GENÇ FUTBOLCULARIN PROSOSYAL VE ANTİSOSYAL DAVRANIŞLARININ İNCELENMESİ

Yıl 2018, , 102 - 109, 05.08.2018

Serdar Alemdağ

https://doi.org/10.17155/omuspd.394766

Cited By: 3

Öz

Araştırmanın amacı, genç futbolcuların prososyal ve antisosyal
davranışlarını bazı değişkenlere göre incelemektir. Araştırmanın örneklem
grubu, Trabzon ilindeki amatör takımlarda futbol oynayan ve yaşları 12 ile 17 arasında
değişen toplam 225 futbolcudan oluşmaktadır. Araştırmada veriler sporda
prososyal ve antisosyal davranış ölçeği kullanılarak elde edilmiştir. Verilerin
analizinde, tanımlayıcı istatistikler, t testi ve çok değişkenli istatistik
olan MANOVA kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın sonucunda, genç futbolcuların
prososyal davranışlarının yüksek, antisosyal davranışlarının ise düşük olduğu
görülmüştür. Bunun yanında futbol oynama yılı arttıkça prososyal davranış
eğiliminin arttığı antisosyal davranış eğiliminin ise azaldığı bir diğer sonuç
olarak karşımıza çıkmaktadır (p<0,05). Sonuçların bu şekilde olması, altyapılar
seviyesinde futbolun kitleleri eğlendiren, heyecanlandıran ve fair play
çerçevesinde görsel bir şölen olma özelliğinin benimsenmiş olduğunu
göstermektedir. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

takım sporları, Davranış, spor ahlakı

INVESTIGATION OF PROSOCIAL AND ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIOR OF YOUNG SOCCER PLAYERS

Öz

The aim of the research is to examine the
prosocial and antisocial behavior of young soccer players according to some
variables. The sample group of the study consisted of a total of 225 football players
aged between 12 and 17 who played soccer in the infrastructure of amateur teams
in Trabzon province. Prosocial and antisocial behavior scale in sport was used
as data collection tool in the research. In the analysis of the data,
descriptive statistics, t test and MANOVA, which is a multivariate statistic,
were used. As a result of the research, it was seen that young footballers had
high prosocial behaviors and low antisocial behaviors. In addition, as the
years of playing football increases, the tendency of prosocial behavior
increases and the tendency of antisocial behavior decreases (p<0.05). These
result show that the features of soccer as entertaining and exciting masses at
the level of infrastructure and as being a visual feast within the context of
fair play have been adopted.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Behavior, team sports, sport morality

Kaynakça

• 1. Shields DL, Funk CD, Light Bredemeier B. Relationships among moral and contesting variables and prosocial and antisocial behavior in sport. J Moral Educ [Internet]. 2018;47(1):17–33. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2017.1350149
• 2. Kavussanu M. morality in sport. S. Jowette & D. Lavallee, editor. Human Kinetics; 2007. 265-277 p.
• 3. Kavussanu M. Motivational predictors of prosocial and antisocial behaviour in football. J Sports Sci. 2006;24(6):575–88.
• 4. Bredemeier BJ, Shields DL. Athletic Aggression : An Issue of Contextual Morality. Sociol Sport. 1986;3:15–28.
• 5. Bredemeier, B. J. & Shields DL. Moral Growth Among Athletes and Nonathletes: A Comparative Analysis. J Genet Psychol. 1986;147(1):7–18.
• 6. Bredemeier BJ. Moral reasoning and the perceived legitimacy of intentionally injurious sport acts. J Sport Psychol. 1985;7:110–24.
• 7. Duda JL, Olson LK, Templin TJ. Attitudes and the Perceived Legitimacy of Injurious Acts. 1991;62(1):79–87.
• 8. Vallerand RJ, Deshaies P, Cuerrier J-P, Pelletier LG, et al. Ajzen and Fishbein’s theory of reasoned action as applied to moral behavior: A confirmatory analysis. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1992;62(1):98–109.
• 9. Kavussanu, M. & Roberts GC. Moral Functioning in Sport:An Achievement Goal Perspective. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2001;23:34–57.
• 10. Light Bredemeier BJ. Children’s moral reasoning and their assertive, aggressive, and submissive tendencies in sport and daily life. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 1994;16:1–14.
• 11. Stephens DE, Light Bredemeier BJ. Moral atmosphere and judgments about aggression in girls’ soccer: Relationships among moral and motivational variables. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 1996;18:158–73.
• 12. Kavussanu M. Moral behaviour in sport: a critical review of the literature. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol. 2008;1(2):124–38.
• 13. Eisenberg, N. & Fabes EA. The Roots of Prosocial Behavior in Children. In: Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK.; 1998.
• 14. Kavussanu M, Boardley ID. The Prosocial and Antisocial Behavior in Sport Scale. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2009;31(1):97–117.
• 15. Kavussanu M, Seal AR, Phillips DR. Observed prosocial and antisocial behaviors in male soccer teams: Age differences across adolescence and the role of motivational variables. J Appl Sport Psychol. 2006;18(4):326–44.
• 16. Al-Yaaribi A, Kavussanu M. Teammate Prosocial and Antisocial Behaviors Predict Task Cohesion and Burnout: The Mediating Role of Affect. J Sport Exerc Psychol [Internet]. 2017;39(3):199–208. Available from: http://journals.humankinetics.com/doi/10.1123/jsep.2016-0336
• 17. Kavussanu M, Ring C, Kavanagh J. Antisocial behavior, moral disengagement, empathy and negative emotion: A comparison between disabled and able-bodied athletes. Ethics Behav. 2014;25(4):297–306.
• 18. Kavussanu M, Stanger N, Boardley ID. The prosocial and antisocial behaviour in sport scale: Further evidence for construct validity and reliability. J Sports Sci. 2013;31(11):1208–21.
• 19. Hodge K, Gucciardi DF. Antisocial and Prosocial Behavior in Sport: The Role of Motivational Climate, Basic Psychological Needs, and Moral Disengagement. J Sport Exerc Psychol [Internet]. 2015;37(3):257–73. Available from: http://journals.humankinetics.com/doi/10.1123/jsep.2014-0225
• 20. Balçikanli GS, Yildiran İ. Elit Salon Hokeyi Oyuncularında Empatik Beceri ile Prososyal Davranışlar Arasındaki İlişki. 2018;23(1):1–8.
• 21. Bandura A. social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. Gewirtz WMK& JL, editor. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.; 1991. Vol 1, pp. 71-129.
• 22. Staub E. Personality and Social Psychology Review Moral Disengagement in the Perpetration of Inhumanities. Personal Soc Psychol Rev. 1999;3(3):179–92.
• 23. Al-Yaaribi A, Kavussanu M, Ring C. Consequences of prosocial and antisocial behavior for the recipient. Psychol Sport Exerc [Internet]. 2016;26:102–12. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2016.06.012
• 24. Shields DL, Funk CD, Bredemeier BL. Relationships among moral and contesting variables and prosocial and antisocial behavior in sport. J Moral Educ. 2017;47(1):1–17.
• 25. Bruner MW, Boardley ID, CÔté J. Social identity and prosocial and antisocial behavior in youth sport. Psychol Sport Exerc [Internet]. 2014;15(1):56–64. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.09.003
• 26. Balcikanli GS. The Turkish Adaptation of the Prosocial and Antisocial Behavior in Sport Scale (PABSS). Int J Humanit Soc Sci. 2013;3(18):271–6.