Araştırma Makalesi

An examination of the thematic consistency and auteur signature in Tolga Karaçelik’s cinema

Cilt: 23 Sayı: 2026 7 Ocak 2026
PDF İndir
TR EN

An examination of the thematic consistency and auteur signature in Tolga Karaçelik’s cinema

Abstract

The objective of this study is to analyse the filmography of Tolga Karaçelik, a director who is representative of the Recent Turkish Cinema, within the framework of the Auteur theory. This approach aims to elucidate the thematic consistency that forms the foundation of his cinematic style. The research sample consists of the director's feature films Gişe Memuru, Sarmaşık, Kelebekler, and Psycho Therapy: The Shallow Story of a Writer Who Decided to Write About a Serial Killer. In this study, the deductive thematic analysis method was employed as a qualitative data analysis technique, with latent coding being adopted. A systematic analysis process was undertaken, resulting in the identification of four fundamental thematic axes: authority and power, journey, dysfunctional relationships, and madness, suicide, and death. The research findings demonstrate that Karaçelik's characters are confined, both physically and psychologically, within the narrative structures he employs. Furthermore, the blend of tragedy and absurd humour is indicative of a consistent structure that extends from local stories to universal existential crises. The inclusion of the director's latest film, which was shot in English, in this structure serves to demonstrate that thematic continuity is able to transcend cultural boundaries. This study systematically demonstrates the content and formal continuity in Karaçelik’s cinema, thereby supporting the director's distinct auteur identity in Recent Turkish Cinema.

Keywords

tolga karaçelik , turkish cinema , auteur theory , thematic analysis

Kaynakça

  1. Abisel, N., & Eryılmaz, T. (2014). Sinemanın çağdaşlaşması: Yeni gerçekçilik, yeni dalga. In M. İri (Ed.), Sinema araştırmaları: Kuramlar, kavramlar, yaklaşımlar (pp. 24–62). Derin Yayınları.
  2. Aharoni, S., Eczacıbaşı, S., & Yalçındağ, A. (Producers), & Karaçelik, T. (Director). (2024). Psycho Therapy: The shallow tale of a writer who decided to write about a serial killer [Film]. Curious Gremlin.
  3. Astruc, A. (2016). Yeni avangardın doğuşu: Kamera-kalem (Le camera-stylo) (N. Özer, Trans.). In A. Karadoğan (Ed.), Auteur kuram ve sanat sineması üzerine (pp. 29–34). De Ki Basım Yayım.
  4. Atam, Z. (2011). Yakın plan yeni Türkiye sineması. Cadde.
  5. Bordwell, D., & Thompson, K. (2017). Film art: An introduction (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  6. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
  7. Büker, S. (2019). Auteur kurama giriş. In S. Büker & G. Y. Topçu (Eds.), Sinema: Tarih-kuram-eleştiri (pp. 264–267). İthaki Yayınları.
  8. Corrigan, T., & White, P. (2012). The film experience: An introduction (3rd ed.). Bedford/St. Martin’s.
  9. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.
  10. Çınar, U. (2025, July 30). Her filmin ihtiyacı başka: Tolga Karaçelik ve Psycho Therapy. BantMag. https://bantmag.com/her-filmin-ihtiyaci-baska-tolga-karacelik-ve-psycho-therapy/

Kaynak Göster

APA
Dugan, S. E. (2026). An examination of the thematic consistency and auteur signature in Tolga Karaçelik’s cinema. OPUS Journal of Society Research, 23(2026), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.26466/opusjsr.1829540