Kanada'da Göçmenlerin Algılanan Sosyoekonomik Statüsü: Göçmenlik Durumu ve Çeşitli Faktörlerin Etkileşiminin Rolü

Öz

Algılanan sosyoekonomik statü (ASS), sosyal hiyerarşideki algılanan konum, çeşitli sağlık sonuçları ve genel refah açısından önemli bir göstergedir. Ancak, ASS'nün belirleyicileri üzerine sınırlı sayıda çalışma mevcut olup, göçmen nüfusu için ASS'nün etkilerini inceleyen birkaç çalışma bulunmaktadır. Bu çalışma, Kanada'daki göçmenlerin algılanan sosyal sınıfı üzerine göçmenlik durumu, demografik ve sosyoekonomik özellikler ve çevresel faktörlerin etkisini değerlendirmek için Dünya Değerler Araştırması'nın 7. dalgasının Kanada örneğinden 4018 bireyi kullanmaktadır. Araştırma, göçmenlik durumunu bireyin ve ebeveynlerinin göçmen olup olmamasına göre ayırarak üç modelde incelemiştir. Demografik faktörlerin göçmenlik statüsü ile etkileşimi, sosyal sınıf algısı üzerinde önemli etkilere sahiptir. Fransızca ve İngilizce dışında bir dil konuşmanın ve beyaz olmamanın, özellikle annenin göçmenlik durumu ile etkileşiminde, sosyal sınıf algısı üzerinde negatif etkileri bulunmuştur. Sosyoekonomik değişkenlerin göçmenlik durumları ile etkileşiminde, göçmen bireylerin ailelerinden daha iyi bir gelire sahip olmaları sosyal sınıf algısını pozitif yönde etkilerken, daha kötü bir gelire sahip olmaları negatif etkiler yaratmaktadır. Çevresel faktörlerin göçmenlik durumu ile etkileşiminde, göçmen bireylerin kırda yaşaması ve iyi bir mahallede bulunmaları sosyal sınıf algısını olumlu etkilemektedir. Bu bulgular, göçmenlerin sosyoekonomik uyumunu artırmak için dil desteği, etnik kapsayıcılık girişimleri ve finansal iyileştirme programlarının önemini vurgulamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Algılanan sosyoekonomik statü
• göçmen
• sağlık
• öznel refah

Perceived Socioeconomic Status of Immigrants in Canada: The Role of Immigration Status and Various Factors' Interaction

Öz

Perceived socioeconomic status (PSS) is an important indicator of perceived position in the social hierarchy, various health outcomes, and overall well-being. However, there are limited studies on the determinants of PSS, and few that examine its effects on immigrant populations. This study evaluates the impact of immigration status, demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, and environmental factors on the perceived social class of immigrants in Canada using data from the 7th wave of the World Values Survey, with a sample of 4018 individuals. The research examines immigration status by separating it into individual and parental immigration status across three models. The interaction of demographic factors with immigration status has significant effects on perceived social class. Speaking a language other than French or English, and being non-white, particularly when interacting with the mother's immigration status, has negative effects on perceived social class. In the interaction of socioeconomic variables with immigration status, having a better income than their family positively affects the perceived social class of immigrants, while having a worse income has negative effects. The interaction of environmental factors with immigration status shows that living in rural areas and good neighborhoods positively affects perceived social class. These findings highlight the importance of language support, ethnic inclusivity initiatives, and financial improvement programs to enhance the socioeconomic integration of immigrants.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Perceived socioeconomic status
• migrants
• health
• subjective well-being

