Teknostres ve uzaktan çalışma ilişkisi: Yazılım sektörü çalışanları örneği

Öz

Bilgi iletişim teknolojilerindeki (BİT) gelişme ekonomik olarak daha az maliyetli olduğu düşünülen uzaktan çalışmayı kolaylaştırmıştır. Ancak, BİT ve onların işlem süreçleriyle ilgili yaşanılan hızlı değişimler, çalışma ortamının özel alana taşmış olması ve benzeri sorunlar çalışanların BİT kaynaklı stres yaşamalarının yolunu açmıştır. Bu çalışmanın amacı teknostres ile uzaktan çalışma arasındaki ilişkiyi analiz etmek ve teknostresin alt boyutlarının uzaktan çalışmanın alt boyutlarına olan etkisini incelemektir. Araştırmada nicel araştırma yöntemi kullanılarak teknokentlerdeki yazılım firmalarında uzaktan çalışma tecrübesi olan 162 BİT çalışanlarına internet üzerinden (Google Forms ile e-posta gönderilerek) anket yapılmıştır. Veriler korelasyon ve regresyon testleri ile analiz edilmiştir. Araştırma bulgularına göre yazılım firmaları çalışanlarının teknostres düzeyi düşük seviyededir. Tekno-aşırı yük ve istila uzaktan çalışanların etkililik/verimlilik algısını ve iş-yaşam etkileşimini pozitif yönde yordamaktadır. Tekno-güvensizlik uzaktan çalışanların etkililik/verimlilik algısını negatif yönde, tekno-belirsizlik ise pozitif yönde yordamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Bilgi iletişim teknolojileri
• yazılım sektörü
• teknostres
• uzaktan çalışma

Etik Beyan

Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Araştırma ve Yayın Etiği Kurulu tarafından 27.05.2025/698452 tarih ve sayılı kararıyla onaylanmıştır.

The relationship between technostress and remote work: The case of software industry employees

Öz

Developments in information and communication technologies (ICT) have facilitated remote working, which is considered economically less costly. However, rapid changes in ICT and their operational processes, the transfer of the work environment into the private sphere, and similar issues have led employees to experience stress originating from ICT. The aim of this study is to analyze the relationship between technostress and remote work and to examine the effects of the subdimensions of technostress on the subdimensions of remote work. Using a quantitative research method, an online survey (Google Forms) was administered to 162 ICT employees working in software firms located in technoparks, all of whom had experience with remote working. The data were analyzed using correlation and regression analyses. According to the findings, the level of technostress among employees of software firms is low. Techno-overload and invasion positively predict remote workers’ perceptions of effectiveness/productivity and work–life interaction. Techno-insecurity negatively affects perceptions of effectiveness/efficiency, while techno-uncertainty positively affects perceptions of effectiveness/efficiency.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Information and communication technologies
• software industry
• technostress
• remote working

Kaynakça

1. Akay, M., & Kundakcı, N. (2021). ÇKKV ve tamsayılı programlama yöntemleri ile bir üretim işletmesinde uzaktan çalışma modelinin oluşturulması. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Meslek Yüksekokulu Dergisi, 24(2), 548-568.
2. Akca, M., & Küçükoğlu, M. T. (2020). COVID-19 ve iş yaşamına etkileri: evden çalışma. Journal of International Management Educational and Economics Perspectives, 8(1), 71-81.
3. Akman, A. Z., Evliyaoglu, F., Çolak, H. E. E., & Erdirencelebi, M. (2023). Uzaktan çalışma yaşam ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 24(1), 254-277.
4. Aktan, O., & Toraman, Ç. (2022). The relationship between technostress levels and job satisfaction of teachers within the COVID-19 period. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 10429-10453
5. Alam, M. A. (2016). Techno-stress and productivity: Survey evidence from the aviation industry. Journal of Air Transport Management, 50, 62-70.
6. Al-Habaibeh, A., Watkins, M., Waried, K., & Javareshk, M. B. (2021). Challenges and opportunities of remotely working from home during COVID-19 pandemic. Global Transitions, 3, 99-108.
7. Allen, T. D., Golden, T. D., & Shockley, K. M. (2015). How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological Science in the Public interest, 16(2), 40-68.
8. Almer, E. D., & Kaplan, S. E. (2002). The effects of flexible work arrangements on stressors, burnout, and behavioral job outcomes in public accounting. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 14(1), 1-34.

