KARİYERİN KAVRAMSAL YAPISININ SINIFLANDIRILMASI: ORTAK KELİME ANALİZİ

Yıl 2022, Sayı: 51, 409 - 425, 09.08.2022

İhsan Aytekin

https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.1124129

Öz

Belirli bir bilgi birikimi düzeyine erişen bir araştırma alanının ilerlemesini ve geleceğini anlamak için konu örüntülerinin, araştırma akımlarının, kavramsal yapı ve evriminin tarihsel bir perspektiften analiz edilmesi gerekir. Önemli bir bilgi birikimine ulaşması ve analiz düzeyi açısından çeşitlilik içermesi nedeniyle, dağınık olan teorik ve kavramsal yapısının konsolidasyonu ve evrimsel özelliklerinin açığa çıkarılması için kariyer alanının sistematik bir bir şekilde gözden geçirilmesi gerekmektedir. Bu çalışma ile 1975 – 2018 yıllarını kapsayan çalışmaların sistematik gözden geçirilmesi yapılarak alanın kavramsal yapısının ve yeni trendlerinin ortaya çıkarılması amaçlanmaktadır. Bu doğrultuda, Web of Science kapsamında yayınlanmış çalışmaların bibliyometrik verileri indirilerek ortak kelime analizi yapılmıştır. Yapılan analiz sonucunda kariyer alanında yapılan çalışmaların örgütsel kariyer yönetimi ve çevresel faktörler, bireysel kariyer yönetimi ve kariyer çıktıları ve kariyer öncesi ve kariyer serüveni şeklinde üç farklı kümede toplandığı görülmüştür. Buna ek olarak yeni ortaya çıkan ya da gelişen kavram ve değişkenler incelenmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular, literatürden yararlanılarak tartışılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kariyer, Bireysel Kariyer Yönetimi, Örgütsel Kariyer Yönetimi, Ortak Kelime Analizi, Bibliyometrik Analiz

Destekleyen Kurum

Ankara Sosyal Bilimler Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Koordinasyon Birimii

Proje Numarası

SHD-2018-186

Teşekkür

Bu çalışmaya destek olan ASBU'ye teşekkür ederim

CLASSIFICATION OF CONCEPTUAL STRUCTURE OF THE CAREER: A CO-WORD ANALYSIS

Öz

In order to understand the progress and future of a research field that has reached a certain level of knowledge, it is necessary to analyze the subject patterns, research trends, conceptual structure and evolution from a historical perspective. A systematic review of the domain is required in order to consolidate its scattered theoretical and conceptual structure and reveal its evolutionary characteristics, since career is a scientific discipline that has been studied for many years, permeable with many different scientific fields, and received great interest from both academic and professional environments. With this study, it is aimed to reveal the conceptual structure of and the new developments in the field by systematically reviewing the studies, covering the years 1975 – to 2018, in the field. In this direction, common word analysis was performed by downloading the bibliometric data of the studies published within the scope of the Web of Science. As a result of the analysis, it has been observed that the studies in the field of career are gathered in three different clusters: i) organizational career management and environmental factors, ii) individual career management and career outputs, and iii) pre-career and career adventure. In addition, emerging concepts were examined. The findings were discussed by comparing the literature.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Career, Individual Career Management, Organizational Career Management, Common Word Analysis, Bibliometric Analysis

