Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Problem Davranışların İşlevinin Belirlenmesinde Denemeye Dayalı İşlevsel Analiz ile Geleneksel İşlevsel Analiz Sonuçlarının Karşılaştırılması

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 19 Sayı: 3, 451 - 483, 01.09.2018
https://doi.org/10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.336153

Öz

Okul öncesi kaynaştırma ortamlarında
sergilenen problem davranışlara yönelik etkili müdahaleler geliştirebilmek için
bu davranışların işlevinin belirlenmesi önemlidir. Bu araştırmada, çeşitli
problem davranışlara sahip, okul öncesi kaynaştırmaya devam eden özel
gereksinimli öğrencilerin, davranışlarının işlevini belirlemede, denemeye
dayalı işlevsel analiz (DDİA) kullanımının etkililiğini belirlemek
amaçlanmıştır. Bu doğrultuda, DDİA’dan elde edilen sonuçlarla, etkililiği
kanıtlanmış bir yöntem olan geleneksel işlevsel analiz (GİA) sonuçları
karşılaştırılmış ve sonuçlar arasındaki uyum incelenmiştir. Araştırmaya,
yaşları 62-67 ay aralığında bulunan biri dil bozukluğu üçü otizm spektrum
bozukluğu tanısına sahip toplam 4 erkek öğrenci katılmıştır. Araştırmanın ilk
bölümünde DDİA, ikinci bölümünde GİA süreci uygulanmıştır. DDİA sürecine
ilişkin veriler, sistematik gözlem yoluyla toplanmıştır. GİA sürecinde ise,
multi element deseni kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda, tüm katılımcıların
problem davranışlarının işlevini belirlemede DDİA ile GİA sonuçları arasında
tam uyum olduğu görülmüştür. Bu durum, DDİA yönteminin problem davranışlarının
işlevlerini belirlemede etkili bir yöntem olabileceğini göstermektedir.

