Ticari Açıklık, Ekonomik Büyüme ve CO2 Emisyonu: Nafta Ülkeleri Üzerine Bir Analiz

Zeliha Gülmez

Ticari Açıklık, Ekonomik Büyüme ve CO2 Emisyonu: Nafta Ülkeleri Üzerine Bir Analiz

Öz

İklim değişikliği özellikle son otuz yılda dünya çapında endişe yaratan sorunlardan biri haline gelmiştir. Bu yüzden küresel ısınmaya sebep olan sera gazı emisyonlarındaki artış yoğun bir şekilde araştırılmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, 1997-2018 dönemine ait verileri kullanarak Kuzey Amerika Serbest Ticaret Anlaşması’na (Kanada, Meksika, ABD) taraf ülkeler için ekonomik büyüme, ticari açıklık ve CO2 emisyonları arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemektir. Bu doğrultuda çalışmada Pedroni FMOLS, DOLS ve eşbütünleşme testleri kullanılmıştır. Analiz bulgularına göre değişkenler arasında uzun dönemde eşbütünleşme ilişkisi bulunmaktadır. Ayrıca ticari açıklık ve CO2 emisyonları arasında negatif ve anlamlı bir ilişkinin varlığı saptanmıştır. Bununla birlikte çalışmada elde edilen bulgular ekonomik büyüme ve CO2 emisyonu arasındaki ilişkinin Çevresel Kuznets Eğrisi hipotezini desteklediğini ortaya koymaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Akbostancı, E., Türüt Aşık, S. ve Tunç, G. İ. (2009). The Relationship Between Income And Environment in Turkey: is There An Environmental Kuznets Curve?. Energy policy, 37(3), 861-867.
Akbulut Bekar, S. ve Terzi, H. (2017). Türkiye’de CO2 Emisyonu ile Dışa Açıklık Arasındaki İlişki. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 1, 83-98.
Ali, Z., Zaman, Z. ve Ali, M. (2015). The Effect of International Trade on Carbon Emissions: Evidencefrom Pakistan. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 9, 289-300.
Ali, H.S., Law, S.H. ve Zannah, T.I. (2016). Dynamic Impact Of Urbanization, Economic Growth, Energy Consumption, And Trade Openness on CO2 Emissions In Nigeria. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 23, 12435-12443.
Al-Mulali, U., Ozturk, I. ve Solarin, S. A. (2016). Investigating The Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis in Seven Regions: The Role Of Renewable Energy. Ecological indicators, 67, 267-282.
Alper, F.Ö. ve Alper, A.E. (2018). Ticari Açıklık Çevre İlişkisi. International Congress of Energy, Economy and Security, 35-40.
Ang, J.B. (2007). CO2 Emissions, Energy Consumption, And Output in France. Energy Policy, 35, 4772-4778.
Ansari, M.A., Haider, S. ve Khan, N.A. (2020). Does Trade Openness Affects Global Carbon Dioxide Emissions Evidence from The Top 10 CO2 Emitters. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 31(1), 32-53.

