Otoklavlama-Retrogradasyon yöntemi uygulanarak pirinç nişastasından elde edilen enzime dirençli nişastanın ekmek hamuru reolojisi ve ekmeğin bazı kimyasal özellikleri üzerine etkisi

Öz

Bu çalışma ile son yıllarda popüleritesi hızla artan ürünlerden olan enzime dirençli nişastanın (EDN) otoklavlama-retrogradasyon (OR) yöntemi ile eldesi ve ekmek hamurunun reolojik özellikleri ile ekmeğin bazı kimyasal özellikleri üzerine etkisinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Başlangıçta bileşiminde EDN bulunmayan saf pirinç nişastasına OR yöntemi uygulandığında içeriğinde %0.57 oranında EDN oluşmuştur. OR uygulanmış EDN (ORN)’nin nem, kül ve toplam nişasta içeriği sırasıyla %8.74, %0.50, %70.82 olarak bulunmuştur. Elde edilen ORN, ekmeklik buğday unu ile yer değiştirme prensibine göre %0, %2, %4 ve %6 oranlarında buğday ununa ilave edilmiştir. Amilograf, Kieffer hamur ve gluten uzayabilirlik testi ve Chen-Hoseney hamur yapışkanlık testleri (CHT) ile farklı oranlarda ORN eklenerek oluşturulan ekmek hamurunun reolojik özellikleri ölçülmüştür. Jelatinizasyonun maksimum noktasındaki vizkosite %6 ilave oranında en düşük değeri (782 B.U.) alırken %2 ilave oranında maksimum kuvvet (Rmax) en yüksek değeri (65.96 g) almıştır. Uzayabilirlik yeteneği %2 ilave oranında kontrol örneğine benzer değerde iken %4 ve %6 oranlarında artmıştır. Yapışkanlık, adezyon kuvveti ve hamur gücü parametreleri üzerine %2 oranında eklenen dirençli nişastanın etkisi olmazken eklenme oranı %4 ve %6’ya çıkarıldığında değerler yükselmiştir. %0, %2, %4 ve %6 oranlarında ORN eklenerek üretilen ekmeklerin dirençli nişasta miktarı ilave oranıyla orantılı olarak artmıştır. Sonuç olarak OR yöntemi ile pirinç nişastasından EDN elde edilebileceği ve %2 oranında ekmek hamuruna eklenen bu ORN’nin reolojik özellikler bakımından kontrol örneğe yakın değerler içerdiği, ancak ekmekte önemli düzeyde diyet lif artışı sağlanabilmesi için ORN’nin en az %6 oranında ilave edilmesi gerektiği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Elde edilen EDN fırıncılık ürünlerinin fonksiyonel özelliklerini geliştirmede değerli bir bileşen olarak kullanılabilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Pirinç nişastası
• Dirençli nişasta
• Otoklavlama-Retrogradasyon
• Ekmek hamuru

Effects of enzyme-resistant starch obtained from rice starch by autoclavingretrogradation method on the rheology of bread dough and some chemical properties of bread

Abstract

This study was aimed to investigate the effects of enzyme resistant starch (ERS)which is rapidly growing product in recent years obtained by autoclaving-retrogradation (AR) method, on the rheological properties of bread dough and some chemical properties of bread. In pure rice starch (PRS), while there was not ERS found at the beginning, 0.57% ERS was occurred after AR application. moisture, ash and total starch content of AR applied ERS (A-ERS) were found as 8.74%, 0.50%, 70.82% respectively. A-ERS was added in to wheat flour at 0%, 2%, 4% and 6% levels replacement with wheat flour. Effects of A-ERS on dough rheological properties was evaluated by using amylograph, Kieffer dough and gluten extensibility rig (KER) and Chen-Hoseney Dough Stickiness Rig tests (CHT). The lowest amylograph peak viscosity (782 B.U.) was observed when A-ERS was added at 6% concentration and the maximum force (Rmax) measured with KER was shown the highest value as 65.96 g by the addition of 2% A-ERS. The extensibility increased with the addition of 4% and 6% A-ERS while at 2% addition level it was given the similar values with control sample. CHT tests showed that inclusion of 2% A-ERS did’nt cause any significant change on the stickiness, work of adhesion and dough strength but significant increase on these parameters were observed as the level of A-ERS increased from 2 to 4 and 6% respectively. The amount of resistant starch present in the chemical composition of the bread increased proportionally with the addition rate of A-ERS. As a result; RS was occurred with AR application, substitution at 2% of A-ERS gave rheological values at least as good as the control sample. However, in order to achieve significant dietary fiber increase in bread, it was concluded that A-ERS should be added at least 6% level. Thus it can be suggested that A-ERS can be used as a valuable ingredient to enhance the functional properties of bakery products.