Kaynakça

  • Alberto, P. A., & Troutman, A. C. (2003). Applied behavior analysis for teachers (6th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education.
  • Austin, J. L., Groves, E. A., Reynish, L. C., & Francis, L. L. (2015). Validating trial‐based functional analyses in mainstream primary school classrooms. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 48(2), 274-288.
  • Baydık, B., & Bakkaloğlu, H. (2009). Alt sosyoekonomik düzeydeki özel gereksinimli olan ve olmayan ilköğretim öğrencilerinin sosyometrik statülerini yordayan değişkenler [Variables that predict sociometric status of primary school students with and without special needs at lower socioeconomic level]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 9(2), 401-447.
  • Bloom, S. E., Iwata, B. A., Fritz, J. N., Roscoe, E. M., & Carreau, A. B. (2011). Classroom applicatıon of a trial-based functional analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44(1), 19-31.
  • Bloom, S. E., Lambert, J. M., Dayton, E., & Samaha, A. L. (2013). Teacher‐conducted trial‐based functional analyses as the basis for intervention. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46(1), 208-218.
  • Carr, E. G., Taylor, J. C., & Robinson, S. (1991). The effects of severe behavior problems in children on the teaching behavior of adults. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24(3), 523-535.
  • Chandler, L. K., & Dahlquist, C. M. (2002). Functional assessment: Strategies to prevent and remediate challenging behavior in school settings (1st ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education.
  • Chezan, L. C., Drasgow, E., & Martin, C. A. (2014). Discrete-trial functional analysis and functional communication training with three adults with intellectual disabilities and problem behavior. Journal of Behavioral Education, 23(2), 221-246.
  • Cozby, P. C. (2003). Methods in behavioral research. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
  • DeLeon, I. G., & Iwata, B. A. (1996). Evaluation of a multiple‐stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29(4), 519-533.
  • Dunlap, G., Strain, P. S., Fox, L., Carta, J. J., Conroy, M., Smith, B. J., et al. (2006). Prevention and intervention with young children's challenging behavior: Perspectives regarding current knowledge. Behavioral Disorders, 32(1), 29-45.
  • Emerson, E., Kiernan, C., Alborz, A., Reeves, D., Mason, H., Swarbrick, R., et al. (2001). The prevalence of challenging behaviors: A total population study. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 22(1), 77-93.
  • Erbaş, D., Kırcaali-İftar, G., & Tekin-İftar, E. (2007). İşlevsel değerlendirme: Davranış sorunlarıyla başa çıkma ve uygun davranışlar kazandırma süreci [Functional assessment: Dealing with behavioral problems and the process for gaining appropriate behaviors] (3. Baskı). Ankara: Kök Yayıncılık.
  • Flynn, S. D., & Lo, Y. Y. (2016). Teacher implementation of trial-based functional analysis and differential reinforcement of alternative behavior for students with challenging behavior. Journal of Behavioral Education, 25(1), 1-31.
  • Hanley, G. P., Iwata, B. A., & McCord, B. E. (2003). Functional analysis of problem behavior: A review. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36(2), 147-185.
  • Hastings, R. P., & Bham, M. S. (2003). The relationship between student behaviour patterns and teacher burnout. School Psychology International, 24(1), 115-127.
  • Iwata, B. A., Dorsey, M. F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, K. E., & Richman, G. S. (1982). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2(1), 3-20.
  • Iwata, B. A., Dorsey, M. F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, K. E., & Richman, G. S. (1994). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27(2), 197-209.
  • Jensen, J. (2011). Classroom applications of a trial-based functional analysis in an early childhood education setting (Master’s dissertation). Avaible from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 1491889)
  • Kohlman, S. A. (2013). An evaluation of trial-based functional analyses (Master’s dissertation). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10211.9/2252
  • Kunnavatana, S. S., Bloom, S. E., Samaha, A. L., Lignugaris, B., Dayton, E., & Harris, S. K. (2013). Using a modified pyramidal training model to teach special education teachers to conduct trial-based functional analyses. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 36(4), 267-285.
  • Lambert, J. M., Bloom, S. E., & Irvin, J. (2012). Trial‐based functional analysis and functional communication training in an early childhood setting. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45(3), 579-584.
  • Landers, E., Alter, P., & Servilio, K. (2008). Students' challenging behavior and teachers' job satisfaction. Beyond Behavior, 18(1), 26-33.
  • Lang, R., O'Reilly, M., Machalicek, W., Lancioni, G., Rispoli, M., & Chan, J. M. (2008). A preliminary comparison of functional analysis results when conducted in contrived versus natural settings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 41(3), 441-445.
  • LaRue, R.H., Lenard, K., Weiss, M.J., Bamond, M., Palmieri, M., Kelley, M.E., (2010). Comparison of traditional and trial-based methodologies for conducting functional analyses. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 31(2), 480-487.
  • Mace, F. C. (1994). The significance and future of functional analysis methodologies. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27(2), 385-392.
  • Matson, J. L., & Minshawi, N. F. (2007). Functional assessment of challenging behavior: Toward a strategy for applied settings. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 28(4), 353-361.
  • McComas, J. J., & Mace, F. C. (2000). Theory and practice in conducting functional analysis. In E.S. Shapiro & T. R. Kratochwill (Eds.), Behavioral assessment in school (pp.78-98). New York: Guilford.
