The Impact of Metaverse on Architectural Production: Opportunities and Challenges

Abstract

Technological advancements are rapidly transforming our world and influencing architecture, which has evolved alongside human history. The relationship between humans and space is being redefined with the emergence of digital spaces and virtual environments. The new world order, based on internet interactions, has particularly positioned virtual spaces at the center of daily life, shifting spatial discussions towards the realm of digital interactions. Commitment to digital spaces has become more pronounced since the onset of the coronavirus pandemic. The Metaverse, a digitalization field connecting real and virtual worlds, is a contemporary phenomenon impacting architectural production. This study examines the effects of advancements in Metaverse technology on architecture and space production, aiming to raise awareness among researchers in this emerging field. Within the study, the role of architecture in the Metaverse is questioned, and the advantages and disadvantages of digitalization in space production are analyzed. The literature reviewed in the study was analyzed thematically, and the SWOT analysis technique was used to determine the strengths and weaknesses of digital production. The study provides crucial insights into the future of space production, offers information on how the Metaverse environment can be utilized in architectural design, and discusses the potential risks associated with its use.

Keywords

• Metaverse
• virtual space
• Computer-aid architecture
• SWOT analysis
• Architectural design

Metaverse’ün Mimari Üretim Üzerindeki Etkileri: Fırsatlar ve Zorluklar

Öz

Teknolojik ilerlemeler, dünyamızı hızla dönüştürmekte ve insanlık tarihi ile paralel olarak evrilen mimariyi etkilemektedir. Dijital mekanların ve sanal ortamların ortaya çıkışıyla insan ve mekân arasındaki ilişki yeniden tanımlanmaktadır. İnternet etkileşimlerine dayalı yeni dünya düzeni özellikle sanal mekânları günlük yaşamın merkezine taşıyarak mekân tartışmalarını sanal etkileşim alanlarına yönlendirmektedir. Dijital alanlara olan bağlılık koronavirüs salgınından bu yana kazandığı ivmeyle belirgin hale gelmektedir. Gerçek ve sanal dünyaları birbirine bağlayan bir dijitalleşme alanı olan Metaverse, mimari üretimi etkileyen güncel bir fenomendir. Bu çalışma, Metaverse teknolojisindeki ilerlemelerin mimarlık ve mekân üretimine olan etkilerini ele almakta ve bu yeni gelişen alanda araştırmacılara farkındalık yaratmayı amaçlamaktadır. Çalışmada, Metaverse içinde mimarlığın rolü sorgulanmakta ve dijitalleşmenin mekân üretimindeki avantajları ile dezavantajları incelenmektedir. Bu bağlamda, incelenen literatür tematik olarak analiz edilmiş ve dijital üretimin güçlü ve zayıf yönlerini belirlemek için SWOT Analiz tekniği kullanılmıştır. Çalışma, mekân üretiminin geleceği hakkında önemli ipuçları sunmakta, mimari tasarımda Metaverse ortamının nasıl kullanılabileceği ve kullanımıyla ilişkili potansiyel riskler hakkında bilgiler vermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• metaverse
• sanal mekan
• mimari tasarım
• dijital tasarım
• SWOT analizi

Kaynakça

1. Abramov, N., Lankegowda, H., Liu, S., Barazzetti, L., Beltracchi, C., & Ruttico, P. (2024). Metamorphosis: A digital approach to transforming communities through photogrammetry and Metaverse. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLVIII-2/W, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-2-W4-2024-1-2024
2. Alexenberg, M. (2011). The future of art in a postdigital age: From Hellenistic to Hebraic consciousness. Intellect Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv36xvpkc
3. Benzaghta, M. A., Elwalda, A., Mousa, M., Erkan, I., & Rahman, M. (2021). SWOT analysis applications: An integrative literature review. Journal of Global Business Insights, 6(1), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.5038/2640-6489.6.1.1148
4. Cai, Y., Llorca, J., Tulino, A. M., & Molisch, A. F. (2022). Compute- and data-intensive networks: The key to the Metaverse. 2022 1st International Conference on 6G Networking, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/6GNet54646.2022.9830429
5. Celine, E. (2018). Başlat: Ready player one, çeviren: Taylan Taftaf. Dex Kitap.
6. Cooper, H. M. (1998). Synthesizing research: A guide for literature reviews. Sage Publications.
7. Davis, A., Murphy, J., Owens, D., Khazanchi, D., & Zigurs, I. (2009). Avatars, people, and virtual worlds: Foundations for research in Metaverses. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10(2), 90–117. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00183
8. Díaz, J. E. M. (2020). Virtual world as a complement to hybrid and mobile learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(22), 267. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i22.14393

