BRICS ve BRICS+ Ülkelerinde Mal ve Hizmet Ticareti ile Ekonomik Büyüme Arasındaki İlişki: Panel Veri Analizi

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 4, 1406 - 1424, 23.12.2025

Nil Sirel Öztürk

https://doi.org/10.30586/pek.1689811

Öz

Bu çalışma, BRICS ve BRICS+ kapsamında yer alan seçilmiş ülkelerde mal ve hizmet ticaretinin ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki etkilerini incelemektedir. 1994–2023 dönemini kapsayan panel veri seti kullanılarak, Dünya Bankası Kalkınma Göstergeleri veri tabanından elde edilen yıllık veriler analiz edilmiştir. Bağımlı değişken olarak kişi başına düşen gayrisafi yurt içi hasıla (GSYH), bağımsız değişkenler olarak ise mal ihracatı, mal ithalatı, hizmet ihracatı ve hizmet ithalatı ele alınmıştır. Panel veri setinde çapraz kesit bağımlılığı ve eğim heterojenliği tespit edilmiş; bu nedenle analizler Artırılmış Ortalama Grup (AMG) yöntemiyle gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bulgular, mal ihracatının ve özellikle hizmet ithalatının ekonomik büyüme üzerinde pozitif ve anlamlı etkiler yarattığını göstermektedir. Ülke bazlı sonuçlar ise dış ticaretin büyüme üzerindeki etkisinin homojen olmadığını ve ülkeye özgü yapısal farklılıkların belirleyici olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Ayrıca, Dumitrescu-Hurlin Panel Granger Nedensellik testi sonuçları, mal ve hizmet ticaretinin tüm alt bileşenlerinin en az bir ülkede ekonomik büyümenin Granger nedeni olduğunu göstermektedir. Bu bulgular, dış ticaretin sadece eşzamanlı değil, aynı zamanda yönlendirici bir büyüme belirleyicisi olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

BIRCS , ekonomik büyüme , dış ticaret , panel veri analizi

The Relationship Between Merchandise and Service Trade and Economic Growth in BRICS and BRICS+ Countries: A Panel Data Analysis

Öz

This study examines the impact of merchandise and service trade on economic growth in selected BRICS and BRICS+ countries. A panel dataset was constructed by utilizing annual data from the World Bank’s World Development Indicators for the period 1994–2023, Per capita gross domestic product (GDP) was employed as the dependent variable, while merchandise exports, merchandise imports, service exports, and service imports served as the independent variables. Tests revealed the presence of cross-sectional dependence and slope heterogeneity within the panel data, leading to the adoption of the Augmented Mean Group (AMG) estimation method. The findings indicate that merchandise exports and, particularly, service imports have a positive and statistically significant impact on economic growth. Country-specific results highlight that the relationship between trade and growth is not homogeneous but shaped by structural differences across nations. Moreover, the Dumitrescu-Hurlin Panel Granger Causality test confirms that all components of foreign trade act as Granger causes of economic growth in at least one country. These results suggest that foreign trade is not only correlated with but also dynamically drives growth in the BRICS+ context.

