Örtük Koşulluluk: Dijital Vatandaşlık Önkoşulu ve Sosyal Hakların Dönüşümü

Öz

Bu makale, kamu hizmetlerinin dijitalleşmesinin sosyal haklar üzerindeki yapısal etkilerini sosyal politika teorisi çerçevesinde incelemekte ve bu süreci kavramsallaştırmak amacıyla "dijital vatandaşlık önkoşulu" kavramını önermektedir. Temel argüman şudur: kamu hizmetlerinin dijital platforma taşınması, refah devletinin evrensellik taahhüdünü hukuken değil ama fiilen aşındırmakta; meta dışılaştırılmış hizmetlerin doğrudan özelleştirilmesi anlamına gelmeden, erişim koşullarının dijital kapasiteye bağlanması yoluyla örtük bir yeniden-içselleştirme süreci üretmektedir. İnternet bağlantısı, akıllı cihaz ve dijital okuryazarlık, sosyal hakların kullanımının fiilî önkoşulları haline geldikçe, dijital kapasitesi en düşük olan kesimler—düşük gelirli, az eğitimli, yaşlı ve kırsal kesimde yaşayanlar—söz konusu hizmetlerden yapısal biçimde dışlanmaktadır. Makale, teorik çerçevesini Marshall'ın sosyal vatandaşlık teorisi, O'Connor ve Gough'un sınıf temelli refah devleti analizleri ve Esping-Andersen'in meta dışılaştırma tipolojisi ekseninde oluşturmaktadır. Kavramın analitik özgünlüğü, dijital uçurum, dijital tabakalaşma ve koşulluluk literatüründen sistematik biçimde ayrıştırılarak ortaya konmaktadır. Örtük yeniden-içselleştirmenin işlediği kurumsal mekanizmaları ele almak üzere dört operasyonel ölçüt ve kurumsal tasarım ilkeleri önerilmektedir. Türkiye refah bağlamı, dijitalleşmenin yapısal olarak sınırlı meta dışılaştırma kapasitesiyle nasıl etkileştiğini somutlaştıran bir örnek olarak sunulmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dijital vatandaşlık önkoşulu
• meta dışılaştırma
• refah devleti

Tacit Conditionality: The Digital Citizenship Prerequisite and the Transformation of Social Rights

Öz

This article examines the structural effects of the digitalization of public services on social rights within the framework of social policy theory, proposing the concept of "digital citizenship prerequisite" to conceptualize this process. The central argument is that the transfer of public services to digital platforms silently erodes the universality claim of the welfare state (not through legal means but in practice), producing a tacit re-commodification process by conditioning access on digital capacity, without directly privatizing decommodified services. As internet connectivity, smart devices, and digital literacy become de facto prerequisites for exercising social rights, the groups least equipped with digital capacity (those with low incomes, limited education, older age, or rural residence) face structural exclusion from services designed to protect them from market dependence. The article constructs its theoretical framework around Marshall's theory of social citizenship, O'Connor and Gough's class-based welfare state analyses, and Esping-Andersen's decommodification typology. The analytical originality of the concept is demonstrated through systematic differentiation from the digital divide, digital stratification, and conditionality literatures. Four operational criteria are proposed for empirical identification of the prerequisite, alongside institutional design principles to address the mechanisms through which tacit re-commodification operates. The Turkish welfare context illustrates how digitalization interacts with a structurally limited decommodification capacity.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Digital citizenship prerequisite
• decommodification
• welfare state

Kaynakça

1. Bourdieu, P. (2011). The forms of capital In The sociology of economic life, 3rd Edition, M. Granovetter & R. Swedberg (Eds.), Routledge: New York, pp. 78–92.
2. Buğra, A.; Keyder, Ç. (2006). The Turkish welfare regime in transformation. Journal of European Social Policy, 16(3), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928706065593
3. Castells, M. (2011). The rise of the network society. John Wiley & Sons: Sussex.
4. Dean, H. (2015). Social Rights and Human Welfare. Routledge: London.
5. DiMaggio, P.; Hargittai, E.; Celeste, C.; Shafer, S. (2004). Digital inequality: From unequal access to differentiated use In Social Inequality, K. Neckerman (Ed.), Russell Sage Foundation: New York, pp. 355–400. https://www.webuse.org/pdf/DiMaggioEtAl-DigitalInequality2004.pdf
6. Dwyer, P. (2004). Creeping Conditionality in the UK: From Welfare Rights to Conditional Entitlements? The Canadian Journal of Sociology 29(2), 265-287. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/cjs.2004.0022.
7. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Princeton University Press: Princeton.
8. Eurostat. (2024). Digital skills in 2023: impact of education and age. Retrieved June 29, 2026, from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/w/ddn-20240222-1

9. Eurostat. (2025). 70% of EU citizens used online public services in 2024. Retrieved June 29, 2026, from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/w/ddn-20250226-1
10. Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor, St. Martin's Press: New York.
11. European Commission. (2023). Turkey 2023 country report (SWD (2023) 698 final). https://www.ab.gov.tr/avrupa-birligi-komisyonu-2023-yili-turkiye-ulke-raporu-yayimlandi_53655.html
12. Ferrera, M. (1996). The 'Southern Model' of welfare in Social Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 6(1), 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/095892879600600102
13. Gough, I. (1979). The Political Economy of the Welfare State. Macmillan: London.
14. Helsper, E.J.; Reisdorf, B.C. (2017). The emergence of a 'digital underclass' in Great Britain and Sweden: Changing reasons for digital exclusion. New Media & Society, 19(8), 1253–1270. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816634676
15. Henman, P. (2011). Conditional citizenship? Electronic networks and the new conditionality in public policy. Policy & Internet, 3(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.2202/1944-2866.1103
16. Lister, R. (2003). Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan: London.
17. Marshall, T.H. (1950). Citizenship and Social Class and Other Essays. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
18. Mossberger, K.; Tolbert, C.J.; McNeal, R.S. (2008). Digital Citizenship: The Internet, Society, and Participation. MIT Press: Cambridge.
19. Norris, P. (2001). Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
20. O'Connor, J. (1973). The Fiscal Crisis of the State. St. Martin's Press: New York.
21. Selwyn, N. (2004). Reconsidering political and popular understandings of the digital divide. New media & society, 6(3), 341-362. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444804042519
22. Turkish Statistical Institute. (2023). Survey on information and communication technology (ICT) usage in households and by individuals. Retrieved March 9, 2026, from https://veriportali.tuik.gov.tr/en/press/49407
23. Van Dijk, J. (2020). The Digital Divide. Polity Press: Cambridge.