KÜRESELLEŞME İNSANİ İYİ OLMA HALİNE ETKİ EDER Mİ? MÜSLÜMAN BİR ÜLKE OLARAK TÜRKİYE ÖRNEKLEMİNDE BİR İNCELEME

Yıl 2023, , 75 - 90, 02.01.2023

Betül Can

https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.1121001

Öz

Son yıllarda sürdürülebilir kalkınma planlarının önemli bir parçası olan iyi olma olgusu özellikle koronavirüs salgınıyla birlikte hem bireylerin hem de toplumların daha fazla gündemine yer etmiştir. Küreselleşme ve iyi olma arasındaki ilişki ise söz konusu süreçte daha fazla önem kazanmaya başlamıştır. Küreselleşme ise beraberinde getirdiği pozitif etkilere rağmen özündeki kültürel değişim etkisinden dolayı Müslüman toplumlarda yer yer reaktif bir tutumla karşılanmaktadır. Bu kapsamda bir Müslüman ülke örneği olarak Türkiye örnekleminde küreselleşmenin insani iyi olma düzeyine etkisi üzerinde durulacaktır. Çalışma 1990-2018 yıllarını kapsamakta olup bu çalışmada ekonometrik yöntemlerden zaman serisi tekniği uygulanmıştır. Her ne kadar küreselleşme kültürel ve değersel anlamda homojenleştirme ihtimalini barındırsa da yapılan ampirik inceleme neticesinde küreselleşme ve insani iyi olma hali arasında uzun dönemli bir ilişki olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca uzun dönem analizinde küreselleşmenin insani iyi olma hali üzerinde pozitif ve istatistiki olarak anlamlı bir etkisinin olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Çalışma, literatürde özellikle Türkiye örnekleminde ilk kez küreselleşme ve iyi olma arasındaki ilişkiyi araştırması bağlamında önem taşımaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Küreselleşme, İnsani iyi olma, İnsani Kalkınma, Müslüman Toplumlar, Din, İslam

Destekleyen Kurum

Yok

Proje Numarası

Yok

DOES GLOBALIZATION AFFECT HUMAN WELL-BEING? AN EXAMINATION ON THE SAMPLE OF TURKEY AS A MUSLIM COUNTRY

Öz

The phenomenon of well-being, which has been an important part of sustainable development plans in recent years, has been on the agenda of both individuals and societies, especially with the outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic. The relationship between globalization and well-being has started to gain more importance in this process. On the other hand, despite the positive effects that globalization brings, it has encountered a very reactive attitude in Muslim societies due to the effect of cultural change in its essence. In this context, the effect of globalization on the level of human well-being in Turkey, as an example of a Muslim country, will be emphasized. The study covered the years 1990-to 2018 and the time series technique, one of the econometric methods, is applied. Although globalization contains the possibility of cultural and value homogenization, as a result of the empirical analysis, it is found that there is a long-term relationship between globalization and human well-being. In addition, in the long-term analysis, it is concluded that globalization has a positive and statistically significant effect on human well-being. The study is important in the context of researching the relationship between globalization and well-being in the Turkish sample for the first time in the literature

Anahtar Kelimeler

Globalization, Human Well-being, Human Development, Muslim Societies, Religion, Islam

