Derleme

Olumlu ve Olumsuz Manası ile Siyasal Katılım Türlerinin İncelenmesi

Cilt: 10 Sayı: 17 31 Mart 2019
PDF İndir
EN TR

Analysis of Political Participation Types With Positive And Negative Meaning

Abstract

In every political regime, individuals have a place in the state and society as well as in politics. In particular, the reason for the existence of democratic regimes is that each individual can have a say in the administration of the country in which they live. In this context, democracies aim to push all individuals towards the political sphere. This creates willing or unintentional political participation. Political participation is a very critical concept for today's political science. Because political participation is the most fundamental element of the quality of today's democracy. The functioning of democracy in a country can be measured by the health of participation. As a matter of fact, quality rather than quantity is important. Because participation does not create a positive process with every sense. As a matter of fact, a country's internalization of democracy is directly proportional to the positive dimensions of political participation. In this study, firstly, the concept of political participation was discussed and then the type of political participation was tried to be determined and this study was evaluated with its positive and negative dimensions. It has also tried to provide information on how these situations is encountered in particular Turkey.

Keywords

Democracy,Political Participation,Klientalism,Tokenism,Depolitization,Participation in Turkish Democracy

Kaynakça

  1. Aydın, A. ve Belli, A. (2015). Cumhurbaşkanlığı ve Meşruiyet Tartışmaları, Türkiye’de seçim sistemindeki değişim cumhurbaşkanlığı seçi-mi ve medya iletişim ve siyaset odaklı incelemeler, (Ed.: Faruk Temel ve Onur Önürmen), Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi, s. 87-102.
  2. Belli, A. ve Aydın, A. (2012). Yerel demokrasi ve katılım: kahramanmaraş ve Hatay illerinin karşılaştırılması.II. Bölgesel Sorunlar Ve Türkiye Sempozyumu.
  3. Belli, A. (2016). Türkiye'de kent konseylerinin işlevselliği önündeki sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri: Büyükşehir belediyeleri örneği. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi, Kahramanmaraş.
  4. Bravo, H. (2006). Yöneten-yönetilen ilişkisi/ çelişkisi. Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 1, 123-144.
  5. Brodie, E., Cowling, E.,Nissen, N., P., Angela E., Jochum, V. ve Warburton, D. (2009). Understanding Participation: A Literature Review, http://pathwaysthroughparticipation.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/ 2009/09/Pathways-literature-review-final-version.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 08.011.2018).
  6. Çukurçayır, M. A. (2012). Siyasal katılma ve yerel demokrasi. Konya: Çizgi Kitabevi.
  7. Dahl, R. A. (2001). Demokrasi üzerine, (Çev.: Betül Kadıoğlu), Ankara: Phoenix Yayınevi.
  8. Daver, B. (1993). Siyaset bilimine giriş. Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi.
  9. Dursun, D. (2010). Siyaset bilimi. İstanbul: Beta Yayınları.
  10. Higgs, G., Berry, R., Kidner D., Langford, M. (2008). Using IT ap-proaches to promote public participation in renewable energy planning: Prospects and challenges. Land Use Policy, 25(4), 596–607.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Aydın, A. (2019). Olumlu ve Olumsuz Manası ile Siyasal Katılım Türlerinin İncelenmesi. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 10(17), 2119-2138. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.509050

Cited By