9. Arnetz, B. B., & Wiholm, C. (1997). Technological stress: Psychophysiological symptoms in modern offices. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 43(1), 35-42.
10. Atanasoff, L. & Venable, M. A. (2017). Technostress: Implications for adults in the workforce. The Career Development Quarterly, 65(4), 326-338.
11. Atrian, A., & Ghobbeh, S. (2023). Technostress and job performance: Understanding the negative impacts and strategic responses in the workplace. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.07072. https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.07072 (Erişim Tarihi: 27.02.2026).
12. Bailey, N. B. K. D. E., & Kurland, N. B. (1999). The advantages and challenges of working here, there, anywhere, and anytime. Organizational Dynamics, 28(2), 53-68.
13. Banerjee, P., & Gupta, R. (2024). A mixed-method exploration of effects of technostress on remote/hybrid working professionals. Computers in Human Behavior, 150, 107974.
14. Baycık, G., Doğan, S., Yangın, D. D., & Yay, O. (2021). COVID-19 pandemisinde uzaktan çalışma: Tespit ve öneriler. Çalışma ve Toplum, 3(70), 1683-1727.
15. Bebitoğlu, M. E. (2026). Uzaktan çalışma yönteminin mental iyi oluş üzerindeki etkisinde prososyal motivasyonun aracı rolü. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 27(1), 509-537.
16. Bencsik, A., & Juhasz, T. (2023). The impact of technostress on organizational functioning. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 21(1), 230.
17. Bencsik, A., & Juhasz, T. (2023). Impact of technostress on work-life balance. Human Technology, 19(1), 41-61. Bhardwaj, P. (2019). Types of sampling in research. Journal of the practice of cardiovascular sciences, 5(3), 157-163.
18. Bloom, N. (2020). How working from home works out. Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research, 8. Blumberga, S., & Pylinskaya, T. (2019, August). Remote work advantages and disadvantages on the example in it organisation. In International Conference NORDSCI. Athens (Vol. 281).
19. Breideband, T., Talkad Sukumar, P., Mark, G., Caruso, M., D'Mello, S., & Striegel, A. D. (2022). Home-life and work rhythm diversity in distributed teamwork: a study with information workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 6(CSCW1), 1-23.
20. Brodt, T. L., & Verburg, R. M. (2007). Managing mobile work-insights from European practice. New Technology, Work and Employment, 22(1), 52-65.
21. Cram, W. A., Wiener, M., Tarafdar, M., & Benlian, A. (2022). Examining the impact of algorithmic control on Uber drivers’ technostress. Journal of management information systems, 39(2), 426-453.
22. Chiappetta, M. (2017). The Technostress: definition, symptoms and risk prevention. Senses and Sciences, 4(1), 358-361.
23. Çetin, D., & Bülbül, T. (2017). Okul yöneticilerinin teknostres algıları ile bireysel yenilikçilik özellikleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(3), 1241-1264.
24. Demirel, E. Ö., & Şekeroğlu, B. (2025). Akademisyenlerde uzaktan çalışma ile teknostres ilişkisi. Uluslararası Yönetim Akademisi Dergisi, 8(2), 392-405.
25. Di Dalmazi, M., Mandolfo, M., Stringhini, C., & Bettiga, D. (2022, June). Influence of technostress on work engagement and job performance during remote working. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 149-163). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
26. Di Martino, V., & Wirth, L. (1990). Telework: A new way of working and living. International Labour Review, 129(5), 529-552.
27. Elshaiekh, N. E. M., Hassan, Y. A. A., & Abdallah, A. A. A. (2018, November). The impacts of remote working on workers performance. In 2018 international Arab conference on information technology (ACIT) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.
28. Er, F. (2026). Digitalization and technostress: psychosocial effects and artificial intelligence supported intervention opportunities. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar, 18(2), 616-627.
29. Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American journal of theoretical and applied statistics, 5(1), 1-4.
30. Ewers, M., & Kangmennaang, J. (2023). New spaces of inequality with the rise of remote work: Autonomy, technostress, and life disruption. Applied Geography, 152, 102888.
31. Ferrara, B., Pansini, M., De Vincenzi, C., Buonomo, I., & Benevene, P. (2022). Investigating the role of remote working on employees’ performance and well-being: an evidence-based systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19), 12373.
