Araştırma Makalesi

Sustainability of Higher Education in Emergencies: The Case of Turkey

Cilt: 20 Sayı: Human Behavior and Social Institutions 30 Ekim 2023
PDF İndir
EN TR

Sustainability of Higher Education in Emergencies: The Case of Turkey

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic had devastating effects on higher education systems and necessitated policymakers to take immediate measures. While this period is an opportunity to correct imperfections in higher education systems, it is also a challenge in terms of planning new policies that necessitate digitalized equipment and personnel support that increased due to the pandemic. The study aims to examine which factors of higher education learning communities can help sustain higher education institutions during and beyond emergencies. Based on a qualitative study presenting views of Turkish faculty, major findings reflect the key components of higher education learning communities. These were spotted as; ‘democratic and collaborative environments that target equitable student access to education, student success, as well as faculty professional development and well-being of faculty and students and examined through the lenses of critical pedagogy and transformational theory. Apart from the suggestions of the participants for sustainability, the author also presented some immediate-to-long-term policy suggestions for higher education decision-makers that prioritize equity, accountability, and quality, and the main principles of learning communities as collaboration and democracy, all of which are also important concepts for further development of society.

Keywords

COVID-19 pandemic , emergency situations , higher education learning communities , sustainability

Kaynakça

  1. Aristovnik, A., Keržiˇc, D., Ravšelj, D., Tomaževiˇc, N., & Umek, L. (2020). Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the life of higher education students: A global perspective. Sustainability, 12, 8438. DOI:10.3390/su12208438
  2. Arnhold, N., Brajkovic, L., Nikolaev, D., & Zavalina, P. (2020). Tertiary education and COVID-19: Impact and mitigation strategies in Europe and Central Asia. World Bank. Retrieved November 13, 2021, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341781394
  3. Baran, E., & AlZoubi, D. (2020). Human-centered design as a frame for transition to remote teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 365-372. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/216077
  4. Bell, L., & Schniedewind, N. (1987). Reflective minds/intentional hearts: Joining humanistic education and critical theory for liberating education. Journal of Education, 169(2), 55-77. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205748716900205
  5. Biesta, G. (1998). Say you want a revolution. Suggestions for the impossible future of critical pedagogy. Educational Theory, 48(4), 499-510. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.1998.00499.x
  6. Boyer, E. L. (1987). College: The undergraduate experience in America. Harper & Row.
  7. Boztürk, B. (2021). Barış akademisyenleri görevlerine dönemedi: AYM tartışması. Deutsche Welle. Retrieved November 10, 2021, from https://p.dw.com/p/42buE
  8. Bradley-Levine, J., & Carr, K.A. (2015). Critical theory and Catholic social teaching: A research framework for Catholic schools. Journal of Catholic Education, 18(2), 27–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.15365/joce.1802032015
  9. Brown, K. (2004). Leadership for social justice and equity: Weaving a transformative framework and pedagogy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(1), 77-108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X03259147
  10. Clark, M. C., & Wilson, A. L. (1991). Context and rationality in Mezirow’s theory of transformational learning. Adult Education Quarterly, 41(2), 75-91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001848191041002002

Kaynak Göster

APA
Erdemir, B. (2023). Sustainability of Higher Education in Emergencies: The Case of Turkey. OPUS Journal of Society Research, 20(Human Behavior and Social Institutions), 751-769. https://doi.org/10.26466/opusjsr.1344652