PRENATAL HORMON MARUZİYETİNİN KARİYER DEĞERLERİNE ETKİSİ: 2D:4D ORANI PERSPEKTİFİ

Öz

2d:4d oranı, insanlarda işaret parmak uzunluğunun yüzük parmağı uzunluğuna bölünmesiyle elde edilen bir orandır. Bu oran, prenatal (doğum öncesi) hormon maruziyetinin bir göstergesi olarak kabul edilmektedir. Düşük 2d:4d oranı yüksek testesteron maruziyetinin bir göstergesidir ve daha çok erkeklerde bu oran düşük çıkmaktadır. Yüksek 2d:4d oranı ise, yüksek östrojen maruziyetine işaret etmekle birlikte kadınlarda bu oran daha yüksektir. 2d:4d oranının bireylerin psikolojik ve biyolojik özelliklerini anlamada değerli bir araç olduğu düşünülmektedir. Bu çalışma, 2d:4d parmak uzunluğu oranı ile bireylerin kariyer değerleri arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemekle birlikte kariyer değerlerine etki eden diğer demografik özellikleri de araştırmaktadır. 536 önlisans öğrencisi üzerine yapılan çalışmada anket yöntemi kullanılmış ayrıca öğrencilerin parmak uzunlukları dijital kumpas yardımıyla ölçülüp 2d:4d oranları elde edilmiştir. Çalışma sonucuna göre, cinsiyet ile kariyer değerleri alt boyutları arasında anlamlı ilişkiler bulunmuştur. Ayrıca çalışmada aynı biyolojik cinsiyete sahip ancak farklı beyin cinsiyetine sahip katılımcıların kariyer değerleri açısından farklılaşıp farklılaşmadığı incelenmiş ve farklı beyin cinsiyetinin kariyer değerlerini farklılaştırmadığı ortaya konmuştur. Yine farklı biyolojik cinsiyete sahip fakat aynı beyin cinsiyetine sahip katılımcılarında kariyer değerleri açısından farklılaşmadığı ortaya konmuştur. Cinsiyetin kariyer değerlerine etkisinde beyin cinsiyetinin düzenleyici bir rolünün olmadığı tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• 2d:4d oranı
• Beyin Cinsiyeti
• Kariyer Değerleri

EFFECT OF PRENATAL HORMONE EXPOSURE ON CAREER VALUES: 2D:4D RATIO PERSPECTIVE

Öz

The 2d:4d ratio is obtained by dividing the length of the index finger by the length of the ring finger in humans. This ratio is accepted as an indicator of prenatal hormone exposure. A low 2d:4d ratio is an indicator of high testosterone exposure and is more common in men. A high 2d:4d ratio indicates high estrogen exposure, but this ratio is higher in women. The 2d:4d ratio is thought to be a valuable tool in understanding the psychological and biological characteristics of individuals. This study examines the relationship between the 2d:4d finger length ratio and the career values of individuals, as well as other demographic characteristics that affect career values. The survey method was used in the study conducted on 536 associate degree students, and the students' finger lengths were measured with a ruler and 2d:4d ratios were obtained. According to the study results, significant relationships were found between gender and career values sub-dimensions. In addition, the study examined whether the participants with the same biological sex but different brain sex differed in career values and revealed that different brain sex did not differentiate career values. Again, it was revealed that the participants with different biological sex but the same brain sex did not differentiate in terms of career values. It was determined that brain sex did not have a moderating role in the effect of gender on career values.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• 2d:4d ratio
• Brain Gender
• Career Values