32. Ferreira, R., Pereira, R., Bianchi, I. S., & da Silva, M. M. (2021). Decision factors for remote work adoption: advantages, disadvantages, driving forces and challenges. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 70.
33. Geels, F. W., & Smit, W. A. (2000). Failed technology futures: pitfalls and lessons from a historical survey. Futures, 32(9-10), 867-885.
34. Gifford, J. (2022). Remote working: unprecedented increase and a developing research agenda. Human Resource Development International, 25(2), 105-113.
35. Girardi, D., Rapisarda, S., Arcucci, E., Dal Corso, L., Riedl, R., Pividori, I., & Falco, A. (2025). Supervisor support and virtual leadership moderate the association between technostress creators and strain in remote work: Evidence based on hair cortisol and occupational physician’s hetero-evaluations. PLoS One, 20(6), e0323385.
36. Goodman, L. A. (1961). Snowball sampling. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 32(1), 148-170.
37. Grant, C. A., Wallace, L. M., Spurgeon, P. C., Tramontano, C., & Charalampous, M. (2019). Construction and initial validation of the E-Work Life Scale to measure remote e-working. Employee Relations, 41(1), 16-33.
38. Hessari, H., Daneshmandi, F., & Nategh, T. (2024). Examining the impact of technostress on perceived organizational commitment: The mediating role of individual innovation. International Journal of Business and Applied Economics, 3(4), 803-824.
39. Hill, E. J., Ferris, M., & Märtinson, V. (2003). Does it matter where you work? A comparison of how three work venues (traditional office, virtual office, and home office) influence aspects of work and personal/family life. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63(2), 220-241.
40. Ilgaz, G., Ozgur, H., & Cuhadar, C. (2016). The adaptation of technostress scale into Turkish. 11th International Balkan Education and Science Congress, Porec, Croatia http://ibes.ufzg.hr/public/publications/Book_of_Abstracts.pdf
41. ILO (2020). COVID-19: Guidance for labour statistics data collection: Defining and measuring remote work, telework, work at home and home-based work. 5/June/2020, 1-14
42. Ingusci, E., Signore, F., Cortese, C. G., Molino, M., Pasca, P., & Ciavolino, E. (2023). Development and validation of the remote working benefits & disadvantages scale. Quality & Quantity, 57(2), 1159-1183.
43. Jalagat, R., & Jalagat, A. (2019). Rationalizing remote working concept and its implications on employee productivity. Global Journal of Advanced Research, 6(3), 95-100.
44. Johnson, M. (1997). Teleworking in brief, Routledge.
45. Kalay, F., Şimşek, M., & Oğrak, A. (2009). Bilişim teknolojilerinin iş stresi üzerindeki etkileri: Türk bankacılık sektöründe bir uygulama. Akademik Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi (AKAD), 1(1), 16-29.
46. Karaman, H., Atar, B., & Aktan, D. Ç. (2017). Açımlayıcı faktör analizinde kullanılan faktör çıkartma yöntemlerinin karşılaştırılması. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 37(3), 1173-1193.
47. Khedhaouria, A., & Maier, C. (2025). Same technostress situation but different responses: A trait activation theoretical perspective on IT mindfulness in remote work. Information & Management, 62(5), 104136.
48. Kim, E. J., & Park, S. (2025). Work–life balance in remote working: does organizational support matter?. Employee relations: The International Journal, 47(6), 889-906.
49. Klein, M. & Yerlikaya, İ. (2025). Effects of digital transformation on work-life balance: Experiences of young professional woman in Turkey. Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 13(16), 1-16.
50. Kłopotek, M. (2017). The advantages and disadvantages of remote working from the perspective of young employees. Organizacja i Zarządzanie: Kwartalnik Naukowy, 4, 39-49.
51. Kowalski, G., & Ślebarska, K. (2022). Remote working and work effectiveness: a leader perspective. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(22), 15326.
52. Kraemer, M. U., Yang, C. H., Gutierrez, B., Wu, C. H., Klein, B., Pigott, D. M., ... & Scarpino, S. V. (2020). The effect of human mobility and control measures on the COVID-19 epidemic in China. Science, 368(6490), 493-497.
53. Küçükvardar, M., & Tıngöy, Ö. (2018). Teknoloji bağımlılığının semptomlar temelinde incelenmesi. AJIT-e: Academic Journal of Information Technology, 9(35), 111-123.
54. La Torre, G., Esposito, A., Sciarra, I., & Chiappetta, M. (2019). Definition, symptoms and risk of techno-stress: a systematic review. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 92(1), 13-35.
55. Lazarova, T. (2020). The economic perspective of remote working places. Пари и Култура б(2), 30-41.