  • McDonald, J., Moore, D. W., & Anderson, A. (2012). Comparison of functional assessment methods targeting aggressive and stereotypic behaviour in a child with autism. The Australian Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 29(01), 52-65.
  • Meaker, T. M. (2012). Correspondence between teacher-conducted trial-based functional analyses and traditional functional analyses with high-school aged students (Master’s dissertation). Avaible from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 1518639)
  • Mehas, K., Boling, K., Sobieniak, S., Sprague, J., Burke, M. D., & Hagan, S. (1998). Finding a safe haven in middle school. Teaching Exceptional Children, 30(4), 20-23.
  • Najdowski, A. C., Wallace, M. D., Ellsworth, C. L., MacAleese, A. N., & Cleveland, J. M. (2008). Functional analyses and treatment of precursor behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 41(1), 97.
  • Northup, J., Wacker, D., Sasso, G., Steege, M., Cigrand, K., Cook, J., & DeRaad, A. (1991). A brief functional analysis of aggressive and alternative behavior in an outclinic setting. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24(3), 509-522.
  • Oliver, A. C., Pratt, L. A., & Normand, M. P. (2015). A survey of functional behavior assessment methods used by behavior analysts in practice. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 48(4), 817-829.
  • O'Neill, R. E., Horner, R. H., Albin, R. W., Sprague, J. R., Storey, K., & Newton, J. S. (1997). Functional assessment and program development for problem behavior (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks.
  • Özbey, S. (2009). Anaokulu ve Anasınıfı Davranış Ölçeğinin (PKBS-2) geçerlik güvenirlik çalışması ve destekleyici eğitim programının etkisinin incelenmesi (Yayımlanmamş doktora tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara, Türkiye). https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/’nden elde edilmiştir. (Tez No. 227837)
  • Phillips, K. J., & Mudford, O. C. (2008). Functional analysis skills training for residential caregivers. Behavioral Interventions, 23(1), 1-12.
  • Poulou, M. S. (2015). Emotional and behavioural difficulties in preschool. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(2), 225-236.
  • Rispoli, M. J., Davis, H. S., Goodwyn, F. D., & Camargo, S. (2013). The use of trial-based functional analysis in public school classrooms for two students with developmental disabilities. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 15(3), 180-189.
  • Rispoli, M., Ninci, J., Neely, L., & Zaini, S. (2014). A systematic review of trial-based functional analysis of challenging behavior. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 26(3), 271-283.
  • Rispoli, M., Burke, M. D., Hatton, H., Ninci, J., Zaini, S., & Sanchez, L. (2015). Training head start teachers to conduct trial-based functional analysis of challenging behavior. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 17(4), 235-244.
  • Rispoli, M., Ninci, J., Burke, M. D., Zaini, S., Hatton, H., & Sanchez, L. (2015). Evaluating the accuracy of results for teacher ımplemented trial-based functional analyses. Behavior Modification, 39(5), 627-653.
  • Schmidt, J. D., Drasgow, E., Halle, J. W., Martin, C. A., & Bliss, S. A. (2014). Discrete trial functional analysis and functional communication training with three individuals with autism and severe problem behavior. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 16(1), 44-55.
  • Sigafoos, J., & Saggers, E. (1995). A discrete-trial approach to the functional analysis of aggressive behaviour in two boys with autism. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 20(4), 287-297.
  • Smith, R. G., & Churchill, R. M. (2002). Identification of environmental determinants of behavior disorders through functional analysis of precursor behaviors. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35(2), 125-136.
  • Snell, M. E., Voorhees, M. D., Berlin, R. A., Stanton-Chapman, T. L., Hadden, S., & McCarty, J. (2012). Use of interview and observation to clarify reported practices of head start staff concerning problem behavior implications for programs and training. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 14(2), 108-117.
  • Tekin-İftar, E. (2012). Dönüşümlü uygulamalar modeli [Alternating conditions model]. E.Tekin-İftar (Ed.) Eğitim ve davranış bilimlerinde tek denekli araştırmalar [Single-subject research in education and behavioral sciences] içinde (ss. 313-327). Ankara: Türk Psikologlar Derneği.
  • Tekin- İftar, E., & Kırcaali- İftar, G. (2013). Özel Eğitimde Yanlışsız Öğretim Yöntemleri [Errorless teaching methods in special education] (2. Baskı). Ankara: Vize Yayıncılık.
  • Thomason‐Sassi, J. L., Iwata, B. A., Neidert, P. L., & Roscoe, E. M. (2011). Response latency as an index of response strength during functional analyses of problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44(1), 51-67.
  • Wallace, M. D., Doney, J. K., Mintz‐Resudek, C. M., & Tarbox, R. S. (2004). Training educators to implement functional analyses. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37(1), 89-92.
Toplam 50 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Gamze Apaydın

Çığıl Aykut Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Eylül 2018
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2018 Cilt: 19 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA Apaydın, G., & Aykut, Ç. (2018). Problem Davranışların İşlevinin Belirlenmesinde Denemeye Dayalı İşlevsel Analiz ile Geleneksel İşlevsel Analiz Sonuçlarının Karşılaştırılması. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi, 19(3), 451-483. https://doi.org/10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.336153




The content of the Journal of Special Education is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Licence. 

download 13337  download         download