Do teachers know up-to-date basic life support? A field survey in Amasya, Turkey.
Öz
Aim: It is important for teachers to have sufficient knowledge about basic life support (BLS) to reduce mortality and morbidity rates in life-threatening events at schools. This study aimed to determine teachers’ knowledge levels about BLS in XXXXX .
Methods: 1,365 teachers in the city of XXXXX constituted its sample. Data was collected using a questionnaire with 35 questions about the teachers’ demographic information, attitudes towards BLS and knowledge about up-to-date BLS practices (According to AHA 2015 guidelines). Their knowledge levels were evaluated on an 18-point scale.
Results: The data of 1.365 teachers who completely filled out the questionnaire were analyzed. The teachers’ mean score on the BLS questionnaire was 7.93±2.16. Their BLS knowledge levels were not associated with gender, age, education level or the number of years since their most recent BLS training (p>0.05). The ratios of teachers who knew emergency call numbers (98.4%), were able to evaluate respiration (80.6%), had the ability to maintain airway patency (66.9%) and knew the starting criteria for BLS (90.6%) were high. The ratio of teachers who knew the first assessment of process steps (4.5%) and maximum time that should be spent (23.7%), compression site (17.8%), the number of compressions and compression to respiration ratios (33.3%), depth of compression (37.6%), time for life-saving exhalation (8.0%), the number of compressions per minute (15.6%), and for civilian first aiders, knew how to use an automatic external defibrillator (AED) (24.2%) were low.
Conclusion: The teachers in XXXXX do not have sufficiently updated information about BLS practices (the first BLS assessment and required time for BLS, BLS steps, respiration period, compression site, depth and the number of compressions).
Anahtar Kelimeler
Destekleyen Kurum
Proje Numarası
Kaynakça
- 1. Selimen D, Kuguoglu S, Eti Aslan F. Emergency Care. Yuce Publishing, Istanbul; 2004.
- 2. Herlitz J, Engdahl J, Svensson L, Angquist KA, Young, M, Holmberg S. Factors associated with an increased chance of survival among patients suffering from an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in a national perspective in Sweden. Am Heart J. 2005;149:61-66.
- 3. Gursoy A, Cilingir D. Changes in advanced life support: review. Turk J Med Sci. 2008;28:916-922.
- 4. American Heart Assocation (2017). 2015 Guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resusitation and emergency cardiovasculer care. http://www.atuder.org.tr/atuderData/Uploads/files/2015-AHA-Guidelines-Highlights English.pdf . Date: 2015 (Accesed March 23, 2017).
- 5. Karasar N. Scientific Research Method (28th Edition). Nobel Publication Distribution, Ankara; 2015.
- 6. Dixe M, Gomez JCR. Knowledge of the Portuguese population on basic life support and availability to attend training. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2015;49:636-644.
- 7. Kara F, Yurdakul A, Erdogan B, Polat E. Evaluation of current basic life support information of nurses working in a public hospital. MAKU Institute of Health Sci.J. 2015;3:17-26.
- 8. Alotaibi O, Alamri F, Almufleh F, Alsougi W. Basic life support: Knowledge and attitude among dental students and staff in the college of dentistry, King Saud University. Saudi J Dent Res. 2016;7:51–56.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
İç Hastalıkları
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar
Kenan Gümüş
0000-0002-3582-6609
Türkiye
Seval Keloğlan
0000-0003-3533-7941
Türkiye
Nurhan Doğan
0000-0002-6713-6581
Türkiye
Aslı Yılmaz
0000-0003-4148-8316
Türkiye
Gamze Fışkın
0000-0003-3065-6484
Türkiye
Merve Yurttaş
*
0000-0003-4162-3741
Türkiye
Yayımlanma Tarihi
14 Mayıs 2020
Gönderilme Tarihi
20 Aralık 2019
Kabul Tarihi
21 Şubat 2020
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2020 Cilt: 13 Sayı: 2