Keywords

• Rice starch
• Resistant starch
• Autoclaving-Retrogradation
• Bread dough

Kaynakça

1. [1] Bleakley S. Cereal Proteins: Potential Health Applications and Allergenicities. Editors: Hayes M. Novel Proteins for Food, Pharmaceuticals and Agriculture: Sources, Applications and Advances, 77-100, Hoboken, New Jersey, U.S, John Wiley Sons Ltd, 2018.
2. [2] Balkan B. Katı Substrat Fermentasyonu ile Ham Nişastayı Parçalayan Yeni Bir Fungal Amilaz Üretimi Saflaştırılması ve Biyokimyasal Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi. Doktora Tezi, Trakya Üniversitesi, Edirne, Türkiye, 2008.
3. [3] Zhu LJ, Liu QQ, Wilson JD, Gu MH, Shi YC. “Digestibility and physicochemical properties of rice (Oryzasativa L.) flours and starches differing in amylose content”. Carbohydrate Polymers, 86(4), 1751-1759, 2011.
4. [4] Dhital S, Warren FJ, Butterworth PJ, Ellis PR, Gidley MJ. “Mechanisms of starch digestion by α-amylase-structural basis for kinetic properties”. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 57(5), 875-892, 2017.
5. [5] Zhang G, Sofyan M, Hamaker BR. “Slowly digestible state of starch: Mechanism of slow digestion property of gelatinized maize starch”. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 56(12), 4695-4702, 2008.
6. [6] Raigond P, Ezekiel R, Raigond B. “Resistant starch in food: A review”. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 95(10), 1968-1978, 2015.
7. [7] Zaman SA, Sarbini SR. “The potential of resistant starch as a prebiotic”. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 13(3), 1-7, 2015.
8. [8] Demirekin A, Gül H. “Enzime dirençli nişasta ve sağlık üzerindeki etkileri”. Uludağ Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(2), 71-78, 2016.