56. Leech, N. L., Barrett, K.C., Morga, G.A. (2015). IBM SPSS for intermediate statistics, use and interpretation, 5th. Edition, Routledge.
57. Ma, J., Ollier-Malaterre, A., & Lu, C. Q. (2021). The impact of techno-stressors on work–life balance: The moderation of job self-efficacy and the mediation of emotional exhaustion. Computers in Human Behavior, 122, 106811.
58. Malecki, F. (2020). Overcoming the security risks of remote working. Computer Fraud & Security, (7), 10-12. Matore, E. M., & Khairani, A. Z. (2020). The pattern of skewness and kurtosis using mean score and logit in measuring adversity quotient (AQ) for normality testing. International Journal of Future Generation Communication and Networking, 13(1), 688-702.
59. McPhail, R., Chan, X. W., May, R., & Wilkinson, A. (2024). Post-COVID remote working and its impact on people, productivity, and the planet: an exploratory scoping review. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 35(1), 154-182.
60. Mordi, C., Akanji, B., & Ajonbadi, H. (2026). Exploring the impact of technostress on the work–life boundary of UK academics during the coronavirus pandemic. Information Technology & People, 39(1), 501-520.
61. Mundfrom, D. J., Shaw, D. G., Ke, T. L. (2005). Minimum sample size recommendations for conducting factor analyses. International Journal of Testing, 5(2), 159-168.
62. Nayak, S., Budhwar, P., & Malik, A. (2025). Technostress of HR professionals: the darker implication of remote work transformations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 36(10),1666-1711.
63. Özbey, K. Y., & Demirel, Y. (2024). Teknokentlerde uzaktan çalışmanın örgütsel bağlılık üzerine etkisi. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(2), 356-383.
64. Öztırak, M., & Orak, B. (2022). Uzaktan çalışma süreçlerinde dijital zorbalığın örgütsel dışlanmaya etkisi üzerine bir çalışma. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 10(2), 605-630.
65. Özyıldız, K. H. & Alkan, A. (2022). Hekim sahiplenme: bir ölçek geliştirme çalışması. Hacettepe Sağlık İdaresi Dergisi, 25(1), 209-232.
66. Pirkkalainen, H., Salo, M., Tarafdar, M., & Makkonen, M. (2019). Deliberate or instinctive? Proactive and reactive coping for technostress. Journal of Management Information Systems, 36(4), 1179-1212.
67. Pompa, L., De Pretis, F., Cambrea, D. R., & Garzia, C. (2025). Teleworking and the challenges of digitalization: The role of human resource managers. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32(3), 3674-3692.
68. Poortman, C. L., & Schildkamp, K. (2012). Alternative quality standards in qualitative research?, Quality & Quantity, 46, 1727-1751.
69. Prasad, D. K., Mangipudi, D. M. R., Vaidya, D. R., & Muralidhar, B. (2020). Organizational climate, opportunities, challenges and psychological wellbeing of the remote working employees during COVID-19 pandemic: A general linear model approach with reference to information technology industry in Hyderabad. International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology (IJARET), 11(4), 372-389.
70. Prasad, K. D. V. (2021). Remote working challenges and opportunities during COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Business Strategy, Finance and Management, 2(1-2), 01-03.
71. Pv, S., & Viswanathan, B. (2021). Technostress levels of IT sector employees in the remote working model: A study on Indian IT sector. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 23(8), 9-14.
72. Qi, C. (2019). A double-edged sword? Exploring the impact of students’ academic usage of mobile devices on technostress and academic performance. Behaviour & Information Technology, 38(12), 1337-1354.
73. Renk, S., & Sutter, C. (2026). Always available? A systematic review on extended work-related availability, health outcomes and work-family conflict. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1726421.
74. Saim, M. A. S. M., Rashid, W. E. W., & Ma’on, S. N. (2021). Technostress creator and work life balance: a systematic literature review. Romanian Journal of Information Technology & Automatic Control/Revista Română de Informatică și Automatică, 31(1), 77-88.
75. Salanova, M., Llorens, S., & Ventura, M. (2014). Technostress: The dark side of technologies. In Christian Korunka-Peter Hoonakker (Eds.), The impact of ICT on quality of working life, (pp. 87-103). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8854-0_6
76. Sarıbay, B. (2023). Uzaktan çalışma üzerine sosyolojik bir değerlendirme. Sosyoloji Dergisi, (46), 221-241.
77. Sarling, A., Leineweber, C., & Peristera, P. (2026). Option better than action? Autonomy over remote work, technostress, and mental health disparities in Sweden during the COVID-19 pandemic. Acta Psychologica, 262, 106185.
