İlköğretim Matematik Öğretmeni Adaylarına Yönelik Matematik Dilinin Öğretimi Öz Yeterlik Ölçeğinin Geliştirilmesi

Yıl 2025, Sayı: 65, 139 - 159, 19.09.2025

Erdem Çekmez , Mustafa Güler , Taha Ertuğrul Kuzu

https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.1505026

https://izlik.org/JA33JL88LM

Öz

Bu araştırmada ilköğretim matematik öğretmeni adaylarının matematik dilini öğretmeye ilişkin öz yeterliklerini belirlemek için bir ölçeğin geliştirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmanın katılımcılarını 14 üniversitenin ilgili programının son yarıyılında öğrenim gören 419 öğretmen adayı oluşturmaktadır. Ölçeğin ne düzeyde geçerli ve güvenilir ölçme gerçekleştirdiği madde uyum istatistikleri, benimsenen kategori yapısının işlevselliği, kişilere ve maddelere yönelik güvenirlik ve ayırt edicilik indeksleri, örneklemi hedefleme yeterliği, maddelerin oluşturduğu hiyerarşi, maddelerin yanlılık gösterme durumu, tek boyutluluk ve yerel bağımsızlık bileşenleri açısından incelenmiştir. Verilerin analizi, Rasch ölçme teorisi çerçevesinde derecelendirme ölçeği modeli temelinde Winsteps® yazılımı aracılığıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bulgular kategori yapısının işlevsel olduğunu, madde uyum istatistiklerinin literatürde önerilen aralıkta bulunduğunu, tek boyutluluk ve yerel bağımsızlık kıstaslarının sağlandığını, kişilere ve maddelere ilişkin güvenirlik ve ayırt edicilik indekslerinin uygun olduğunu, maddelerin yanlılık göstermediğini ortaya koymuştur. Bununla birlikte ölçeğin örneklemi hedefleme hususunda orta düzey isabetsizlik sergilediği belirlenmiştir. Sonuç olarak ölçek makul düzeyde geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçüm gerçekleştirmekte olup ileriki araştırmalarda kullanılabilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Matematik dili , Öz yeterlik , Matematik öğretmeni adayları

Etik Beyan

Bu araştırma, Trabzon Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Bilimsel Araştırma ve Yayın Etiği Kurulunun 24.04.2024 tarihli E-81614018-050.04-2400019593 sayılı kararı ile alınan izinle yürütülmüştür.

Development of the Mathematical Language Teaching Self-Efficacy Scale for Pre-service Elementary Mathematics Teachers

https://izlik.org/JA33JL88LM

Öz

This study aimed to develop a scale to determine the self-efficacy of pre-service primary mathematics teachers regarding teaching the language of mathematics. The participants of the research consisted of 419 teacher candidates studying in the final semester of the relevant program at 14 universities. The extent to which the scale provides valid and reliable measurement was examined in terms of item fit statistics, the functionality of the adopted category structure, reliability and discrimination indices for persons and items, sample targeting adequacy, the hierarchy formed by the items, item bias status, unidimensionality, and local independence components. Data analysis was conducted using Winsteps® software based on the rating scale model within the framework of Rasch measurement theory. The findings revealed that the category structure was functional, item fit statistics were within the ranges suggested in the literature, the criteria for unidimensionality and local independence were met, the reliability and discrimination indices for persons and items were appropriate, and the items did not exhibit bias. However, it was determined that the scale demonstrated a moderate level of mistargeting concerning the sample. Consequently, the scale provides reasonably valid and reliable measurement and can be utilized in future research.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Mathematical language , Self-efficacy , Prospective mathematics teachers

Etik Beyan

This study was carried out with the approval of the Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Committee of Trabzon University for Social and Human Sciences, granted by the decision dated 24.04.2024 and numbered E-81614018-050.04-2400019593.

