Sürdürülebilir tedarik zinciri yönetiminde DEMATEL yöntemiyle tedarikçi değerlendirme kriterlerinin incelenmesi ve sağlık sektöründe bir uygulama

Öz

Tedarik zinciri, hammaddenin temin edilmesinden nihai müşteriye ulaşılmasına kadar yapılan tüm faaliyetleri kapsayan bir değer zinciri yönetimidir. Müşteri memnuniyetini sağlayacak biçimde malzeme, bilgi ve para kontrolünü sağladığı için firmaların vazgeçemediği bir yönetim strateji modelidir. Sürdürülebilir tedarik zinciri kavramı, doğal kaynakların tüketilmesi hususunda toplumsal farkındalığın artmasıyla ortaya çıkmıştır. Bu olguya göre firmalar ekonomik, çevresel ve sosyal boyutlar altında tedarik zinciri faaliyetlerini sürdürerek varlıklarını devam ettirmektedir. Bu çalışmada İstanbul’da sağlık alanında faaliyet gösteren bir firmanın sürdürülebilir tedarik zincirinde tedarikçi seçimi konusunda tedarikçilerin sürdürülebilirlik performanslarını ölçebilmek için DEMATEL (Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory) yöntemi uygulanmıştır. Yapılan çalışmada çok kriterli karar verme yöntemi yardımıyla sürdürülebilir tedarik zincirinin performansını en çok arttıracak performans kriterinin verilen kriterler arasından seçilmesi üzerine çalışılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Tedarik zinciri yönetimi,Sürdürülebilirlik,DEMATEL

Analyzing criteria used in supplier evaluation by DEMATEL method in sustainable supply chain management and an application to health sector

Abstract

Supply chain is a value chain management, which consists of all activities beginning from purchasing of the raw materials until delivering the goods to consumers. It is an indispensable strategic management model since it offers controlling materials, information and money according to customer satisfaction. The concept of sustainable supply chain has emerged with increasing public awareness on exhaustion of the natural resources. According to this phenomenon, companies maintain their existence with ongoing supply chain operations under economic, environmental and social dimensions. In this study, a supplier selection problem in a healthcare company is analyzed with utilizing Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) approach under sustainable supply chain management concept in order to measure suppliers’ sustainability performances. By the help of this multi criteria decision-making method, the most efficient performance criterion is selected among the criteria in order to improve sustainable supply chain performance.

Keywords

• Supply chain management,Sustainability,DEMATEL

Kaynakça

1. Farahani RZ, Rezapour S, Drezner T, Fallah S. “Supply chain network design classifications, paradigms and analyses”. Omega, 41, 969-983, 2013.
2. Uysal F. “An integrated model for sustainable performance measurement in supply chain”. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 62, 689-694, 2012.
3. Farahani RZ, Rezapour S, Drezner T, Fallah S. “Competitive supply chain network design: An overview of classifications, models, solution techniques and applications”. Omega, 45, 92-118, 2014.
4. Zhang Q, Shah N, Wassick J, Helling R, Egerschot P. “Sustainable supply chain optimisation: An industrial case study”. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 74, 68-83 2014.
5. Eskandarpour M, Dejax P, Miemczyk J, Péton O. “Sustainable supply chain network design: An optimization-oriented review”. Omega, 54, 11-32, 2015.
6. Dadhich P, Genovese A, Kumar N, Acquaye A. “Developing sustainable supply chains in the UK construction industry: A case study". International Journal of Production Economics, 164, 271-284, 2015.
7. Lin RJ. “Using fuzzy DEMATEL to evaluate the green supply chain management practices”. Journal of Cleaner Production, 40, 32-39, 2013.
8. Frostenson M, Prenkert F. “Sustainable supply chain management when focal firms are complex: a network perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 85-94, 2015.

