Araştırma Makalesi

Examination of the Role of Defense Mechanisms and Attachment Styles in Personality Disorder Beliefs among Nonclinical and Clinical Samples

Cilt: 14 Sayı: Ek 1 29 Aralık 2022
PDF İndir
EN TR

Examination of the Role of Defense Mechanisms and Attachment Styles in Personality Disorder Beliefs among Nonclinical and Clinical Samples

Abstract

Attachment styles, defense mechanisms, and the underlying personality disorders’ personality beliefs are considered to be closely related to psychopathology. The aim of this study is to compare the scores of attachment styles, defense mechanisms, and personality beliefs variables in a non-clinical group and a clinical group diagnosed with depression, obsessive-compulsive, and anxiety disorder and to examine the relationships between these variables. A total of 178 participated in the study, 59 of which were in the clinical group and 119 in the nonclinical group. The Personality Belief Questionnaire-Short Form (PBQ-SF), The Defense Style Questionnaire-40 (DSQ-40), and Relationship Scales Questionnaire (RSQ) were applied to the participants. Avoidant, dependent, passive-aggressive, obsessive-compulsive (OC), antisocial, schizoid, paranoid, and borderline personality belief scores were found to be higher in the clinical group, while mature defense scores were significantly higher in the nonclinical group. On the other hand, there was no difference between the two groups in terms of attachment styles. According to multiple linear regression analysis results, attachment styles and defense mechanisms predicted personality disorder beliefs in the range of 19.5% to 33.5% for the clinical group and 22.7% to 46.9% for the nonclinical group. In conclusion, the findings suggest that attachment styles and defense mechanisms may contribute to the understanding of the etiological causes of personality disorders and may be helpful in the treatment of personality disorders.

Keywords

Destekleyen Kurum

Çalışmayı destekleyen herhangi bir kurum bulunmamaktadır.

Kaynakça

  1. Andrews G, Singh M, Bond M. (1993) The Defense Style Questionnaire. Journal of Nervous and mental Disease 181 (4):246-56.
  2. Beck AT, Davis DD, Freeman A. (2015) Cognitive Therapy of Personality Disorders. Third Edition. New York: Guilford Publications.
  3. Beckwith H, Moran PF, Reilly J. (2014) Personality disorder prevalence in psychiatric outpatients: a systematic literature review. Personality and mental health 8(2), 91-101.
  4. Bilge Y. (2018) Kişilik bozuklukları ve savunma mekanizmaları. Electronic Turkish Studies 13(10), 145-167.
  5. Bilge Y, Bilge Y. (2019) A Study on The Validity and Reliability of The Personality Belief Questionnaire-Short Form in Turkish Community Sample. Journal of Cognitive Behavioral Psychotherapy and Research. JCBPR 8(1): 7-15.
  6. Blaya C, Dornelles M, Blaya R, Kipper L, Heldt E, Isolan L, Manfro GG. (2006) Do defense mechanisms vary according to the psychiatric disorder? Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry 28(3), 179-183.
  7. Bowlby J. (1973) Attachment and loss. Vol. 2, Separation: Anxiety and anger. Penguin: Harmonsworth.
  8. Bowlby J. (1988) Developmental psychiatry comes of age. American Journal of Psychiatry 145, 1-10.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Psikoloji

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

29 Aralık 2022

Gönderilme Tarihi

6 Ocak 2022

Kabul Tarihi

3 Mayıs 2022

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2022 Cilt: 14 Sayı: Ek 1

Kaynak Göster

JAMA
1.Bilge Y, Karamustafalıoğlu N, Kanlısu N, Özdemir A. Examination of the Role of Defense Mechanisms and Attachment Styles in Personality Disorder Beliefs among Nonclinical and Clinical Samples. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar. 2022;14:37–45.

Creative Commons Lisansı
Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar Creative Commons Atıf-Gayriticari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.