Destekleme politikalarının Türkiye'deki tarımsal etkinlik ve toplam faktör verimliliğine etkileri

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 32 Sayı: 1, 35 - 39, 15.02.2017

Nevra Alhas Eroğlu Mehmet Bozoğlu

https://doi.org/10.7161/omuanajas.288864

Cited By: 2

Öz

Tarım
sektöründe üretim faktörlerinin verimli ve etkin kullanımı, artan nüfusun gıda
talebinin karşılanması, çiftçilerin hayat standartlarının yükseltilmesi ve
tarımsal kalkınmanın gerçekleştirilmesi için çok büyük önem taşımaktadır. Bu
araştırmanın amacı, destekleme politikalarının Türkiye’nin 1980-2009
dönemindeki tarımsal etkinliği ve toplam faktör verimliliğine etkilerinin
ortaya konulmasıdır. Destekleme politikalarının piyasayla uyumlu olduğu 2000
sonrası dönemde kaynaklar, önceki döneme göre daha etkin kullanılmıştır. Tarım
sektörünün 2000’li yıllardaki toplam faktör verimliliği 1980’li yıllara göre
%3,6 azalmasına rağmen, 1990’lı yıllara göre %27 artmış ve verimlilikteki artış
tamamen teknolojik gelişmeden kaynaklanmıştır. Tarım sektörünün ekinliği ve
verimliliğinin artırılabilmesi için tarım sektöründe yeni teknolojilere uyum
sağlama ile birlikte rekabet koşullarının iyileştirilmesi gerekmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Tarımsal destekleme politikası, Veri zarflama analizi, Malmquist endeks, Toplam faktör verimliliği, Türkiye

Impacts of the support policies on agricultural efficiency and total factor productivity in Turkey

Öz

Productive and efficient use of
the production factors in the agricultural sector is very essential in order to
meet the food demand of increasing population, to raise life standards of
farmers and to realize agricultural development. The aim of this research is to
explore the effects of support policies on the efficiency and the total factor
productivity (TFP) of Turkish agriculture during the period of 1980-2009. Data
Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Malmquist Index were used to analyze the
efficiency of resource utilization and TFP. After the period of 2000 in which
the support policies mainly compatible with market mechanism, the resources
were used more efficient than the previous period. Although TFP of agricultural
sector in 2000’s decreased by 3,6% compared to 1980’s, it increased by 27% with
respect to 1990’s and the increase in productivity was entirely arised from the
technological change. In order to enhance the technical efficiency and TFP in
the agricultural sector, it is necessary to adapt new technologies which are
accompanied by improving the competition conditions in the agricultural
markets.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Agricultural support policy, Data envelopment analysis, Malmquist index, Total factor productivity, Turkey

Kaynakça

• Armagan, G., Ozden, A., Bekcioglu, S., 2010. Efficiency and total factor productivity of crop production at NUTS1 level in Turkey: Malmquist index approach. Journal of Quality and Quantity, 44(3):573-581.
• Arnade, C., 1998. Using a programming approach to measure international agricultural efficiency and productivity. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 49:67-84.
• Avcı, M.A., Kaya, A. A., 2008. The analysis of efficiency and total factor productivity in agricultural sector of Turkey and transition economies (1992-2004). Ege Academic Review, 8(2):843-860.
• Brümmer, B., Glauben, T., Lu, W., 2006. Policy reform and productivity change in Chinese agriculture: A distance function approach. Journal of Development Economics, 81:61-79.
• Caves, D.W., Christensen, L.R., Diewert, W. E., 1982.The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output and productivity. Econometrica, 50(6):1393-1414.
• Cankurt, M., Miran, B., Günden,, C., Şahin, A., 2010. The impacts of global crises on agricultural productivity and efficiency of Turkey and the EU. 9th Turkish Agricultural Economics Congress, 221-228 p., 22-24 September, Şanliurfa.
• Chen, P.C., Yu, M.M., Chang, C.C., Hsu, S.H., 2008.Total factor productivity growth in China's agricultural sector. China Economic Review, 19(4):580-593.
• Coelli, T.J., Rao, D.S.P., 2005. Total factor productivity growth in agriculture: a Malmquist index analysis of 93 countries, 1980-2000. Agricultural Economics, 32(1):115-134.
• Deliktaş, E., Ersungur, S.M., Candemir, M., 2005. The comparison of agricultural efficiency and productivity growth in the EU and Turkey. 1980-2002. International Journal of Business Management and Economics, 1:109-124.
• Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Norris, M., Zhang, Z., 1994. Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. American Economic Review, 84:66-82.
• Fulginiti, L.E., Perrin, R.K., 1993. Prices and productivity in agriculture. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 75 (3):471-482.
• Fulginiti, L.E., R.K. Perrin, 1997. LDC agriculture: nonparametric malmquist productivity indexes. Journal of Development Economics, 53:373-390.
• Fulginiti, L.E., Perrin, R.K., 1998. Agricultural productivity in developing countries. Agricultural Economics, 19:45-51.
• Galanopoulos, K., Karagiannis, G., Koutroumanidis, T., 2004. Malmquist productivity index estimates for European agriculture in the 1990s. Operational Research, 4(1):73-91.
• Kawagoe, T., Hayami, Y., 1985. An intercountry comparison of agricultural production efficiency, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 67:87–92.
• Kawagoe, T., Hayami, Y., Ruttan, V., 1985. The intercountry agricultural production function and productivity differences among countries. Journal of Development Economics, 19:113-132.
• Lau, L., Yotopolous, P., 1989. The meta-production function approach to technological change in the world agriculture. Journal of Development Economics. 31:241-269.
• Mao, W., Koo, W.W., 1997. Productivity growth, technological progress, and efficiency change in Chinese agriculture after rural economic reforms: a DEA approach. China Economic Review, 8(2):157-174.
• Nin, A., Arndt, C., Preckel, P.V., 2003. Is agricultural productivity in developing countries really shrinking? New evidence using a modified nonparametric approach. Journal of Development Economics, 71:395-415.
• Nkamleu, G.B., 2004. Productivity growth, technical progress and efficiency change in African agriculture. African Development Review, 16(1):203-220.
• Thirtle, C., Piesse, J., Lusigi, A., Suhariyanto, K., 2003. Multi-factor agricultural productivity, efficiency and convergence in Botswana, 1981-1996. Journal of Development Economics, 71:605-624.
• Trueblood, M.A., Coggins, J., 2003.Intercountry agricultural efficiency and productivity: a malmquist index approach, World Bank, Washington.
• Tunca, H., Karaçuka, M., Deliktaş, E., 2014. The competitive power of Turkish agriculture compared to the European Union countries: a dynamic data envelopment analysis. Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences (Atatürk University), 28(3): 89-105.
• Umetsu, C., Lekprichakul, T., Chakravorty, U., 2003. Efficiency and technical change in the Philippine rice sector: A malmquist total factor productivity analysis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85(4):943-963.
• Zaim, O., Çakmak, E., 1998. Efficiency in Turkish agriculture: trends and comparative analysis. In. Bulutay, T. (Ed), Agricultural Structure and Employment Turkish Statistical Institute, Publication number 2210, 353-378 p.