Apergis, N. ve Payne J.E. (2009). CO2 Emissions, Energy Usage, And Output in Central America. Energy Policy, 37, 3282-3286.
Apergis, N. ve Payne J.E. (2010). The Emissions, Energy Consumption, And Growth Nexus: Evidence From The Commonwealth of Independent States. Energy Policy,38, 650-655.
Arouri, M.H., Ben Youssef, A., M’Henni, H. ve Rault, C. (2012) Energy Consumption, Economic Growth and CO2 Emissions in Middle East and North African Countries. Energy Policy, 45, 342-349.
Artan, S., Hayaloğlu, P. ve Seyhan, B. (2015). Türkiye’de Çevre Kirliliği, Dışa Açıklık ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13(1), 308-325.
Atıcı C. (2012). Carbon Emissions, Trade Liberalization, And The Japan–Asean Interaction: A Group-Wise Examination. Journal of the Japanese And International Economies, 26(1), 167-178.
Azomahou, T., Laisney, F. ve Van, P. N. (2006). Economic Development And CO2 Emissions: A Nonparametric Panel Approach. Journal of Public Economics, 90(6-7), 1347-1363.
BP. (2021). Statistical Review of World Energy. Erişim Tarihi: 10.10.2022. https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of world -energy/co2-emissions.html.
Chen, F., Jiang, G. ve Kitila, G.M. (2021). Trade Openness and CO2 Emissions: The Heterogeneous and Mediating Effects for the Belt and Road Countries. Sustainability, 13, 1958 (1-16).
Choi, I. (2001). Unit Root Tests for Panel Data. Journal of International Money and Finance, 20, 249-272.
Copeland, B.R. ve Taylor, M.S. (2004). Trade, Growth and the Environment. Journal of Economic Literature. 42(1), 7-71.
Dauda, L., Long, X., Mensah, C. N., Salman, M., Boamah, K. B., Ampon-Wireko, S. ve Dogbe, C. S. K. (2021). Innovation, Trade Openness And CO2 emissions in Selected Countries in Africa. Journal of Cleaner Production, 281, 125143.
Dean, J.M. (2002). Does Trade Liberalization Harm The Environment? A New Test. Canadian Journal of Economics, 35 (4), 819-842.
Dinda, S. (2004). Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: A Survey. Ecological Economics, 49 (4), 431-455.
Dinda, S. ve Coondoo, D. (2006). Income and Emission: A Panel Data-Based Cointegration Analysis. Ecological Economics, 57(2), 167-181.
Dogan, E. ve Turkekul, B. (2016). CO2 Emissions, Real Output, Energy Consumption, Trade, Urbanization And Financial Development: Testing The EKC Hypothesis For The USA. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23, 1203-1213.
Dou, Y., Zhao, J., Malik, M.N. ve Dong, K. (2021). Assesing the Impact of Trade Openness on CO2 Emissions: Evidence from China-Japan-ROK FTA Countires. Journal of Environmental Management, 296, 113241.
Engel, R.F. ve Granger, C.W.J. (1987). Cointegration And Error Correction: Representation, Estimation And Testing. Econometrica, 55, 251-276.
Ertuğrul H. M., Çetin, M., Şeker, F. ve Doğan, E. (2016). The Impact of Trade Openness on Global Carbon Dioxide Emissions: Evidence from The Top Ten Emitters Among Developing Countries, Munich Personal RePEc Archive, 67, 543-555.
Farhani S., Shahbaz M., Arouri M. (2013). Panel Analysis of CO2 emissions, GDP, Energy Consumption, Trade Openness And Urbanization for MENA Countries. MPRA Paper No. 49258.
Farhani, S., Chaibi, A., ve Rault, C. (2014). CO2 emissions, output, energy consumption, and trade in Tunisia. Economic Modelling, 38, 426-434.
Farhani, S. ve Öztürk, İ. (2015). Causal Relationship Between CO2 Emissions, Real Gdp, Energy Consumption, Financial Development, Trade Openness, And Urbanization in Tunisia. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 22, 15663-15676.
Fisher, R.A. (1932). Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Forth Edition, Edinburgh, Oliver and Boyd.
Fotros, M. H. ve Maaboudi, R. (2011). Trade Openness and CO2 Emissions in Iran, 1971-2008. International Journal of Business and Development Studies, 3(1), 73-84.
Friedl, B. ve Getzner, M. (2003). Determinants of CO2 Emissions in A Small Open Economy. Ecological economics, 45(1), 133-148.
Grossman, G. ve Krueger, A. (1991). Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. National Bureau of Economics Research Working PaperNo. 3194 NBER, Cambridge.
