm

Yazarlar

Yayımlanma Tarihi

Gönderilme Tarihi

Kabul Tarihi

Yayımlandığı Sayı

DOI

IZ

Kaynak Göster