Kaynakça

1. Abele, A. E., Hagmaier, T., & Spurk, D. (2016). Does career success make you happy? the mediating role of multiple subjective success evaluations. Journal of happiness studies, 17, 1615-1633. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-015-9662-4
2. Abdullah, A. T. L. İ., & Keldal, G. (2017). Mesleki kişilik tipleri envanterinin geliştirilmesi. Eskişehir osmangazi üniversitesi sosyal bilimler dergisi, 18(1), 73-93.
3. Adamczyk, J. G., Safranow, K., Gajewski, A. K., Boguszewski, D., Sozański, H., Sołtyszewski, I., & Żekanowski, C. (2021). The second‐to‐fourth digit (2d: 4d) ratio of male combat athletes is associated with the choice of sport. Journal of human kinetics, 78(1), 59-66. Akkermans, J., & Tims, M. (2017). Crafting your career: how career competencies relate to career success via job crafting. Applied psychology,, 66(1), 168-195. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12082
4. Aktaş, H. (2004). The importance of career anchor notion for an effective career planning and an example application at turkish air force undergraduate and graduate schools. Master's thesis, Marmara Universitesi (Turkey).
5. Alkaya, S. A., Yaman, Ş., & Simones, J. (2018). Professional values and career choice of nursing students.
6. Nursing ethics, 25(2), 243-252.
7. Altmann, T., & Roth, M. (2024). Vulnerable women and grandiose men? a 2d: 4d study on the links between narcissism and prenatal estrogen/testosterone exposure in women and men. Personality and ındividual differences, 229, 112756. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2024.112756
8. Angwaomaodoko, E. A. (2023). Influence of Gender On Career Choice and Academic Performance. international journal of Education, Learning and Development, 11(5), 10-37745.

