Gecekondu Terminolojisinin Yeniden Değerlendirilmesi: Kentsel Gayriresmîlik Fikirlerinin Epistemolojik Eleştirisi

Öz

Bu makale, kentsel planlama ve kalkınmada 'gecekondu' teriminin anlamını, uygulamasını ve etkilerini inceleyerek anlamların ardındaki amaçları keşfetmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Sorun, terimin olumsuz bir önyargı olarak izlenimine derin bir dikkat gösterilmeden aşırı kullanılmasında yatmaktadır. Bu araştırmada, kelimenin anlamının teknik olarak doğuşunu, duyurulmasını ve savunulmasını analiz etmek için içerik analizi, mantıksal argüman ve yorumlama teknikleri uygulanmıştır. Bulgular, gecekondu teriminin anlamının, gecekondu yıkımını meşrulaştırmak için olumsuz anlamlara ve izlenimlere sahip kelimelerden çıkarıldığını ortaya koymaktadır. Epistemolojik analiz, 'gecekondu' anlamının, çözümden ziyade iyileştirme olarak bazı basit iyileştirmelere dikkat çekmek için operasyonel merkezler tarafından merkezileştirildiğini ortaya koymaktadır. İyileştirme politikalarına rağmen gecekondu sakinlerinin yüzdesi artmıştır. Bu çalışma gecekondu tanımında üç eğilime ulaştı: fiziksel özelliklere dikkat eden biçimciler, operasyonlara ve eylemlere odaklanan pragmatistler ve terimin sorunlarını ve gerçek anlamını ortaya koymaya çalışan eleştirel çalışmalar. Sonuç olarak, gecekondu olgusu evlerin veya alanların fiziksel özelliklerinden ziyade kentsel alanlardaki daha geniş gelişme eksikliklerine ışık tutuyor.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Gecekondu
• Epistemoloji
• Anlam
• Uygulama
• Eleştirel Analiz
• kentsel gayriresmîlik
• eleştirel kentselcilik
• kentsel yönetişim

Reevaluating Slum Terminology: An Epistemological Critique of Urban Informality Ideas

Abstract

This paper aims to examine the meaning, application, and effects of the term ‘slum’ in urban planning and development plans to discover the purposes behind this meaning. The problem is located in the extensively use the term without paying deep attention to the impression of the term as a negative prejudgment. Content analysis, logical argument, and interpretation techniques were applied in this research to analyze the genesis, publicizing, and advocating the meaning of the word technically. The results of research reveal that the meaning of the term slum was extracted from words with negative meanings and impressions to legitimize slum demolishing. Epistemological analysis reveals that the meaning of the ‘slum’ was centralized by operational centers to orient the attention to some physical improvement as upgrading rather than the solution. Despite the upgrading policies, the percentage of slum dwellers has increased. This study attained three trends in the definition of slum: formalists with orientation to physical specifications, pragmatists with a focus on operations and actions, and critical studies who endeavor in exposing the problems based on social and economic factors in the context. In conclusion, the slum phenomena spotlight broader development deficiencies in urban planning regarding the limitation of social and economic opportunities for public rather than the physical specifications of houses or areas.

Keywords

• Slum
• Epistemology
• Meaning
• Application
• Critical Analysis
• urban informality
• critical urbanism
• urban governance

Kaynakça

1. AlSayyad, N. (2004). Urban informality as a new way of life. In A. Roy, & N. AlSayyad (Eds.), Urban informality: Transnational perspectives from the Middle East, Latin America, and South Asia (pp. 7-30). New York: Lexington Books.
2. APA, A. (2006). Planning and urban design standards. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons Inc.
3. Atkinson, A. (2009). Cities after oil-one more time. City, 13(4), 493–498.
4. Audi, R. (2015). The Cambridge dictionary of philosophy (3 ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Avni, N., & Yiftachel, O. (2014). The new divided city? Planning and ‘gray space’ between global north-west and south-east. In S. Parnell , & S. Oldfield (Eds.), The Routledge handbook on cities of the global south (pp. 487-505). New York: Routledge.
