The Methodological Foundations of Post Keynesian Economics

Yıl 2020, , 147 - 160, 15.01.2020

Ethem Esen , Kemal Yıldırım

https://doi.org/10.17541/optimum.599265

Öz

Post Keynesian view, which has emerged as a new approach to the economy, evolves as an alternative approach to the economic policies of Orthodox economic thought. However, with its evolving methodological and comprehensive structure, it continues to develop as an original positive school of thought. Post Keynesian economics deals with real economic problems in the world where uncertainty prevails while analyzing the economy. Thus, Post Keynesians try to explain how the economy works and how it should operate. Post Keynesians express the importance of historical time and expectations in this process in which uncertainty prevails. In this study, the fundamental propositions and methodological structure of Post Keynesian economics, which are not known in the literature, will be explained. In doing so, the methodological structure of Post Keynesian economics will be compared with the methodological structure of the neoclassical economics.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Post Keynesian Economics, Methodology, Critical Realism, Non-ergodic System

Post Keynesyen Ekonominin Metodolojik Temelleri

Öz

Ekonomiye yeni bir yaklaşım olarak ortaya çıkan Post Keynesyen görüş, Ortodoks ekonomi düşüncesinin ortaya koyduğu ekonomi politikalarına karşı alternatif bir yaklaşım olarak gelişmektedir. Bununla birlikte, gelişen metodolojik yapısıyla özgün bir pozitif düşünce okulu olarak gelişimini sürdürmeye devam etmektedir. Post Keynesyen ekonomi, ekonomiyi analiz ederken belirsizliğin hâkim olduğu dünyada gerçek ekonomik sorunlarla ilgilenmektedir. Böylece Post Keynesyenler, ekonominin nasıl işlediğini ve nasıl işlemesi gerektiğini açıklamaya çalışmaktadırlar. Post Keynesyenler belirsizliğin hâkim olduğu bu süreçte tarihsel zamanın ve beklentilerin son derece önemli olduğunu ifade etmektedir. Bu çalışmada, ekonomi literatürde tam olarak bilinmeyen Post Keynesyen ekonominin temel önermeleri ve metodolojik yapısı açıklanacaktır. Bunu yaparken de Post Keynesyen ekonominin metodolojik yapısı Neo-klasik ekonominin metodolojik yapısıyla karşılaştırılarak ortaya konulacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Post Keynesyen Ekonomi, Metodoloji, Eleştirisel Realizm, Ergodik Olmayan Sistem

Kaynakça

• Arestis, P. (1992). The Post-Keynesian approach to economics: an alternative analysis of economic theory and policy. Aldershot: Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Arestis, P. (1997). Money, pricing, distribution and economic ıntegration. London: Macmillan Press.
• Ayata, S. (1987). Kapitalizm ve küçük üreticilik: Türkiye’deki halı dokumacılığı. Ankara: Yurt Yayınları.
• Brown, A. (2003). Critical realism. In J. E. King (Eds.), The Elgar companion to Post Keynesian economics. Edward Cheltenham: Elgar Publishing.
• Carabelli, A. M. & Cedrini, M. A. (2017). Keynes against Kalecki on economic method. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Vol. 40, No. 3.
• Davidson, P. (1980). Post Keynesian economics: solving the crisis in economic theory. The Public Interest, Special Edition.
• Davidson, P. (1994). Post Keynesian macroeconomic theory: a foundation for successful economic policies for the twenty-first century. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Davidson, P. (2003). Setting the record straight on a history of Post Keynesian economics. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Vol. 26, No. 2.
• Dow, S. (1991). The Post-Keynesian school. In D. Mair & A. G. Miller (Eds.). Edward Elgar, A modern guide to macroeconomic thought, Aldershot: Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Dow, S. (2001). The Post Keynesian methodology. In R. Holt & S. Pressman (Eds.), A new guide to Post Keynesian economics, London: Routledge.
• Downward, P. (1999). Pricing theory in Post Keynesian economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
• Downward, P. (2003). Econometrics. In J. E. King (Eds.), The Elgar companion to Post Keynesian economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
• Drakopoulos, S. A. (1999). Post-Keynesian choice theory. In P. A. O’Hara (Eds.), Encyclopedia of political economy, Vol. 2, London: Routledge.
• Gerrard, B. (1996). Competing schools of thought in macroeconomics-an ever-emerging consensus. Journal of Economic Studies, Vol. 23, No. 1.
• Hart, N. & Kriesler, P. (2014). Keynes, Kalecki, Sraffa: coherence?. Australian School of Business Research Paper, No. 2014 ECON 06.
• Hart, N. & Kriesler, P. (2015). Post-Keynesian economics: A user’s guide. The Australian Economic Review, Vol. 48, No: 3.
• King, J. E. (2002). A history of Post Keynesian economics Since 1936. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
• King, J. E. (2013). A brief introduction to Post Keynesian macroeconomics. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, 39. Jahrgang, Heft 4.
• Lavoie, M. (1992). Foundations of Post-Keynesian economic analysis. Aldershot: Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Lawson, T. (1997). Economics and reality. London: Routledge Publishing.
• Robinson, J. (1962). Essays in the theory of economic growth. London: Macmillan.
• Setterfield, M. (1995). Historical time and economic theory. Review of Political Economy, 7(1).
• Seyidoğlu, H. (1999). İngilizce-Türkçe ekonomi ve işletmecilik terimleri açıklamalı sözlük. İstanbul: Güzem Can Yayınları.