9. Baker, F. (1888). Anthropological notes on the human hand. .American anthropologist, 1(1), 51-76.
10. Baştürk, S. (2013). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Vize Yayıncılık.
11. Brañas‐Garza, P., Galizzi, M. M., & Nieboer, J. (2018). Experimental and self‐reported measures of risk taking and digit ratio (2d: 4d): evidence from a large, systematic Study. International economic review, 59(3), 1131-1157. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/iere.12299
12. Bridges, J. S. (1989). Sex differences in occupational values. Sex roles, 20(3), 205-211. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287992.
13. Brown, D. (2002). The role of work and cultural values in occupational choice, satisfaction, and success: A
14. theoretical statement. Journal of counseling & development, 80(1), 48-56. Brown, S. D., & Lent, R. W. (Eds.). (2004). career development and counseling: putting theory and research to work. John Wiley & Sons.
15. Can, A., & Taylı, A. (2014). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin kariyer gelişimlerinin incelenmesi. Abant İzzet baysal
16. üniversitesi eğitim fakültesi dergisi, 14(2), 321-346.
17. Cebe, B., & Varol, A. (2012). 2D: 4D Parmak uzunlukları oranı ile kişilerin sayısal-sözel dallara yatkınlıkları arasındaki ilişkinin uzman sistem ile tespiti. Türkiye bilişim vakfı bilgisayar bilimleri ve mühendisliği dergisi, 6(1).
18. Cenzo, D., & Robbins, S. (1996). Human resource management (5th Edition),John Willey&Sons.
19. Chae, K. S., & Ma, M. (2015). Study on the correlation between family function and high-school students’ level of career maturity. The korean study on culture exchange, 4, 31-54.
20. Christiansen, K. (2001). Behavıoural effects of androgen ın men and women. Journal of endocrınology, 170(1), 39-48. https://sid.ir/paper/672646/en adresinden alındı
21. Çarkıt, E., & Bacanlı, F. (2020). Kariyer olgunluğunda cinsiyet farklılıkları: meta analiz çalışması. Pamukkale üniversitesi eğitim fakültesi dergisi, 48, 84-104.
22. Çiftçi, G. E., & Hırlak, B. (2019). Meslek yükseokulu öğrencilerinin kariyer çapalarının bazı sosyo- demografik faktörler açısından incelenmesi. Business & management studies: an ınternational journal, 7(5), 2385-2407. doi:https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v7i5.1266
23. Dwyer, R. E., & Wright, E. O. (2019). Low-wage job growth, polarization, and the limits and opportunities of the service economy. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 5(4), 56-76.
24. Ekonomim (2024, Ocak 17). https://www.ekonomim.com/saglik/elden-anlasiliyor-psikopatligin-alameti-
25. tespit-edildi-haberi-725239 adresinden alındı
26. Fidan, F. (2005). Evlilik kariyeri öldürüyor mu? Yaklaşımlar, değerlendirmeler, algılamalar. Sakarya üniversitesi iktisadi ve idari bilimler fakültesi tartışma metinleri, 2(2), 1-18.
27. Fink, B., Manning, J. T., & Neave, N. (2004). Second to fourth digit ratio and the ‘big five’ personality factors. Personality and ındividual differences, 37(3), 495-503. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2003.09.018
28. Garn, S. M., Burdi, A. R., Babler, W. J., & Stinson, S. (1975). Early prenatal attainment of adult metacarpal‐ phalangeal rankings and proportions. American journal of physical anthropology, 43(3), 327-332. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330430305
29. Gavinski, K., Cleveland, E., Didwania, A. K., Feinglass, J. M., & Sulistio, M. S. (2021). Relationship between confidence, gender, and career choice in internal medicine. Journal of general internal medicine, 36, 662- 667.
30. Genazzani, A. R., Pluchino, N., Luisi, S., & Luisi, M. (2007). Estrogen, cognition and female ageing. Human reproduction update. 13(2), 175-187. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dml042
31. George, D., & Mallery, M. (2010). Spss for windows step bysstep: a simple guide and reference. Allyn & Bacon.
32. Hayes, A. F. (2022). ıntroduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression- based approach. (3. Baskı). Guilford publications. Hell, B., & Päßler, K. (2011). Are occupational interests hormonally influenced? The 2D: 4D-interest nexus. Personality and ındividual differences, 51(4), 376-380. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.033
33. Hitlin, S. (2006). Parental influences on children’s values and aspirations: Bridging two theories of social class and socialization. Sociological Perspectives, 49(1), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.1525/sop.2006.49.1.25
34. Hirschi, A. (2010). The role of chance events in the school-to-work transition: The influence of demographic, personality and career development variables. Journal of vocational behavior, 77(1), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2010.02.002
35. Hong, S., & Lim, H. (2024). A Study on the types of career values and ınfluencing factors among middle and high school students through latent profile analysis. Korean society for the study of vocational education. https://doi.org/10.37210/jver.2024.43.1.73.
36. Jost, M., & Möser, S. (2023). Salary, flexibility or career opportunity? a choice experiment on gender specific job preferences. Frontiers in sociology, 8, 1154324.
37. Karadeniz, Y., & Özkan, Ç. (2021). Üniversite öğrencilerinin mezuniyet sonrası kariyer beklentileri: ayvacık meslek yüksekokulu örneği. Manisa celal bayar üniversitesi sosyal bilimler dergisi, 19(2), 113-136.
38. Karancı, G. (2003). Genç işsizliğini önlemede mesleğe yöneltme sürecinin rolü. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi.
39. Karim, N. I. A., & Rasdi, R. M. (2021). The ınterplay between career decision making efficacy, career exposure and career choice of undergraduates: does gender matters?. Journal of academic research in business and social sciences, 11(19), 131-146.
40. Lippa, R. A. (2006). Finger lengths, 2d: 4d ratios, and their relation to gender-related personality traits and the
41. big five. Biological psychology, 71(1), 116-121. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2005.02.004
