Araştırma Makalesi

The Trolley Problem Revisited: Crisis Ethics, Gender, and Media Discourse after the February 6 Earthquakes in Turkiye

Sayı: Reimagining Social Entanglement 30 Ekim 2025
PDF İndir
TR EN

The Trolley Problem Revisited: Crisis Ethics, Gender, and Media Discourse after the February 6 Earthquakes in Turkiye

Abstract

This study examines the reflections of crisis ethics and gender in media discourse following the February 6, 2023 earthquakes. Building on the Trolley Problem metaphor, it explores how resource allocation and ethical dilemmas intersect with gender dimensions in times of disaster. The research was conducted through a big data analysis based on the GDELT GKG dataset, quantitatively assessing news density, sentiment tone, and gender-related themes. The findings reveal that news intensity was significantly higher in Hatay compared to other provinces, that sentiment tone generally remained stable with a focus on information delivery, and that gender themes attained only limited and fragmented visibility. These results demonstrate that, in times of crisis, media prioritized operational information over emotional or equality-oriented discourse, and that women’s specific needs were insufficiently represented. The study underscores how the Trolley Problem highlights ethical and gender-based vulnerabilities in crisis management; it further argues that media discourse and related crisis management practices should be evaluated not only in terms of quantitative intensity but also through the lens of qualitative equity. In doing so, the study contributes to the development of an ethical crisis management model capable of transforming the post-disaster social imagination.

Keywords

Crisis Ethics , Trolley Problem , February 6 Earthquake , Gender , GDELT.

Kaynakça

  1. Alexander, D. (2013). Resilience and disaster risk reduction: An etymological journey. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 13(11), 2707–2716.
  2. Altıparmak, İ. B., & Birel, S. (2024). 6 Şubat 2023 depremi sonrası sosyal yaşamın toplumsal cinsiyet bağlamında değerlendirilmesi: Nurdağı örneği. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi, 41(1), 125–145.
  3. Atlı, K. M., & Ateş, Ö. T. (2023). Toplumsal cinsiyet eşitliği üzerine yapılan araştırmalar: Kadın ve gençlik perspektifleri. Marmara Üniversitesi Kadın ve Toplumsal Cinsiyet Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(2), 21–36.
  4. Bago, B., Rand, D. G., & Pennycook, G. (2022). Reasoning about misinformation: Strategic or automatic? Cognition, 223, 105018.
  5. Beşpınar, F. U., & Beşpınar, L. Z. (2023). 6 Şubat depremlerinin ardından toplumsal cinsiyet ve kadın hakları perspektifinden bir değerlendirme. Ankara Barosu Dergisi, 81(Özel Sayı), 467–502.
  6. Bradshaw, S. (2015). Gendered crises, gendered responses: Assessing the linkages between gender, disasters and humanitarian crises. Gender & Development, 23(3), 667–681.
  7. Comfort, L. K. (2007). Crisis management in hindsight: Cognition, communication, coordination, and control. Public Administration Review, 67(s1), 189–197.
  8. Enarson, E., & Morrow, B. H. (1998). The gendered terrain of disaster: Through women’s eyes. Praeger.
  9. Enarson, E., & Meyreles, L. (2004). International perspectives on gender and disaster: Differences and possibilities. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 24(10/11), 49–93.
  10. Enarson, E., & Chakrabarti, P. G. D. (2009). Women, gender and disaster: Global issues and initiatives. SAGE.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Doğan, E., & Güngör, H. Y. (2025). The Trolley Problem Revisited: Crisis Ethics, Gender, and Media Discourse after the February 6 Earthquakes in Turkiye. OPUS Journal of Society Research, Reimagining Social Entanglement, 119-133. https://doi.org/10.26466/opusjsr.1772075