FONKSİYONEL GELİR DAĞILIMI VE EKONOMİK BÜYÜME İLİŞKİSİ ÜZERİNE TEORİK BİR İNCELEME

Yıl 2023, Sayı: 58, 1 - 20, 08.09.2023

Ahmet Eren Yıldırım , Meneviş Uzbay Pirili

https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.1322301

Öz

Bu çalışma fonksiyonel gelir dağılımı ve ekonomik büyüme ilişkisinin açıklanmasında farklı teorik yapıların bakış açılarını analiz etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. 2008 Küresel Krizi piyasa ekonomisinin etkinliğini ve bu doğrultuda büyüme ve bölüşüm ilişkilerini yeniden tartışılır hale getirmiştir. Bu çalışmada fonksiyonel gelir dağılımı ve ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi Klasik dönemden başlayarak günümüze gelen gelişim sürecinde ele alınmaktadır. Farklı teorik yapıların temel varsayımları ve üretim bölüşüm ilişkisine bakış açılarının analiz edildiği çalışmada ortaya koyulan sonuç, farklılıkların önemli ölçüde ekonomik sistemlerin ele alınış biçiminden kaynaklandığını göstermektedir. Buna göre, ekonominin genel işleyişini arz yönünden tartışan Neo-Klasik paradigma ile talep yönünden tartışan Keynesyen yaklaşımın varsayımlarına dayalı olarak ortaya çıkan Post-Keynesyen paradigma arasında fonksiyonel gelir dağılımının öneminin vurgulanmasına yönelik önemli farklılıklar olduğu gözlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Fonksiyonel gelir dağılımı, ekonomik büyüme, Keynesyen yaklaşım, Neo-Klasik yaklaşım, Post-Keynesyen yaklaşım

A THEORETICAL EXAMINATION ON THE RELATIONSHIP OF FUNCTIONAL INCOME DISTRIBUTION AND ECONOMIC GROWTH

Öz

This study aims to analyze the perspectives of different theoretical structures in explaining the relationship between functional income distribution and economic growth. The 2008 Global Crisis made the efficiency of the market economy and, accordingly, the relations between growth and distribution debatable once again. In this study, the relationship between functional income distribution and economic growth is discussed in the development process starting from the Classical period to the present day. The result of the study, in which the basic assumptions of different theoretical structures and their perspectives on the production distribution relationship are analyzed, shows that the differences are mainly due to the way economic systems are handled. Accordingly, it has been observed that there are significant differences in emphasizing the importance of functional income distribution between the Neo-Classical paradigm, which discusses the general functioning of the economy from the supply side, and the Post-Keynesian paradigm, which emerged based on the assumptions of the Keynesian approach, which discusses the demand side.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Functional income distribution, economic growth, Keynesian approach, Neo-Classical approach, Post-Keynesian approach

