Investigation of the Relationships Between the Entrepreneurship Characteristics and Teacher Self-Efficiencies of Teacher Candidates: The Case of Gaziantep University

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 19, 706 - 727, 30.09.2019

İbrahim Halil Korkmaz , Arif Çerçi , Kadir Kaan Büyükikiz

https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.593504

Cited By: 3

Öz

This study was carried out to determine the relationships and differences between teacher self-efficacy and teacher entrepreneurship characteristics of teacher candidates who are studying at Education Faculties. For the purpose of the study, data were collected from the students of two different faculties of education affiliated with Gaziantep University. Correlation analysis performed on the data set showed that there was a positive and statistically significant relationship between teacher candidates' entrepreneurial tendencies and teacher self-efficacy. In addition, the t-test revealed that there were significant differences between the students of Gaziantep Faculty of Education and Nizip Faculty of Education with respect to both entrepreneurship and teacher self-efficacy levels. It was found that the t-test on the gender variable of the prospective teachers differed significantly in terms of entrepreneurial characteristics and teacher self-efficacy in terms of statistically significant difference between men and women. Psychological Counseling and Guidance, Classroom, Social Studies, Mathematics, Turkish and English Language Teaching Departments, which are part of the study, were statistically differentiated statistically in terms of entrepreneurship and teacher self-efficacy. It is possible to think that the motives that improve teacher trainees' entrepreneurship characteristics and the motives that elevate their teacher self-efficacy are the same or similar. This should be considered in the context of curriculum and syllabus design given in the faculties of education of teachers. Thus, it will be possible to educate individuals who are both better trained professionally and who can respond to the needs of the era at a higher level.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Entrepreneurship, Self-efficacy, Teacher, Education, Student

Öğretmen Adaylarının Girişimcilik Özellikleriyle Öğretmen Öz-yeterlikleri Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi: Gaziantep Üniversitesi Örneği

Öz

Bu çalışma, Eğitim Fakültelerinde okuyan öğretmen adaylarının öğretmen öz-yeterlik ve öğretmen girişimcilik özellikleri arasındaki ilişki ve farklılıkları belirlemek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Araştırma kapsamında veriler, Gaziantep Üniversitesine bağlı iki farklı eğitim fakültesinde öğrenim gören öğretmen adaylarından toplanmıştır. Veri seti üzerinde yapılan korelasyon analizi, öğretmen adaylarının girişimcilik eğilimleri ile öğretmen öz-yeterliği arasında pozitif ve istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki olduğunu göstermiştir. Buna ek olarak t-testi, Gaziantep Eğitim Fakültesi ve Nizip Eğitim Fakültesi öğrencileri arasında hem girişimcilik hem de öğretmen öz-yeterlik düzeyleri açısından anlamlı farklılıklar olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Öğretmen adaylarının cinsiyet değişkeni bakımından girişimcilik özellikleri ve öğretmen öz-yeterlikleri arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık olduğu bulunmuştur. Araştırmanın örneklemini oluşturan Rehberlik ve Psikolojik Danışmanlık, Sınıf, Sosyal Bilgiler, Matematik, Türkçe ve İngilizce Öğretmenliği Bölümleri, girişimcilik ve öğretmen öz-yeterliği açısından istatistiksel olarak ayrıştırılmıştır. Araştırmadan elde edilen sonuçlardan hareketle öğretmen adaylarının girişimcilik özelliklerini ve motivasyonlarını arttıran güdülerinin aynı veya benzer olduğunu söylemek mümkündür. Bu durum, öğretmenlerin eğitim fakültelerinde verilen müfredat ve müfredat tasarımı bağlamında ele alınabilir. Böylelikle hem profesyonel olarak daha iyi eğitilmiş hem de çağın ihtiyaçlarına daha yüksek düzeyde cevap verebilen bireyler yetiştirmek mümkün olacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Girişimcilik, Öz-yeterlik, Öğretmen, Eğitim, Öğrenci