42. Manning, J. T., Scutt, D., Wilson, J., & Lewis-Jones, D. I. (1998). The ratio of 2nd to 4th digit length: a predictor of sperm numbers and concentrations of testosterone, luteinizing hormone and oestrogen. Human reproduction (Oxford, England)(11), 3000-3004. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.11.3000
43. Manning, J., Kilduff, L., Cook, C., & Crewther, B. (2014). Digit ratio (2d: 4d): a biomarker for prenatal sex steroids and adult sex steroids in challenge situations. Frontiers in endocrinology, 5(9), 1-5. doi:doi: 10.3389/fendo.2014.00009
44. Nye, J. C., & Orel, E. (2015). The influence of prenatal hormones on occupational choice: 2d: 4d evidence from moscow. Personality and ındividual differences, 78, 39-42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.01.016
45. Özkoçak, V., Akın, G., & Gültekin, T. (2017). Somatoskopi ve antropometri tekniklerinin adli bilimler için önemi. Hitit üniversitesi sosyal bilimler enstitüsü dergisi, 10(2), 703-714.
46. Öztürk, U., & Yıldırım, E. (2023). Comparison of new career approach attitudes and subjective career success perceptions in terms of demographic variables. Journal of management and economics research, 21(3), 426-444. doi:https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.1261286
47. Pace, F., & Sciotto, G. (2021). Gender differences in the relationship between work–life balance, career opportunities and general health perception. Sustainability, 14(1), 357. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010357
48. Parslow, E., Ranehill, E., Zethraeus, N., Blomberg, L., von Schoultz, B., Hirschberg, A. L., & Dreber, A. (2019). The digit ratio (2d: 4d) and economic preferences: no robust associations in a sample of 330 women. Journal of the economic science association, 5, 149-169.
49. Pasanen, B. E., Tomkinson, J. M., Dufner, T., Park, C. W., Fitzgerald, J. S., & Tomkinson, G. R. (2022). The
50. relationship between digit ratio (2d: 4d) and muscular fitness: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. American journal of human biology, 34(3), e23657. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.23657
51. Phelps, V. R. (1952). Relative index finger length as a sex-influenced trait in man. American journal of human genetics, 4(2), 72.
52. Pinnington, A., Aldabbas, H., Mirshahi, F., & Pirie, T. (2022). Organisational development programmes and employees’ career development: the moderating role of gender. Journal of workplace learning, 34(5), 466- 496.
53. Puts, D. A., McDaniel, M. A., Jordan, C. L., & Breedlove, S. M. (2008). Spatial ability and prenatal androgens: meta-analyses of congenital adrenal hyperplasia and digit ratio (2d: 4d) studies. Archives of sexual behavior, 37, 100-111.
54. Robinson, C. H., & Betz, N. E. (2008). A psychometric evaluation of Super’s Work Values Inventory, Revised. journal of career assessment, 16(4), 456–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072708318903
55. Scheın, E.H. (1990). Career Anchors and Job/Role Planning: The Links Between Career Pathing and Career Development. MIT Sloan School of Management, May, 1990; Rev. Sept
56. Schein, E. H. (1996). Career anchors revisited: ımplications for career development in the 21st Century.
57. Academy of management perspectives, 10(4), 80-88. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.1996.3145321
58. Schein, E. H., Schneier, I., & Barker, C. H. (1961). Coercive persuasion. W. W. Norton & Company.
59. Serdar, A., Baştürk, Ş., Arabacı, Ö. ve Baştaymaz, T. (2013). Üniversite öğrencileri arasında işsizlik riski, kariyer beklentileri ve siyasal marjinalleşme. sosyal siyaset konferansları / Journal of social policy conferences, Sayı:64-65 – 2013/1-2, 1-34.
60. Bozkurt, S. (2023). Process macro ile aracılık, düzenleyicilik ve durumsal aracılık etki analizleri. Ekin yayınevi
61. Söner, O. (2021). Kariyer karar verme güçlüğünde cinsiyet farklılıkları: bir meta analiz çalışması. Mehmet akif ersoy üniversitesi eğitim fakültesi dergisi, (57), 401-424.
62. Spurk, D., Hirschi, A., & Dries, N. (2019). Antecedents and outcomes of objective versus subjective career success: competing perspectives and future directions. Journal of management, 45(1), 35-69. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318786563
63. Super, D. E. (1953). A theory of vocational development. American psychologist, 8, 185–219
64. Şentürk, E. E., & Tarakçı, H. (2020). Alışverişte seni kim yönlendiriyor? testosteron mu östrojen mi? Journal of humanities and tourism research, 10(4), 978-994.
65. Thummakul, D., Kaeodumkoeng, K., Prasertsin, U. S., Sinjindawong, S., & Makmee, P. (2012). The development of happy workplace index. International journal of business and management studies, 1(2), 527-536.
66. Tüik. (2024, Mayıs 30). Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Ulusal-Egitim- Istatistikleri-2023-53444 adresinden alındı
67. Twenge, J. M., Campbell, S. M., Hoffman, B. J., & Lance, C. E. (2010). Generational differences in work values: Leisure and extrinsic values increasing, social and intrinsic values decreasing. Journal of management, 36(5), 1117–1142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309352246
68. Uzun, G. B., & İnceoğlu, F. (2024). Association of 2d: 4d finger length ratio of people working in different professions with personality traits. Heliyon, 10(11), e32332. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32332
69. Voracek, M., & Loibl, L. M. (2009). Scientometric analysis and bibliography of digit ratio (2d: 4d) research, 1998–2008.Psychological reports, 104(3), 922-956. doi:https://doi.org/10.2466/PR0.104.3.922-956
70. Voracek, M., Pum, U., & Dressler, S. G. (2010). Investigating digit ratio (2d: 4d) in a highly male‐dominated occupation: the case of firefighters. Scandinavian journal of psychology,, 51(2), 146-156. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00758.x
71. Weis, S. E., Firker, A., & Hennig, J. (2007). Associations between the second to fourth digit ratio and career interests. Personality and ındividual differences, 43(3), 485-493.
72. Zhao, H., O'Connor, G., Wu, J., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2021). Age and entrepreneurial career success: a review and a meta-analysis. Journal of business venturing, 36(1), 106007. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2020.106007