9. Ding, X., Sun, M., Bai, W., & Li, X. (2022). Exploration of architectural design in the co-construction mode of user and designer in the Metaverse environment. 2022 7th International Conference on Systems, Control and Communications, 55–60. https://doi.org/10.1145/3575828.3575838
10. Dionisio, J. D. N., III, W. G. B., & Gilbert, R. (2013). 3D virtual worlds and the Metaverse. ACM Computing Surveys, 45(3), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1145/2480741.2480751
11. Duan, H., Li, J., Fan, S., Lin, Z., Wu, X., & Cai, W. (2021). Metaverse for social good: A university campus prototype. Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1145/3474085.3479238
12. Far, S. B., & Rad, A. I. (2022). Applying digital twins in Metaverse: User interface, security and privacy challenges. Journal of Metaverse, 2(1), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2204.11343
13. Fink, A. G. (2019). Conducting research literature reviews: From the internet to paper. Sage Publications.
14. Finney, A. (2022a, March 02). BIG designs virtual office Viceverse in the metaverse for Vice Media Group. Dezeen. https://www.dezeen.com/2022/03/02/big-viceverse-metaverse-virtual-office-vice-media/ (last access: 08.02.2024).
15. Finney, A. (2022b, March 11). Zaha Hadid Architects designs virtual Liberland Metaverse city. Dezeen. Retrieved from https://www.dezeen.com/2022/03/11/liberland-metaverse-city-zaha-hadid-architects/ (last access: 10.02.2024).
16. Fu, Y., Li, C., Yu, F. R., Luan, T. H., Zhao, P., & Liu, S. (2023). A survey of blockchain and intelligent networking for the metaverse. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 10(4), 3587–3610. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2022.3222521
17. Ghisleni, C. (2022, November 06). Will the metaverse be the end of engineering? ArchDaily. Retrieved from https://www.archdaily.com/988273/will-the-metaverse-be-the-end-of-engineering?ad_source=search&ad_medium=search_result_articles (last access: 24.01.2024).
18. Gürel, E. (2017). SWOT analysis: A theoretical review. Journal of International Social Research, 10(51), 994–1006. https://doi.org/10.17719/jisr.2017.1832
19. Güven, F., & Güven, İ. (2022). Metaverse toplumu: Kimlik, mekan ve yeni topluluk bilinci. Erciyes Akademi, 36(4), 1792–1812. https://doi.org/10.48070/erciyesakademi.1159046
20. He, B., & Bai, K.-J. (2021). Digital twin-based sustainable intelligent manufacturing: A review. Advances in Manufacturing, 9(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-020-00302-5
21. Hou, N., Nishina, D., Sugita, S., Jiang, R., Kindaichi, S., Oishi, H., & Shimizu, A. (2024). Virtual reality space in architectural design education: Learning effect of scale feeling. Building and Environment, 248, 111060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.111060
22. Huynh-The, T., Pham, Q.-V., Pham, X.-Q., Nguyen, T. T., Han, Z., & Kim, D.-S. (2023). Artificial intelligence for the metaverse: A survey. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 117, 105581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105581
23. Karadağ, D. (2022, October 14). Mimarlığın tanıdık ama yeni evreni: Metaverse. XXI. Retrieved from https://xxi.com.tr/i/mimarligin-tanidik-ama-yeni-evreni-metaverse (last access: 12.01.2024).
24. Kexin, L., Yi, Q., Xiaoou, S., & Yan, L. (2020). Future education trend learned from the Covid-19 pandemic: Take ≪artificial intelligence≫ online course as an example. 2020 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education (ICAIE), 108–111. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAIE50891.2020.00032
25. Kiong, L. V. (2022). Metaverse made easy. Independently Published.
26. Lee, L.-H., Braud, T., Zhou, P., Wang, L., Xu, D., Lin, Z., Kumar, A., Bermejo, C., & Hui, P. (2021). All One Needs to Know about Metaverse: A Complete Survey on Technological Singularity, Virtual Ecosystem, and Research Agenda. Journal of Latex Class Files, 14(8), 1–67. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2110.05352
