Stereotipik davranışların azaltılmasında kullanılan yöntemlerin etkililiği: Betimsel ve meta analizi

Yıl 2010, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 02, 1 - 12, 01.03.2010

Özlem Toper Korkmaz İbrahim H. Dike

https://doi.org/10.1501/Ozlegt_0000000149

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

Stereotipik Davranışların Azaltılmasında Kullanılan Yöntemlerin Etkililiği: Betimsel ve Meta Analizi

Öz

Yineleyici, tekrarlanan davranış olarak tanımlanan stereotipi, farklı gelişimsel yetersizlik türlerinde görülmekle beraber, yaygın olarak otistik bozukluk (otizm) gösteren bireylerde de gözlenmekte ve otistik bozukluğun ayırıcı tanı ölçütlerinden birini oluşturmaktadır. Geçmişten günümüze çeşitli yöntemlerin stereotipik davranışların azaltılmasında kullanıldığı görülmektedir. Bu çalışmada da stereotipik davranışların azaltılmasında kullanılan yöntemlerin etkililiklerini incelemek amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaçla 1996 ile 2010 yılları arasında tarama yapılarak otistik bozukluk gösteren bireylerde vokal ya da motor stereotipi veya her ikisinin birden azaltılmasının amaçlandığı toplam 18 araştırma betimsel ve meta analizi yapılarak incelenmiştir. Araştırmanın betimsel analiz sonuçları stereotipik davranışların azaltılmasında kullanılan yöntemlerin etkili olduğunu gösterirken, meta analizi sonuçları yöntemlerin “şüpheli” olduğu sonucunu göstermiştir

