ÖNGÖRÜCÜ POLİSLİK: SUÇ ÖNLEME VE TEMEL HAKLARI DENGELEMEK

Öz

Suçun henüz işlenmeden engellenmesine yönelik bir çaba olan suç öngörüsü yeni bir kavram değildir. Öte yandan, teknolojik gelişmelerin de etkisiyle, öngörücü tekniklerin kolluk kuvvetlerince kullanımı suç oranlarını azaltmak ve kaynak verimliliğini artırmak amaçlarıyla önemli ölçüde artmıştır. Söz konusu tekniklerin sağladığı düşünülen avantajlara karşın, suç öngörüsü fikrine suistimale açık yapısına istinaden dikkatle yaklaşılmalıdır. Bu bağlamda, makale, önceki deneyimlerin de gösterdiği gibi, öngörüye dayalı polisliğin etkinliği, şeffaflığı ve etik sonuçlarıyla ilgili önemli endişeleri vurgulamaktadır. Özellikle, önyargılı veri kullanımı, algoritmik şeffaflık eksikliği ve özel hayatın gizliliği ile masumiyet karinesi gibi temel hakların ihlali gibi risklere dikkat çekilmesi gerekmektedir. Amerika Birleşik Devletleri ve Avrupa’dan örnekler üzerinden yapılan değerlendirmeyle, makale, öngörüye dayalı polisliğin kısa vadeli bazı avantajlar sunmakla birlikte, uygun şekilde düzenlenip eleştirel olarak değerlendirilmediği takdirde, uzun vadede demokratik hesap verebilirlik, kamu güveni ve toplumsal eşitlik açısından ciddi tehditler oluşturduğunu savunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Öngörücü polislik
• önleyici polislik
• suç öngörüsü
• suç önleme
• PredPol

PREDICTIVE POLICING: BALANCING CRIME PREVENTION AND FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS

Öz

Crime prediction is not a new concept in the effort to prevent criminal activities before they occur. However, with the help of technological advancements, the use of predictive techniques by law enforcement agencies has increased significantly, aiming to reduce crime and improve resource efficiency. Despite these perceived advantages, the idea of crime prediction must be approached with great caution due to its exploitable nature. In this respect, the paper highlights significant concerns related to its effectiveness, transparency, and ethical implications, as demonstrated by previous experiences. Particular attention must be given to the risks of biased data, algorithmic opacity, and the violation of fundamental rights such as privacy and the presumption of innocence. Drawing from examples in the United States and Europe, the paper argues that although predictive policing may offer short-term advantages, it poses significant long-term threats to democratic accountability, public trust, and social equity if not properly regulated and critically evaluated.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Predictive policing
• preventive policing
• crime prediction
• crime prevention
• PredPol

Kaynakça

1. Bakke E, ‘Predictive Policing: The Argument For Pubiıc Transparency’ (2018) 74(1) Annual Survey of American Law 131-172
2. Berk R A, ‘Artificial Intelligence, Predictive Policing, and Risk Assessment for Law Enforcement’ (2021) 4 Annual Review of Criminology 209-237
3. Birks D, Townsley M and Hart T, Predictive Policing in an Australian Context: Assessing Viability and Utility (Australian Institute of Criminology 2023)
4. Bowers K J, Johnson S D and Pease K, ‘Prospective Hot-Spotting: The Future of Crime Mapping?’ (2004) 44(5) The British Journal of Criminology 641-658
5. Bozbayındır A E, ‘The Advent of Preventive Criminal Law: An Erosion of The Traditional Criminal Law?’ (2018) 29 Criminal Law Forum 25-62
6. Brantingham P J and Faust F L, ‘A Conceptual Model of Crime Prevention’ (1976) 22(3) Crime & Delinquency 284-296
7. Brantingham P J, Valasik M and Mohler G O, ‘Does Predictive Policing Lead to Biased Arrests? Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial’ (2018) 5(1) Statistics and Public Policy 1-6
8. Chan J, ‘The Future of AI Policing: Explroing the Sociotechnical Imaginaries’ in John L M McDaniel and Ken G Pease (eds), Predictive Policing and Artificial Intelligence (1st edn, Routledge 2021)

