The Mediating Role of Country of Origin Effect in the Effect of Consumer Ethnocentrism on Café Preference
Öz
This research aims to investigate the mediating role of the country of origin effect (COO) in the relationship between consumer ethnocentrism (CE) and cafe preference. Consumer ethnocentrism refers to the extent to which consumers exhibit a preference for domestic products over foreign ones. The country of origin effect suggests that consumers’ evaluations and perceptions of a product are influenced by its country of origin. In the context of the cafe industry, this study examines whether consumer ethnocentrism influences Turkish/American cafe preference, and whether this relationship is mediated by the country of origin effect for Turkish consumers who live in Rize. The findings revealed that CE has an effect on both COO and cafe preference. COO has a direct effect on cafe preference and mediation role in the effect of consumer ethnocentrism on cafe preference. The result indicating that the country of origin effect of Turkish consumers has a positive impact on both Turkish and American cafe preferences suggests that Turkish consumers may have a favorable view of both Turkish and American cafes based on their perceived country of origin.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Consumer ethnocentrism, cafe preference, country of origin effect, Turkish cafes, American cafes.
Kaynakça
- Aktan, M., & Anjam, M. (2022). A holistic approach to investigate consumer’s attitude toward foreign products: Role of country personality, self-congruity, product image and ethnocentrism. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 34(2), 151-167.
- Ari, E. S., & Madran, C. (2011). The role of consumer ethnocentrism and country of origin effect on purchase decision. Öneri Dergisi, 9(35), 15-33.
- Arslandere, M., & Yusuf, E. R. (2020). The impact of country of origin effect and consumer ethnocentrism on purchase intention of foreign brand recreational materials used in sports activities: An empirical research. Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise, 22(2), 171-182.
- Balabanis, G., & Diamantopoulos, A. (2008). Brand origin identification by consumers: A classification perspective. Journal of International Marketing, 16(1), 39-71.
- Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986, January). The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic and Statistical Consideration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, s. 1173-1182.
- Bi, X., Gunessee, S., Hoffmann, R., Hui, W., Larner, J., Ma, Q. P., & Thompson, F. M. (2012). Chinese consumer ethnocentrism: A field experiment. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 11(3), 252-263.
- Bruwer, J., & Buller, C. (2012). Country‐of‐origin (COO) brand preferences and associated knowledge levels of Japanese wine consumers. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 21(5), 307-316.
- Camacho, L. J., Ramírez-Correa, P. E., & Salazar-Concha, C. (2021). Consumer Ethnocentrism and Country of Origin: Effects on Online Consumer Purchase Behavior in Times of a Pandemic. Sustainability, 14(1), 348.
- Cilingir, Z., & Basfirinci, C. (2014). The impact of consumer ethnocentrism, product involvement, and product knowledge on country of origin effects: An empirical analysis on Turkish consumers’ product evaluation. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 26(4), 284-310.
- Cleveland, M., Laroche, M. and Papadopoulos, N. (2009), “Cosmopolitanism, consumer ethnocentrism, and materialism: an eight-country study of antecedents and outcomes”, Journal of International Marketing, 17 (1), pp. 116-146.