6. Bettencourt, L., & West, G. (2010). A unified theory of urban living. Nature, 467 , 912–913.
7. Bicchieri, C. (2016). Norms in the wild: How to diagnose, measure, and change social norms. Oxford: Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Borgatta, E. F., & Montgomery, R. J. (2000). Encyclopedia of sociology. New York: Macmillan Reference USA.

9. Brady, I. (1994). Poetics for a planet: Discourse on some problems of being in place. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln, The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 979-1026). London: Sage Publication Inc.
10. Brenner, N., & Schmid, C. (2015). Towards a new epistemology of the urban? City, 19(2-3), 151–182. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2015.1014712
11. Bristow, W. F. (2007). Hegel and the transformation of philosophical critique. Oxford: Oxford Academic. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199290642.003.0006
12. Bryceson, D. F. (2014). Re-evaluating the influence of urban agglomeration in sub-Saharan Africa: population density, technological innovation and productivity. In S. Parnell, & S. Oldfield, The Routledge handbook on cities of the global south (pp. 75-85). London: Routledge.
13. Buckley, R., & Kallergis, A. (2014). Does African urban policy provide a platform for sustained economic growth? In S. Parnell, & S. Oldfield, The Routledge handbook on cities of the global south (pp. 173-190). London: Routledge.
14. Carmona, M. (2001). Housing design quality: through policy, guidance and review. London: Spon Press.
15. Carver, T. (2003). Engels: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
16. Chiarella, D. (2005). The history of urban planning and cities. Lulu.com; null edition.
17. Chisholm, L. A. (2018). The history of landscape design in 100 gardens. New York: Timber Press.
18. Collins, J., & Selina, H. (2012). Heidegger: A graphic guide. Icon Books Ltd.
19. Crumley, J. S. (2009). An introduction to epistemology. Broadview Press.
20. Crystal, D. (2008). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics (6 ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
21. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5 ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
22. Derrida, J. (1981). Writing and difference (eBook ed.). doi:https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203991787
23. Derrida, J. (2013). Of grammatology. Johns Hopkins University Press.
24. Devitt, M. (2007). Scientific realism. In F. Jackson, & M. Smith, The Oxford handbook of contemporary philosophy (pp. 873-904). Oxford University Press Inc. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199234769.003.0026
25. Dictionary. (2024, 07 01). Dictionary.com. Retrieved from Slum: https://www.dictionary.com/browse/slum
26. Dreyfus, L. H., & Rabinow, P. (1982). Michel Foucault; Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. Harvester Wheatsheaf.
27. Drisko, J. W., & Maschi, T. (2016). Content analysis. Oxford University Press.
28. Dupre, L. (2004). The Enlightenment and the intellectual foundations of modern culture. Yale University Press.
29. Eddy, M. D. (2013). The shape of knowledge: Children and the visual culture of literacy and numeracy. Science in Context, 26(2), 215–245. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/s0269889713000045
30. Ellicott, K. (2002). Cities of the world (6 ed., Vol. 1). The Gale Group Ink.
31. Espinet, D. (2021). Object. In M. A. Wrathall, The Cambridge Heidegger Lexicon, (pp. 531-535). Cambridge University Press.
32. Evert, K.-J. (2010). Encyclopedic dictionary of landscape and urban planning. Springer-Verlag Berlin.
33. Fainstein, S. (2015). Resilience and Justice. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(1), 157-167. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12186
34. Felluga, D. F. (2015). Critical theory: the key concepts. Routledge.
35. Fleischacker, S. (2013). What is Enlightenment? Kant’s Questions. New York: Routledge.
36. Flew, A. (1979). A dictionary of philosophy. Pan Books Ltd.
37. Foley, D., & Valenzuela, A. (1994). Critical ethnography: The politics of collaboration. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln, The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 217-234). Sage Publication Inc.
38. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. Pantheon Books.
39. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings . (C. Gordon, Trans.) The Harvester Press.
40. Franz, J. M. (1994). A critical framework for methodological research in architecture. Design Studies, 15(4), 433-447.
41. Fritzman, J. M. (2014). Hegel. Polity Press.
42. Garric, J.‐P. (2017). The French Beaux‐Arts. In M. Bressani, & C. Contandriopoulos, The companions to the history of architecture, volume III, nineteenth century architecture, part I: Historicism, the Beaux‐Arts, and the Gothic (pp. 1-15). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
43. Gilbert, A. (2004). Love in the time of enhanced capital flows reflections on the links between liberalization and informality. In A. Roy, & N. AlSayyad (Eds.), Urban informality: Transnational perspectives from the Middle East, Latin America, and South Asia (pp. 33-66). Lexington Books.
44. Given, L. M. (2008). The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. doi:https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963909
45. Gleeson, B. (2014). The urban condition. Routledge.
46. Gomez, A. P. (2003). Hermeneutics as architectural discourse. Singapore: Department of Architecture, National University of Singapore.
47. Green, J. (2008). A revolutionary life: Biography of Friedrich Engels. Artery Publications.
48. Griffin, A. (2022). The rise of academic architectural education: The origins and enduring influence of the Acadâemie d’architecture. Routledge.
49. Grimm, S. R. (2011). Understanding. In S. Bernecker, & D. Pritchard, The Routledge companion to epistemology (pp. 84-94). Routledge.
50. Groat, L., & Wang, D. (2002). Architectural research methods. John Wiley & Sons INC.
51. Gron, A. (2009). Introduction: Hegel, history and the Hegelian legacy.
52. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln, Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105-117). Sage.
53. Han-Pile, B. (2005). Early Heidegger’s appropriation of Kant. In H. L. Dreyfus, & M. A. Wrathall, A Companion to Heidegger (pp. 80-101). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
54. Hansen, E. (2009). The Hegelian notion of progress and Its applicability in critical philosophy. In A. Gron, M. Raffnsoe-Moller , & A. Sorense, Dialectics, self-consciousness, and recognition: The Hegelian legacy (pp. 201-227). NSU Press.
55. Harris, R., & Vorms, C. (2017). Introduction . In R. Harris, & C. Vorms, What’s in a name?: talking about urban peripheries (pp. 3-35). University of Toronto Press.
56. Harvey, D. (1985). The urbanization of capital. Basil Blackwell.
57. Harvey, D. (2005). Paris, Capital of Modernity. Routledge.
58. Hetherington, S. (2012). Epistemology's past here and now. In S. Hetherington, Epistemology: the key thinkers (pp. 1-28). Continuum International Publishing Group.
59. Hillier, J. (2002). Shadows of power: An allegory of prudence in land-use planning. Routledge Press.
60. Holzhey, H., & Mudroch, V. (2005). Historical dictionary of Kant and Kantianism. Scarecrow Press, Inc.
61. Huchzermeyer, M. (2011). Cities with ‘slums’: From slum eradication to a right to the city in Africa. University of Cape Town Press.
62. Hunt, T. (2009). Marx's general: The revolutionary life of Friedrich Engels. Metropolitan Books.
63. Inwood, M. (1999). A Hegel dictionary. Blackwell Publishers Inc.
64. Jin, H. (2021). Deconstructive hermeneutics of nature and culture: Thinking after Derrida. Space and Culture, 24(4), 679-696. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331219828287
65. King, R. (2023). Informality as process and the social construction of slums: Southeast Asian areas. In A. Mayne, The Oxford handbook of the modern slum (pp. 73-88). Oxford University Press.