9. Coleman C and Norris C, Introducing Criminology (Routledge 2011)
10. Crawford A and Evans K, ‘Crime Prevention and Community Safety’ in Mike Maguire, Rod Morgan and Robert Reiner (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Criminology (5th edn, Oxford University Press 2012)
11. Dülger M V, ‘Prevention of Discrimination in the Practices of Predictive Policing’ in Muharrem Kılıç and Sezer Bozkuş Kahyaoğlu (eds), Algorithmic Discrimination and Ethical Perspective of Artifical Intelligence (Springer 2024)
12. Egbert S, ‘Predictive Policing in Deutschland: Grundlagen, Risiken, (Mögliche) Zukunft’, in Strafverteidigervereinigungen (ed), Räume der Unfreiheit. Texte und Ergebnisse des 42. Strafverteidigertages Münster (1st edn, Organisationsbüro der Strafverteidigervereinigungen 2018)
13. Egbert S and Leese M, Criminal Futures: Predictive Policing and Everyday Police Work (1st edn, Routledge 2021)
14. Emniyet Genel Müdürlüğü Trafik Başkanlığı, ‘Yapay Zekâ Destekli Mobil Hız Tespit Sistemi Kullanılmaya Başlandı’ (30 June 2024) accessed 5 May 2025
15. Erdoğan I, Kumkumoğlu S Ç and Kumkumoğlu A K, ‘Turkish Report on AI and Administration of Justice’ (2023)
16. eRDIP accessed 6 May 2025
17. EUCPN, Artificial Intelligence and Predictive Policing: Risks and Challenges (EUCPN 2022)
18. European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, Addressing Racism in Policing (Publication Office of the European Union 2024)
19. Ferguson A G, ‘Big Data and Predictive Reasonable Suspicion’ (2015) 163(2) University of Pennsylvania Law Review 327-410
20. Ferguson A G, ‘Policing Predictive Policing’ (2017) 94(5) Washington University Law Review 1109-1189
21. Gerstner D, ‘Predictive Policing in the Context of Residential Burglary: An Empirical Illustration on the Basis of a Pilot Project in Baden‐Württemberg, Germany’ (2018) 3(2) European Journal for Security Research 115-138
22. Gilling D, Crime Prevention; Theory, Policy and Politics (1st edn, Routledge 1997)
23. Gstrein O J, Bunnik A and Zwitter A J, ‘Ethical, Legal and Social Challenges of Predictive Policing’ (2019) 3(3) Catolica Law Review 77-98
24. Hamilton M, ‘Predictive Policing through Risk Assessment’ in John L M McDaniel and Ken G Pease (eds), Predictive Policing and Artificial Intelligence (1st edn, Routledge 2021)
25. Hofmann H, Predictive Policing (Duncker & Humblot 2020)
26. Hunt P, Saunders J and Hollywood J S, Evaluation of the Shreveport Predictive Policing Experiment (RAND 2014)
27. İçer Z, ‘Yapay Zekâ Temelli Önleyici Hukuk Mekanizmaları- Öngörücü Polislik’ (Yapay Zeka Çağında Hukuk, Yearly Report 2021)
28. Jones M, ‘Predictive Policing a Success in Santa Cruz, Calif.’ (8 October 2012) accessed 8 May 2025
29. Lab S P, Crime Prevention (7th edn, Anderson 2010)
30. Lecorps Y and Tissandier G, ‘PAVED with Good Intentions? An Evaluation of a French Police Predictive Policing System’ (2023) SSRN accessed 14 May 2025
31. Lee Y, Bradford B and Posch K, ‘The Effectiveness of Big Data-Driven Predictive Policing: Systematic Review’ (2024) 7(2) Justice Evaluation Journal 127-160
32. Mazerolle L G, ‘Crime Prevention’ in Richar A. Wright and J. Mitchell Miller (eds), Encyclopedia of Criminology Volume I (Routledge 2005)
33. Meijer A and Wessels M, ‘Predictive Policing: Review of Benefits and Drawbacks’ (2019) 42(12) International Journal of Public Administration 1031-1039
34. Miller S, ‘Predictive Policing’ in David Edmonds (ed), Future Morality (1st edn, Oxford University Press 2021)
35. Mitchell R, ‘Predictive Policing Gets Personal’ (24 October 2013) accessed 13 May 2025
