Sınıf Performansı Üzerinde Algılanan Öğretmen Destekleyici Davranışların Rolü

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 42 Sayı: 1, 195 - 244, 30.06.2023

İlhan İlter

https://doi.org/10.7822/omuefd.1218632

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı öz-belirleme kuramı temel alınarak algılanan öğretmen destekleyici davranışların ortaokul öğrencilerinin sınıf performansları üzerindeki rolünü incelemektir. Araştırmanın örneklemini Türkiye’de bir şehirde yer alan ortaokullarda öğrenim gören 296 yedinci sınıf öğrencisi oluşturmaktadır. Algılanan öğretmen destekleyici davranışlar Kişilerarası Davranışlar Ölçeği Öğretmen Kısa Formu kullanılarak belirlenmiştir. Öğrencilerin sınıf performans düzeylerini ölçmek için Türkçeye uyarlanarak geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmaları yapılan Sınıf Performans Ölçeği (Cronbach Alpha katsayısı = ,88) kullanılmıştır. Algılanan öğretmen destekleyici davranışların öğrencilerin sınıf performanslarını ne düzeyde yordadığını belirlemek için çoklu doğrusal regresyon analizi kullanılmıştır. Analiz sonuçları üç tür öğretmen destekleyici davranışın (özerklik, yeterlilik ve ilişkililik ihtiyacı) öğrencilerin sınıf performansı ile pozitif yönde ilişkili olduğunu göstermiştir. Regresyon modeline göre sınıf performansı üzerinde en güçlü yordayıcı değişken özerklik destekleyici faktör ve onu izleyen yeterlilik destekleyici faktör iken en zayıf yordayıcı değişken ilişkililik destekleyici faktörüdür. Bu sonuçlardan yola çıkarak ortaokul öğrencilerinin sınıf performanslarının algılanan öğretmen yeterlilik ya da ilişkililik destekleyici davranışlarından daha çok özerklik destekleyici öğretmen davranışları tarafından daha fazla şekillendiğini söylemek mümkündür. Araştırmada elde edilen tüm bulgular öğretmenin öğrencilere derinden sağlayacağı özerklik, yeterlilik ve ilgili olma desteğinin öğrencilerin akademik ve kişilerarası yeterliliklerinin bir bileşimi olarak sınıf performanslarında tatminkar sonuçlar elde etmesi açısından önemli olduğunu göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Öz-belirleme kuramı, öğretmen desteği, sınıf performansı, ortaokul öğrencileri,

The Role of Perceived Teacher-Supportive Behaviours on Classroom Performance

Öz

Based on self-determination theory, this study examined the role of perceived teacher supportive behaviors on the classroom performance of middle school students. The sample consisted of 296 seventh grade students studying in middle schools in a city in Turkey. Perceived teacher supportive behaviors were determined using the Interpersonal Behavior Scale Teacher Short Form. The Classroom Performance Scale (Cronbach Alpha coefficient = .88), which was adapted to Turkish and whose validity and reliability studies were carried out, was used to measure the classroom performance levels of participants. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to determine to what extent perceived teacher supportive behaviors predicted students' classroom performance. The results showed that three types of teacher supportive behaviors (need for autonomy, competence, and relatedness) were positively associated with students' classroom performance. According to the regression model, the strongest predictor variable on classroom performance is the autonomy supporting factor followed by the competence supporting factor, while the weakest predictor variable is the relatedness supporting factor. This finding shows that middle school students' classroom performance is more shaped by autonomy-supportive teacher behaviors rather than perceived teacher competence or relatedness-supporting behavior dimensions. All the findings obtained in the study indicate that the autonomy, competence and relevance support that the teacher will provide to students is important in terms of achieving satisfactory results in classroom performance as a combination of students' academic and interpersonal competences.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Self-determination theory, teacher support, classroom performance, middle school students

