Bölgesel Güvenlik Kompleksi Bağlamında Artan Arktik Rekabeti ve Askeri Güvenlik

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 13 Sayı: Özel Sayı, 90 - 111, 10.10.2024

Ezgi Şahin , Merve Suna Özel Özcan

Öz

Arktik’te küresel ısınma sonucunda eriyen buzullar, enerji kaynaklarının ve alternatif deniz rotalarının kullanımını mümkün hale getirmiştir. Bu durum, bölgenin ekonomik ve politik değerini artırmıştır. Bu bağlamda, Arktik, bölgesel ve küresel güçler için çekim merkezi haline gelirken, Arktik Konseyi, bölge devletleri arasında iş birliğini teşvik eden temel mekanizma olarak öne çıkmaktadır. Ancak, Rusya-Ukrayna Savaşı bölgenin güvenlik dinamiklerini değiştirmiştir. Bu gelişme, Arktik Konseyi’nin, Rusya’nın eylemlerine tepki olarak faaliyetlerini askıya almasına neden olmuş ve bölgede askeri hareketliliği artırmıştır. Bu durum, güvenlik ikilemini tetikleyerek, tarafların askeri varlıklarını ve operasyonlarını artırma eğilimini güçlendirmiştir. İsveç ve Finlandiya’nın NATO’ya üyeliğiyle Arktik Konseyi’nin yapısı, yedi NATO üyesi devlet ve Rusya olarak şekillenmiştir. NATO’nun Arktik’teki genişlemesi, Rusya tarafından bir tehdit olarak değerlendirilmektedir; buna karşılık, Rusya’nın Çin ile ilişkilerini derinleştirmesi ise NATO’nun tehdit algılarını şekillendirmektedir. Arktik bölgesinde Rusya ve Çin’in iş birliği, NATO’ya karşı yeni bir denge unsuru olarak ortaya çıkmıştır. Bu bağlamda, Arktik’te bölgesel güvenlik kompleksi teorisi çerçevesinde askeri sektör açısından, Arktik NATO ve Avrasya-Arktik olmak üzere iki alt sistemden oluşan jeopolitik ittifak yapısı ortaya çıkmıştır. Bu makalenin amacı, Arktik’in küresel rekabet arenasına dönüşüm sürecini ve güvenlik dinamiklerini incelemektir. Çalışmada bölgedeki stratejik varlıklar tartışıldıktan sonra, tarafların artan askeri varlık ve faaliyetlerinin bölgesel güvenlik ittifakları üzerindeki etkileri analiz edilecektir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Arktik, Arktik Konseyi, Bölgesel Güvenlik Kompleksi, Rusya, NATO

Destekleyen Kurum

Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Koordinasyon Birimi

Proje Numarası

2024/063

Increasing Arctic Competition and Military Security in the Context of Regional Security Complex

Öz

The melting glaciers in the Arctic, resulting from global warming, have facilitated using energy resources and alternative maritime routes. This development has enhanced the economic and political value of the region. As the Arctic has become a focal point for regional and global powers, the Arctic Council has emerged as a fundamental mechanism promoting cooperation among the regional states. However, the Russia-Ukraine War has altered the security dynamics of the Arctic. This development has led to suspending the Arctic Council’s activities in response to Russia’s actions, resulting in increased military mobility in the region. Consequently, this situation has triggered a security dilemma, reinforcing the tendency of the parties to augment their military presence and operations. With the accession of Sweden and Finland to NATO, the structure of the Arctic Council has shaped itself into comprising seven NATO member states and Russia. While NATO’s expansion in the Arctic has led Russia to perceive this situation as a threat, Russia’s deepening of relations with China in response is also shaping NATO’s threat perceptions. In this context, in alignment with the theory of regional security complexes in the Arctic, a geopolitical alliance structure has emerged consisting of two subsystems: Arctic NATO and Eurasian-Arctic. The cooperation between Russia and China in the Arctic has surfaced as a new balancing factor against NATO. This article aims to examine the process of the Arctic’s transformation into a global competition arena and its security dynamics. In this context, after discussing the strategic assets in the region, the effects of the increasing military presence of the parties on regional security alliances will be analyzed.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Arctic, Arctic Council, Regional Security Complex, Russia, NATO