Anahtar Kelimeler

Stereotipik davranış, otistik bozukluk, meta- analizi, alanyazın taraması

Kaynakça

• Ahearn, W. H., Clark, K. M., Debar, R. & Florentino, C. (2005).On the role of preference in response competition. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 38, 247–250.
• Ahearn, W. H., Clark, K. M., MacDonald, R. P. F. & Chung, B. I. (2007). Assesing and treating vocal stereotypy in children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 263-275.
• Athens, E. S., Vollmer, T. R., & Sloman, K. N. (2008). An analysis of vocal stereotypy and therapist fading. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 41 (2), 291–297.
• Baumeister, A.A. & Forehand, R. (1972). Effects of contingent shock and verbal command on body rocking of retardates. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28, 586–590.
• Bodfish, J.W., Symons, F.J., Parker, D.E. & Lewis, M.H. (2000). Varieties of repetitive behavior in autism: Comparisons to mental retardation. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30, 237-243.
• Brusa, E. & Richman, D. (2008). Developing stimulus control for occurrences of stereotypy exhibited by a child with autism. International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy, 4 (3), 264–269.
• Conroy, M.A., Asmus, J.M.; Sellers, J.A. & Ladwig, C.N. (2005). The use of an antecedent-based intervention to decrease stereotypic behavior in a general education classroom: A case study. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities. 20(4), 223– 230.
• Cunningham, A.B. & Schreibman, L. (2008). Stereotypy in autism: The importance of function. Res Autism Spectrum Disorders. 2 (3), 469-479.
• Dib, N. & Sturmey, P.(2007). Reducing student stereotypy by improving teachers’ implementation of discrete-trial teaching. Journal of Behavior Analysis, 40, 339–343
• Falcomata, T.S., Roane, H.S., Hovanetz, A.N., Kettering, T.L. & Keeney, K.M. (2004). An evaluation of response cost in the treatment of inappropriate vocalizations maintained by automatic reinforcement. Journal of Behavior Analysis, 37, 83–87.
• Foxx, R.M. & Azrin, N.H. (1973). The elimination of autistic self-stimulatory behavior by overcorrection. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 1–14.
• Gartland, B. (2009). The effects of response interruption/redirection and differential reinforcement of other behaviors on vocal stereotypy in children with autism. Unpublished Mater Thesis. The USA: The Ohio State University.
• Hagopian, L.P. & Toole, L.M. (2009). Effects of response blocking and competing stimuli on steretypic behavior. Behavioral Intervention 24, 117-125
• Hanley, G.P., Iwata, B.A. & McCord, B.E. (2003). Functional analysis of problem behavior: A review. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36 (2), 147-185.
• Harris, S.L. & Wolchik, S.A. (1979). Suppression of self-stimulation: Three alternative strategies. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 185–198.
• Karasu, N. (2009). Özel eğitimde delile dayalı yöntemlerin belirlenmesi: Tek denekli çalışma analizleri ve karşılaştırmaları. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 7 (1), 143–163.
• Kern, L., Koegel, R.L & Dunlap, G. (1984). The influence of vigorous versus mild exercise on autistic stereotyped behaviors. Journal of Autism and Devolopmental Disorders, 14, 57- 67.
• Kırcaali-İftar, G. (2003). Otistik özellik gösteren çocuklara iletişim becerilerinin kazandırılması. İstanbul: YA-PA
• Koegel, R.L. & Koegel, L.K. (1995). Teaching children with autism: Strategies for initiatin positive interactions and improving learning opportunities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
• LeBlanc, L.A Patel, M.R & Carr, J.E. (2000). Recent advances in the assessment of aberrant behavior maintained by automatic reinforcement in individuals with developmental disabilities. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry.31, 137–154.
• Liu-Gitz, L. & Banda, D.R. (2010). A replication of the RIRD strategy to decrease vocal stereotypy in a student with autism. Behavioral Interventions. 25, 77–87
• Loftin, R.L., Odom, S.L. & Lantz, J.F. (2008). Social interaction and repetitive motor behaviors. Developmental Disorders, 38, 1124–1135.
• Meany-Daboul, M.G., Roscoe, E.M., Bourret, J.C. & Ahearn, W.H. (2007). A comparison of momentary time sampling and partial-interval recording for evaluating functional relations. Journal of Behavior Analysis, 40, 501–514.
• Morrison, K. & Rosales-Ruiz, J. (1997) The effect of object preferences on task performance and steretypy in a child with autism. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 18(2), 127-137.
• Rapp, J.T.(2007). Further evaluation of methods to identify matched stimulation. Journal of Behavioral Analysis, 40, 73-88.
• Rapp, J.T., Patel, M.R., Ghezzi, P.M., O’Flahaerty, C.H. & Titterington, C.J. (2009). Establishing stimulus control of vocal stereotypy displayed by young children with autism. Behavioral Intervention 24, 85-105.
• Rapp, J.T. & Vollmer, T.R. (2005). Stereotypy 1: A review of behavipral assessment and treatment. Disabilities. 26, 527-547
• Rozenblat, E., Brown, J.L.; Brown, A.K.; Reeve, S.A. & Reeve, K.F. (2009). Effects of adjusting DRO schedules on the reduction of stereotypic vocalization in children with autism.Behavioral Intervention, 24, 1-15.
• Sachs, D.A. (1973). The efficacy of time out procedures in a variety of behavior problems. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 4, 237–242
• Scotti, J. R., Evans, I. M., Meyer, L. H., Walker, P. (1991). A meta-analysis of intervention research with problem behavior: Treatment validity and standards of practice. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 96, 233-256.
• Shabani, D.B.; Wilder, D.A. & Flood, W.A. (2001) Reducing stereotypic behavior through discrimination training, differential reinforcement of other behavior, and self- monitoring. Behavioral Intervention, 16, 279– 286.
• Sidener, T.M.; Carr, J.E. & Firtf, A.M. (2005) Superimposition and withholding of edible consequences as treatments for automatically reinforced stereotypy. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 38, 121–124.
• Taylor, B.A.; Hoch,H. & Weissman, M. (2005). The analysis and treatment of vocal stereotypy in a child with autism. Behavioral Intervention, 20, 239–253.
• Turnbull, R., Turnbull, A., Shank, M. & Smith, S.J. (2004). Exceptional lives: Special education in today’s schools. USA: Pearson