Kaynakça

• Allen, J., Gregory, A., Mikami, A., Lun, J., Hamre, B., & Pianta, R. (2013). Observations of effective teacher-student interactions in secondary school classrooms: Predicting student achievement with the classroom assessment scoring system-secondary. School Psychology Review, 42(1), 76– 98.
• Alley, K.M. (2019). Fostering middle school students’ autonomy to support motivation and engagement. Middle School Journal, 50(3), 5-14.
• Ames, C. (1992). Achievement goals and the classroom motivational climate. In D. H. Schunk & J. L. Meece (Eds.), Students’ perceptions in the classroom (pp. 3–24). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Baumeister, R., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.
• Brady, C. E., Evans, S. W., Berlin, K. S., Bunford, N., & Kern, L. (2012). Evaluating school impairment with adolescents using the classroom performance survey. School Psychology Review, 41(4), 429-446.
• Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2001). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, race, and gender in middle school science. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 7(4), 269-283.
• Burton, K. D., Lydon, J. E., D’Alessandro, D. U., & Koestner, R. (2006). The differential effects of intrinsic and identified motivation on well-being and performance: Prospective, experimental, and implicit approaches to self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 750-762.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2014). Sosyal bilimler için veri ve analizi el kitabı: İstatistik, araştırma deseni, SPSS uygulamaları ve yorum. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayın.
• Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Caldarella, P., Larsen, R. A. A., Williams, L., Wehby, J. H., Wills, H. P., & Kamps, D. (2017). Monitoring academic and social skills in elementary school: A psychometric evaluation of the classroom performance survey. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 19(2), 78–89.
• Caldarella, P., Larsen, R. A., Williams, L., Lulla, S. R., & Wills, H. P. (2022). Behavior monitoring in the middle grades: Evaluation of the classroom performance survey. RMLE Online, 45(6), 1-15.
• Carreira, J. M., Ozaki, K., & Maeda, T. (2013). Motivational model of English learning among elementary school students in Japan. System, 41(3), 706–719.
• Catalano, R. F., Berglund, M. L., Ryan, J. A. M., Lonczak, H. S., & Hawkins, J. D. (2004). Positive youth development in the United States: Research findings on evaluations of positive youth development programs. The Annuals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591, 98-124.
• Cerasoli, C. P., Nicklin, J. M., & Ford, M. T. (2014). Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 980-1008.
• Chen, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Beyers, W., Boone, L., Deci, E. L., Van der Kaap-Deeder, J., & Verstuyf, J. (2015). Basic psychological need satisfaction, need frustration, and need strength across four cultures. Motivation and Emotion, 39, 216-236.
• Chen, S., Chen, A., & Zhu, X. (2012). Are K–12 learners motivated in physical education? A meta-analysis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 83(1), 36-48.
• Chirkov, V. I. (2011). Dialectical relationships among human autonomy, the brain, and culture. In V. I. Chirkov, R. M. Ryan, & K. M. Sheldon (Eds.), Human autonomy in cross cultural contexts: Perspectives on the psychology of agency, freedom, and well-being (pp. 65–91). Springer.
• Cox, A., & Williams, L. (2008). The roles of perceived teacher support, motivational climate, and psychological need satisfaction in students’ physical education motivation. Journal Of Sport And Exercise Psychology, 30(2), 222-239.
• Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., ve Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları. (2. Baskı), Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yay.
• Daniels, E. (2019). Understanding young adolescents through the intersection of cognitive neuroscience, psychology, and educational pedagogy. In Virtue, D. C. (Ed.). (2019). International handbook of middle level education theory, research, and policy (pp. 91-102). Routledge.
• Danielsen, A. G., Breivik, K., & Wold, B. (2011). Do perceived academic competence and school satisfaction mediate the relationships between perceived support provided by teachers and classmates, and academic initiative? Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 55, 379–401.
• Deci, E. L., & Moller, A. C. (2005). The concept of competence: A starting place for understanding intrinsic motivation and self-determined extrinsic motivation. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 579–597). Guilford Press.
• Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., & Williams, G. C. (1996). Need satisfaction and the self-regulation of learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 165–183.
• Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and selfdetermination in human behaviour. In E. Deci & R. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
• Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (2000). The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.
• Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: The University of Rochester Press.
• DeFreese, J. D., & Smith, A. L. (2014). Athlete social support, negative social interactions, and psychological health across a competitive sport season. Journal Of Sport And Exercise Psychology, 36(6), 619-630.
• di Perna, J. C., & Elliott, S. N. (1999). Development and validation of the academic competence evaluation scales. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 17(3), 207-225.
• Earl, S. R., Taylor, I. M., Meijen, C., & Passfield, L. (2017). Autonomy and competence frustration in young adolescent classrooms: Different associations with active and passive disengagement. Learning and Instruction, 49, 32–40.
• Eccles, J. S., Lord, S. E., & Roeser, R. W. (1996). Round holes, square pegs, rocky roads, and söre feet: The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents’ experiences in schools and families. In D. Cicchetti & S. L. Toth (Eds.), Adolescence: Opportunities and challenges (pp. 47–92). University Rochester Press.
• Elliot, A. J., McGregor, H. A., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). The need for competence. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 361–387). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
• Ersoy, E. (2020). Ortaokul ve lise öğrencilerinin akademik destek algıları ile okul yaşam doyum düzeyleri arasındaki ilişki (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). İnönü Üniversitesi.
• Evans, D., Borriello, G. A., & Field, A. P. (2018). A review of the academic and psychological impact of the transition to secondary education. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(1482), 1–18.
• Feng, X., Xie, K., Gong, S., Gao, L., & Cao, Y. (2019). Effects of parental autonomy support and teacher support on middle school students’ homework effort: Homework autonomous motivation as mediator. Frontiers in Psychology, 612, 1-10.
• Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th Ed.). Sage.
• Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
• Fu, D., Liu, Y., & Zhang, D. (2023). The relationship between teacher autonomy support and student mathematics achievement: a 3-year longitudinal study. Educational Psychology, 1-20.
• Furrer, C., & Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children's academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 148.
• Goldstein, S. E., Boxer, P., & Rudolph, E. (2015). Middle school transition stress: Links with academic performance, motivation, and school experiences. Contemporary School Psychology, 19(1), 21-29.
• Goodenow, C. (1993). Classroom belonging among early adolescent students: Relationships to motivation and achievement. Journal of Early Adolescence, 13, 21–43.
• Grolnick, W. S., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (1991). The inner resources for school achievement: Motivational mediators of children’s perceptions of their parents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 508–517.
• Guay, F. (2022). Applying self-determination theory to education: Regulations types, psychological needs, and autonomy supporting behaviors. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 37(1), 75-92.
• Guay, F., Ratelle, C. F., Roy, A., & Litalien, D. (2010). Academic self-concept, autonomous academic motivation, and academic achievement: Mediating and additive effects. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 644–653.
• Haerens, L., Aelterman, N., Vansteenkiste, M., Soenens, B., & Van Petegem, S. (2015). Do perceived autonomy-supportive and controlling teaching relate to physical education students’ motivational experiences through unique pathways? Distinguishing between the bright and dark side of motivation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 16, 26-36.
• Hafen, C. A., Allen, J. P., Mikami, A. Y., Gregory, A., Hamre, B., & Pianta, R. C. (2012). The pivotal role of adolescent autonomy in secondary school classrooms. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41(3), 245– 255.
• Hospel, V., & Galand, B. (2016). Are both classroom autonomy support and structure equally important for students’ engagement? A multilevel analysis. Learning and Instruction, 41, 1–10.
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.
• Jang, H., Kim, E. J., & Reeve, J. (2012). Longitudinal test of self-determination theory’s motivation mediation model in a naturally occurring classroom context. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1175–1188.
• Jang, H., Kim, E. J., & Reeve, J. (2016). Why students become more engaged or more disengaged during the semester: A self-determination theory dual-process model. Learning and Instruction, 43, 27–38.
• Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 588–600.
• Jones, R., Armour, K., & Potrac, P. (2004). Sports coaching cultures: From practice to theory. London, UK: Routledge.
• Karadeniz, Ö. (2019). Öğretmen desteğinin risk grubundaki öğrencilerin davranışlarına etkisi. Bilim Armonisi, 2(1), 59-71.
• Karasar, N. (2014). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi. (26.baskı). Ankara Nobel Yayınevi.
• Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.
• Kutsal, D. ve Bilge, F. (2012). Lise öğrencilerinin tükenmişlik ve sosyal destek düzeyleri. Eğitim ve Bilim, 37(164), 283-297.
• Lam, S., Jimerson, S., Kikas, E., Cefai, C., Veiga, F. H., Nelson, B., & Zollneritsch, J. (2012). Do girls and boys perceive themselves as equally engaged in school? The results of an international study from 12 countries. Journal of School Psychology, 50(1), 77- 94.
• Legault, L., Green-Demers, I., & Pelletier, L. (2006). Why do high school students lack motivation in the classroom? Toward an understanding of academic amotivation and the role of social support. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 567–582.
• Leo, F. M., Mouratidis, A., Pulido, J. J., López-Gajardo, M. A., & Sánchez-Oliva, D. (2022). Perceived teachers’ behavior and students’ engagement in physical education: The mediating role of basic psychological needs and self-determined motivation. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 27(1), 59-76.
• Lonsdale, C., Sabiston, C. M., Raedeke, T. D., Ha, A. S., & Sum, R. K. (2009). Self-determined motivation and students’ physical activity during structured physical education lessons and free choice periods. Preventive Medicine, 48(1), 69–73.
• Lüftenegger, M., van de Schoot, R., Schober, B., Finsterwald, M., & Spiel, C. (2014). Promotion of students’ mastery goal orientations: Does TARGET work? Educational Psychology, 34, 451–469.
• Mageau, G., Ranger, F., Joussemet, M., Koestner, R., Moreau, E., & Forest, J. (2015). Validation of the perceived parental autonomy support scale (P-PASS). Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 47, 251–262.
• Maulana, R., Helms-Lorenz, M., Irnidayanti, Y., & van de Grift, W. (2016). Autonomous motivation in the Indonesian classroom: Relationship with teacher support through the lens of self-determination theory. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(3), 441-451.
• Maurer, T. W., Allen, D., Gatch, D. B., Shankar, P., & Sturges, D. (2013). Students' academic motivations in three disciplines. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 13(5), 77–89.
• Mouratidis, A. A., Vansteenkiste, M., Sideridis, G., & Lens, W. (2011). Vitality and interest-enjoyment as a function of class-to-class variation in need-supportive teaching and pupils’ autonomous motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(2), 353–366.
• Murdock, T. B. (1999). The social context of risk: Status and motivational predictors of alienation in middle school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 62–75.
• Nicholls, J. G., & Nolen, S. B. (1995). Big science, little teachers: Knowledge and motives concerning student motivation. In J. G. Nicholls & T. A. Thorkildsen (Eds.), Reasons for learning (pp. 5–20). New York: Teachers College Press.
• Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7, 133–144.
• Oga-Baldwin, W. L. Q., & Nakata, Y. (2017). Engagement, gender, and motivation: A predictive model for Japanese young language learners. System, 65, 151–163.
• Patrick, B. C., Skinner, E. A., & Connell, J. P. (1993). What motivates children’s behavior and emotion? Joint effects of perceived control and autonomy in the academic domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 781–791.
• Pianta, R. C. (1999). Enhancing relationships between children and teachers. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
• Pitzer, J., & Skinner, E. (2017). Predictors of changes in students’ motivational resilience over the school year: The roles of teacher support, self-appraisals, and emotional reactivity. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 41(1), 15-29.
• Pomerantz, E. M., Cheung, C.S., & Qin, L. (2012). Relatedness between children and parents: Implications for motivation. In R. M. Ryan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 579–349). NewYork, NY: Oxford University Press.
• Reeve, J. (2006). Teachers as facilitators: What autonomy-supportive teachers do and why their students benefit. The Elementary School Journal, 106(3), 225–236.
• Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Barch, J., & Jeon, S. (2004). Enhancing high school students’ engagement by increasing their teachers’ autonomy support. Motivation and Emotion, 28(2), 147-169.
• Rocchi, M. A., Pelletier, L. G., & Couture, A. L. (2013). Determinants of coach motivation and autonomy supportive coaching behaviours. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 14(6), 852-859.
• Rocchi, M., & Pelletier, L. G. (2017). The antecedents of coaches’ interpersonal behaviors: The role of the coaching context, coaches’ psychological needs, and coaches’ motivation. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 39(5), 366–378.
• Rocchi, M., Pelletier, L., & Desmarais, P. (2016). The validity of the Interpersonal Behaviors Questionnaire (IBQ) in sport. Measurement İn Physical Education and Exercise Science, 21(1), 15-25.
• Rocchi, M., Pelletier, L., Cheung, S., Baxter, D., & Beaudry, S. (2017). Assessing need-supportive and need-thwarting interpersonal behaviours: The Interpersonal Behaviours Questionnaire (IBQ). Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 423–433.
• Roeser, R. W., Eccles, J. S., & Sameroff, A. J. (2000). School as a context of early adolescents' academic and social-emotional development: a summary of research findings. The Elementary School Journal, 100(5), 443-471.
• Roeser, R.W., Eccles, J.S. & Sameroff, A.J. (1998). Academic and emotional functioning in early adolescence: Longitudinal relations, patterns, and prediction by experience in middle school. Development and Psychopathology, 10, 321–352.
• Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M. Y., Spilt, J. L., & Oort, F. J. (2011). The influence of affective teacher–student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic approach. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 493– 529.
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141-166.
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2011). A self-determination theory perspective on social, institutional, cultural, and economic supports for autonomy and their importance for well-being. Chirkov V., Ryan R., Sheldon K. (Eds.). In human autonomy in cross-cultural context (pp. 45-64). Springer.
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York: Guilford Press.
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
• Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2016). Autonomy and autonomy disturbances in self-development and psychopathology: Research on motivation, attachment, and clinical process. In D. Cicchetti (Ed.), Developmental psychopathology: Vol. 1. Theory and method (3rd ed., pp. 385–438). New York: Wiley.
• Ryan, R. M., Stiller, J. D., & Lynch, J. H. (1994). Representations of relationships to teachers, parents, and friends as predictors of academic motivation and self-esteem. Journal of Early Adolescence, 14, 226–249.
• Sakiz, G., Pape, S. J., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2012). Does perceived teacher affective support matter for middle school students in mathematics classrooms? Journal of School Psychology, 50, 235–255.
• Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., and Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74.
• Seçer, İ. (2015). Psikolojik test geliştirme ve uyarlama süreci: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları. Ankara: Anı Yay.
• Shahar, G., Henrich, C. C., Blatt, S. J., Ryan, R., & Little, T. D. (2003). Interpersonal relatedness, self-definition, and their motivational orientation during adolescence: A theoretical and empirical integration. Developmental Psychology, 39, 470-483.
• Sheldon, K., & Filak, V. (2008). Manipulating autonomy, competence and relatedness support in a game-learning context: New evidence that all three needs matter. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 257–283.
• Smith, G., & Campbell, F. (1980). A critique of some ridge regression methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 75(3), 74–103.
• Stroet, K., Opdenakker, M. C., & Minnaert, A. (2013). Effects of need supportive teaching on early adolescents’ motivation and engagement: A review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 9, 65–87.
• Stroet, K., Opdenakker, M.-C., & Minnaert, A. (2015). What motivates early adolescents for school? A longitudinal analysis of associations between observed teaching and motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42, 129–140.
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). New York: Allyn and Bacon.
• Tavşancıl, E. (2014). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi. (5. Basım). Ankara: Nobel Akademi Yay.
• Taylor, G., Jungert, T., Mageau, G. A., Schattke, K., Dedic, H., Rosenfield, S., & Koestner, R. (2014). A self-determination theory approach to predicting school achievement over time: The unique role of intrinsic motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39, 342–358.
• Tezbaşaran, A. (1997). Likert tipi ölçek geliştirme kılavuzu. Ankara: Türk Psikologlar Derneği.
• Turner, J. C., Christensen, A., Kackar-Cam, H., Trucano, M., & Fulmer, S. (2014). Enhancing student engagement: Report of a three-year intervention with middle school teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 51(6), 1195–1226.
• Urdan, T., & Schoenfelder, E. (2006). Classroom effects on student motivation: Goal structures, social relationships, and competence beliefs. Journal of Psychology, 44, 331–349.
• Vallerand, R. (2001). A hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in sport and exercise. In G. C. Roberts (Ed.), Advances in motivation in sport and exercise (pp. 263–319). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
• Vasconcellos, D., Parker, P. D., Hilland, T., Cinelli, R., Owen, K. B., Kapsal, N., Lee, J., Antczak, D., Ntoumanis, N., Ryan, R. M., & Lonsdale, C. (2020). Self-Determination Theory applied to physical education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(7), 1444-1469.
• Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2012). Structural equation modeling: Applications using Mplus. John Wiley.
• Wang, M. T., & Eccles, J. S. (2012). Social support matters: Longitudinal effects of social support on three dimensions of school engagement from middle to high school. Child Development, 83(3), 877–895.
• Wang, M. T., & Holcombe, R. (2010). Adolescents’ perceptions of school environment, engagement, and academic achievement in middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 47(3), 633-662.
• Wentzel, K. R. (1997). Student motivation in middle school: The role of perceived pedagogical caring. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 411–419.
• Wentzel, K. R., & Battle, A. A. (2001). School relationships and school adjustment. In T. Urdan & F. Pajares (Eds.), Adolescence and education: General issues in the education of adolescence (pp. 93–118). Information Age.
• Wentzel, K. R., Muenks, K., McNeish, D., & Russell, S. (2017). Peer and teacher supports in relation to motivation and effort: A multi-level study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49, 32–45.
• Williams, N., Whipp, P., Jackson, B., & Dimmock, J. (2013). Relatedness support and the retention of young female golfers. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 25, 412–430.
• Yıldız, M. ve Şenel, E. (2018). Sporda kişiler arası davranışlar ölçeği (SKD) Türkçe formunun geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Gazi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 23(4), 219-231.
• Yu, C., Li, X., Wang, S., & Zhang, W. (2016). Teacher autonomy support reduces adolescent anxiety and depression: An 18-month longitudinal study. Journal of Adolescence, 49, 115–123.