Gülmez, A. ve Yardımcıoğlu, F. (2012). OECD Ülkelerinde Ar-Ge Harcamaları ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi: Panel Eşbütünleşme ve Panel Nedensellik Analizi (1990-2010). Maliye Dergisi, 163, 335-353.
Halıcıoğlu, F. (2009) An Econometric Study Of CO2 Emissions, Energy Consumption, Income and Foreign Trade in Turkey. Energy Policy,37, 1156-1164.
He, J. ve Richard, P. (2010). Environmental Kuznets Curve For CO2 in Canada. Ecological economics, 69(5), 1083-1093.
Heil, M. T. ve Selden, T. M. (2001). Carbon Emissions And Economic Development: Future Trajectories Based On Historical Experience. Environment And Development Economics, 6(1), 63-83.
Hossain, M. S. (2011). Panel Estimation For CO2 Emissions, Energy Consumption, Economic Growth, Trade Openness And Urbanization Of Newly Industrialized Countries. Energy Policy, 39(11), 6991-6999.
IEA. (2021). Global Energy Review 2021, CO2 Emissions. Erişim Tarihi: 09.11.2022. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-energy-review-2021/co2-emissions.
Im, K., Pesaran, H. ve Shin, Y. (2003). Testing For Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels. J. Econ, 115, 53-74.
Jayanthakumaran, K., Verma, R. ve Liu, Y. (2012). CO2 Emissions, Energy Consumption, Trade and Income: A Comparative Analysis of Chinaand India. Energy Policy, 42, 450-460.
Jun, W., Mahmood, H. ve Zakaria, M. (2020). Impact of Trade Openness on Environment in China. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 21(4), 1185-1202.
Kao, C. (1999). Spurious Regression And Residual‐Based Tests For Cointegration in Panel Data.J. Econ. 90, 1-44.
Kasman, A. ve Duman, Y.S. (2015). CO2 Emissions, Economic Growth, Energy Consumption, Trade And Urbanization In New Eu Member And Candidate Countries: A Panel Data Analysis. Economic Modelling,44, 97-103.
Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic Growth And Income Inequality. American Economic Review, 45, 1-28.
Leal, P. H. ve Marques, A. C. (2020). Rediscovering the EKC Hypothesis For The 20 Highest CO2 Emitters Among OECD Countries By Level Of Globalization. International Economics, 164, 36-47.
Li, T., Wang, Y. ve Zhao, D. (2016). Environmental Kuznets Curve in China: New Evidence From Dynamic Panel Analysis. Energy Policy, 91, 138-147.
Liang, W. ve Yang, M. (2019). Urbanization, Economic Growth And Environmental Pollution: Evidence From China. Sustainable Computing: Informatics And Systems, 21, 1-9.
Liddle, B. (2001). Free Trade And The Environment-Development System. Ecological Economics, 39(1), 21-36.
Lv, Z. ve Xu, T. (2019). Trade Openness, Urbanization and CO2 Emissions: Dynamic Panel Data Analysis of Middle-Income Countries. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 28(3), 317-330.
Maddala, G. ve Wu, S. (1999). A Comparative Study Of Unit Root Tests And A New Simple Test.Oxf. Bull. Econ. Stat. 61, 631-652.
Mahmood, H., Maalel, N. ve Zarrad, O. (2019). Trade Openness and CO2 Emissions: Evidence from Tunisia. Sustainability, 11, 3295-3309.
Managi, S. (2004). Trade Liberalization And The Environment: Carbon Dioxide For 1960-1999. Economics Bulletin, 17(1), 1-5.
Naranpanawa, A. (2011). Does Trade Openness Promote Carbon Emissions?Empirical Evidence from Sri Lanka. The Empirical Economics Letters, 10(10), 974-986.
Nathaniel, S.P. (2020). Modelling Urbanization, Trade Flow, Economic Growth And Energy Consumption With Regards To The Environmentin Nigeria. Geo Journal, 85, 1499-1513.
Naughton, H. T. (2006). The Impact Of Trade On The Environment. University of Oregon Working Paper, 1-36.
Omri, A., Daly, S., Rault, C. ve Chaibi, A. (2015). Financial Development, Environmental Quality, Trade and Economic Growth: What Causes What in MENA Countries. Energy Economics, 48, 242-252.
Orman, H.L., Ceylan, S. ve Yılmaz Şahin, B. (2019). Dışa Açıklık ve Çevresel Kirlilik İlişkisi: Türkiye Örneği. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 3, 12-24.
Öztürk, İ. ve Acaravcı, A. (2010). On The Relationship Between Energy Consumption, Co2 Emissions And Economic Growth in Europe. Energy, 35, 5412-5420.
Öztürk, İ. ve Acaravcı, A. (2013). The Long-Run and Causal Analysis of Energy, Growth, Openness and Financial Development on CarbonEmissions in Turkey. Energy Economics, 36, 262-267.