Proje Numarası

2024/063

Kaynakça

• Alberque, W. & Fraioli, P. (2023, 12 Mart). Russia’s new foreign policy concept: The airing of grievances and a new vision of world order. https://www.iiss.org/online-analysis/online-analysis/2023/04/russia-new-foreign-policy-concept-the-airing-of-grievances-and-a-new-vision-of-world-order
• Allen, T. W., Whitman, C. T., & Brimmer, E. (2019). Arctic imperatives: Reinforcing U.S. Strategy on America’s fourth coast. Independent Task Force Report No. 75.
• Allied Command Transformation, (2023). The future of the high north. https://www.act.nato.int/article/the-future-of-the-high-north
• Anderson, A. (2009). After the Ice: Life, death and geopolitics in the new Arctic. HarperCollins Publishers.
• Andreeva, S. (2023). Science at Stake-Russia and the Arctic Council. Arctic Review on Law and Politics, 14,112-131.
• Arctic Portal. (2024,). Arctic council progresses in restarting project-level work. https://arcticportal.org/ap-library/news/3515-arctic-council-resumes
• Arctic Yearbook. (2023). Spence, J., Alexander E., Rodven, R., & Harriger S. What Makes the Arctic Exceptional? Stories of Geopolitics, Environments and Homelands. What makes the Arctic exceptional? Stories of geopolitics, environments and homelands - Arctic Yearbook
• Arruda, G. & Johannsdottir, L. (2024). Climate change adaptation and green finance: The Arctic and non-Arctic world. Routledge Advances in Climate Change Research.
• Brigham, L. W. (2017, 3 Şubat). The Arctic Waterway to Russia’s economic future. https://www.wilsonquarterly.com/quarterly/into-thearctic/the-arctic-waterway-to-russias-economic-future/
• Brimmer, E.D. (2023). Changing geopolitics in the Arctic. Subcommittee on Transportation and Maritime Security United States House of Representatives 1st Session, 118th Congress. Council on Foreign Relations: https://www.cfr.org/report/changing-geopolitics-arctic-0
• Buchanan, E. (2020, 14 Mart). Russia’s Updated Arctic Strategy: New Strategic Planning Document Approved. https:/ /arctic-governance/arctic-circumpolar-governance/where-is-the-arctic/
• Buzan, B. (2015). İnsanlar, devletler & korku. (E. Çıtak, Çev.). RÖLE Akademik Yayıncılık.
• Buzan, B. ve Waever, O. (2003). Regions and Powers the structure of international Security. Cambridge University Press.
• Buzan, B., Waever, O. & De Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A new framework for analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
• Charron, A. (2021, 18 Nisan). Common ground: Why Russia and Canada should cooperate in the Arctic. https://carnegieendowment.org/posts/2021/08/common-ground-why-russia-and-canada-should-cooperate-in-the-arctic?lang=en&center=russia-eurasia
• Child, N. (2022). Russia’s new Maritime Doctrine: Adrift from reality?. https://www.iiss.org/online-analysis/military-balance/2022/09/russias-new-maritime-doctrine-adrift-from-reality/
• Clark, J. (2024). Pentagon Arctic policy official underscores critical role of alliances in evolving region Pentagon Arctic policy official underscores critical role of alliances in evolving region. https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/3741920/pentagon-arctic-policy-official-underscores-critical-role-of-alliances-in-evolv
• Cozad, Mark, Cortez A. Cooper III, Alexis A. Blanc, David Woodworth, Anthony Atler, Kotryna Jukneviciute, Mark Hvizda, & Sale Lilly. (2024) Future Scenarios for Sino-Russian Military Cooperation: Possibilities, Limitations, and Consequences. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA2061-5.html. Also available in print form.
• Discovering the Arctic. (2024). Where is the Arctic?. https://discoveringthearctic.org.uk/arctic-governance/arctic-circumpolar-governance/where-is-the-arctic
• Edvardsen, A. (2024, 21 Mayıs). Pentagon’s upcoming new Arctic strategy: We talk to Norway, Finland, and Sweden a lot. https://www.highnorthnews.com/en/pentagons-upcoming-new-arctic-strategy-we-talk-norway-finland-and-sweden-lot
