Batı’nın Gücü, Doğu’nun Sessizliği: Edward Said ve Lu Xun’un Eleştirilerinde Ortak Noktalar

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 4, 1675 - 1686, 23.12.2025

Ali Kiriktaş

https://doi.org/10.30586/pek.1775595

Öz

Bu makale, postkolonyal teorinin kurucusu Edward Said ile modern Çin edebiyatının öncüsü Lu Xun’un entelektüel projelerini karşılaştırmalı bir perspektifle incelemektedir. Farklı tarihsel ve coğrafi bağlamlardan gelmelerine rağmen, her iki düşünürün de temel bir sorunsal olan hegemonik güç yapılarının yarattığı “sessizlik” olgusu etrafında birleştiği iddia edilmektedir. Said, Oryantalizm kavramsallaştırmasıyla Batı’nın söylemsel gücünün Doğu’yu nasıl nesneleştirdiğini ve dışarıdan bir güçle nasıl susturduğunu analiz eder. Buna karşılık Lu Xun, “demir ev” ve “Ah Q ruhu” gibi metaforlar aracılığıyla Çin toplumunun kendi içine kapalı ataletini, kayıtsızlığını ve ahlaki felcini, yani kendi kendine nasıl sustuğunu teşhis eder. Makale, bu iki farklı sessizlik biçiminin (dışarıdan dayatılan ve içeriden üretilen) birbirini besleyen diyalektik bir ilişki içinde olduğunu savunmaktadır. Dışsal hegemonya, içsel atalete zemin hazırlarken; içsel kayıtsızlık da dışsal tahakkümü kolaylaştırmaktadır. Bu ortak sorun karşısında her iki düşünür de benzer bir çözüm önerir. Said’in sürgün entelektüeli ile Lu Xun’un savaşçı entelektüelinin, bu sessizliği kırmak ve rahatsız edici hakikatleri dile getirmek gibi ortak bir misyonu paylaştığı sonucuna varılmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

: Edward Said , Lu Xun , Oryantalizm , Entelektüel , Hegemonya.

The Power of the West, the Silence of the East: Common Ground in the Critiques of Edward Said and Lu Xun

Öz

This article examines the intellectual projects of Edward Said, the founder of postcolonial theory, and Lu Xun, the pioneer of modern Chinese literature, from a comparative perspective. Despite coming from different historical and geographical contexts, it is argued that both thinkers converge around the phenomenon of ‘silence’ created by hegemonic power structures, a fundamental issue. Said analyses how the West's discursive power objectifies the East and silences it through external force, using his conceptualisation of Orientalism. In contrast, Lu Xun diagnoses Chinese society's self-imposed inertia, apathy, and moral paralysis-that is, how it silences itself-through metaphors such as the ‘iron house’ and the ‘spirit of Ah Q.’ The article argues that these two different forms of silence (imposed from outside and produced from within) exist in a dialectical relationship that feeds off each other. External hegemony paves the way for internal inertia, while internal indifference facilitates external domination. Faced with this shared and suffocating problem, both thinkers propose a similar solution. It is concluded that Said's exiled intellectual and Lu Xun's militant intellectual share a common mission: to break this silence and articulate uncomfortable truths.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Edward Said , Lu Xun , Orientalism , Intellectual , Hegemony.