Proje Numarası

Yok

Kaynakça

• Alatartseva, E., & Barysheva, G. A. (2016). What is well-being in the modern society: Objective view. SHS Web of Conferences. Vol. 28: Research Paradigms Transformation in Social Sciences (RPTSS 2015).—Les Ulis, 2016., 282015, 1114.
• Bahadur, S. J. (2011). Globalization and human aspect of development in developing countries: Evidence from panel data. Journal of Globalization Studies, 2(1), 78–96.
• Berger, P. L. (2003). Religions and globalisation. European Judaism, 36(1), 4–10.
• Bhagwati, J. N. (2005). In defense of globalization: It has a human face. The 2005 Angelo Costa Lecture, Rome.
• Bourdieu, P. (1990), The Logic of practice, Translated by Richard Nice. Stanford University Press, Stanford. CA.
• Buysse, J., Can, M., & Gozgor, G. (2018). Globalisation outcomes and the real output in the subSaharan Africa LICs: a cointegration analysis. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 31(1), 338–351.
• Can, B. (2020). Pierre Bourdieu, pratik kuramı ve dinsel alan. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü (Yayınlanmamış Doktora tezi) 2020, Isparta.
• Can, M, & Doğan, B. (2016). Küreselleşme ve enerji tüketimi ilişkisi: Türkiye örnekleminde eşbütünleşme analizi. Maliye Dergisi, 170, 59–70.
• Can, Muhlis. (2016). Ekonomik küreselleşme sofistike mamül üretimini etkiler mi?: Güney Kore örnekleminde ampirik bir analiz. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 11(3), 21–38.
• Clark, D. A. (2014). Defining and measuring human well-being. Global Environmental Change. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands. Http://Dx. Doi. Org/10.1007/978-94-007-5784-4_66, 833–855.
• Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. [2009] In: Ed Diener (ed) The science of well-being: the collected works of Ed Diener. Springer, London, 11–58.
• Dollar, D. (2005). Globalization, poverty, and inequality since 1980. The World Bank Research Observer, 20(2), 145–175.
• Dreher, A. (2006). Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization. Applied Economics, 38(10), 1091–1110.
• Erdem, M. (2003). Küreselleşme ve İslam dünyası, Dini Araştırmalar, 6(17), 5-9.
• Figueroa, A. M. (2014). The impact of globalization on human development in the developing countries: The case of Central and South America. Revista Eletrônica de Ciência Política, 5(2).
• Gaston, N., & Rajaguru, G. (2009). Has globalization increased Australian inequality. Laggards and Leaders in Labour Market Reform: Comparing Japan And Australia, 85–108.
• Ghemawat, P., (2014). “Globalization” in Wiley encyclopedia of management, (3rd edition), edited by Cary L. Cooper. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
• Global Wellness Institute, https://globalwellnessinstitute.org/industry-research/happiness-wellbeing-index/ Erişim tarihi: 12.05.2022
• Goklany, I. M. (2002). The globalization of human well-Being, Policy Analysis, 447, 1-20.
• Gözgör, G., & Can, M. (2017). Causal linkages among the product diversification of exports, economic globalization and economic growth. Review of Development Economics, 21(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12301.
• Hasan, A., & Waheed, A. (2021). Impact of globalization on human development: A panel data analysis of selected south Asian countries. Global Economics Science, 1–11.
• Haseeb, M., Suryanto, T., Hartani, N. H., & Jermsittiparsert, K. (2020). Nexus between globalization, income inequality and human development in Indonesian economy: Evidence from the application of partial and multiple wavelet coherence. Social Indicators Research, 147(3), 723–745.
• Hussain, A., Majeed, S., Muhammad, S. D., & Lal, I. (2010). Impact of globalization on HDI (Human Development Index): case study of Pakistan. European Journal of Social Sciences, 13(1), 46-55.
• Johansen, S. (1988). Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12(2–3), 231–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1889(88)90041-3.
• Johansen, S. & Juselius, K. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration—with appucations to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52(2), 169–210.
• Jordá, V. & Sarabia, J. M. (2015). Well-being distribution in the globalization era: 30 years of convergence. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 10(1), 123–140.
• Kahneman, D. (1999). Objective happiness. Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, 3(25), 1–23.
• Kawachi, I. & Wamala, S. (2006). Globalization and health. Oxford University Press.
• Khan, N. H., Ju, Y. & Hassan, S. T. (2019). Investigating the determinants of human development index in Pakistan: An empirical analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(19), 19294–19304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05271-2.