27. Leigh, D. (2010). SWOT analysis. In Ryan Watkins & Doug Leigh (Eds.), Handbook of Improving Performance in the Workplace, Volume Two: Selecting and Implementing Performance Interventions (pp. 115–140). Pfeiffer. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470587102.ch5
28. Lin, J. (2022). On the innovative design of digital media under the background of the metaverse. Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Comprehensive Art and Cultural Communication (CACC 2022). Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 663, 158-163. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220502.034
29. Ma, B., Luo, X., An, X., Guo, J., & Liu, P. (2024). An analytical research using image processing to create an architectural virtual scene. Second International Conference on Physics, Photonics, and Optical Engineering (ICPPOE 2023). 13075, 515-522. SPIE. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3026688
30. Mace, J. J., Pham, T., Leach, T., Cook, C., & Carrico, C. (2020). Virtual and Augmented Reality: Advancements and Dilemmas. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 18(4), 502–520. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506820956801
31. Moneta, A. (2020). Architecture, heritage, and the Metaverse: New approaches and methods for the digital built environment. Traditional Dwellings and Settlements Review, 1(32), 37–49.
32. Mystakidis, S. (2022). Metaverse. Encyclopedia, 2(1), 486–497. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia2010031
33. Neustaedter, C., & Fedorovskaya, E. (2009). Capturing and sharing memories in a virtual world. CHI '09: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1161–1170. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518878
34. Onecha, B., Cornadó, C., Morros, J., & Pons, O. (2023). New approach to design and assess metaverse environments for improving learning processes in higher education: The case of architectural construction and rehabilitation. Buildings, 13(5), 1340. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13051340
35. Özenir, İ. (2022). Metaverse ve üretim: Metaverse’ün üretime etkileri. Erciyes Akademi, 36(2), 559–573. https://doi.org/10.48070/erciyesakademi.1073659
36. Pangrazio, L., & Sefton-Green, J. (2021). Digital Rights, Digital Citizenship and Digital Literacy: What’s the Difference? Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 10(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2021.1.616
37. Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754887 Pinkwart, N., & Olivier, H. (2009). Cooperative virtual worlds—A viable eCollaboration pathway or merely a gaming trend? Electronic Markets, 19(4), 233–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-009-0022-2
38. Polini, W., & Corrado, A. (2020). Digital twin of composite assembly manufacturing process. International Journal of Production Research, 58(17), 5238–5252. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1714091
39. Rahaman, H., & Tan, B.-K. (2011). Interpreting digital heritage: A conceptual model with end-users’ perspective. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 9(1), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1260/1478-0771.9.1.99
40. Rawat, D. B., & El Alami, H. (2023). Metaverse: Requirements, architecture, standards, status, challenges, and perspectives. IEEE Internet of Things Magazine, 6(1), 14–18. https://doi.org/10.1109/IOTM.001.2200258
41. Robins, K. (2021). İmaj görmenin kültür ve politikası, çeviren: Nurçay Türkoğlu. Ayrıntı Yayınları.
42. Roy, R. B., Mishra, D., Pal, S. K., Chakravarty, T., Panda, S., Chandra, M. G., Pal, A., Misra, P., Chakravarty, D., & Misra, S. (2020). Digital twin: Current scenario and a case study on a manufacturing process. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 107(9–10), 3691–3714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05306-w
43. Scavnicky, R. (2022, May 09). Bjarke Ingels Group’s virtual headquarters for Vice Media disappoints on every level. The Architect’s Newspaper. Retrieved from https://www.archpaper.com/2022/05/big-metaverse-headquarters-for-vice-media-disappointing/ (last access: 05.03.2024).