Kaynakça

• Ahmad, A. (1994). In theory: Classes, nations, literatures. Verso.
• Althusser, L. (2014). On the reproduction of capitalism: Ideology and ideological state apparatuses (G. M. Goshgarian, Trans.). Verso.
• Anderson, M. (1990). The limits of realism: Chinese fiction in the revolutionary period. University of California Press.
• Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. University of Chicago Press.
• Ashcroft, B., & Ahluwalia, P. (2009). Edward Said (2nd ed.). Routledge.
• Ashcroft, B., Griffiths, G., & Tiffin, H. (2002). The empire writes back: Theory and practice in post-colonial literatures (2nd ed.). Routledge.
• Bauman, Z. (1989). Legislators and interpreters: On modernity, post-modernity and intellectuals. Polity Press.
• Benda, J. (2006). The treason of the intellectuals (R. Aldington, Trans.). Transaction Publishers.
• Bender, T. (1997). Intellect and public life: Essays on the social history of academic intellectuals in the United States. Johns Hopkins University Press.
• Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. Routledge.
• Bourdieu, P. (1993). Language and symbolic power (G. Raymond & M. Adamson, Trans.). Harvard University Press.
• Bové, P. A. (1986). Intellectuals in power: A genealogy of critical humanism. Columbia University Press.
• Brennan, T. (2006). Wars of position: The cultural politics of Left and Right. Columbia University Press.
• Brennan, T. (2021). Places of mind: A life of Edward Said. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
• Calinescu, M. (1987). Five faces of modernity: Modernism, avant-garde, decadence, kitsch, postmodernism. Duke University Press.
• Chatterjee, P. (1993). The nation and its fragments: Colonial and postcolonial histories. Princeton University Press.
• Cheek, T. (2016). The intellectual in modern Chinese history. Cambridge University Press.
• Cheng, E. K. (2013). Lu Xun: A Chinese writer for the world. The Chinese University of Hong Kong Press.
• Chomsky, N. (2016). Who rules the world? Metropolitan Books.
• Chow, R. (1991). Woman and Chinese modernity: The politics of reading between West and East. University of Minnesota Press.
• Chow, T. (1960). The May Fourth Movement: Intellectual revolution in modern China. Harvard University Press.
• Clifford, J. (1988). The predicament of culture: Twentieth-century ethnography, literature, and art. Harvard University Press.
• Cohen, P. A. (2010). Discovering history in China: American historical writing on the recent Chinese past. Columbia University Press.
• Cohn, B. S. (1996). Colonialism and its forms of knowledge: The British in India. Princeton University Press.
• Davies, G. (2013). Lu Xun's revolution: Writing in a time of violence. Harvard University Press.
• Denton, K. A. (Ed.). (1996). Modern Chinese literary thought: Writings on literature, 1893–1945. Stanford University Press.
• Dirlik, A. (1991). Anarchism in the Chinese revolution. University of California Press.
• Duara, P. (1995). Rescuing history from the nation: Questioning narratives of modern China. University of Chicago Press.
• Elman, B. A. (2000). A cultural history of civil examinations in late imperial China. University of California Press.
• Fairbank, J. K., & Goldman, M. (2006). China: A new history (2nd enlarged ed.). The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
• Fanon, F. (1963). The wretched of the earth (C. Farrington, Trans.). Grove Press.
• FitzGerald, J. (1996). Awakening China: Politics, culture, and class in the Nationalist Revolution. Stanford University Press.
• Foster, P. B. (2006). Ah Q archaeology: Lu Xun, Ah Q, Ah Q progeny and the national character discourse in twentieth century China. Lexington Books.
• Foucault, M. (1976). The archaeology of knowledge & the discourse on language. Harper Colophon.
• Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). Pantheon Books. (Original work published 1975)
• Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977 (C. Gordon, Ed.). Pantheon Books.
• Furedi, F. (2006). Where have all the intellectuals gone?: Confronting 21st century philistinism. Continuum.
• Goldman, M. (1967). Literary dissent in Communist China. Harvard University Press.
• Goldman, M. (Ed.). (1977). Modern Chinese literature in the May Fourth Era. Harvard University Press.
• Gouldner, A. W. (1979). The future of intellectuals and the rise of the new class. Macmillan.
• Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks (Q. Hoare & G. N. Smith, Eds. & Trans.). International Publishers.
• Grieder, J. B. (1981). Intellectuals and the state in modern China: A narrative history. Free Press.
• Hanan, P. (2004). Chinese fiction of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Columbia University Press.
• Hayot, E. (2004). Chinese dreams: Pound, Brecht, Tel quel. University of Michigan Press.
• Hevia, J. L. (2003). English lessons: The pedagogy of imperialism in nineteenth-century China. Duke University Press.
• Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. W. (2023). Dialectic of enlightenment: Philosophical fragments (E. Jephcott, Trans.). Stanford University Press.
• Hsia, C. T. (1999). A history of modern Chinese fiction. Indiana University Press.
• Hussein, A. A. (2002). Edward Said: Criticism and society. Verso.