9. [9] Sievert D, Pomeranz Y. “Enzyme-resistant starch. I. Characterization and evaluation by enzymatic, thermo analytical and microscopic methods”. Cereal Chemistry, 66(4), 342-347, 1989.
10. [10] Parchure AA, Kulkarni PR. “Effect of food processing treatments on generation of resistant starch”. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, 48(4), 257-260, 1997.
11. [11] Perera A, Meda V, Tyler RT. “Resistant starch: A review of analytical protocols for determining resistant starch and of factors affecting the resistant starch content of foods”. Food Research International, 43(8), 1959-1974, 2010.
12. [12] Tan X, Li X, Chen L, Xie F, Li L, Huang J. “Effect of heatmoisture treatment on multi-scale structures and physicochemical properties of breadfruit starch”. Carbohydrate Polymers, 161, 286-294, 2017.
13. [13] Inagaki T, Seib PA. “Firming of bread crumb with crosslinked waxy barley starch substituted for wheat starch”. Cereal Chemistry, 69(3), 321-325, 1992.
14. [14] Armero E, Collar C. “Crumb firming kinetics of wheat breads with anti-staling additives”. Journal of Cereal Science, 28(2), 165-174, 1998.
15. [15] Collar C. “Significance of viscosity profile of pasted and gelled formulated wheat doughs on bread staling”. European Food Research and Technology, 216(6), 505-513, 2003.
16. [16] Dobraszczyk BJ, Morgenstern MP. “Rheology and the bread making process”. Journal of Cereal Science, 38(3), 229-245,2003.
17. [17] Stojceska V, Butler F, Gallagher E, Keehan D. “A comparison of the ability of several small and large deformation rheological measurements of wheat dough to predict baking behaviour”. Journal of Food Engineering, 83(4), 475-482, 2007.
18. [18] Rosell CM, Rojas JA, Benedito de Barber C. “Influence of hydrocolloids on dough rheology and bread quality”. Food Hydrocolloids, 15(1), 75-81, 2001.
19. [19] Dündar AN, Göçmen D. “Effects of autoclaving temperature and storing time on resistantstarch formation and its functional and physico chemical properties”. Carbohydrate Polymers, 97(2), 764-771, 2013.
20. [20] Kieffer R, Wieser H, Henderson MH, Graveland A. “Correlations of the bread-making performance of wheat flour with rheological measurements on a micro-scale”. Journal of Cereal Science, 27(1), 53-60, 1998.
21. [21] Chen WZ, Hoseney RC. “Development of an objective method for dough stickiness”. Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft &Technologie, 28(5), 467-473, 1995.
22. [22] Ashogbon AO, Akintayo TE. “Isolation, composition, morphological and pasting properties of starches from rice cultivars grown in Nigeria”. Starch/Stärke, 64, 181-187, 2012.
23. [23] Arns B, Bartz J, Radunz M, Evangelho JA, Pinto VZ, Zavareze ER, Dias ARG. “Impact of heat-moisture treatment on rice starch, applied directly in grain paddy rice or in isolated starch”. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 60(2), 708-713, 2015.
24. [24] Xue Q, Newman RK, Newman CW. “Effects of heat treatment of barley starches on in vitro digestibility and glucose responses in rats”. Cereal Chemistry, 73(5), 588-592, 1996.
25. [25] Larroque O, Gianibelli MC, MacRitchie F. “Protein composition for pairs of wheat lines with contrasting dough extensibility”. Journal of Cereal Science, 29(1999), 27-31, 1999.
26. [26] Shuey WC, Tipples KH. Amylograph Handbook, American Association of Cereal Chemists, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA. 1980.
27. [27] Rojas JA, Rosell CM, Benedito de Barber C. “Pasting properties of diferent wheat flour-hydrocolloid systems”. Food Hydrocolloids, 13(1), 27-33, 1999.
28. [28] Hassan EG, Mustafa AMI, Elfaki AA. “Effect of different starches on dough rheological properties of wheat flour”. Journal of Agri-Food and Applied Sciences, 3(4), 110-117, 2015.
29. [29] Komlenić DK, Ugarčić-Hardi Ž, Jukić M, Planinić M, BucićKojić A, Strelec I. “Wheat dough rheology and bread quality effected by Lactobacillusbrevis preferment, dry sourdough and lactic acid addition”. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 45, 1417-1425, 2010.
30. [30] Adhikari B, Howes T, Bhandari BR, Truong V.“Stickiness in foods: a review of mechanisms and test methods”. International Journal of Food Properties, 4(1), 1-33, 2001.
31. [31] Grausgruber H, Hatzenbichler E, Ruckenbauer P. “Analysis of repeated stickiness measures of wheat dough using a texture analyzer”. Journal of Texture Studies, 34(1), 69-82, 2003.
32. [32] Turfani V, Narducci V, Durazzo A, Galli V, Carcea M. “Technological, nutritional and functional properties of wheat bread enriched with lentil or carob flours”. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 78, 361-366, 2017.
33. [33] Rosell CM, Santos E. “Impact of fibers on physical characteristics of fresh and staled bake off bread”. Journal of Food Engineering, 98(2), 273-281, 2010.
34. [34] Amagliani L, O’Regan J, Kelly AL, O’Mahony JA. “Chemistry, structure, functionally and applications of rice starch”. Journal of Cereal Science, 70, 291-300, 2016.
35. [35] Giuberti G, Fortunati P, Gallo A. “Can Different Types of Resistant Starch İnfluence the in Vitro Starch Digestion of Gluten Free Breads?”. Journal of Cereal Science, 70, 253-255, 2016.