Araştırma Makalesi

Psychological Capital and Burnout Relationship of Employees in Turkey: A Meta-Analysis within the Scope of Sub-Dimensions

Cilt: 18 Sayı: Yönetim ve Organizasyon Özel Sayısı 10 Temmuz 2021
PDF İndir
TR EN

Psychological Capital and Burnout Relationship of Employees in Turkey: A Meta-Analysis within the Scope of Sub-Dimensions

Abstract

This study is based on a meta-analysis, conducted in Turkey between the years 2012-2020, that focuses on the psychological capital (PsyCap) and burnout sub-dimensions’ relationship of employees working in both public and private sectors. The analysis was carried out based on the correlation coefficients and sample sizes of 9 studies with a total sample size of 2280 that complied with the previously established criteria. After the stages of literature review and coding, calculating the effect sizes of each studies that meet the criteria, performing basic meta-analysis and calculating the general effect size, estimation and correction stages of publication bias were carried out with Comprehensive Meta Analysis (CMA) V3 software. The general effect size was calculated through the random effect model as a result of the homogeneity test. Additionally, it was concluded that there was no publication bias by examining the funnel plot, fail-safe number and Tau coefficient. According to the results of analyzes, all hypotheses claiming that there is a negative relationship between employees’ psychological capital and burnout sub-dimensions working in Turkey were proven. It was revealed that the general effect sizes under the random-effect model varied between weak and medium levels. These results have been discussed within the scope of the literature, and suggestions have been developed for practitioners and future studies.

Keywords

Psychological capital , burnout , sub-dimensions , meta-analysis

Kaynakça

  1. Altınkurt, Y., Ertürk, A. and Yılmaz, İ. (2015) Öğretmenlerin psikolojik sermayeleri ile tükenmişlik düzeyleri arasındaki ilişki. Journal of Teacher Education and Educators, 4(2), 166-187.
  2. Amornpipat, I. (2019). The relationship between positive psychological capital and job burnout: A study of Thai Airways international flight attendants. Psychology Research, 9(5), 189-196. doi:10.17265/2159-5542/2019.05.001
  3. Argon, T. and Tükel, H. (2016). Study of school supervisors’ organizational psychological capital perception and burnout level. Journal of Contemporary Administrative Science, 1(1), 1-16.
  4. Avey, J.B., Reichard, R., Luthans, F. and Mhatre, K.H. (2011). Meta-Analysis of the impact of positive psychological capital on employee attitudes, behaviors, and performance. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 22(2), 127-152. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.20070.
  5. Avey, J.B., Wernsing, T.S. and Luthans, F. (2008). Can positive employees help positive organizational change? impact of psychological capital and emotions on relevant attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Science, 44(1), 48-70. doi 10.1177/0021886307311470.
  6. Bakioğlu, A and Özcan, Ş. (2016). Meta Analiz. (Meta Analysis) Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık Eğitim Danışmanlık.
  7. Bakker, A.B. Van Der Zee, K. I., Lewig, K. A. and Dollard, M. F. (2006). The relationship between the big five personality factors and burnout: A study among volunteer counselors. The Journal of Social Psychology, 146(1), 31–50. doi: 10.3200/SOCP.146.1.31-50.
  8. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review,84(2),191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.
  9. Bandura, A. (1997), Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman
  10. Bandura, A. and Locke, E. A. (2003). Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), 87-99. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.87.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Ocak, M., & Arıkan, Ö. U. (2021). Psychological Capital and Burnout Relationship of Employees in Turkey: A Meta-Analysis within the Scope of Sub-Dimensions. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 18(Yönetim ve Organizasyon Özel Sayısı), 1085-1119. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.905267