Kaynakça

• Açıl, E., & Zeybek, Z. (2017). Students’ ability to use and understand mathematical language with their teacher’s ability to notice the ways of how students use mathematical language? Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 42, 87-107.
• Adler, J. (1999). The dilemma of transparency: Seeing and seeing through talk in the mathematics classroom. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(1), 47 64. https://doi.org/10.2307/749629
• Akcan, F. (2023). The effect of the online supportive learning tool developed for digital security proficiency in social studies course on students' self-efficacy perceptions (Publication No: 776088) [Doctoral dissertation, Gazi University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
• Andrich, D. (1996). A hyperbolic cosine latent trait model for unfolding polytomous responses: Reconciling Thurstone and Likert methodologies. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 49, 347-365. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1996.tb01093.x
• Araujo, Z. d., Roberts, S. A., Willey, C., & Zahner, W. (2018). English learners in K–12 mathematics education: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 88(6), 879-919. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318798093
• Baber, R. L. (2011). The language of mathematics: Utilizing math in practice. John Wiley & Sons.
• Bali-Çalikoğlu, G. (2002). Language in mathematics teaching scale. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 23, 57-61.
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman and Company.
• Barton, B. (2008). The language of mathematics: Telling mathematical tales. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-72859-9
• Barwell, R. (2016). Formal and informal mathematical discourses: Bakhtin and Vygotsky, dialogue and dialectic. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 92(3), 331-345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9641-z
• Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Bond, T. G., Yan, Z., & Heene, M. (2021). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (4th ed.). Routledge
• Boone, W. J. (2020). Rasch basics for the novice. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Rasch measurement: Applications in quantitative educational research (pp. 9-30). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1800-3
• Boone, W. J., & Staver, J. R. (2020). Advances in Rasch analysis in the human sciences. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43420-5
• Boone, W. J., Staver, J. R., & Yale, M. S. (2014). Rasch analysis in the human sciences. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6857-4_4
• Burns, M. (2006). Marilyn Burns on the language of math. Instructor, 115(7), 41-43.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2019). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods]. Pegem Akademi
• Carlson, M., Wilcox, R., Chou, C.-P., Chang, M., Yang, F., Blanchard, J., … & Clark, F. (2011). Psychometric properties of reverse-scored items on the CES-D in a sample of ethnically diverse older adults. Psychological Assessment, 23(2), 582-562. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022484
• Çekmez, E., Tuti, G., & Terzi, S. Y. (2023). Investigation of the psychometric properties of a mathematics anxiety test for 3rd and 4th grade primary school students. Anadolu University Journal of Education Faculty, 7(4), 819-841. https://doi.org/10.34056/aujef.1254390
• Çepni, S. (2007). Araştırma ve proje çalışmalarına giriş [Introduction to research and project studies]. Celepler Matbaacılık.
• Duncan, P. W., Bode, R. K., Lai, S. M., & Perera, S. (2003). Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: The stroke impact scale. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84(7), 950-963. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00035-2
• Durkin, K., & Shire, B. (1991). Lexical ambiguity in mathematical contexts. In K. Durkin & B. Shire (Eds.), Language in mathematical education (pp. 71-84). Open University Press.
• Erath, K., Prediger, S., Quasthoff, U. Μ., & Heller, V. (2018). Discourse competence as important part of academic language proficiency in mathematics classrooms: The case of explaining to learn and learning to explain. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 99(2), 161 179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9830-7
• Fan, J., & Bond T. (2019). Applying Rasch measurement in language assessment: Unidimensionality and local independence. In V. Aryadoust & M. Raquel (Eds.), Quantitative data analysis for language assessment: Fundamental techniques (pp.83 102). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315187815
• Gökmen, A.D.Y., & Ulusoy, M. (2022). The role of vocabulary knowledge and comprehension skills on retelling skills: Different path analysis tests. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 56, 372-400. https://doi.org/10.9779.pauefd.1026827.
• Gürefe, N. (2018). Mathematical language skills of mathematics prospective teachers. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(4), 661-671. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2018.060410
• Gray, V. (2004). The language of mathematics: A functional definition and development of an intrument to measure teacher perceived self-efficacy [Doctoral dissertation, Oregon State University]. http://hdl.handle.net/1957/31694
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic. Edward Arnold.
• Kabael, T., & Yayan, B. (2017). Effect of self-evaluation on pre-service mathematics teachers’ self-efficacy in language of mathematics. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 7(1), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.18039/ajesi.292575
• Kuzu, T. (2023). Multilingual meaning making – An explorative study of German-Turkish learners’ translanguaging processes regarding the part-whole-concept. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 44(4), 325-353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13138-023-00219-z
• Kuzu, T., & Ratzke, C. (2024). Explanatory videos in the context of learning processes: An interdisciplinary interpretative interaction analysis of production and reflection processes. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 8(2), 227-259. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202426555
• Linacre, J. M. (2002). Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. Journal of Applied Measurement, 3(1), 85-106.