78. Savić, D. (2020). COVID-19 and work from home: Digital transformation of the workforce. Grey Journal (TGJ), 16(2), 101-104.
79. Singh, P., Bala, H., Dey, B. L., & Filieri, R. (2022). Enforced remote working: The impact of digital platform-induced stress and remote working experience on technology exhaustion and subjective wellbeing. Journal of Business Research, 151, 269-286.
80. Şahin, Y., & Esenkaya, M. (2025). The reflections of technostress on job performance: A meta-analytical approach. Kafkas Üniversitesi Yönetim ve Bilişim Dergisi, 1(1), 11-24.
81. Şakar, M., & Şahin, D. E. (2021). Esnek çalışma modellerinden uzaktan çalışma ve uzaktan çalışanların sigortalılığı. Sosyal Güvenlik Dergisi, 11(2), 249-267.
82. Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2007). The impact of technostress on role stress and productivity. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(1), 301-328.
83. Tarafdar, M, Tu Q & Ragu-Nathan T. S. (2010). Impact of technostress on end-user satisfaction and performance, Journal of Management Information Systems, 27(3), 303-334.
84. Tarafdar, M., Cooper, C. L., & Stich, J. F. (2019). The technostress trifecta‐techno eustress, techno distress and design: Theoretical directions and an agenda for research. Information Systems Journal, 29(1), 6-42.
85. Tarafdar, M., Pirkkalainen, H., Salo, M., & Makkonen, M. (2020). Taking on the “dark side” - Coping with technostress. IT Professional, 22(6), 82-89.
86. Tarafdar, M., Stich, J. F., Maier, C., & Laumer, S. (2024). Techno‐eustress creators: Conceptualization and empirical validation. Information Systems Journal, 34, 2097–2131.
87. Taser, D., Aydin, E., Torgaloz, A. O., & Rofcanin, Y. (2022). An examination of remote e-working and flow experience: The role of technostress and loneliness. Computers in Human Behavior, 127, 107020.
88. Tavares, A. I. (2017). Telework and health effects review. International Journal of Healthcare, 3(2), 30-36.
89. Ting, H., Memon, M. A., Thurasamy, R., & Cheah, J. H. (2025). Snowball sampling: A review and guidelines for survey research. Asian Journal of Business Research, 15(1), 1-15.
90. Tu, Q., Wang, K., & Shu, Q. (2005). Computer-related technostress in China. Communications of the ACM, 48(4), 77-81.
91. Türen, U., Erdem, H., & Kalkın, G. (2015). İşyerinde tekno-stres ölçeği: Havacılık ve bankacılık sektöründe bir araştırma. Çalışma İlişkileri Dergisi, 6(1), 1-19.
92. Upadhyaya, P., & Vrinda. (2021). Impact of technostress on academic productivity of university students. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 1647-1664.
93. Urbaniec, M., Małkowska, A., & Włodarkiewicz-Klimek, H. (2022). The impact of technological developments on remote working: insights from the polish managers’ perspective. Sustainability, 14(1), 552.
94. Vaidya, S., & Bedi, H. S. (2025). Effects of flexible work arrangements on work-life balance and job stress levels. Vascular and Endovascular Review, 8(12), 248-257.
95. Vartiainen, M. (2021). Telework and remote work. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1-32.
96. Velicer, W. F., & Fava, J. L. (1998). Affects of variable and subject sampling on factor pattern recovery. Psychological Methods, 3(2), 231.
97. Yadav, P., & Madhukar, D. V. (2024). Impact of remote work on employee well being-a conceptual perspective. International Journal of Management, 15(2), 96-107.
98. Yalçın, R. C., Gökmen, Y., Erdem, H., & Türen, U. (2022). The mediating role of organisational cynicism on the relationship between technostress and job performance: A research on teachers. Sosyoekonomi, 30(54), 73-99.
99. Yasinta, T., Firdaus, F., Haqq, Z. N., & Run, P. (2024). The impact of techno complexity on workperformance through emotional exhaustion. Jurnal Fokus Manajemen Bisnis, 14(2), 164-176.
100. Yasiroh, Y. Y. (2025). The impact of stress due to remote working (teleworking) caused by tecnostress on employee satisfaction, anxiety, and performance in DIY. International Journal of Economics and Management Research, 4(3), 426-437. Yıldırım, A. B. (2021). Teknostresin Çalışanların Karar Verme Eğilimlerine Olan Etkisinde İş Güvencesizliği ve Duygusal Zekanın Düzenleyici Rolü: Havacılık Sektöründe Bir Araştırma [Basılmamış Doktora Tezi]. Marmara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul. Yıldırım, B. A., & Börü, D. E. (2023). The effect of technological stress dimensions on employees' decision-making styles and regulatory role of job ınsecurity perception: a research in the aviation sector. Journal of Aviation, 7(1), 39-54.