Kaynakça

• Akyüz, Y. (2009). Sermaye, Bölüşüm, Büyüme. Ankara: Efil Yayınevi.
• Asimakopulos, A. (1988). Theories of Income Distribution. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher, 1st Edition.
• Bhaduri, A. ve Marglin, S. (1990). Unemployment and the real wage: theeconomic basis for contesting political ideologies. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 14(4), 375-393.
• Boratav, K. ve Yeldan, E. (2001). Turkey, 1980-2000: Financial Liberalization, Macroeconomic (in)-Stability, and Patterns of Distribution. In Taylor, L. (Eds.), External Liberalization in Asia, Post-Socialist Europe, and Brazil (pp.417-455). New York: Oxford University Press.
• Bowles, S. ve Boyer, R. (1995). Wages, Aggregate Demand, and Employment in an Open Economy. In Epstein, G. S. & Gintis, H. (Eds.), Macroeconomic Policy after the Conservative Era: Studies in Investment, Saving and Finance (pp.143-171). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Cobb, C. ve Douglas, P. (1928). A Theory of Production. The American Economic Review, 18(1), 139-165.
• Desai, M. (2009). Marksist İktisat Teorisi (Çev. Satlıgan, N.). Ankara: Efil yayınevi. (Özgün çalışma, 1974).
• Domar, E. (1946). Capital Expansion, Rate of Growth, and Employment. Econometrica, 14(2), 137-147.
• Edgeworth, F. (1925). Papers Relating to Political Economy. London: Macmillan and co.
• Engel, R. F. & Granger, C. W. J. (1987). Co-Integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing. Econometrica, 55(2), 251-276.
• Felderer, B & Homburg, S. (2017). Makro İktisat ve Yeni Makro İktisat (Çev. Aydoğuş, O.). Ankara: Efil Yayınevi, 2. Basım. (Özgün Çalışma, 2005).
• Feldstein, M. & Horioka, C. (1980). Domestic Saving and International Capital Flows. The Economic Journal, 90(358), 314-329.
• Gordon, D. M. (1995a). Putting the horse (back) before the cart: disentangling the macro relationship between investment and saving. In Epstein, G. S. & Gintis, H. (Eds.), Macroeconomic Policy after the Conservative Era: Studies in Investment, Saving and Finance (pp. 57-108). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Gordon, D. M. (1995b). Growth, distribution and the rules of the game: social structuralist macro foundations for a democratic economic policy. In Epstein, G. S. & Gintis, H. (Eds.), Macroeconomic Policy after the Conservative Era: Studies in Investment, Saving and Finance (pp. 335-383). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Granger, C. W. J. (1988). Some recent development in a concept of causality. Journal of Econometrics, 39(1-2), 199-211. doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(88)90045-0.
• Granger, C. W. J. & Newbold, P. (1974). Spurious Regressions in Econometrics. Journal of Econometrics, 2, 111-120.
• Gujarati, D. (2004). Basic Econometrics. New York: The McGraw-Hill Company, 4th Edition.
• Harcourt, G. C. (2006). The Structure of Post-Keynesian Economics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1st Edition.
• Harrod, R. (1939). An Essay in Dynamic Theory. The Economic Journal, 49(193), 14-33.
• Harris, R. & Sollis, R. (2003). Applied Time Series Modeling and Forecasting. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 1st Edition.
• Hartwig, J. (2014). Testin the Bhaduri-Marglin model with OECD panel data. International Review of Applied Economics, 28(4), 419-435. doi: 10.1080/02692171.2014.896881.
• Haug, A. A. (2002). Temporal Aggregation and the Power of Cointegration Tests: a Monte Carlo Study. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 64(4), 399-412.
• Hein, E. (2014). Distribution and Growth After Keynes: A Post-Keynesian Guide. Northampton: Edward Elgar.
• Hein, E. & Vogel, L. (2008). Distribution and growth reconsidered: empirical results fors ix OECD countries. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 32, 479-511. doi: 10.1093/cje/bem047
• Hein, E. & Vogel, L. (2009). Distribution and Growth in France and Germany: Single Equation Estimations and Model Simulations Based on the Bhaduri/Marglin Model. Review of Political Economy, 21(2), 245-272. doi: 10.1080/09538250902834053
• Hein, E. & Tarassow, A. (2010). Distribution, aggregate demand and productivity growth: theory and empirical results for six OECD countries based on a pos-Kaleckian model. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34, 727-754. doi: 10.1093/cje/bep066
• Hein, E. & Truger, A. (2007). Money, Distribution and Economic Policy. Northampton: Edward Elgar, 1st Edition.