Kaynakça

• Akar, H. and Aydın, S. (2015). The predictive level of social entrepreneurship characteristics of the personality traits of preservice teachers. The Journal of Academic Social Science,3(12), 425-436.
• Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American psychologist, 37(2), 122-147.
• Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 21-41.
• Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Psychology, 3(3), 265-299.
• Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G.V. and Pastorelli, C. (2001). Self-efficacy beliefs as shapers of children’s aspirations and career trajectories. Child Development, 72(1), 187-206.
• Barr, J.S. (2000). A comparison of the perceptions of entrepreneurial traits by program and gender among secondary at-risk, vocational, and college-preparatory students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Faculty of the Graduate School University of Missouri-Columbia, USA.
• Bellingham, L., Dhaliwal, H., Matlay and etc. (2012). Enterprise and entrepreneurship education: Guidance for UK higher education providers. Available at: http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/26741 (accessed 3 August2015).
• Bozkurt, Ö.Ç. (2011). Dünyada ve Türkiye’de girişimcilik eğitimi: Başarılı girişimciler ve öğretim üyelerinden öneriler. Ankara: Detay yayıncılık.
• Çapa, Y., Çakıroğlu J. ve Sarıkaya, H. (2005). Öğretmen özyeterlik ölçeği Türkçe uyarlamasının geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Eğitim ve Bilim, 30(137), 74-81.
• Çetin, Ş., Şahin, Ç., Mertol, H., Arcagök, S. and Girgin, D. (2017). A Comparison of entrepreneurial skills of fourth-grade gifted and normal student’s in social studies. Turkish Journal of Giftedness and Education, 7(2), 110-125.
• Chell, E., & Baines, S. (2000). Networking, entrepreneurship and microbusiness behaviour. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 12(3), 195-215.
• Deveci, İ. (2016). Fen bilimleri öğretim programıyla (5-8) bütünleştirilmiş girişimcilik eğitimi modüllerinin geliştirilmesi, uygulanması ve değerlendirilmesi.Yayınlanmamış DoktoraTezi, Uludag Universitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Bursa.
• Deveci, İ., and Aydın, F. (2017). Multiple intelligence as a predictor of the entrepreneurial characteristics of prospective science teachers. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 18(3), 175-188. DOI: 10.17679/inuefd.335888
• Deveci, İ., and Çepni, S. (2015). Öğretmen adaylarına yönelik girişimcilik ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. International Journal of Human Sciences, 12(2), 92-112.
• Duchesneau, D.A., and Gartner, W.B. (1990). A profile of new venture success and failure in an emerging industry. Journal of Business Venturing, 5(5), 297-312.
• European Commission, (2011). Entrepreneurship education: Enabling teachers as a critical success factor. A report on Teacher Education and Training to prepare teachers for the challenge of entrepreneurship education. Final Report, Entrepreneurship Unit, Bruxelles.
• European Commission, (2014). Entrepreneurship education: A guide for educators. Entrepreneurship 2020 Unit Directorate-General for Enterprise and Industry, European Commission, 1049 Brussels.
• European Commission, (2016). Entrepreneurship education at school in Europe. Eurydice Report. EACEA/Eurydice, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
• Field, A.P. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
• Jones, C. (2019). A signature pedagogy for entrepreneurship education. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 26(2), 243-254.
• Li, C., Rehman, H., Asim, S. (2019). Induction of Business Incubation Centers in Education Institutions: An Effective Approach to Foster Entrepreneurship. Journal of Entrepreneur Education, 22(1), 1-12.
• Özdemir, E. (2015). Tarama yöntemi. M. Metin (Ed.), Kuramdan uygulamaya eğitimde bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (2. Baskı) içinde (77-97). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Pearce, J. (2003). Social enterprise in anytown. London: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.
• Rauch, A., and Frese, M. (2007). Let's put the person back into entrepreneurship research: A meta-analysis on the relationship between business owners' personality traits, business creation, and success. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 16(4), 353-385.
• Rotter, J.B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1), 1-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0092976
• Rushing, F. (1990) Entrepreneurship and education. In C. A. Kent (Ed.), Entrepreneurship education current developments, future directions (pp 29–39). New York: Quoru Books.
• Schumpeter, J.A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.
• Schunk, D.H. (1987). Peer Models and Children’s Behavioral Change. Review of Educational Research, 57(2), 149–174. https://doi.org/10.-3102/00346543057002149
• Shane, S. and Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217-226. DOI:10.5465/amr.2000.2791611
• Shaw, E. and Carter, S. (2007). Social entrepreneurship, theoretical antecedents and empirical analysis of entrepreneurial processes and outcomes, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 14, (3), 418-434.
• Snow, M.H. (2012). Music education and entrepreneurship: Post-secondary music teacher education and value creation for individuals and communities (Unpublished master dissertation). Boston University: USA.
• Tschannen-Moran M. and Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an exclusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783-805.
• Yılmaz, E., Sünbül, A.M. (2009). Developing Scale of University Students Entrepreneuership. Selçuk University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 21, 196-203.
• Zampetakis, L.A., Kafetsios, K., Bouranta, Dewett, N.T ,and Moustakis,V.S. (2009). On the relationship between emotional intelligence and entrepreneurial attitudes and intentions. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 15(6), 595-618.