Proje Numarası

SHD-2018-186

Kaynakça

• Acedo, F. J., Barroso, C., Casanueva, C. ve Galán, J. L. (2006). “Co‐authorship in Management and Organizational Studies: An Empirical and Network Analysis”, Journal of Management Studies, 43(5), 957-983.
• Allen, T. D., Eby, L. T., Poteet, M. L., Lentz, E. ve Lima, L. (2004). “Career Benefits Associated with Mentoring for Proteges: A Meta-analysis”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 127-136.
• Anderson, S. E., Coffey, B. S. ve Byerly, R. T. (2002). “Formal Organizational Initiatives and Informal Workplace Practices: Links to Work-Family Conflict and Job-Related Outcomes. Journal of Management, 28, 787 - 810.
• Arnold, J. (2001), “Careers and Career Management”. International Handbook of Work and Organizational Psychology, (Ed: Anderson, N., Ones, D., Sinangil, H. and Viswesvaran, C.), 2, 115-132. London: Sage.
• Arnold, J. ve Cohen, L. (2008). “The Psychology of Careers in Industrial and Organizational Settings: A Critical but Appreciative Analysis. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. (Ed: G. P. Hodgkinson, ve J. K. Ford), London: Wiley.
• Arthur, M. B. (1994). “The Boundaryless Career: A New Perspective for Organizational Inquiry”. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 295-306.
• Arthur, M. B. (2008). “Examining Contemporary Careers: A Call for Interdisciplinary Inquiry”. Human Relations, 61, 163–186.
• Arthur, M. B. ve Rousseau, D. M. (1996). The Boundaryless Career: A New Employment Principle for A New Organizational Era. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Arthur, M. B., Khapova, S. N. ve Wilderom, C. P. M. (2005). “Career Success in A Boundaryless Career World”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 177-202.
• Ashforth, B.E., Kreiner, G.E. ve Fugate, M. (2000). “All in A Day's Work: Boundaries and Micro Role Transitions”, Academy of Management Review, 25, 472-491.
• Aytekin, İ. (2016). Kariyer Sermayesinin Akademisyenlerin Kariyer Başarısına Etkisi: Ampirik Bir Araştırma, Doktora Tezi, Gebze Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
• Bandura, A. ve Locke, E. A. (2003). “Negative Self-efficacy and Goal Effects Revisited”, The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 1, 87-99.
• Baruch, Y. (2006). Career Development in Organizations and Beyond: Balancing Traditional and Contemporary Viewpoints”, Human Resource Management Review, 16, 125-138.
• Bechky, B. A. (2006). “Gaffers, Gofers, and Grips: Role-Based Coordination in Temporary Organizations”, Organizational Science, 17, 3-21.
• Benavides-Velasco, C. A., Quintana-García, C. ve Guzmán-Parra, V. F. (2013). “Trends in Family Business Research”, Small Business Economics, 40 (1), 41-57.
• Betz, N. E. ve Hackett, G. (1981). “The Relationship of Career-Related Self-Efficacy Expectations to Perceived Career Options in College Women and Men”, Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28, 399-410.
• Borgman, C. L. ve Furner, J. (2002). “Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics”. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36 (1), 1-53.
• Bredillet, C. (2002). “Mapping The Dynamics of Project Management Field: Project Management in Action”, Proceedings of PMI Research Conference, (Ed: G. P. Hodgkinson, ve J. K. Ford), 157-169.
• Cable, D.M., & DeRue, D.S. (2002). “The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions”, The Journal of Applied Psychology, 87 (5), 875-894.
• Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., Turner, W. A. ve Bauin, S. (1983). “From Translations to Problematic Networks: An Introduction to Co-Word Analysis”, Information, 22 (2), 191-235.
• Cappelli, P. (1999). “Career Jobs are Dead”. California Management Review, 42, 146- 167.
• Cha, S. E., Hewlin, P. F., Roberts, L. M., Buckman, B. R., Leroy, H., Steckler, E. L., Ostermeier, K. ve Cooper, D. (2019). “Being Your True Self at Work: Integrating the Fragmented Research on Authenticity in Organizations”, Academy of Management Annals, 13 (2), 633–671.
• Chao, G.T., O'Leary-Kelly, A., Wolf, S., Klein, H.J. ve Gardner, P.D. (1994). “Organizational Socialization: Its Content and Consequences”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 730-743.
• Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and Visualizing Emerging Trends and Transient Patterns in Scientific Literature”, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 57 (3), 359-377.
• Cho, J. (2014). “Intellectual Structure of The Institutional Repository Field: A Co-Word Analysis”, Journal of Information Science, 40(3), 386-397.
• Chudzikowski, K., Demel, B., Mayrhofer, W., Briscoe, J. P., Milikic, J. U. B. B. ve Hall, D. T. (2009). “Career Transitions and Their Causes: A Country-Comparative Perspective”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82, 825-849.
• Collings, D. G., Scullion, H. ve Morley, M. J. (2007). “Changing Patterns of Global Staffing in The Multinational Enterprise: Challenges to The Conventional Expatriate Assignment And Emerging Alternatives”, Journal of World Business, 42, 198-213.
• Crant, J.M. (2000). “Proactive Behavior in Organizations”, Journal of Management, 26, 435-462.
• De Janasz, S. C., Sullivan, S. E. ve Whiting, V. (2003). “Mentor Networks and Career Success: Lessons for Turbulent Times”, Academy of Management Executive, 17 (4), 78-91.
• DeFillippi, R. J. ve Arthur, M. B. (1994). “The Boundaryless Career: A Competency-Based Perspective”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 307–324.
• Ding, Y., Chowdhury, G. G. ve Foo, S. (2001). “Bibliometric Cartography of Information Retrieval Research by Using Co-Word Analysis”, Information Processing & Management, 37 (6), 817-842.
• Dlouhy, K. ve Biemann, T. (2015). “Optimal Matching Analysis in Career Research: A Review and Some Best-Practice Recommendations”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 90, 163–173.
• Donnelly, R. (2008). “Careers And Temporal Flexibility in The New Economy: An Anglo-Dutch Comparison of Consultancy”, Human Resource Management Journal, 18, 197–215.
• Eby, L.T., Butts, M.M. ve Lockwood, A. (2003). “Predictors Of Success in The Era Of The Boundaryless Career”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 689-708.
• Eby, L.T., Casper, W.J., Lockwood, A., Bordeaux, C.R. ve Brinley, A. (2005). “Work and Family Research in IO/OB: Content Analysis and Review of The Literature (1980–2002)”, Journal Of Vocational Behavior, 66, 124-197.
• Feng, J., Zhang, Y. Q. ve Zhang, H. (2017). “Improving the Co-Word Analysis Method Based on Semantic Distance”, Scientometrics, 111 (3), 1521-1531.
• Fugate, M., Kinicki, A. J. ve Ashforth, B. E. (2004). “Employability: A Psycho-Social Construct, Its Dimensions, and Applications”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65, 14-38.
• Furrer, O., Thomas, H. ve Goussevskaia, A. (2008). “The Structure and Evolution of The Strategic Management Field: A Content Analysis Of 26 Years of Strategic Management Research”, International Journal of Management Reviews, 10 (1), 1-23.
• Gati, I., Krausz, M. ve Osipow, S. H. (1996). “A Taxonomy of Difficulties iin Career Decision-making”, Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43, 510-526.
• Greenhaus, J. H., Callanan, G. A. ve Godshalk, V. M. (2010). Career Management, (4th ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
• Greenhaus, J.H., Parasuraman, S. ve Wormley, W.M. (1990). “Effects of Race on Organizational Experiences, Job Performance Evaluations, and Career Outcomes”, Academy of Management Journal, 33, 64-86.
• Guan, Y., Arthur, M. B., Khapova, S. N., Hall, R. J. ve Lord, R. G., (2019). “Career Boundarylessness and Career Success: A Review, Integration and Guide to Future Research”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 110, 390–402.
• Hackett, G., & Betz, N.E. (1981). “A Self-Efficacy Approach to The Career Development of Women”. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 18, 326-339.
• Haenggli, M., ve Hirschi, A. (2020). “Career Adaptability and Career Success in The Context of a Broader Career Resources Framework”, Journal of Vocational Behavior. 119, 103414.
• Hall, D.T. (2004). “The Protean Career: A Quarter-Century Journey”. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65, 1-13.
• Heilman, M.E., Wallen, A.S., Fuchs, D. ve Tamkins, M.M. (2004). “Penalties for Success: Reactions to Women Who Succeed at Male Gender-Typed Tasks”, The Journal of applied psychology, 89 3, 416-427.
• Hu, J. ve Zhang, Y. (2015). “Research Patterns and Trends of Recommendation System in China Using Co-Word Analysis”, Information Processing & Management, 51(4), 329-339.