Pata, U.K. ve Caglar, A.E. (2021). Investigating the EKC Hypothesis with Renewable Energy Consumption, Human Capital, Globalization and Trade Openness for China: Evidence from Augmented ARDL Approachwith A Structural Break, Energy, 216 (1), 119220.
Pedroni, P. (1999). Critical Values For Cointegration Tests in Heterogeneous Panels With Multiple Regressors. Oxf. Bull. Econ. Stat., 61, 653-670.
Pedroni, P. (2000). Fully-Modified OLS for Heterogeneous Cointegrated Panels. Advances in Econometrics, 15, 93-130.
Pedroni, P. (2001). Purchasing Power Parity Tests in Cointegrated Panels. Review of Economics and Statistics, 83, 727-731.
Pedroni, P. (2004). Panel Cointegration: Asymptotic And Finite Sample Properties Of Pooled Time Series Tests With An Application To The PPP Hypothesis. Econ Theory, 20, 597-625.
Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y. ve Smith, R. J. (2001). Bound Testing Approaches to the Analysis of Long-Run Relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics,16, 289-326.
Rahman, M. Z. (2013). Relationship Between Trade Openness and CarbonEmission: A Case of Bangladesh. Journal of Empirical Economics,1(4),126-134.
Rahman, M.M. ve Alam, K. (2021). Clean Energy, Population Density, Urbanization and Environmental Pollution Nexus: Evidence from Bangladesh. Renewable Energy, 172, 1063-1072.
Ren, S., Yuan, B., Ma, X. ve Chen, X. (2014). International Trade, FDI (Foreign Direct Investment) and Embodied CO2 Emissions: A Case Study of Chinas Industrial Sectors. China Economic Review, 28, 123-134.
Roca, J., Padilla, E., Farré, M. ve Galletto, V. (2001). Economic Growth And Atmospheric Pollution in Spain: Discussing The Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis. Ecological Economics, 39(1), 85-99.
Saidi, K. ve Mbarek, M.B. (2017). The Impact of Income, Trade, Urbanization, And Financial Development on CO2 Emissions In 19 Emerging Economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 24, 12748-12757.
Shafik, N. (1994). Economic Development And Environmental Quality: An Econometric Analysis. Oxford Economic Papers, 46, 757-773.
Shahbaz, M., Hye, Q.M.A., Tiwari, A.K., ve Leitão, N.C. (2013). Economic Growth, Energy Consumption, Financial Development, International Trade and CO2 Emissions in Indonesia. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 25, 109-121.
Shahzad, S. J.H., Kumar, R.R., Zakaria, M. ve Hurr, M. (2017). Carbon Emission, Energy Consumption, Trade Openness and Financial Development in Pakistan: A Revist. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 70, 185-192.
Soytaş, U. ve Sarı, R. (2009). Energy Consumption, Economic Growth, And Carbon Emissions: Challenges Faced By an EU Candidate Member. Ecological Economics, 68,1667-1675.
Stern, D.I. (2004). The Rise and Fall of the Environmental Kuznets Curve. World Development, 32(8), 1419-1439.
Tamazian, A. ve Rao, B. B. (2010). Do Economic, Financial And Institutional Developments Matter For Environmental Degradation? Evidence From Transitional Economies. Energy Economics, 32(1), 137-145.
Tatoğlu, F. Y. (2017). Panel Zaman Serileri Analizi. İstanbul: Beta Yayınları.
Topallı, N. (2021). Ticari Açıklık ve CO2 Emisyonu Arasındaki İlişki: Türkiye Örneği. acikerisim@nevsehir.edu.tr.
Ubaidillah, N.Z., Decker, L., Rahim, R.A. ve Ismail, F. (2013). The Nexus Between Trade Openness and CO2 Emissions in Selected BIMP-EAGA Countries. BIMP-EAGA Journal for Sustainable Tourism Development, 2(2), 29-39.
United Nations Climate Change. (2022). What is the Kyoto Protocol? Erişim Tarihi: 12.12.2022. https://unfccc.int/.
Westerlund, J. (2007). Testing For Error Correction in Panel Data. Oxf. Bull. Econ. Stat., 69,0305-9049. World Integrated Trade Solution. (2023). Trade Balance, Exports And Imports https://wits.worldbank.org/. Erişim Tarihi: 07.08.2023
Villareal, M. Ve Fergusson, I. F. (2014). NAFTA at 20: Overview and Trade Effects. CRS Report.
Yıldırım, B. (2013). Ticari Açıklık ve CO2 Emisyonu: Karşılaştırmalı Ülke Analizi. International Journal of Social Science, 6(1), 1611-1621.
Zhang, S., Liu, X. ve Bae, J. (2017). Does Trade Openness Affect CO2 Emissions: Evidence from Ten Newly Industrialized Countries?. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 24, 17616-17625

