Analysis of Political Participation Types With Positive And Negative Meaning
Abstract
In every political
regime, individuals have a place in the state and society as well as in
politics. In particular, the reason for the existence of democratic regimes is
that each individual can have a say in the administration of the country in
which they live. In this context, democracies aim to push all individuals
towards the political sphere. This creates willing or unintentional political
participation. Political participation is a very critical concept for today's
political science. Because political participation is the most fundamental
element of the quality of today's democracy. The functioning of democracy in a country
can be measured by the health of participation. As a matter of fact, quality
rather than quantity is important. Because participation does not create a
positive process with every sense. As a matter of fact, a country's
internalization of democracy is directly proportional to the positive
dimensions of political participation. In this study, firstly, the concept of
political participation was discussed and then the type of political
participation was tried to be determined and this study was evaluated with its
positive and negative dimensions. It has also tried to provide information on
how these situations is encountered in particular Turkey.
Keywords
Kaynakça
- Aydın, A. ve Belli, A. (2015). Cumhurbaşkanlığı ve Meşruiyet Tartışmaları, Türkiye’de seçim sistemindeki değişim cumhurbaşkanlığı seçi-mi ve medya iletişim ve siyaset odaklı incelemeler, (Ed.: Faruk Temel ve Onur Önürmen), Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi, s. 87-102.
- Belli, A. ve Aydın, A. (2012). Yerel demokrasi ve katılım: kahramanmaraş ve Hatay illerinin karşılaştırılması.II. Bölgesel Sorunlar Ve Türkiye Sempozyumu.
- Belli, A. (2016). Türkiye'de kent konseylerinin işlevselliği önündeki sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri: Büyükşehir belediyeleri örneği. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi, Kahramanmaraş.
- Bravo, H. (2006). Yöneten-yönetilen ilişkisi/ çelişkisi. Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 1, 123-144.
- Brodie, E., Cowling, E.,Nissen, N., P., Angela E., Jochum, V. ve Warburton, D. (2009). Understanding Participation: A Literature Review, http://pathwaysthroughparticipation.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/ 2009/09/Pathways-literature-review-final-version.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 08.011.2018).
- Çukurçayır, M. A. (2012). Siyasal katılma ve yerel demokrasi. Konya: Çizgi Kitabevi.
- Dahl, R. A. (2001). Demokrasi üzerine, (Çev.: Betül Kadıoğlu), Ankara: Phoenix Yayınevi.
- Daver, B. (1993). Siyaset bilimine giriş. Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi.
- Dursun, D. (2010). Siyaset bilimi. İstanbul: Beta Yayınları.
- Higgs, G., Berry, R., Kidner D., Langford, M. (2008). Using IT ap-proaches to promote public participation in renewable energy planning: Prospects and challenges. Land Use Policy, 25(4), 596–607.