Araştırma Makalesi

Öğrencilerin Matematiksel Dili Kullanma ve Anlama Becerisi ile Öğretmenlerinin Öğrencilerin Matematiksel Dili Nasıl Kullandıklarını Fark Edebilme Yeteneği

Cilt: 42 Sayı: 42 1 Temmuz 2017
Elif Açıl *, Zülfiye Zeybek *
PDF İndir
EN TR

Students’ Ability to Use and Understand Mathematical Language with Their Teacher’s Ability to Notice the Ways of How Students Use Mathematical Language?

Abstract

This study not only focused on investigating seventh grade estudents’ use of mathematical language correctly, but it also focused on teacher noticing, which includes  being able to make sense of students’ thinking and the ways of how they used mathematical languages to convey their thinking.For this purpose, we worked with three seventh-grade students who demonstrated different achievement levels in mathematics and their math teacher. We used student journals and student interviews in order to investigate students’ use of mathematical language; while we used teacher logs and teacher interview to investigate the process of teacher noticing. Grounded-theory approach guided the analysis of the data collected. Each interview was transcribed and  interesting issues regarding students’ use of mathematical language and teacher noticing were summarized. This study demonstrated that students tended to use mathematical language; however, how often they used mathematical language and how accurate they used it to convey their thinking varied based on their academic achievements. Additionally, participant teacher’s level of noticing of the students’ use of mathematical language differed based on students’ academic achievements. 

Keywords

Teacher noticing,Mathematical language,Concepts of area,Geometrical reasoning skills

Kaynakça

  1. Barcelos, A., M., F. (2000). Understanding teachers' and students' language learning beliefs in experience: A Deweyan approach (John Dewey). (Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi). University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa.
  2. Baselli, A., G. (1789). An essay on mathematical language, or, an introduction to the mathematical sciences. London: Authors.
  3. Brendefur, J., & Frykholm, J. (2000). Promoting mathematical communication in the classroom: Two preservice teachers' conceptions and practices. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3(2), 125-153.
  4. Chirume, S. (2012). How does the Use of Mathematical Symbols Influence Understanding of Mathematical Concepts by Secondary School Students?, International Journal of Social Science & Education, 3(1), 35-46.
  5. Cuban, L. (1995). The hidden variable: How organizations influence teacher responses to secondary science curriculum reform, Theory into Practice, Reforming Science Education, 34(1), pp. 4-11.
  6. Çalıkoğlu Bali, G. (2002). Matematik öğretiminde dil ölçeği. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 23, 57-61.
  7. Dubinsky, E. (2000). Meaning and formalism in mathematics, International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 5(3), 211-240.
  8. Ernest, P. (1999). Forms of knowledge in mathematics and mathematics education: Philosophical and rhetorical perspectives, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 38(1–3), 67–83.
  9. Ferrari, L., P. (2004). Matematical language and advanced mathematics learning, Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2, 383–390.
  10. Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: Theory into practice. New York: Basic books.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Açıl, E., & Zeybek, Z. (2017). Öğrencilerin Matematiksel Dili Kullanma ve Anlama Becerisi ile Öğretmenlerinin Öğrencilerin Matematiksel Dili Nasıl Kullandıklarını Fark Edebilme Yeteneği. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 42(42), 87-107. https://izlik.org/JA26EP64XZ