• Ibarra, H. (1995). “Race, Opportunity, And Diversity Of Social Circles In Managerial Networks”, Academy of Management Journal, 38, 673-703.
• Judge, T.A., Cable, D.M., Boudreau, J.W ve Bretz, R.D. (1995). “An Empirical Investigation of The Predictors of Executive Career Success”, Personnel Psychology, 48, 485-519.
• Judge, T.A., Higgins, C.A., Thoresen, C.J. ve Barrick, M.R. (1999a). “The Big Five Personality Traits, General Mental Ability, and Career Success Across The Life Span”, Personnel Psychology, 52, 621-652.
• Judge, T.A., Thoresen, C.J., Pucik, V. ve Welbourne, T.M. (1999b). “Managerial Coping With Organizational Change: A Dispositional Perspective”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 107-122.
• Kanfer, R., & Ackerman, P.L. (2004). “Aging, Adult Development, and Work Motivation”, Academy of Management Review, 29, 440-458.
• Kenny, M. E., Blustein, D. L., Haase, R. F., Jackson, J. ve Perry, J. C. (2006). Setting The Stage: Career Development and The Student Engagement Process”, Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(2), 272–279.
• Kenny, M. E., ve Bledsoe, M. (2005). “Contributions of the Relational Context to Career Adaptability Among Urban Adolescents”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 257–272.
• Khasseh, A.A., Soheili, F., Moghaddam, H. S. ve Chelak, A. M. (2017). “Intellectual Structure of Knowledge in I-metrics: A Co-Word Analysis”, Information Processing & Management, 53(3), 705-720.
• Kuijpers, M. ve Scheerens, J. (2006). Career Competencies for The Modern Career. Journal of Career Development, 32, 303-319.
• Le, H., Robbins, S.B. ve Westrick, P.A. (2014). “Predicting Student Enrollment and Persistence in College STEM Fields Using an Expanded P-E Fit Framework: A Large-Scale Multilevel Study”, The Journal of applied psychology, 99 5, 915-47.
• Lee, C.I., Felps, W. ve Baruch, Y. (2014). “Toward a Taxonomy of Career Studies Through Bibliometric Visualization”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 85(3), 339-351.
• Lent, R.W., Brown, S.D., & Hackett, G. (1994). “Toward a Unifying Social Cognitive Theory of Career and Academic Interest, Choice, and Performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79-122.
• Lent, R.W., Brown, S.D., & Hackett, G. (2000). Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis”, Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47, 36-49.
• Li, E. Y., Liao, C. H. ve Yen, H. R. (2013). “Co-authorship Networks and Research Impact: A Social Capital Perspective”, Research Policy, 42 (9), 1515-1530.
• Lu, K. ve Wolfram, D. (2012). “Measuring Author Research Relatedness: A Comparison of Word Based, Topic‐Based, And Author Cocitation Approaches”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63 (10), 1973-1986.
• Major, D. A., Turner, J. E. ve Fletcher, T. D. (2006). “Linking Proactive Personality and The Big Five to Motivation to Learn and Development Activity”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 927-935.
• Major, V.S., Klein, K.J. ve Ehrhart, M.G. (2002). “Work Time, Work Interference With Family, And Psychological Distress”, The Journal of applied psychology, 87 3, 427-436.
• Multon, K. D., Brown, S. D. ve Lent, R. W. (1991). “Relation of Self-Efficacy Beliefs to Academic Outcomes: A Meta-Analytic Investigation”, Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38 (1), 30–38.
• Nerur, S. P., Rasheed, A. A. ve Natarajan, V. (2008). “The Intellectual Structure of The Strategic Management Field: An Author Co-Citation Analysis”, Strategic Management Journal, 29 (3), 319–336.
• Ng, T.W.H. ve Feldman, D.C. (2014). “Subjective Career Success: A Meta-Analytic Review”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 85, 169-179.
• Ng, T. W. H., Eby, L. T., Sorensen, K. L. ve Feldman, D. C. (2005). “Predictors of Objective and Subjective Career Success: A Meta-Analysis”, Personnel Psychology, 58, 367-408.
• Nilsson, J.E., Flores, L.Y., Berkel, L.V., Schale, C.L., Linnemeyer, R.M. ve Summer, I. (2007). “International Career Articles: A Content Analysis of Four Journals Across 34 Years”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70, 602–613.
• Noe, R.A. ve Wilk, S.L. (1993). “Investigation of The Factors That Influence Employees' Participation In Development Activities”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 291-302.