• Huters, T. (2005). Bringing the world home: Appropriating the West in late Qing and early Republican China. University of Hawaiʻi Press.
• Jacoby, R. (1987). The last intellectuals: American culture in the age of academe. Basic Books.
• Jennings, J., & Kemp-Welch, A. (Eds.). (1997). Intellectuals in politics: From the Dreyfus Affair to Salman Rushdie. Routledge.
• Karl, R. E. (2002). Staging the world: Chinese nationalism at the turn of the twentieth century. Duke University Press.
• Kennedy, V. (2000). Edward Said: A critical introduction. Polity Press.
• Kiriktaş, A. (2024). Lu Xun’un eserlerinde birey ve toplum: Gelenekten modernizme bir yolculuk. Cappadocia Journal of Area Studies, 6(2), 199–217.
• Larson, W. (1991). Literary authority and the modern Chinese writer: Ambivalence and autobiography. Duke University Press.
• Lee, L. O. (1987). Voices from the iron house: A study of Lu Xun. Indiana University Press.
• Lee, L. O. (Ed.). (2022). Lu Xun and his legacy. University of California Press.
• Lei, S. H. (2014). Neither donkey nor horse: Medicine in the struggle over China's modernity. University of Chicago Press.
• Levenson, J. R. (1968). Confucian China and its modern fate: A trilogy. University of California Press.
• Lin, Y. (1979). The crisis of Chinese consciousness: Radical antitraditionalism in the May Fourth era. University of Wisconsin Press.
• Link, P. (2000). The uses of literature: Life in the socialist Chinese literary system. Princeton University Press.
• Liu, L. H. (1995). Translingual practice: Literature, national culture, and translated modernity-China, 1900-1937. Stanford University Press.
• Loomba, A. (2015). Colonialism/postcolonialism (3rd ed.). Routledge.
• Lu, X. (1980). Selected works of Lu Hsun (Vol. 1) (X. Yang & G. Yang, Trans.). Foreign Languages Press.
• Lu, X. (1990). Diary of a madman and other stories (W. A. Lyell, Trans.). University of Hawaii Press.
• Lu, X. (2009). The real story of Ah-Q and other tales of China: The complete fiction of Lu Xun (J. Lovell, Trans.). Penguin Classics.
• Lyell, W. A. (1990). (Çev.). Diary of a madman and other stories by Lu Xun. University of Hawaii Press.
• McDougall, B. S., & Louie, K. (1997). The literature of China in the twentieth century. Columbia University Press.
• Mitchell, T. (1991). Colonising Egypt. Cambridge University Press.
• Moore-Gilbert, B. (1997). Postcolonial theory: Contexts, practices, politics. Verso.
• Nandy, A. (2009). The intimate enemy: Loss and recovery of self under colonialism. Oxford University Press.
• Pollard, D. E. (2003). The true story of Lu Xun. The Chinese University Press.
• Posnock, R. (1991). The trial of curiosity: Henry James, William James, and the challenge of modernity. Oxford University Press.
• Prakash, G. (Ed.). (1995). After colonialism: Imperial histories and postcolonial displacements. Princeton University Press.
• Pusey, J. R. (1998). Lu Xun and evolution. State University of New York Press.
• Pye, L. W. (1992). The spirit of Chinese politics. Harvard University Press.
• Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. Pantheon Books.
• Said, E. W. (1983). The world, the text, and the critic. Harvard University Press.
• Said, E. W. (1993). Culture and imperialism. Alfred A. Knopf.
• Said, E. W. (1994). Representations of the intellectual: The 1993 Reith lectures. Pantheon Books.
• Said, E. W. (1997). Covering Islam: How the media and the experts determine how we see the rest of the world. Pantheon Books.
• Said, E. W. (2000). Out of place: A memoir. Vintage.
• Said, E. W. (2000). Reflections on exile. In E. W. Said, Reflections on exile and other essays (ss. 173–186). Harvard University Press.
• Said, E. W. (2004). Humanism and democratic criticism. Columbia University Press.
• Sartre, J.-P. (2001). What is literature? (B. Frechtman, Trans.). Routledge.
• Schwarcz, V. (1986). The Chinese enlightenment: Intellectuals and the legacy of the May Fourth movement of 1919. University of California Press.
• Scott, J. C. (1999). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press.
• Semanov, V. I. (2017). Lu Hsün and his predecessors (C. J. Alber, Trans.). Routledge.
• Shih, S. (2001). The lure of the modern: Writing modernism in semi-colonial China, 1917–1937. University of California Press.
• Spence, J. D. (1981). The gate of heavenly peace: The Chinese and their revolution, 1895-1980. Viking Press.
• Spence, J. D. (1990). The search for modern China. W. W. Norton & Company.
• Spivak, G. C. (1999). A critique of postcolonial reason: Toward a history of the vanishing present. Harvard University Press.
• Sun, L. (2013). The Chinese national character: From nationhood to individuality. Routledge.
• Viswanathan, G. (Ed.). (2002). Power, politics, and culture: Interviews with Edward W. Said. Vintage Books.
• Walzer, M. (2002). The company of critics: Social criticism and political commitment in the twentieth century. Basic Books.
• Wang, D. D. (2004). The monster that is history: History, violence, and fictional writing in twentieth-century China. University of California Press.
• Young, R. J. C. (2016). Postcolonialism: An historical introduction. Blackwell Publishing.
• Zhang, X. (1998). Chinese modernism in the era of reforms: Cultural fever, avant-garde fiction, and the new Chinese cinema. Duke University Press.