The Problem of Overcoming Ortientalism in Phenomenology of Religion of W. Cantwell Smith

Öz

We focuses on three basic problems in this article. Firstly, we are interested in Smith’s phenomenology which has criticized classical orientalism. According to this, Smith attributes a destroying purpose relating orientalism and essentialism to phenomenology of religion. Smith opposes to pozitivistic and historicisist reductionism built by orientalism. He asserts that orientalist conception isolated religious texts from personal dimension by reifying them. Smith tries to build a pluralistic structure instead dualistic structure of orientalism. The second problem relates with developing a hermeneutical conception of Quran beyond western researchers’ orientalist perspective on Quran. Smith opposes to orientalists who don’t accept Quran as scripture and some historicist conception relating to Quran. Early orientalism’s false convictions on Quran bases on their distorded conception on religion, language and history. It is vital to understand hermeneutically concept of historicity in order to avoid such a orientalism. Third problem relates with understanding religion by emphatetic interpolation called insider’s perspective instead orientalist definition. Smith tries to establish a dialogue between orientalist perspective and believer connected with religion and avoids from a monological orientalism.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Orientalism, religious studies, identity, Quran

W. Cantwell Smith’in Din Fenomenolojisinde Oryantalizmi Aşma Sorunu

Öz

Bu makalede üç temel problem üzerine odaklanmaktayız. İlk olarak, klasik oryantalizmi tenkit eden Smith’in fenomenolojisiyle ilgilenmekteyiz. Buna göre, Smith din fenomenolojisine oryantalizm ve özselciliğe ilişkin yıkıcı bir amaç atfeder. Smith, oryantalizm tarafından inşa edilen pozitivist ve tarihselci indirgemeciliğe karşı çıkar. Oryantalist anlayışın dini metinleri şeyleştirerek, onları personel boyuttan yalıttığını iddia eder. Smith oryantalizmin düalist yapısı yerine çoğulcu bir yapı inşa etmeye çalışır. İkinci problem, Kuran hakkında batılı araştırmacıların oryantalist perspektifinin ötesinde Kuran’ın hermenötik bir anlayışını geliştirmekle ilgilidir. Smith Kuranı kutsal bir kitap olarak kabul etmeyen oryantalistlere ve Kurana ilişkin tarihselci bir anlayışa karşı çıkar. Kuran hakkında erken dönem oryantalizminin yanlış kanaatleri, din, dil ve tarih hakkında onların çarpık anlayışına dayanır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• oryantalizm, dini araştırmalar, kimlik, Kuran

Kaynakça

1. Baird, Robert , Category Formation and the History of Religions, Paris: The Hague, 1971
2. Cox, James, From Primitive to Indigenous: The Academy Study of Indigenous Religions, London: Ashgate, 2007
3. Davaney, Sheila Greeve, “Between Identity and Footnotes”, Identity and the Politics of Scholarship in the Study of Religion, ed. Sheila Greeve Davaney and José Ignacio Cabezón, London: Routledge, 2004
4. Fazlurrahman, İslam, Ankara: Selçuk Yayınları, 1996
5. Fitzgerald, Timothy, The Ideology of Religious Studies, New York: Oxford University Press, 2000
6. Gualtieri, Antonio R., “Hermeneutics of the Old&New Orientalism”, The Contemporary Study of The Arab World, ed. E. Sullivan and J. Ismael, Edmonton: The University of Alberta Press
7. King Richard, Orientalism and Religion, London: Routledge, 2001
8. ____“Orientalism and the Study of Religions”, The Routledge Companion to the Study of Religion, ed. John R. Hinnells, London: Routledge, 2005

9. Kuşcu, Emir, Dinleri Anlamada Fenomenolojik Yöntem Sorunu: W. Cantwell Smith Örneği, Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Basılmamış Doktora Tezi, 2010
10. Madigan, Daniel A., Quran’s Self-İmage, New Jersey: Princeton University Press
11. Oxtoby, Willard Gurdon , “Religionswissenschaft Revisited”, Religions in Antiquity, ed. Jacob Neusner, Leiden Brill, 1970
12. Rodrigues, Hillary and John S. Harding, Introduction to the Study of Religion, London: Routledge, 2009.
13. Said, Edward, Oryantalizm, İstanbul: İrfan, 1998
14. Segal, Robert, “Categorizing Religion”, Perspecties on Method and Theory in the Study of Religion, ed. Armin Geertz and Russell McCutcheon, Boston: Brill, 2000
15. Smart, Ninian, Dimensions of The Sacred, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996
16. Smith, W. Cantwell, Believing-A Historical Perspective, Oxford: Oneworld, 1998
17. ____, The Faith of Other Men, New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1972
18. ____, What is Scripture, London: SCM Press, 1993
19. ____, “Comparative Religion: Whither and Why”, Essays in Methodology, ed. M. Eliade and J. Kitagawa, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1959.