• Fouche, G. & Pedersen, J. G. (2022, 12 Şubat). Dark Arctic: NATO allies wake up to Russian supemacy in the region. https://www.reuters.com/graphics/ARCTIC-SECURITY/zgvobmblrpd/
• GAO (2023) Arctic Region: Factors that affect the advancement of U.S. priorities. GAO reports, 1-12. Rapor No: GAO-24-107192
• Garamone, J. (2023, 14 Nisan). Arctic heating up literally and as scene of strategic competition. https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/3353265/arctic-heating-up-literally-and-as-scene-of-strategic-competition
• Garrick, L. & Miller, R. (2024). Wealth of the Arctic: Trade, trends and opportunity at northern latitudes. Alaska Business Monthly, 40(3), 10-17.
• Geir H., Soltvedt, I.F. & Rottem, S. V. (2019). Arctic governance, Norway, Russia and Asia. I.B. Tauris.
• Genç, A. (2021). Uluslararası güvenlikte Arktika Bölgesi. Astana Yayınları.
• Geographic Guide. (2008, 15 Mart). Map of the Arctic Region. https://www.geographicguide.com/arctic-map.htm.
• Goverment of Canada, (2020). Statement of Canada’s Arctic foreign policy. https://sencanada.ca/Content/Sen/Committee/441/POFO/briefs/POFO_SS-1_Brief_ARF_e.pdf
• Gronholt Pedersen, J. & Fouche, G. (2023). Arctic security. https://www.reuters.com/graphics/ARCTIC-SECURITY/zgvobmblrpd/.
• Güçyetmez, F. (2023). The Impact of NATO Enlargement on Russian security in the Baltic and Arctic. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 12(4), 1564-1578. https://doi.org/10.33206/mjss.1267796
• Holm, A. O. (2024). The Arctic arms race extends beyond military power. https://www.highnorthnews.com/en/arctic-arms-race-extends-beyond-military-power.
• Hong, N. (2011). Arctic energy: Pathway to conflict or cooperation in the high north? http://www.ensec.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=310:arctic-energy-pathway-to-conflict-or-cooperation-in-the-high-north&catid=116:content0411&Itemid=375
• Huasheng, Z. & Kortunov, A. (2024). The world in 2035: The goog, the bad and the ugly. https://russiancouncil.ru/en/analytics-and-comments/analytics/the-world-in-2035-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/?sphrase_id=141483291
• Institute of Energy Strategy. (2010). Energy strategy of Russia for the period up to 2030. App. to the public and business magazine “Energy Policy”. Institute of Energy Strategy.
• Interfaks (2024). Duma terminates 1956 Soviet-UK agreement on fishing rights in Barents Sea. https://interfax.com/newsroom/top-stories/99674/
• Kjellen, J. (2022). The Russian northern fleet and the (re)militarisation of the Arctic. Arctic Review on Law and Politics, 13, 34-52.
• Kocatepe, Ö. F., & Şahin, M. (2024). Post-Soviet regional security complex revisited: Is central Asia still a subcomplex?. Bilig (110), 135-156.
• Limon, O. & Gürdal Limon, E. (2023). Arktik güvenliğini yeniden düşünmek: Değişimler ve zorluklar. Güvenlik Bilimleri Dergisi, 12(2), 223-248.
• Limon, O. & Gürdal Limon, E. (2024). The impact of the Ukraine War on Russian military capabilities in the Arctic, Polar Geography 47(3) 157-178. Doi: 10.1080/1088937X.2024.2399003
• Limon, O. (2021). Arktik güvenliği: Riskler ve zorluklar. O. Limon, Ü. Güneş ve S. Karagöz (Edt.), 21. Yüzyılda Bölgesel Sorunlar içinde (s. 775-802). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
• Martynova, M. (2019). Eu, Russia and China Arctic strategies: Comparative analysis. Economic & Social Development: Book of Proceedings, 1, 773–778.
• Nilsson, A. E. (2007). A changing Arctic Climate: Science and policy in the Arctic climate ımpact assessment. Linköping Studies in Arts ans Science.
• Nord, D. C. (2015). Leadership challenges facing Chairs of the Arctic Council. T. Koivurova (Ed..), Arctic Governance: Leadership and Cooperation in the Circumpolar North içinde (s. 197-201). Arctic Centre (University of Lapland).
• NSIDC, (2024). Arctic Sea ice news&analysis. https://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/