• Parker, S.K., Williams, H.M. ve Turner, N. (2006). “Modeling The Antecedents of Proactive Behavior at Work”. The Journal of applied psychology, 91 (3), 636-52 .
• Pfeffer, J. vee Fong, C. T. (2002). T”he End of Business Schools? Less Success Than Meets the Eye”. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 1, 78-95.
• Platman, K. (2004). ““Portfolio Careers” And the Search for Flexibility in Later Life”, Work, Employment and Society, 18, 573-600.
• Pulakos, E.D., Arad, S., Donovan, M.A. ve Plamondon, K.E. (2000). Adaptability in the Workplace: Development af a Taxonomy of Adaptive Performance”, The Journal of applied psychology, 85 (4), 612-24 .
• Ramos-Rodriguez A.R. ve Ruiz-Navarro, J. (2004). “Changes in the Intellectual Structure of Strategic Management Research: A Bibliometric Study of the Strategic Management Journal, 1980-2000”, Strategic Management Journal, 25(10), 981–1004.
• Rokaya, M., Atlam, E., Fuketa, M., Dorji, T. C. ve Aoe, J. I. (2008). “Ranking of Field Association Terms Using Co-Word Analysis”, Information Processing & Management, 44 (2), 738-755.
• Rothwell, A. T. ve Arnold, J. (2007). “Self-Perceived Employability: Development and Validation of a Scale”, Personnel Review, 36, 23-41.
• Savickas, M.L. (1997). “Career Adaptability: An Integrative Construct for Life‐Span, Life‐Space Theory”, Career Development Quarterly, 45, 247-259.
• Seibert, S.E., Crant, J.M. ve Kraimer, M.L. (1999). “Proactive Personality and Career Success”, The Journal of Applied Psychology, 84 3, 416-427.
• Seibert, S.E., Kraimer, M.L. ve Liden, R.C. (2001). “A Social Capital Theory of Career Success”, Academy of Management Journal, 44, 219-237.
• Sennett, R. (1998). The Corrosion of Character. The Personal Consequences of Work in New Capitalism. London: Norton.
• Spurk, D., Hirschi, A. ve Dries, N. (2019). “Antecedents and Outcomes of Objective Versus Subjective Career Success: Competing Perspectives and Future Directions”, Journal of Management, 45 (1), 35-69.
• Sullivan, S. (1999). “The Changing Nature of Careers: A Review and Research Agenda”, Journal of Management, 25, 457–484.
• Sullivan, S. ve Arthur, M.B. (2006). “The Evolution of The Boundaryless Career Concept: Examining Physical and Psychological Mobility”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69, 19-29.
• Sullivan, S. ve Baruch, Y. (2009). “Advances in Career Theory and Research: A Critical Review and Agenda for Future Exploration”, Journal of Management, 35, 1542–1571.
• Super, D.E. (1980). “A Life-Span, Life-Space Approach to Career Development”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 16, 282-298.
• Thompson, C.A., Beauvais, L.L. ve Lyness, K.S. (1999). “When Work–Family Benefits Are Not Enough: The Influence Of Work–Family Culture On Benefit Utilization, Organizational Attachment, and Work–Family Conflict”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54 (3), 392 – 415.
• Topalli, M. ve Ivanaj, S. (2016). “Mapping the Evolution of The Impact of Economic Transition on Central and Eastern European Enterprises: A Co-Word Analysis”, Journal of World Business, 51 (5), 744-759.
• Wu, Y., Jin, X. ve Xue, Y. (2017). “Evaluation of Research Topic Evolution in Psychiatry Using Co-Word Analysis”, Medicine, 96(25).
• Yang, Y., Wu, M. ve Cui, L. (2012). “Integration of Three Visualization Methods Based on Co-Word Analysis”, Scientometrics, 90 (2), 659-673.
• Zhang, Q. R., Li, Y., Liu, J. S., Chen, Y. D. ve Chai, L. H. (2017). “A Dynamic Co-Word Network-Related Approach on The Evolution of China’s Urbanization Research”. Scientometrics, 111 (3), 1623-1642.
• Zhao, H., Seibert, S.E. ve Hills, G.E. (2005). “The Mediating Role of Self-Efficacy in The Development of Entrepreneurial Intentions”. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 90 (6), 1265-1272.
• Zhu, J., Song, L.J., Zhu, L., ve Johnson, R.E. (2019). “Visualizing The Landscape And Evolution Of Leadership Research”, The Leadership Quarterly, 30, 215–232.
• Zong, Q. J., Shen, H. Z., Yuan, Q. J., Hu, X. W., Hou, Z. P. ve Deng, S. G. (2013). “Doctoral Dissertations of Library and Information Science in China: A Co-Word Analysis”, Scientometrics, 94(2), 781-799.
• Zupic, I., ve Čater, T. (2015). “Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization”, Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472.