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

-

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Zeliha Gülmez ^*
0000-0002-7650-4761
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

24 Haziran 2024

Gönderilme Tarihi

21 Mart 2023

Kabul Tarihi

30 Ağustos 2023

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2024 Cilt: 13 Sayı: 1

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA63CW42ER

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Gülmez, Z. (2024). Ticari Açıklık, Ekonomik Büyüme ve CO2 Emisyonu: Nafta Ülkeleri Üzerine Bir Analiz. Paradigma: İktisadi ve İdari Araştırmalar Dergisi, 13(1), 1-15. https://izlik.org/JA63CW42ER

AMA

1.Gülmez Z. Ticari Açıklık, Ekonomik Büyüme ve CO2 Emisyonu: Nafta Ülkeleri Üzerine Bir Analiz. Paradigma: İktisadi ve İdari Araştırmalar Dergisi. 2024;13(1):1-15. https://izlik.org/JA63CW42ER

Chicago

Gülmez, Zeliha. 2024. “Ticari Açıklık, Ekonomik Büyüme ve CO2 Emisyonu: Nafta Ülkeleri Üzerine Bir Analiz”. Paradigma: İktisadi ve İdari Araştırmalar Dergisi 13 (1): 1-15. https://izlik.org/JA63CW42ER.

EndNote

Gülmez Z (01 Haziran 2024) Ticari Açıklık, Ekonomik Büyüme ve CO2 Emisyonu: Nafta Ülkeleri Üzerine Bir Analiz. Paradigma: İktisadi ve İdari Araştırmalar Dergisi 13 1 1–15.

IEEE

[1]Z. Gülmez, “Ticari Açıklık, Ekonomik Büyüme ve CO2 Emisyonu: Nafta Ülkeleri Üzerine Bir Analiz”, Paradigma: İktisadi ve İdari Araştırmalar Dergisi, c. 13, sy 1, ss. 1–15, Haz. 2024, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA63CW42ER

ISNAD

Gülmez, Zeliha. “Ticari Açıklık, Ekonomik Büyüme ve CO2 Emisyonu: Nafta Ülkeleri Üzerine Bir Analiz”. Paradigma: İktisadi ve İdari Araştırmalar Dergisi 13/1 (01 Haziran 2024): 1-15. https://izlik.org/JA63CW42ER.

JAMA

1.Gülmez Z. Ticari Açıklık, Ekonomik Büyüme ve CO2 Emisyonu: Nafta Ülkeleri Üzerine Bir Analiz. Paradigma: İktisadi ve İdari Araştırmalar Dergisi. 2024;13:1–15.

MLA

Gülmez, Zeliha. “Ticari Açıklık, Ekonomik Büyüme ve CO2 Emisyonu: Nafta Ülkeleri Üzerine Bir Analiz”. Paradigma: İktisadi ve İdari Araştırmalar Dergisi, c. 13, sy 1, Haziran 2024, ss. 1-15, https://izlik.org/JA63CW42ER.

Vancouver

1.Zeliha Gülmez. Ticari Açıklık, Ekonomik Büyüme ve CO2 Emisyonu: Nafta Ülkeleri Üzerine Bir Analiz. Paradigma: İktisadi ve İdari Araştırmalar Dergisi [Internet]. 01 Haziran 2024;13(1):1-15. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA63CW42ER