• Hein, E., Heise, A. & Truger, A. (2006). Wages, Employment, Distribution and Growth. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Hicks, J. R. (1937). Mr. Keynes and the “Classics”; A Suggested Interpretation. Econometrica, 5(2), 147-159.
• Jetin, B. & Kurt, O. E. (2016). Functional income distribution and growth in Thailand: A post Keynesian econometric analysis. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 39(3), 334-360. doi: 10.1080/01603477.2016.1202774.
• Johansen, S, & Juselius, K. (1990). Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Cointegration – with Applications to the Demand for Money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52(2), 169-210. doi: 10.1111/j.1468- 0084.1990.mp52002003.x
• Jones, C. (2001). Introduction to Economic Growth. New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 2nd Edition.
• Jones, C. & Vollrath, D. (2013). Introduction to Economic Growth. New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 3th Edition.
• Kaldor, N. (1955-56). Alternative Theories of Distribution. The Review of Economic Studies, 23(2), 83-100.
• Kalecki, M. (1938). The Determinants of Distribution of the National Income. Econometrica, 6(2), 97-112.
• Kalecki, M. (1954). Theory of Economic Dynamics. New York: Routledge, 1st Edition.
• Kalecki, M. (1971). Selected Essays on the Dynamics of The Capitalist Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1st Edition.
• Kazgan, G. (1974). İktisadi Düşünce veya Politik İktisadın Evrimi. İstanbul: Bilgi Yayınevi.
• Keynes, J. M. (1930). A Treatise on Money. New York: Cambride University Press, 1st Edition.
• Keynes, J. M. (1936). The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 1st Edition.
• King, J. E. (Ed.) (1996). An Alternative Macroeconomic Theory: The Kaleckian Model and Post-Keynesian Economics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1st Edition.
• Kregel, J. A. (1971). Rate of Profit, Distribution and Growth: Two Views. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 1st Edition.
• Kurt, O. E. (2017). Functional Income Distribution and Growth in South Korea: A Post-Keynesian Econometric Analysis. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 39(2), 553-576. doi: 10.14780/muiibd.384208.
• Lavoie, M. (2006). Introduction to Post-Keynesian Economics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 1st Edition.
• Lavoie, M. (2014). Post-Keynesian Economics: New Foundations. Northampton: Edward Elgar, 1st Edition.
• Luxemburg, R. (1913). The Accumulation of Capital. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd, 1st Edition.
• Malthus, T. R. (1820). Principles of Political Economy. London: William Pickering, 1st Edition.
• Marglin, S. A. (1984). Growth, Distribution and Inflation: a centennial synthesis. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 8(2), 115-144.
• Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of Economics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 8th Edition.
• Marx, K. (1867). Kapital Cilt-1: Ekonomi Politiğin Eleştirisi. New York: L. W. Schmidt, 1st Edition.
• Marx, K. (1885). Kapital Cilt-2: Sermayenin Dolaşım Süreci. Moskova: Progress Publishers, 1st Edition.
• Mill, J. S. (1848). Principles of Political Economy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
• Molera-Simarro, R. (2015). Functional Distribution of Income, Aggregate Demand, and Economic Growth in the Chinese Economy, 1978-2007. International Review of Applied Economics, 29(4), 435-454. doi: 10.1080/02692171.2015.1016404.
• Mosley, P. & Suleiman, A. (2007). Aid, Agriculture and Poverty in Developing Countries. Review of Development Economics, 11(1), 139-158. doi: 10.1111/j.1467- 9361.2006.00354.x.
• Naastepad, C. W. M. & Storm, S. (2006). OECD demand regimes (1960-2000). Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 29(2), 213-248. doi: 10.2753/PKE0160- 3477290203.
• Narayan, P. K. (2005). The Saving and investment nexus for China: evidence from cointegration tests. Applied Economics, 37(17), 1979-1990. doi: 10.1080/00036840500278103.
• Nishi, H. (2012). Structural VAR analysis of debt, capital accumulation, and income distribution in the Japanese economy: a Post Keynesian Perspective, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 34(4), 685-712. doi: 10.2753/PKE0160-3477340405.
• Obst, T., Onaran, Ö. & Nikolaidi, M. (2017). The effects of income distribution and fiscal policy on growth. İnvestment and budget balance: the case of Europe. Greenwich Political Economy Research Center (GPERC), 43.
• Onaran, Ö. & Galanis, G. (2012). Is aggregate demand wage-led or profit-led?. Conditions of Work and Employment Series, 40.