Kaynakça

1. Andersen, R., ve Curtis, J. (2012). The polarizing effect of economic inequality on class identification: Evidence from 44 countries. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 30(1), 129–141.
2. Azzolini, D., ve Barone, C. (2013). Do they progress or do they lag behind? Educational attainment of immigrants’ children in Italy: The role played by generational status, country of origin, and social class. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 31, 82–96.
3. Baquedano-Rodríguez, M., Rosas-Muñoz, J., ve Castillo-Cruces, J. (2023). Subjective socioeconomic status in small-scale aquaculture: Evidence from central-southern Chile. Sustainability, 15(14), 11239.
4. Bukodi, E., ve Goldthorpe, J. H. (2013). Decomposing ‘social origins’: The effects of parents’ class, status, and education on the educational attainment of their children. European Sociological Review, 29(5), 1024–1039.
5. Chen, J., Gee, G. C., Spencer, M. S., Danziger, S. H., ve Takeuchi, D. T. (2009). Perceived social standing among Asian immigrants in the US: Do reasons for immigration matter? Social Science Research, 38(4), 858–869.
6. Chen, X. (2020). Influence of parents’ education level on household human capital investment. In 2020 International Conference on E-Commerce and Internet Technology (ECIT) (pp. 97–104).
7. Choi, Y., Kim, J.-H., ve Park, E.-C. (2015). The effect of subjective and objective social class on health-related quality of life: New paradigm using longitudinal analysis. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 13, 1–11.
8. Cohen, D., Shin, F., Liu, X., Ondish, P., ve Kraus, M. W. (2017). Defining social class across time and between groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(11), 1530–1545.