• Kiani, A., Mohammad, N. & Soomro, R. B. (2021). The impact of globalization on human development index: A case of Pakistan. Studies of Applied Economics, 39(2).
• Kuran-ı Kerim, https://www.kuranmeali.com/Arama.php?kelime=&meal=diyanetisleriyeni&sure=hepsi Erişim Tarihi: 01.04.2022
• Latif, Z., Latif, S., Ximei, L., Pathan, Z. H., Salam, S. & Jianqiu, Z. (2018). The dynamics of ICT, foreign direct investment, globalization and economic growth: Panel estimation robust to heterogeneity and cross-sectional dependence. Telematics and Informatics, 35(2), 318–328.
• Leidner, D. E. (2010). Globalization, culture, and information: Towards global knowledge transparency. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 19(2), 69–77.
• Mahon, J. E. (2010). Mobile capital and Latin American development. Penn State Press.
• Majeed, M. T. (2015). Distributional consequences of globalization: Is organization of the Islamic conference countries different? The International Trade Journal, 29(3), 171–190.
• Majeed, M. T. (2018). Quality of life and globalization: Evidence from Islamic countries. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 13(3), 709–725.
• Marshall, G. (1999). Sosyoloji sözlüğü, Çev. Osman Akınhay-Derya Kömürcü, Bilim ve Sanat Yayınları, Ankara.
• Martens, P., Dreher, A. & Gaston, N. (2010). Globalisation, the global village and the civil society. Futures, 42(6), 574–582.
• Mazlan, N. S., Fadzilah, F. Y. & Ibrahim, S. (2019). The Role of Globalisation in Improving Human Development in Malaysia. Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, 53(2), 227–234.
• Milanovic, B. (2011). Worlds apart. In Worlds Apart. Princeton University Press.
• Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA). (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC.
• Mukherjee, N. & Krieckhaus, J. (2012). Globalization and human well-being. International Political Science Review, 33(2), 150–170.
• Nussbaum, M. & Sen, A. (1993). The quality of life. Clarendon Press.
• Olagunju, K. O., Ogunniyi, A. I., Oguntegbe, K. F., Raji, I. O. & Ogundari, K. (2019). Welfare impact of globalization in developing countries: Examining the mediating role of human capital. Economies, 7(3), 84.
• Onat, H. (2003). Küreselleşme ve İslâm’ı yeniden düşünmek. Dini Araştırmalar, 6 (17).
• Ray, L. (2019). Globalization in the Blackwell encyclopedia of sociology. Edited by George Ritzer and Chris Rojek. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
• Robertson, R. (1992). Globalization: Social theory and global culture, SAGE, London.
• Rogers, D. S., Duraiappah, A. K., Antons, D. C., Munoz, P., Bai, X., Fragkias, M., Gutscher, H. (2012). A vision for human well-being: transition to social sustainability, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages 61-73, ISSN 1877-3435, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2012.01.013.
• Sabi, M. (2007). Globalization and human development. International Conference on Globalization and Its Discontents, Cortland, The Sage Colleges, USA.
• Sapkota, J. B. (2011). Impacts of globalization on quality of life: evidence from developing countries.
• Sen, A. (2014). Development as freedom (1999). The Globalization and Development Reader: Perspectives on Development and Global Change, 525.
• Singh, A. (2012). Financial globalization and human development. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 13(1), 135–151.
• Stallings, B. (1992). International influence on economic policy: debt, stabilization and structural reform.
• Stiglitz, J. & Pike, R. M. (2004). Globalization and its Discontents. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 29(2), 321.
• Taş, K. & Uçar, R. (2003.). İlâhiyatçıların küreselleşmeye yaklaşımı (Küreselleşme Üzerine Bir Alan Araştırması). Dini Araştırmalar, 6 (17).
• Tran, N. Van, Tran, Q. Van, Do, L. T. T., Dinh, L. H. & Do, H. T. T. (2019). Trade off between environment, energy consumption and human development: Do levels of economic development matter? Energy, 173, 483–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.02.042
• Tschannen, O. (1991). The secularization paradigm: A systematization. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 395–415.
• Urata, S. (2002). Globalization and the growth in free trade agreements. Asia Pacific Review, 9(1), 20–32.
• Wang, Z., Rasool, Y., Asghar, M. M. & Wang, B. (2019). Dynamic linkages among CO2 emissions, human development, financial development, and globalization: empirical evidence based on PMG long-run panel estimation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(36), 36248–36263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06556-2
• Wilson, B. (1966). Religion in secular society, London: C.A Watts.
• Weber, M. (1985). Protestan ahlakı ve kapitalizmin ruhu, Çeviren Zeynep Aruoba, Hil Yayınları. İstanbul.
• Wolf, M. (2004). Why globalization works (Vol. 3). Yale University Press. U.S.A.