36. Moses L B and Chan J, ‘Algorithmic Prediction in Policing: Assumptions, Evaluation, and Accountability’ (2018) 28(7) Policing and Society 806-822
37. Mugari I and Obioha E E, ‘Predictive Policing and Crime Control in The United States of America and Europe: Trends in a Decade of Research and the Future of Predictive Policing’ (2021) 10(6) Social Sciences 1-14
38. Narayan S, Predictive Policing and the Construction of the ‘Criminal’: An Ethnographic Study of Delhi Police (Palgrave Macmillan 2023)
39. Nix J, ‘Predictive Policing’ in Roger G. Dunham and Geoffrey P. Alpert (eds), Critical Issues in Policing: Contemporary Reading (7th edn, Waveland 2015)
40. Norton A, ‘Predictive Policing- The Future of Law Enforcement in the Trinidad and Tobago Police Service’, (2013) 62(4) International Journal of Computer Applications 32-36
41. Pearsall B, ‘Predictive Policing: The Future of the Law Enforcement?’ (2010) 266 NIJ Journal 16-19
42. Perry W L, McInnis B, Price C. C, Smith S. C. and Hollywood J. S, Predictive Policing: The Role of Crime Forecasting in Law Enforcement Operations (Rand Corporation 2013)
43. Police Executive Research Forum, Future Trends in Policing (Office of Community Oriented Policing Service 2014)
44. Querbach M, Krom M and Jongejan A, ‘Review of State of the Art: Predictive Policing’ (August 2020) accessed 5 May 2025
45. Ratcliffe J, ‘Predictive Policing’ in David Weisburd and Anthony A. Braga (eds), Police Innovation: Contrasting Perspectives (2nd edn, Cambridge University Press 2019)
46. Rosenblat A, Wikelius K, Boyd D, Gangadharan S P and Yu C, ‘Data & Civil Rights: Criminal Justice Primer’ accessed 16 May 2025
47. Sabelli M, Wayne L M, O’Dowd K, Musa J, Lee W, ‘Garbage in, Gospel out: How Data-Driven Policing Technologies Entrench Historic Racism and ‘Tech-wash’ Bias in the Criminal Legal System’ (National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers 2021)
48. Schlehahn E, Aichroth P, Mann S, Schreiner R, Lang U, Shepherd I D H and Wong B L W, ‘Benefits and Pitfalls of Predictive Policing’ (European Intelligence and Security Informatics Conference, Manchester, September 2015)
49. Schneider S, Crime Prevention: Theory and Practice (2nd edn, CRC 2015)
50. Schuilenburg M and Soudijn M, ‘Big Data Policing: The Use of Big Data and Algorithms by the Netherlands Police’, 17 (2023) Policing 1-9
51. Seidensticker K, Bode F and Stoffel F, ‘Predictive Policing in Germany’ (2018) Konstanz University Working Paper, 2 accessed 29 April 2025
52. Sprenger J and Brodowski D, ‘Predictive Policing, Predictive Justice, and the Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Administration of Criminal Justice in Germany’ (2023) eRDIP accessed 30 April 2025
53. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti İçişleri Bakanlığı, ‘Yapay Zeka ASENA Uyuşturucunun İzini Sürüyor’ (2 June 2022) accessed 6 May 2025
54. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti İçişleri Bakanlığı, ‘Analiz Sistemleri Narkotik Ağı (ASENA) Yazılımı Sayesinde 1,5 yılda 6 bin 636 Olaya Müdahale Edildi’ (26 January 2023) accessed 6 May 2025
55. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti İçişleri Bakanlığı, ‘Narkotik Vaka Analiz Sistemi (NARVAS)’ (01 November 2023) accessed 7 May 2023
56. Uchida C D, ‘Predictive Policing’ in Gerben Bruinsma and David Weisburd (eds), Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice (Springer 2014)
57. Wilson D, ‘Algorithmic Patrol: The Futures of Predictive Policing’ in Ales Zavrsnik (ed), Big Data, Crime and Social Control (1st edn, Routledge 2018)