Araştırma Makalesi

Culture, Motivation, and Performance: Remote and Workplace Dynamics in Organizations

Cilt: 20 Sayı: Human Behavior and Social Institutions 30 Ekim 2023
PDF İndir
EN TR

Culture, Motivation, and Performance: Remote and Workplace Dynamics in Organizations

Abstract

In this study, a divergence in the perceptions of organizational culture between workplace and remote employees within Turkish banks was examined. Workplace employees viewed the culture as bureaucratic yet also innovative and supportive, contrasting with remote employees' perspectives. The research uncovered distinct working styles that significantly influenced job performance, with remote workers displaying a notably positive impact. However, significant differences in the effects of job satisfaction and motivation on job performance between the two groups are not detected. An unexpected discovery was the reverse relationship between a supportive organizational culture and job performance among remote employees. Organizational commitment had a positive influence on job performance for all employees, emphasizing its role in enhancing job satisfaction and performance. This research contributes to the understanding of the intricate relationship between organizational culture and employee performance, in the context of remote and workplace workers. The findings suggest that non-monetary factors significantly motivate employees, with workplace employees emphasizing effective communication and teamwork, while remote workers prioritize effective planning and task execution. While the study provides insights, its industry-specific focus and sample size limitations should be considered for future research to explore these complex relationships in more diverse contexts.

Keywords

Organizational culture , Motivation , Job satisfaction , Job performance , Remote work

Kaynakça

  1. Ababaneh, R.I. (2010). The role of organisational culture on practising quality improvement in Jordanian public hospitals. Leadership in Health Services, 23(3), 244-259.
  2. Afrahi, B., Blenkinsopp, J., de Arroyabe, J. C. F., & Karim, M. S. (2022). Work disengagement: A review of the literature. Human Resource Management Review, 32(2), 100822.
  3. Alderfer, C.P. (1972). Existence, relatedness, and growth. Free Press.
  4. Ameed, S. S., Kumar, S. S., Pandian, P. K., Pandian, B. S., & Sudhakar, J. (2023). Effectiveness of motivation and quality of work life on employee engagement and employee productivity. Rivista Italiana di Filosofia Analitica Junior, 14(2), 1023-1028.
  5. Armstrong, M. (2003). A handbook of human resource management practice (9th ed.). London: Kogan Page.
  6. Armstrong, M. (2007). A handbook of employee reward management and practice (2nd ed.). London: Kogan Page.
  7. Ayedee, D. N., Kumar, M. A., Buttan, D. A., & Shaikh, D. A. A. (2021). Role of emotional intelligence and strategic human resource management during COVID-19 pandemic. Academy of Strategic Management Journal.
  8. Bailey, D. E., & Kurland, N. B. (2002). A review of telework research: Findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 383-400.
  9. Bareket-Bojmel, L., Chernyak-Hai, L., & Margalit, M. (2023). Out of sight but not out of mind: The role of loneliness and hope in remote work and in job engagement. Personality and Individual Differences, 202, 111955.
  10. Barsness, Z. I., Diekmann, K. A., & Seidel, M. D. L. (2005). Motivation and opportunity: The role of remote work, demographic dissimilarity, and social network centrality in impression management. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 401-419.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Al, B. (2023). Culture, Motivation, and Performance: Remote and Workplace Dynamics in Organizations. OPUS Journal of Society Research, 20(Human Behavior and Social Institutions), 727-750. https://doi.org/10.26466/opusjsr.1343604