9. Silvestre BS. “Sustainable supply chain management in emerging economies: Environmental turbulence, institutional voids and sustainability trajectories”. International Journal of Production Economics, 167, 156-169, 2015.
10. Liang H. “Identification of critical success factors for sustainable development of biofuel industry in China based on grey decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL)”. Journal of Cleaner Production, 131, 500-508, 2016.
11. Su CM, Horng DJ, Tseng ML, Chiu ASF, Wu KJ, Chen HP. “Improving sustainable supply chain management using a novel hierarchical grey-DEMATEL approach”. Journal of Cleaner Production, 134, 469-481, 2016.
12. Chuang ML, Shaw WH. “Distinguishing the critical success factors between e-commerce, enterprise resource planning, and supply chain management”. Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE Engineering Management Society, 596-601, Albuquerque, USA, 13-15 August 2000.
13. Bowersox DJ, La Londe BJ, Smykay EW. Readings in Physical Distribution Management; The Logistics of Marketing. New York, USA, Macmillan, 1969.
14. Ross DF. Competing Through Supply Chain Management: Creating Market-Winning Strategies Through Supply Chain Partnerships. Norwell, USA, Springer, 2013.
15. Metz PJ. “Demystifying Supply Chain Management”. Supply Chain Management Review, (4), 4655, 1998.
16. Houlihan JB. “International Supply Chain Management”. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Materials Management, 15(1), 22-38, 1985.
17. Ganeshan E, Jack M, Magazine J, Stephens P. A taxonomic review of supply chain management research. Quantitative models for supply chain management. New York, USA, Springer, 1999.
18. Sadigh AN, Fallah H, Nahavandi N. “A multi-objective supply chain model integrated with location of distribution centers and supplier selection decisions”. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 69(1-4), 225-235, 2013.
19. Baghalian A, Rezapour S, Farahani RZ. “Robust supply chain network design with service level against disruptions and demand uncertainties: A real-life case”. European Journal of Operational Research, 227(1), 199-215, 2013.
20. Seuring S, Müller M. “From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management”. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1699-1710, 2008.
21. Harvard Business Review. “Why Sustainability Is Now the Key Driver of Innovation”. https://hbr.org/2009/09/why-sustainability-is-now-the-key-driver-of-innovation (19.01.2017).
22. Marchant R. “Understanding complexity in savannas: climate, biodiversity and people”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2(1-2), 101-108, 2010.
23. Andrew B. “Market failure, government failure and externalities in climate change mitigation: The case for a carbon tax”. Public Administration and Development, 28(5), 393-401, 2008.
24. Zhou Z, Cheng S, Hua B. “Supply chain optimization of continuous process industries with sustainability considerations”. Computers & Chemical Engineering - Journal, 24(2-7), 1151-1158, 2000.
25. Song W, Ming X, Liu HC. “Identifying critical risk factors of sustainable supply chain management: A rough strength-relation analysis method”. Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 100-115, 2017.
26. Liu S, Kasturiratne D, Moizer J. “A hub-and-spoke model for multi-dimensional integration of green marketing and sustainable supply chain management”. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(4), 581-588, 2012.
27. Govindan K, Khodaverdi R, Jafarian A. “A fuzzy multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability performance of a supplier based on triple bottom line approach”. Journal of Cleaner Production, 47, 345-354, 2013.
28. Chaabane A, Ramudhin A, Paquet M. “Design of sustainable supply chains under the emission trading scheme”. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(1), 37-49, 2012.
29. Ansari ZN, Kant R. “A state-of-art literature review reflecting 15 years of focus on sustainable supply chain management”. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142(4), 2524-2543, 2017.
30. Zuckerman A. Supply Chain Management: Operations. New York, USA, Wiley, 2002.
31. Taghizadeh Herat A. “Using DEMATEL-Analytic network process (ANP) hybrid algorithm approach for selecting improvement projects of Iranian excellence model in healthcare sector”. African Journal Business Management, 6(2), 627-645, 2012.
32. Hsu CH, Wang FK, Tzeng GH. “The best vendor selection for conducting the recycled material based on a hybrid MCDM model combining DANP with VIKOR”. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 66, 95-111, 2012.
33. Tseng ML, Lin YH. “Application of fuzzy DEMATEL to develop a cause and effect model of municipal solid waste management in Metro Manila”. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 158(1-4), 519-533, 2009.
34. Tsai WH, Chou WC. “Selecting management systems for sustainable development in SMEs: A novel hybrid model based on DEMATEL, ANP and ZOGP”. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2), 1444-1458, 2009.
35. Tzeng GH, Chiang CH, Li CW. “Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL”. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(4), 1028-1044, 2007.
36. Orji I, Wei S. “A decision support tool for sustainable supplier selection in manufacturing firms”. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 7(5), 1293-1315, 2014.
37. Chiou CY, Hsu CW, Chen HC. “Using DEMATEL to explore a casual and effect model of sustainable supplier selection”. IEEE International Summer Conference of Asia Pacific, Dalian, China, 10-12 July 2011.
38. Aksakal E, Dağdeviren M. "ANP ve DEMATEL yöntemleri ile personel seçimi problemine bütünleşik bir yaklaşım”. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik-Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(4), 905-913, 2010.