66. Kostof, S. (1995). A history of architecture: Settings and rituals (2 ed.). OUP.
67. Krippendorff, K. H. (2003). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2 ed.). Sage Publications.
68. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago Press.
69. Landes, D. A. (2013). The Merleau-Ponty dictionary. Bloomsbury Academic.
70. Lang, J. (2005). Urban design: A typology of procedures and products. Architectural Press.
71. LeCompte, M. D., Dorothy, E., & Aguilera-Black, B. (2012). Revisiting reliability and validity in higher education research and program evaluation. In C. Secolsky, & B. D. Denison (Eds.), Handbook on measurement, assessment, and evaluation in higher education (pp. 612-636). Routledge.
72. Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Blackwell.
73. Lefebvre, H. (2009). Reflections on the politics of space. In N. Brenner , & S. Elden (Eds.), State, Space, World, Selected Essays (pp. 167-184). Minneapolis • University of Minnesota Press.
74. Lefebvre, H. (2010). Writings on cities. (E. Kofman, & E. Lebas, Trans.) Wiley-Blackwell.
75. Lukasz, S. (2011). Henri Lefebvre on space: architecture, urban research, and the production of theory. The University of Minnesota Press.
76. Mabin, A. (2014). Grounding southern theory in time and place. In S. Parnell, & S. Oldfield, The Routledge handbook on cities of the global south (pp. 21-36). Routledge.
77. Magee, G. A. (2010). The Hegel dictionary. Continuum International Publishing Group.
78. Mayne, A. (2023). Introduction: Slums and the modern world. In A. Mayne, The Oxford handbook of the modern slum (pp. 1-18). Oxford University Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190879457.001.0001
79. Mazarro, A. D. (2018). Slums: Disassembling the concept. ARQ, 98, 80-91.
80. Mertens, D. M. (2012). What comes first? The paradigm or the approach? Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(4), 255-257. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812461574
81. Mugerauer, R. (1995). Interpreting environments: Tradition, deconstruction, hermeneutics. University of Texas.
82. Mugerauer, R. (2014). Interpreting nature: the emerging field of environmental hermeneutics. Robert: Fordham University Press.
83. Norberg-Schulz, C. (2019). Genius loci: towards a phenomenology of architecture. In Historic Cities: Issues in Urban Conservation (pp. 2-31). The Getty Conservation Institute.
84. OED. (2024, 07 01). Online Etymology Dictionary. Retrieved from Slum: https://www.etymonline.com/word/slum
85. Oldfield, S. (2014). Negotiating society and identity in urban spaces in the south. In S. Parnell, & S. Oldfield, The Routledge handbook on cities of the global south (pp. 339-340). Routledge.
86. Oliver, P. (2006). Build to meet need: Cultural issue in vernacular architecture. Architectural Press.
87. Oxford. (2024, 8 8). Slum. Retrieved from Oxford University Press: https://www.oed.com/discover/tracing-the-origin-of-slum/?tl=true
88. Parnell, S., & Robinson, J. (2012). (Re)theorizing Cities from the Global South: Looking Beyond Neoliberalism. Urban Geography, 33(4), 593-617.
89. Parrillo, V. N. (2008). Encyclopedia of social problems. SAGE Publications, Inc.
90. Peck, J. (2015). Cities beyond compare? Regional Studies, 49(1), 160-182.
91. Peck, J. (2017). Uneven regional development. In D. Richardson, N. Castree , M. F. Goodchild, A. Kobayashi, W. Liu , & R. A. Marston, International encyclopedia of geography: People, the earth, environment and technology. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118
92. Pieterse, E. (2010). Cityness and African urban development. Urban Forum, 21(3), 205-219. doi:10.1007/s12132-010-9092-7
93. Pike, D. L. (2016). Slum. In E. Hayot, & R. L. Walkowitz , A new vocabulary for global modernism (pp. 198-213). Columbia University Press.
94. Pippin, R. B. (2010). Hegel on self-consciousness: Desire and death in the phenomenology of spirit. Princeton University Press.
95. Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge.
96. Prigge, W. (2008). Reading the urban revolution: Space and representation. In K. Goonewardena, S. Kipfer, R. Milgrom, & C. Schmid, Space, difference, Everyday Life: Reading Henri Lefebvre (pp. 46-61). Routledge.
97. Proudfoot, M., & Lacey, A. R. (2010). The Routledge dictionary of philosophy (4 ed.). Routledge.
98. Quante, M. (2010). After Hegel: The actualization of philosophy in practice. In D. Moyar, The Routledge companion to nineteenth century philosophy (P. R. Leland, Trans., pp. 197-237). Routledge.
99. Relph, E. (2007). On the identity of places. In M. C. Tiesdell (Ed.), Urban Design Reader (pp. 103-107). Architectural Press.
100. Rescher, N. (2003). Epistemology: An introduction to the theory of knowledge. State University of New York Press, Albany.
101. Robinson, J. (2014). New geographies of theorizing the urban: putting comparison to work for global urban studies. In S. Parnell, & S. Oldfield (Eds.), The Routledge handbook on cities of the global south (pp. 57-70). Routledge.
102. Roche, D. (2000). France in the Enlightenment. (A. Goldhammer, Trans.) Harvard University Press .
103. Roudinesco, E. (2008). Philosophy in turbulent times: Canguilhem, Sartre, Foucault, Althusser, Deleuze, Derrida. Columbia University Press.
104. Roy, A. (2005). Urban informality, toward an epistemology of planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71(2), 147-158.
105. Roy, A. (2009). The 21st century metropolis: New geographies of theory. Regional Studies, 43(6), 819-830.
106. Roy, A., & Ong, A. (2012). Worlding Cities: Asian Experiments and the Art of Being Global. Wiley-Blackwell.
107. Rumfitt, I. (2007). Meaning and understanding. In F. Jackson, & M. Smith, The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy (pp. 492-520). Oxford University Press Inc. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199234769.003.0016
108. Russell, B. (2004). History of western philosophy. Routledge.
109. Sarup, M. (1993). An introductory guide to post-structuralism and post-modernism. Harvester Wheatsheaf.
110. Schalow, F., & Denker, A. (2010). Historical dictionary of Heidegger’s philosophy. Scarecrow Press.
111. Schmid, C. (2008). Henri Lefebvre’s theory of the production of space: towards a three-dimensional dialectic. In K. Goonewardena, S. Kipfer, R. Milgrom, & C. Schmid (Eds.), Space, difference, everyday life: Reading Henri Lefebvre (pp. 27-45). Routledge.
112. Schmid, C. (2015). Specificity and urbanization: A theoretical outlook. In ETH Studio Basel, The inevitable specificity of cities (pp. 287-307). Lars Muller.
113. Schmidt, J. (1996). What is Enlightenment? Eighteenth-century answers and twentieth-century questions. University of California Press.
114. Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
115. Sebina, G. K., & Koma, O. (2015). Right to the city and public spaces: Inner city revitalization in South African’s capital city. In Right to the city for a safe and just world: The Brics city (pp. 138-161). Oxfam or the Brics Policy Center.
116. SEP. (2024, 10 26). Epistemology. Retrieved from Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2024/entries/epistemology/
117. Sideris , L. A., & Banerjee, T. (2007). Postmodern urban form. In M. C. Tiesdell, Urban design reader (pp. 43-51). Architectural Press.
118. Sim, S. (2013). Fifty key postmodern thinkers. Routledge.
119. Simone, A. (2004). People as infrastructure: intersecting fragments in Johannesburg. Public Culture, 16(3), 407–429.
120. Simone, A. (2010). Social infrastructures of city life in contemporary Africa. Discussion Paper , 51, 4-33.
121. Simone, A. (2014). The missing people: reflections on an urban majority in cities of the south. In S. Parnell, & S. Oldfield, The Routledge handbook on cities of the global south (pp. 322-336). Routledge.