9. Cundiff, J. M., Smith, T. W., Uchino, B. N., ve Berg, C. A. (2013). Subjective social status: Construct validity and associations with psychosocial vulnerability and self-rated health. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 20, 148–158.
10. Curtis, J. (2016). Social mobility and class identity: The role of economic conditions in 33 societies, 1999–2009. European Sociological Review, 32(1), 108–121.
11. Damilep, J. Z., Saleh, D. A., Dauda, I. A., ve Pandang, S. D. (2022). Impact of marital status and perceived social support on the psychological wellbeing of mothers. Nigerian Journal of Behavioural Studies, 1(1).
12. Destin, M., Rheinschmidt-Same, M., ve Richeson, J. A. (2017). Status-based identity: A conceptual approach integrating the social psychological study of socioeconomic status and identity. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(2), 270–289.
13. Dizon, J. I. W. T., ve Mendoza, N. B. (2023). Low perceived social rank increases the impact of mental health symptoms on suicidal ideation: Evidence among young adults from the Philippines. Archives of Suicide Research, 27(2), 522–539.
14. Dorling, D. (2014). Thinking about class. Sociology, 48(3), 452–462.
15. Dostie, B., Li, J., Card, D., ve Parent, D. (2023). Employer policies and the immigrant–native earnings gap. Journal of Econometrics, 233(2), 544–567.
16. Durou, G., Maroto, M., ve Brown, D. (2023). Unpacking the Alberta advantage through an intersectional lens: Social class, gender and minority groups in Alberta. Alternate Routes: A Journal of Critical Social Research, 33(1).
17. Engzell, P., Mood, C., ve Jonsson, J. (2020). It’s all about the parents: Inequality transmission across three generations in Sweden. Sociological Science, 7.
18. Genest-Grégoire, A., Guay, J.-H., ve Godbout, L. (2019). Never too rich to be middle-class: An assessment of the reference-group theory and implications for redistributive taxation. In What Drives Inequality? (pp. 123–137). Emerald Publishing Limited.
19. Goon, S., Slotnick, M., ve Leung, C. W. (2024). Associations between subjective social status and health behaviors among college students. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior.
20. Gugushvili, A., ve Jarosz, E. (2024). A longitudinal study of perceived social position and health-related quality of life. Social Science ve Medicine, 340, 116446.
21. Guzi, M., Kahanec, M., ve Mýtna Kureková, L. (2023). The impact of immigration and integration policies on immigrant-native labour market hierarchies. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 49(16), 4169–4187.
22. Haddon, E. (2015). Class identification in New Zealand: An analysis of the relationship between class position and subjective social location. Journal of Sociology, 51(3), 737–754.
23. Hanson, G., ve Liu, C. (2023). Immigration and occupational comparative advantage. Journal of International Economics, 145, 103809.
24. Harrits, G. S., ve Pedersen, H. H. (2018). Class categories and the subjective dimension of class: The case of Denmark. The British Journal of Sociology, 69(1), 67–98.
25. Harrits, G. S., & Pedersen, M. J. (2018). Class and politics in Denmark: The continuing significance of class in the 21st century. European Societies, 20(1), 67-87.
26. Hout, M. (2018). Americans’ occupational status reflects the status of both of their parents. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(38), 9527–9532.
27. Kang, S. J., ve Seo, W. (2022). Do people determine their subjective socioeconomic status based on the housing type and residential neighborhood? Empirical evidence from Seoul. Land, 11(11), 2036.
28. Karthick Ramakrishnan, S. (2004). Second-generation immigrants? The “2.5 generation” in the United States. Social Science Quarterly, 85(2), 380–399.
29. Kim, A. H., Kim, M., ve Ryu, S. (2018). Effects of neighborhood inequality on the relative distance between objective position and subjective identification. International Journal of Japanese Sociology, 27(1), 85–106.
30. Kim, Y., ve Sommet, N. (2023). Income is a stronger predictor of subjective social class in more economically unequal places. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 01461672231210772.
31. Kirsten, F., Botha, I., Biyase, M., ve Pretorius, M. (2023). Determinants of subjective social status in South Africa. Social Indicators Research, 168(1), 1–24.
32. Langlois, S., Zern, A., Anderson, S., Ashekun, O., Ellis, S., Graves, J., ve Compton, M. T. (2020). Subjective social status, objective social status, and substance use among individuals with serious mental illnesses. Psychiatry Research, 293, 113352.
33. Lindberg, M. H., Chen, G., Olsen, J. A., ve Abelsen, B. (2021). Explaining subjective social status in two countries: The relative importance of education, occupation, income, and childhood circumstances. SSM-Population Health, 15, 100864.
34. Lindemann, K. (2007). The impact of objective characteristics on subjective social position. Trames, 11(1), 54–68.
35. Lindemann, K., ve Saar, E. (2014). Contextual effects on subjective social position: Evidence from European countries. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 55(1), 3–23.
36. Mare, R. D., ve Song, X. (2023). Social mobility in multiple generations. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 100806.
37. Maroto, M., Brown, D., ve Durou, G. (2023). Is everyone really middle class? Social class position and identification in Alberta. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie, 60(3), 336–366.
38. Miyakawa, M., Magnusson Hanson, L. L., Theorell, T., ve Westerlund, H. (2012). Subjective social status: Its determinants and association with health in the Swedish working population (the SLOSH study). The European Journal of Public Health, 22(4), 593–597.
39. Muhammad, T., ve Pai, M. (2023). Association between subjective social status and physical frailty in older adults in India: Perceived discrimination and ill-treatment as mediators and moderators. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 35(11), 2517–2530.
