Araştırma Makalesi

Comparative Analysis of Metaphors of Primary School Students and Teachers on Interactive Whiteboards

Sayı: 51 14 Ocak 2021
PDF İndir
TR EN

Comparative Analysis of Metaphors of Primary School Students and Teachers on Interactive Whiteboards

Öz

This study aimed to examine the perceptions of primary school 4th-grade students and their teachers about interactive boards (ET) through metaphors. In this study, the phenomenological pattern, one of the qualitative research designs, was used. The study's working group, in which data analysis was conducted through the content analysis technique, consisted of 127 students studying in the 4th-grade of primary school and 41 primary school teachers. The sampling of the research was determined by the criterion sampling method. In the study, the data were, “Interactive boards like/similar to …, because … ” was collected with a structured form consisting of questions asked. In the study, it was found out that the students and teachers produced 31 and 20 metaphors related to interactive whiteboards, respectively; that the metaphor “Computer” was the most frequently repeated metaphor by both teachers and students; that the category with the highest frequency was “Entertainment tool” in the categories produced by the students and that the category with the highest frequency was “Information collection tool” in the categories created by the teachers. It was also found out that while the metaphors created by the teachers and students related to IWBs were generally positive, but the participants produced some negative metaphors.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Interactive whiteboard, metaphor, educational technology, student, primary school teacher

Kaynakça

  1. Adıgüzel, T., Gürbulak, N. & Sarıçayır, H. (2011). Akıllı tahtalar ve öğretim uygulamaları. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8 (15), 457 - 471
  2. Akçayır, M. (2011). Akıllı tahta kullanılarak işlenen matematik dersinin sınıf öğretmenliği birinci sınıf öğrencilerinin başarı, tutum ve motivasyonlarına etkisi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  3. Akgül, B. (2013). İlköğretim görsel sanatlar dersinde akıllı tahta kullanımının öğrenci başarısına etkisi. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  4. Aktaş, İ., Gökoğlu, S., Turgut, Y. E. & Karal, H. (2014). Öğretmenlerin FATİH Projesine yönelik görüşleri: Farkındalık, öngörü ve beklentiler. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi (EFMED), 8 (1), 257-286.
  5. Alparslan, E. M. & İçbay, M. A. (2017). Teachers’ opinions on interactive white board anditsuse: A case study. Uluslararası Türkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim Dergisi, 6(3), 1778-1797.
  6. Altınçelik, B. (2009). İlköğretim düzeyinde öğrenmede kalıcılığı ve motivasyonu sağlaması yönünden akıllı tahtaya ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. Sakarya Üniversitesi, Sakarya.
  7. Altun, T., Gülay, A. & Mazlum, P. B. S. (2018). İlk defa ET kullanan öğretmenlerin algılarının incelenmesi. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 18 (2), 634-654.
  8. Ateş, M. (2010). The using of active board at secondary school geography lessons. Marmara Geographical Review, (22), 409-427.
  9. Aydın, İ. & Pehlivan, A. (2010). “Türkçe öğretmeni adaylarının “Öğretmen” ve “Öğrenci” kavramlarına ilişkin kullandıkları metaforlar.” Turkish Studies 5 (3), 818-842.
  10. Aydın, M. (2017). Matematik dersinde ET kullanımının öğrenci başarısı, motivasyonu ve tutumları üzerindeki etkisi. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Fırat Üniversitesi, Elâzığ.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Taş, H. (2021). Comparative Analysis of Metaphors of Primary School Students and Teachers on Interactive Whiteboards. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 51, 206-235. https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.690632
AMA
1.Taş H. Comparative Analysis of Metaphors of Primary School Students and Teachers on Interactive Whiteboards. PAÜEFD. 2021;(51):206-235. doi:10.9779/pauefd.690632
Chicago
Taş, Halil. 2021. “Comparative Analysis of Metaphors of Primary School Students and Teachers on Interactive Whiteboards”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, sy 51: 206-35. https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.690632.
EndNote
Taş H (01 Ocak 2021) Comparative Analysis of Metaphors of Primary School Students and Teachers on Interactive Whiteboards. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 51 206–235.
IEEE
[1]H. Taş, “Comparative Analysis of Metaphors of Primary School Students and Teachers on Interactive Whiteboards”, PAÜEFD, sy 51, ss. 206–235, Oca. 2021, doi: 10.9779/pauefd.690632.
ISNAD
Taş, Halil. “Comparative Analysis of Metaphors of Primary School Students and Teachers on Interactive Whiteboards”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 51 (01 Ocak 2021): 206-235. https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.690632.
JAMA
1.Taş H. Comparative Analysis of Metaphors of Primary School Students and Teachers on Interactive Whiteboards. PAÜEFD. 2021;:206–235.
MLA
Taş, Halil. “Comparative Analysis of Metaphors of Primary School Students and Teachers on Interactive Whiteboards”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, sy 51, Ocak 2021, ss. 206-35, doi:10.9779/pauefd.690632.
Vancouver
1.Halil Taş. Comparative Analysis of Metaphors of Primary School Students and Teachers on Interactive Whiteboards. PAÜEFD. 01 Ocak 2021;(51):206-35. doi:10.9779/pauefd.690632