• Osthagen, A., & Raspotnik, A. (2017). Partners or rivals?: Norway and the European Union in the high north. N. Liu, E. A. Kirk, & T. Henriksen (Ed..), The European Union and the Arctic içinde (s.97-118). I.B. Tauris.
• Özal Özcan, M. & Şahin, E. (2024). Rusya-Ukrayna Savaşı’nın Avrupa Birliği enerji politikalarına etkisi. Küresel Politika Çalışmaları Dergisi, 1(1), 27-43.
• Özan, Ö. (2021). Arktik’te silahlanma yarışı: Rusya ve NATO. Akademi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(24), 417-433.
• Petersen, M. B. & Pincus, R. (2021). Arctic militarization and Russian military theory. ORBIS, 65(3), 490-512.
• President of Russia. (2022). Instructions following a meeting on devoloping Russia’s Arctic Zone. http://en.kremlin.ru/acts/assignments/orders/
• RAND Review. (2023). January-February RAND Corporation 2023, https://www.rand.org/pubs/corporate_pubs/CPA682-15.html
• Rothwell, D. (2008). The Arctic in International Affairs: Time for a New Regime?. The Brown Journal of World Affairs, 15(11), 241-253.
• Rottem, S. V. (2020). The Arctic Council: Between environmental protection and geopolitics. Palgrave Macmillan.
• Santini, R. H. (2017). A new regional cold war in the Middle East and North Africa: Regional security complex theory revisited. The International Spectator, 52(4), 96-99.
• Simila, J., & Wallen, H. (2023). Justice, Mining and legal reforms in the Finnish Arctic. Arctic Review on Law and Politics, 14, 228-250.
• Sittlow, B. L. (2020). What’s at stake with rising competiton in the Arctic? https://www.cfr.org/in-brief/whats-stake-rising-competition-arctic
• Steinveg, B. (2023). Arctic Governance through conferencing: Actors, agendas and arenas. Springer Cham.
• Steinveg, B. (2024). Small states in world politics: Norwegian ınterest and foreign policy challanges in the Arctic. Arctic Review on Law and Politics, 15, 3-24.
• Stepka, M. (2022). The Copenhagen school and beyond. A closer look at securitisation theory. Identifying Security Logics in the EU Policy Discourse: The “Migration Crisis” and the EU içinde (s. 17-31). Springer International Publishing.
• Strauss, L., Gordinier, R. & Byrne, M. (2022). U.S. Marines and NATO’s Northern Flank. Arctic Review on Law and Politics, 13, 72-93.
• Şahin, E. (2023). Sovyetler Birliği döneminde Orta Asya’da Rus Etkisi, Akademik Düşünce Dergisi, 8, 29-45.
• Şahin, S. B. & Çetiner, Ö. (2024). NATO’s securitisation of climate change in the Arctic. Güvenlik Stratejileri Dergisi, 20(47), 83-98.
• The Economist. (2022). Russian and Western scientists no longer collaborate in the Arctic. ://www.economist.com/science-and-technology/russian-and-western-scientists-no-longer-collaborate-in-the-arctic/
• The Ministry of Energy of the Russian Federation. (2010). Energy strategy of Russia: For the period up to 2030. Public and Business Magazine.
• The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation. (2023). The concept of the foreign policy of the Russian Federation. https://mid.ru/en/foreign_policy/fundamental_documents/1860586
• The White House. (2022). National Strategy for the Arctic Region. DC: Author.
• Thorsson, E. (2024). Norwegian government proposes significant ıncrease in defense budget. https://www.arctictoday.com/norwegian-government-proposes-significant-increase-in-defense-budget/
• Vladimir, P. (2007) Speech and the following discussion at the Munich Conference on security policy. http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/24034.
• Wall, C. & Wegge, N. (2023). The Russian Arctic threat: Consequences of the Ukraine War. https://www.csis.org/analysis/russian-arctic-threat-consequences-ukraine-war
• Wegge, N., & Halsne, S. (2022). Indroduction: Security and military power in the Arctic. Arctic Review on Law and Politics, 13, 32-33.
• Wezeman, S.T. (2016). Military capabilities in the Arctic: A new cold war in the high north? Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, 3(2), 1-24.
• Willhelmsen, J. & Hjermann, A. R. (2022). Russian Certainty of NATO hostility: Repercussions in the Arctic. Arctic Review on Law and Politics, 13, 114-142.