40. Nakhaie, M. R., ve Kazemipur, A. (2013). Social capital, employment, and occupational status of the new immigrants in Canada. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 14, 419–437.
41. Neubert, M., Süßenbach, P., Rief, W., ve Euteneuer, F. (2024). Does subjective social status affect pain thresholds? – An experimental examination. Psychology, Health ve Medicine, 29(4), 754–764.
42. Niu, L., Hoyt, L. T., Shane, J., ve Storch, E. A. (2023). Associations between subjective social status and psychological well-being among college students. Journal of American College Health, 71(7), 2044–2051.
43. Oddsson, G. (2018). Class imagery and subjective social location during Iceland’s economic crisis, 2008–2010. Sociological Focus, 51(1), 14–30.
44. Parsons, T. (1951). The Social System. Free Press.
45. Pedersen, P. V., Andersen, P. T., ve Curtis, T. (2012). Social relations and experiences of social isolation among socially marginalized people. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29(6), 839–858.
46. Rezaei, O., Adibi, H., ve Banham, V. (2023). Integration challenges of immigrants from non-English-speaking backgrounds in Australia: A critical review from 1975 to 2021. Diaspora Studies, 16(1), 1–31.
47. Richards, L., Maharani, A., ve Präg, P. (2023). Subjective social status and allostatic load among older people in England: A longitudinal analysis. Social Science ve Medicine, 320, 115749.
48. Rumbaut, R. G. (2004). Ages, life stages, and generational cohorts: Decomposing the immigrant first and second generations in the United States. International Migration Review, 38(3), 1160–1205.
49. Schaeffer, M., ve Kas, J. (2023). The integration paradox: A review and meta-analysis of the complex relationship between integration and reports of discrimination. International Migration Review, 01979183231170809.
50. Schieman, S., ve Narisada, A. (2021). A less objectionable greed? Work-life conflict and unjust pay during a pandemic. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 71, 100564.
51. Serre, D., ve Wagner, A.-C. (2015). For a relational approach to cultural capital: A concept tested by changes in the French social space. The Sociological Review, 63(2), 433–450.
52. Shaked, D., Williams, M., Evans, M. K., ve Zonderman, A. B. (2016). Indicators of subjective social status: Differential associations across race and sex. SSM-Population Health, 2, 700–707.
53. Solano, G., ve De Coninck, D. (2023). Explaining migrant integration policies: A comparative study across 56 countries. Migration Studies, 11(1), 75–102.
54. Songül, G. (2023) Mutlak Gelir ve Yaşam Memnuniyeti: Nispi Gelir ve Sosyal Referans Gelir Etkisinin Aracılık Rolü. Politik Ekonomik Kuram, 7(Özel Sayı), 58-68.
55. Sosnaud, B., Brady, D., ve Frenk, S. M. (2013). Class in name only: Subjective class identity, objective class position, and vote choice in American presidential elections. Social Problems, 60(1), 81–99.
56. Stock, I., ve Fröhlich, J. J. (2021). Migrants’ social positioning strategies in transnational social spaces. Social Inclusion, 9(1), 91–103.
57. Stroope, S., Draper, S., ve Whitehead, A. L. (2013). Images of a loving God and sense of meaning in life. Social Indicators Research, 111, 25–44.
58. Tsai, P.-L., ve Ghahari, S. (2023). Immigrants’ experience of health care access in Canada: A recent scoping review. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 25(3), 712–727.
59. Upenieks, L., Bierman, A., ve Lee, Y. (2023). Divine relations as a basis of subjective social status during later-life: Direct and moderating effects. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 62(S1), 141–162.
60. Upenieks, L., Schieman, S., ve Bierman, A. (2022). Jitters on the eve of the Great Recession: Is the belief in divine control a protective resource? Sociology of Religion, 83(2), 194–221.
61. Vidal, C., Jun, H.-J., ve Latkin, C. (2023). The effects of social rank and neighborhood and school environment on adolescent depression and suicidal ideation: A structural equation modeling approach. Child Psychiatry ve Human Development, 54(5), 1425–1437.
62. Wang, Y., Hu, M., Ding, R., ve He, P. (2023). The dynamic relationship between subjective social status and health: Evidence from a Chinese cohort study. British Journal of Health Psychology, 28(1), 1–21.
63. Wang, Y., Xu, S., Chen, Y., ve Liu, H. (2023). A decline in perceived social status leads to post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms in adults half a year after the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic: Consideration of the mediation effect of perceived vulnerability to disease. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14, 1217264.
64. Wright, E. O. (1997). Class Counts: Comparative Studies in Class Analysis. Cambridge University Press.
65. Weiss, D., ve Blöchl, M. (2024). Loss of social status and subjective well-being across the adult life span: Feeling stuck or moving up? Social Psychological and Personality Science, 15(2), 182–192.
66. Wolff, L. S., Acevedo-Garcia, D., Subramanian, S., Weber, D., ve Kawachi, I. (2010). Subjective social status, a new measure in health disparities research: Do race/ethnicity and choice of referent group matter? Journal of Health Psychology, 15(4), 560–574.
67. Woo, B., Wang, K., ve Takeuchi, D. T. (2018). Perceived social position of Asian Americans: Neighborhood context and social comparison. Social Indicators Research, 138, 1075–1087.
68. Worthen, M., Menchaca, J., ve Laine, M. (2023). An intersectional approach to understanding the correlates of depression in college students: Discrimination, social status, and identity. Journal of American College Health, 71(4), 1220–1231.
69. Wright, E. O. (1997). Class Counts: Comparative Studies in Class Analysis. Cambridge University Press.
70. Yaish, M. (2002). The consequences of immigration for social mobility: The experience of Israel. European Sociological Review, 18(4), 449–471.