44. Schumacher, P. (2022). The metaverse as opportunity for architecture and society: Design drivers, core competencies. Architectural Intelligence, 1(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44223-022-00010-z
45. Seymen Aksu, N., & Yalçıner Ercoşkun, Ö. (2022). Kentlerde dijital dönüşüm ve metaverse. EKSEN Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(2), 108–122. https://doi.org/10.58317/eksen.1165011
46. Shakeri, S. (2022, March 25). The Liberland Metaverse, Zaha Hadid Architects’ way into the web 3.0. parametric architecture. Parametric Architecture. Retrieved from https://parametric-architecture.com/the-liberland-metaverse-zaha-hadid-architects-way-into-the-web-3-0/ (last access: 17.02.2024).
47. Shakeri, S., & Ornek, M. A. (2023). How Metaverse evolves the architectural design. Architecture and Planning Journal (APJ), 28(3), Article 35. https://doi.org/10.54729/2789-8547.1230
48. Smart, J., Cascio, J., & Paffendorf, J. (2007). Metaverse Roadmap Overview (2007-2025): A Cross-Industry Public Foresight Project. Acceleration Studies Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/images/1/19/MetaverseRoadmapOverview.pdf (last access: 25.02.2024).
49. Sopher, H., & Lescop, L. (2023). Learning in metaverse: The immersive atelier model of the architecture studio. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 17(3), 536–553. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-10-2022-0213
50. Spiegel, J. S. (2018). The ethics of virtual reality technology: Social hazards and public policy recommendations. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(5), 1537–1550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9979-y
51. Stephenson, N. (2016). Parazit (snow crash), çeviren: Sibel Hacıoğlu. Altıkırkbeş Yayınları.
52. Sun, C. (2021, November 24). Architecting the Metaverse. ArchDaily. Retrieved from https://www.archdaily.com/968905/architecting-the-metaverse?ad_medium=widget&ad_name=related-article&ad_content=984891 (last access: 24.01.2024).
53. Taherysayah, F., Malathouni, C., Liang, H.-N., & Westermann, C. (2024). Virtual reality and electroencephalography in architectural design: A systematic review of empirical studies. Journal of Building Engineering, 85, 108611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.108611
54. Teli, M., Bordin, S., Menéndez Blanco, M., Orabona, G., & De Angeli, A. (2015). Public design of digital commons in urban places: A case study. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 81, 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2015.02.003
55. Turan, T., & Kavut, İ. E. (2022). Gerçeküstü sanat akımının kurgusal mekânlara ve metaverse kavramına katkısının norm bağlamında incelenmesi. Mimarlık Bilimleri ve Uygulamaları Dergisi, 7(1), 346–363. https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1079846
56. Wang, Y., Su, Z., Zhang, N., Xing, R., Liu, D., Luan, T. H., & Shen, X. (2023). A survey on metaverse: Fundamentals, security, and privacy. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 25(1), 319–352. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2022.3202047
57. Weiss, T., & Schiele, S. (2013). Virtual worlds in competitive contexts: Analyzing eSports consumer needs. Electronic Markets, 23(4), 307–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-013-0127-5
58. Yang, Q., Zhao, Y., Huang, H., Xiong, Z., Kang, J., & Zheng, Z. (2022). Fusing blockchain and AI with metaverse: A survey. IEEE Open Journal of the Computer Society, 3, 122–136. https://doi.org/10.1109/OJCS.2022.3188249
59. Yılmaz, İ. (2022). Metaverse ve NFT dünyasına tasarım açısından bir bakış. International Journal of Social Humanities Sciences Research, 9(87), 1752–2118. https://doi.org/10.26450/jshsr.3266
60. Zhang, Y. G., Dang, M. Y., & Chen, H. (2020). An explorative study on the virtual world: Investigating the avatar gender and avatar age differences in their social interactions for help-seeking. Information Systems Frontiers, 22(4), 911–925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-019-09904-2