• Linacre, J. M. (2022). A user quide to Winsteps Ministep Rasch model computer programs. https://www.winsteps.com/a/Winsteps-Manual.pdf
• Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı [Ministry of National Education]. (2018a). Matematik dersi öğretim programı (İlkokul ve ortaokul 1,2,3,4,5,6,7, ve 8. sınıflar) [Mathematics curriculum (Primary and secondary school grades 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8)]. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı.
• Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı [Ministry of National Education]. (2018b). Ortaöğretim matematik dersi (9, 10, 11 ve 12. sınıflar) öğretim programı [Secondary education mathematics curriculum (Grades 9, 10, 11, and 12)]. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı.
• Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı [Ministry of National Education]. (2024a). Ortaöğretim matematik dersi öğretim programı (Hazırlık, 9, 10, 11 ve 12. sınıflar) [Secondary Education Mathematics Curriculum (Preparatory, Grades 9, 10, 11, and 12)]. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı.
• Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı [Ministry of National Education]. (2024b). Ortaokul matematik dersi öğretim programı (5, 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar) [Middle school mathematics curriculum (Grades 5, 6, 7, and 8)]. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı.
• Moleko, M. M. (2021). Teachers’ perspectives on addressing linguistic factors affecting visualization of mathematics word problems. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(11), em2029. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11248
• Moore, R. C. (1994). Making the transition to formal proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27(3), 249-266. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01273731
• Morgan, C. (2020). Mathematical language. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 540-543). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0
• Moschkovich, J. (2015). Academic literacy in mathematics for English learners. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 40, 43-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.01.005 National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. NCTM.
• Neumann, I., Neumann, K., & Nehm, R. (2011). Evaluating instrument quality in science education: Rasch-based analyses of nature of science test. International Journal of Science Education, 33(10), 1373-1405. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.511297
• Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
• Oon, P. T., & Subramaniam, R. (2011). Rasch modelling of a scale that explores the take-up of physics among school students from the perspective of teachers. In R. F. Cavanagh & R. F. Waugh (Ed.), Applications of Rasch measurement in learning environments research (pp. 119-139). Sense Pub.
• Özgen, K., & Bindak, R. (2008). The development of self-efficacy scale for mathematics literacy. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 16(2), 517-528.
• Peng, P., Lin, X., Ünal, Z., Lee, K., Namkung, J., Chow, J., … & Sales, A. (2020). Examining the mutual relations between language and mathematics: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(7), 595-634. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000231
• Pimm, D. (1987). Speaking Mathematically: Communication in mathematics classrooms. Routledge.
• Prediger, S. (2019). Investigating and promoting teachers’ expertise for language-responsive mathematics teaching. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 31, 367 392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-019-00258-1
• Prediger, S., Kuzu, T., Schüler-Meyer, A., & Wagner, J. (2019). One mind, two languages – separate conceptualizations? A case study of students’ bilingual modes for dealing with language-related conceptualizations of fractions. Research in Mathematics Education, 21(2), 188 207. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2019.1602561
• Riccomini, P. J., Smith, G. W., Hughes, E. M., & Fries, K. M. (2015). The language of mathematics: The importance of teaching and learning mathematical vocabulary. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 31(3), 235-252. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2015.1030995
• Schleppegrell, M. J. (2007). The linguistic challenges of mathematics teaching and learning: A research review. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 23(2), 139 159. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560601158461
• Seçer, İ. (2018). Psikolojik test geliştirme ve uyarlama süreci: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları (2. Baskı) [The process of developing and adapting psychological tests: SPSS and LISREL applications (2nd Edition)]. Anı Yayıncılık.
• Smith Jr, E. V., Conrad, K. M., Chang, K., & Piazza, J. (2002). An introduction to Rasch measurement for scale development and person assessment. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 10(3), 189-206.
• Suárez-Alvarez, J., Pedrosa, I., Lozano, L. M., García-Cueto, E., Cuesta, M., & Muñiz, J. (2018). Using reversed items in Likert scales: A questionable practice. Psicothema, 30(2), 149-158. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2018.33
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics (6th ed.). Pearson.
• Tennant, A., & Conaghan, P. (2007). The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: What is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper? Arthritis Care and Research, 5(8), 1358–1362. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.23108
• Uptegrove, E. B. (2015). Shared communication in building mathematical ideas: A longitudinal study. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 40, 106–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.02.001
• Wilkinson, L. C. (2018). Teaching the language of mathematics: What the research tells us teachers need to know and do? The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 51, 167 174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2018.05.001
• Wright, B. D., & Linacre, J. M. (1994). Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8(3), 370.
• Wright, B.D., & Stone, M.H. (2004). Making measures. Phaneron Press
• Zeng, B., Wen, H., & Zhang, J. (2020). How does the valence of wording affect features of a scale? The method effects in the undergraduate learning burnout scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 26-38. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.585179