The Impact of FeTeMM Activities on 7th Grade Students’ Reflective Thinking Skills for Problem Solving Levels and their Achievements

Year 2017, Volume: 4 Issue: 2, 182 - 189, 01.12.2017

Recep Çakır , Cansu Ebren Ozan Emrah Kaya Büşra Buyruk

Abstract

This study aims to identfiy the impact of FeTeMM
(Science and Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) activities on 7th grade
students’ reflective thinking skills for problem solving, academic achievement
at math course. The sampling includes 60 students in the 7th grade attending
school during the second term of 2015-2016 academic year. A quasi-experimental
research design with two groups pre-test/post- test quantitative methods was
used. There were 32 female and 28 male students. 32 students were classified as
experimental group and 28 students as control group. The data were collected
using “ Reflective Thinking Skills for Problem Solving Scale”, and “
Achievement Test”. During quantitative analysis, t test was used to identify
the frequency, mean, median, mode, standard deviation and independent groups.
The results of the study indicate that the students’ academic achievement and
reflective thinking skills for problem solving have improved. According to t
test analysis, there were significant differences between experimental and
control group. Some recommendations were suggested according to the results.

Keywords

FeTeMM, Problem solving skills, Math achievement

References

• Akins, L., and Burghardt, D. (2006). Work in Progress: Improving K–12 Mathematics Understanding with Engineering Design Projects. In Proceedings from the 36th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. New York: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
• Apedoe, X. S., Reynolds, B., Ellefson, M. R., & Schunn, C. D. (2008). Bringing engineering design into high school science classrooms: The heating/cooling unit. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(5), 454-465. doi:10.1007/s10956-008-9114-6.
• Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), 30- 35.
• Cohen, L. & Manion, L. (1997). Reseacrh methods in education (4th ed.). Routledge: London and New York.
• Dewaters, J., S. E. Powers. (2006). Improving science and energy literacy through project-based K-12 outreach efforts that use energy and environmental themes. Proceedings of the 113th Annual ASEE Conference and Exposition, Chicago, IL.
• Doppelt, Y., Mehalik, M. M., Schunn, C. D., Silk, E., & Krysinski, D. (2008). Engagement and achievements: a case study of design-based learning in a science context. Journal of Technology Education, 19(2), 22-39.
• Fraenkel, J. R.,& Wallen, N. E. (1996). How to design and evaluate research in education (3th ed ). Mc Graw Hill Higher Education. New York, ABD.
• Fortus, D., Dershimer, R. C., Krajcik, J. S., Marx, R. W., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2004). Design-based science and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 1081-1110.
• Garcia, T. (1995). The role of motivational strategies in self-regulated learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 63, 29–42.
• Gay, L. R.,& Airasian, P. (2000). Educational research competencies for analysis and application (6th Edition). Ohio: Merrill an imprint of Prentice Hall.
• Hartzler, D. S. (2000). A meta-analysis of studies conducted on integrated curriculum programs and their effects on student achievement. Doctoral dissertation. IndianaUniversity.
• International Technology Education Association. (1999). Technology for All Americans. Reston, VA. ITEA.
• Judson, E. and Sawada, D. (2000). Examining the effects of a reformed junior high school science class on students’ math achievement. School Science and Mathematics, 100 (8), 419–425.
• Lacey, T. A.,& Wright, B. (2009). Occupational employment projections to 2018. Monthly Labor Review, November, 82-109.
• National Research Council (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_ id=12190
• Massachusetts Department of Education. (2006). Massachusetts science and technology/engineering curriculum framework. Retrieved from http://www.doe. mass.edu/frameworks/scitech/1006.pdf
• Moore, T.J., Stohlmann, M.S., Wang, H.-H., Tank, K.M., & Roehrig, G.H. (2013). Implementation and integration of engineering in K-12 STEM education. In J. Strobel, S. Purzer, & M. Cardella (Edt.), Engineering in precollege settings: Research into practice. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
• Riechert, S.,& Post, B. (2010). From skeletons to bridges & other STEM enrichment exercises for high school biology. The American Biology Teacher, 72(1), 20-22.
• Roberts, A. (2012). A justification for STEM education. Technology and engineering teacher, May/June 2012. Retrieved from http://www.iteaconnect.org/mbrsonly/Library/TTT/TTTe/04- 12roberts.pdf.
• Roth, W. (2001). Learning Science through technological design. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 768-790.
• Smith, J. & Karr-Kidwell, P. (2000). The interdisciplinary curriculum: a literary review and a manual for administrators and teachers. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED443172).
• Şahin, A., Ayar, M. C. & Adıgüzel, T. (2014). Fen, teknoloji, mühendislik ve matematik içerikli okul sonrası etkinlikler ve öğrenciler üzerindeki etkileri. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri. 14(1), 1-26.
• Wagner, T. (2008). Rigor redefined. Educational Leadership, 66(2), 20-24.
• Wendell, K., Connolly, K., Wright, C., Jarvin, L., Rogers, C., Barnett, M., & Marulcu, I. (2010, October). Incorporating engineering design into elementary school science curricula. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of American Society for Engineering Education. Singapore.
• Windschitl, M. (2009). Cultivating 21st century skills in science learners: How systems of teacher preparation and professional development will have to evolve. Paper commissioned by National Academy of Science’s Committee on The Development of 21st Century Skills. Washington, DC.