122. Sinnerbrink, R. (2007). Understanding Hegelianism. Acumen Publishing Limited.
123. Slater, T. (2014, 1 24). The resilience of neoliberal urbanism. Retrieved 8 20, 2024, from Open Democracy.
124. Smith, T. (2010). Karl Marx. In D. Moyar, The Routledge companion to nineteenth century philosophy (pp. 238-272). Routledge.
125. Tafahomi, R. (2022). Insight into research dilemma in design studios and relationships with the architecture curriculum. Journal of Design Studio, 4(1), 93-112. doi:https://doi.org/10.46474/jds.1102633
126. Tafahomi, R. (2023). Tracing Hegelian’s philosophy and thoughts in educational styles of architecture design studios. Journal of Design Studio, 5(1), 119-144. doi:https://doi.org/10.46474/jds.1292904
127. Tafahomi, R. (2024). A comparative study on philosophy, epistemology, and methods of teaching in design studios in the Beaux Art, Polytechnique, and Bauhaus: Regeneration, development, or transformation? Journal of Design Studio, 6(2), 357-382. doi:https://doi.org/10.46474/jds.1580498
128. Tafahomi, R., & Chance, S. (2023). Comparing the meaning of ‘thesis’ and ‘final year project’ in architecture and engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 1-26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2023.2244441
129. Tafahomi, R., & Nadi, R. (2021). The interpretation of graphical features applied to mapping SWOT by the architecture students in the design studio. Journal of Design Studio, 3(2), 205-221. doi:https://doi.org/10.46474/jds.1019310
130. Tafahomi, R., & Nadi, R. (2021). The transformative characteristics of public spaces in unplanned settlements. A|Z ITU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 18(2), 285-300. doi:https://doi.org/10.5505/itujfa.2021.14892
131. Thorpe, L. (2015). The Kant dictionary. Bloomsbury Academic.
132. Turner, B. S. (2006). The Cambridge dictionary of sociology. Cambridge University Press.
133. Underhill, N. (2022). The renovation of Paris: The re-making of Paris in the 1800s. Independently published.
134. UNDESA. (2024, 07 14). Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable. Retrieved from Statestic Division: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2023/goal-11/#:~:text=While%20the%20proportion%20of%20the,slums%20or%20slum%2Dlike%20conditions.
135. UN-Habitat. (2006). Analytical perspective of pro-poor slum upgrading frameworks. United Nations Human Settlements Programme, UN-HABITAT and Cities Alliance, Nairobi.
136. UN-Habitat. (2007). What are slums and why do they exist? United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT) . Nirobi, Kenya: UN-Habitat . Retrieved from chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.preventionweb.net/files/1700_462551419GC202120What20are20slums.pdf
137. Vycinas, V. (1969). Earth and gods: An introduction to the philosophy of Martin Heidegger. Hague, Netherlands: Springer Dordrecht. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3359-6
138. Wachsmuth, D. (2014). City as ideology: Reconciling the explosion of the city form with the tenacity of the city concept. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32(1), 75–90.
139. Wang , D., & Ilhan, A. O. (2009). Holding creativity together: A sociological theory of the design professions. Design Issues, 25(1), 5-21. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/20627790
140. Wang, D. (2006). Prediction in theoria: towards an interdisciplinary range of theories related to architecture. Arq, 10(3-4), 263-273.
141. Wang, D. (2009). Kuhn on architectural style. Arq, 13(1), 49-57.
142. Warburton, N. (2011). A little history of philosophy. Yale University Press.
143. WBG. (2024, 07 02). World Bank Group. Retrieved from Data Bank: World Development Indicator_Pupolation living in slums (% of urbam pupolation): https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators/Series/EN.POP.SLUM.UR.ZS#
144. Webster. (2024, 07 01). Merriam-Webster. Retrieved from Slum: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/slum