• Onaran, Ö. & Galanis, G. (2014). Income distribution and growth: a global model. Environment and Planning A, 46, 2489-2513. doi: 10.1068/a46265.
• Onaran, Ö. & Obst, T. (2016). Wage-led growth in the EU15 member-states: the effects of income distribution on growth, investment, trade balance and inflation. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1-35. doi: 10.1093/cje/bew009.
• Onaran, Ö. & Stockhammer, E. (2001, Şubat). The Effect of Distribution on Accumulation, Capacity Utilization and Employment: Testing the Wage-Led Hypothesis for Turkey. Sözel Bildiri, 27th Annual Conference of Eastern Economic Association, Cairo.
• Onaran, Ö. & Stockhammer, E. (2005). Two Different Export-Oriented Growth Strategies: Accumulation and Distribuiton in Turkey and South Korea. Emerging Markets Finance & Trade, 41(1), 65-89.
• Onaran, Ö., Stockhammer, E. & Grafl, L. (2011). Financialisation, income distribution and aggregate demand in the USA. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 35, 637-661. doi: 10.1093/cje/beq045.
• Pasinetti, L. (1962). Rate of Profit and Income Distribution in Relation to the Rate of Economic Growth. The Review of Economic Studies, 29(4), 267-279.
• Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y. & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bound Testing Approaches to the Analysis of Level Relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16, 289-326. doi: 10.1002/jae.616.
• Pesaran, M. H. & Pesaran, B. (1997). Working with Microfit 4.0: Interactive Econometric Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Pigou, A. (1920). The Economics of Welfare. London: Macmillan and co., 4th Edition.
• Ramanathan, R. (1982). Introduction to the Theory of Economic Growth. New York: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 1st Edition.
• Ricardo, D. (1817). On The Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. London: John Murray, 1st Edition.
• Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 71-102.
• Robinson, J. (1967). Growth and The Theory of Distribution. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 38(1), 3-7. doi: 10.1111%2Fj.1467-8292.1967.tb00172.x.
• Smith, A. (1776). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of The Wealth of Nations, London: W. Strahan and T. Cadell.
• Solow, R. (1956). A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65-94.
• Stockhammer, E. & Ederer, S. (2008). Demand effects of the falling wage share in Austria. Empirica, 35, 481-502. doi: 10.1007/s10663-008-9069-0
• Stockhammer, E., Hein, E. & Grafl, L. (2011). Globalization and the effects of changes in functional income distribution on aggregate demand in Germay. International Review of Applied Economics, 25(1), 1-23. doi: 10.1080/02692170903426096
• Stockhammer, E., Onaran, Ö. & Ederer, S. (2009). Functional income distribution and aggregate demand in the Euro area. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33, 139-159. doi: 10.1093/cje/ben026
• Stockhammer, E. & Onaran, Ö. (2001, Ekim). A Post-Keynesian Model for Analyzing the Relationship Between Distribution and Growth. Sözel Bildiri, Old and New Growth Theories: An Assessment Conference, Pisa.
• Stockhammer, E. & Onaran, Ö. (2004). Accumulation, distribution and employment: a structural VAR approach to a Kaleckian macro model. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 15, 421-447. doi: 10.1016/j.strueco.2003.07.002.
• Stockhammer, E., Rabinovich, J. & Reddy, N. (2017). Distribution, wealth and demand regimes in historical perspective. USA, UK, France and Germany, 1855-2010. Kingston University Economics Discussion Papers, 5.
• Stockhammer, E. & Stehrer, R. (2011). Goodwin or Kalecki in Demand? Functional Income Distribution and Aggregate Demand in the Short Run. Review of Radical Political Economics, 43(4), 506-522. doi: 10.1177/0486613411402642
• Storm, S. & Naastepad, C. W. M. (2005). Strategic Factors in Economic Development: East Asian Industrialization 1950-2003. Development and Change, 36(6), 1059-1094.
• Tursoy, T. & Faisal. F. (2018). The impact of gold and crude oil prices on stock market in Turkey: Empirical evidence from ARDL bounds test and combined cointegration. Resources Policy, 55, 49-54. doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2017.10.014.
• Vujcic, B., Deskar-Skrbic, M., Ratkovski, Z. & Zrnc, Z. (2014). Functional distribution of income and economic activity inn Croatia: Post-Keynesian approach. Zbornik Radova Ekonomskog Fakulteta u Rijeci, 32(1), 53-73. Yeldan, E. (2011). İktisadi Büyüme ve Bölüşüm Teorileri. Ankara: Efil Yayınevi, 2. Baskı.