Anahtar Kelimeler

BRICS , economic growth , foreign trade , panel data analysis

Kaynakça

• Ahmad, I., Haider, A., & Afzal, J. (2024). The Geopolitical and Economic Impact of BRICS on the Middle East. FWU Journal of Social Sciences, 18(4), 80-95.
• Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of econometrics, 68(1), 29-51.
• Arnold, T. D. (2025). De-dollarization and global sovereignty: BRICS’quest for a new financial paradigm. Human Geography, 18(1), 78-83.
• Aydin, M., & Turan, Y. E. (2020). The influence of financial openness, trade openness, and energy intensity on ecological footprint: revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for BRICS countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(34), 43233-43245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10238-9
• Balassa, B. (1978). Exports and economic growth: further evidence. Journal of development Economics, 5(2), 181-189.
• Burger, M. J., Thissen, M. J. P. M., van Oort, F. G., & Diodato, D. (2014). The Magnitude and Distance Decay of Trade in Goods and Services: New Evidence for European Countries. Spatial Economic Analysis, 9(3), 231-259. https://doi.org/10.1080/17421772.2014.930166
• Chen, Q., & Shen, Y. (2024). Deep trade agreements and services trade: An analysis based on service trade provisions. The World Economy, 47(7), 2909-2946. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.13563
• Choi, C.-H., Zhou, X., & Ko, J.-O. (2023). Can Human Capital Drive Sustainable International Trade? Evidence from BRICS Countries. Sustainability, 16(1), 135. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16010135
• Coquidé, C., Lages, J., & Shepelyansky, D. L. (2023). Prospects of BRICS currency dominance in international trade. Applied Network Science, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-023-00590-3
• Dai, Y. (2023). Business Cycle Synchronization and Multilateral Trade Integration in the BRICS. The Chinese Economy, 56(3), 163-181.
• Donno, D., & Rudra, N. (2019). David and Goliath? Small developing countries, large emerging markets, and South-South preferential trade agreements. International Studies Quarterly, 63(3), 574-588.
• Dowrick, S. (2004). Trade Openness and Growth: Who Benefits? Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 20(1), 38-56. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grh003
• Dumitrescu, E.-I., & Hurlin, C. (2012). Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic modelling, 29(4), 1450-1460.
• Eberhardt, M., & Bond, S. (2009). Cross-section dependence in nonstationary panel models: a novel estimator.
• Eberhardt, M., & Teal, F. (2010). Productivity Analysis in Global Manufacturing Production.
• Feder, G. (1983). On exports and economic growth. Journal of development Economics, 12(1-2), 59-73.
• Francois, J., & Hoekman, B. (2010). Services trade and policy. Journal of economic literature, 48(3), 642-692.
• Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1991). Trade, knowledge spillovers, and growth. European economic review, 35(2-3), 517-526.
• Halim, M. A., & Moudud-Ul-Huq, S. (2024). Green economic growth in BRIC and CIVETS countries: The effects of trade openness and sustainable development goals. Heliyon, 10(9), e30148-e30148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30148
• Hasan, M. B., Wieloch, J., Ali, M. S., Zikovic, S., & Uddin, G. S. (2023). A new answer to the old question of the environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC). Does it work for BRICS countries? Resources Policy, 87, 104332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104332
• Hoekman, B. M. (2006). Liberalizing trade in services: a survey.
• Huchet‐Bourdon, M., Le Mouël, C., & Vijil, M. (2017). The relationship between trade openness and economic growth: Some new insights on the openness measurement issue. The World Economy, 41(1), 59-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12586
• Kayani, U., Hassan, M. K., Dejan, A., Khan, M., & Nawaz, F. (2024). Assessment of Economic Policy Uncertainty spillovers: A cross-border analysis of global and BRIC economies. International Economics, 179, 100530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2024.100530
• Khmelevskaya, N. (2015). Metamorphoses in trade complementarities among BRICS and their export positions. Voprosy Ekonomiki(8), 43-57. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2015-8-43-57
• Kindleberger, C. P. (1961). Foreign Trade and Economic Growth: Lessons from Britain and France, 1850 to 1913. The Economic History Review, 14(2), 289-305. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0289.1961.tb00052.x
• Krueger, A. O. (1980). Trade policy as an input to development (0898-2937).
• Krugman, P. (1994). Rethinking international trade. MIT press.
• Mora, J., & Olabisi, M. (2020). Economic Development And The Margins Of Trade: Are The Least Developed Countries Different? Economic Inquiry, 59(2), 600-621. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12937
• Pereira, W., Missio, F., & Jayme, F. (2024). Structural Change in the 21st Century: The Role of the Modern Services Sector in the Economic Development Strategy. Review of Political Economy, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/09538259.2024.2342431
• Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics, 0435. Economics, 1240(1), 1.
• Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence. Journal of applied econometrics, 22(2), 265-312.
• Pesaran, M. H. (2015). Testing weak cross-sectional dependence in large panels. Econometric reviews, 34(6-10), 1089-1117.
• Pesaran, M. H., & Yamagata, T. (2008). Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. Journal of econometrics, 142(1), 50-93.
• Radmehr, R., Ali, E. B., Shayanmehr, S., Saghaian, S., Darbandi, E., Agbozo, E., & Sarkodie, S. A. (2022). Assessing the Global Drivers of Sustained Economic Development: The Role of Trade Openness, Financial Development, and FDI. Sustainability, 14(21), 14023. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114023
• Rubinson, R., & Holtzman, D. (1981). Comparative Dependence and Economic Development. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 22(1-2), 86-101. https://doi.org/10.1177/002071528102200106
• Sarker, B. (2024). FDI-growth and trade-growth relationships during crises: evidence from Bangladesh. Financial Innovation, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-023-00571-6
• Singh, S., Bhardwaj, M., Mahendru, M., Bansal, P., & Roszko-Wójtowicz, E. (2024). Exploring economic development and mineral rents nexus across BRICS nations: Fresh insights from multiple threshold panel analysis. Resources Policy, 88, 104537.
• Stojkoski, V., Utkovski, Z., & Kocarev, L. (2016). The Impact of Services on Economic Complexity: Service Sophistication as Route for Economic Growth. PloS one, 11(8), e0161633-e0161633. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161633
• Vazquez, K. C. (2021). Brazil and BRICS multilateralism à la carte: from bilateralism to community interest. Global Policy, 12(4), 534-538.
• Wacziarg, R., & Welch, K. H. (2008). Trade Liberalization and Growth: New Evidence. The World Bank Economic Review, 22(2), 187-231. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhn007