Mimarlıkta Yeni Gerçekçilik: Kuram ve Pratik Arasında

Öz

Bu çalışma, yirmi birinci yüzyılın insan-merkezli tasarım paradigmalarını sarsan çok boyutlu krizleri ve buna bağlı ontolojik tartışmaları bağlamında yeni-gerçekçi olarak nitelenebilecek mimari düşünsel yaklaşımların izlerini sürmektedir. Simgesel yaklaşımların ötesine geçen ve nesnelerin maddi özerkliğine vurgu yapan, Harman, DeLanda ve Barad gibi düşünürlerin fikirleri ile örtüşen mimari yaklaşımlar bu bağlamda tasarım metodolojisi bağlamında incelenir. “Araç-oluş”, “iç-etkileşim” ve “bileşim” gibi kavramlar aracılığıyla, mimari nesnenin işlevselliği ve biçimselliğinin ötesinde çok katmanlı, dirençli ve etkin varlık alanları tanımlanır. Çalışma, mimarlığı insan deneyiminin ötesine geçen gerçekçi bir altyapı ile nesne-yönelimli aktörlerin arasında konumlanan bir ontolojik oluş olarak konumlandırır. Bu bağlamda çerçeveyi tanımladığı düşünülen Takaharu Tezuka, Sami Rintala ve Alejandro Aravena gibi mimarların son dönem yaklaşımları irdelenir. Sonuç olarak yeni gerçekçi mimarlığın; tasarım süreçlerini felsefi ve yöntemsel olarak yeniden tartışan ve doğa ile etkileşimli varlığını önceleyen bir tasarım metodu olarak kuramsal çerçevesi oluşturulmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Mimarlık Teorisi
• Yeni Gerçekçilik
• Yeni Materyalizm
• Graham Harman
• Manuel DeLanda
• Karen Barad

New Realism in Architecture: Between Theory and Praxis

Öz

This study traces architectural thought that can be characterized as new realistic approaches within the context of multi-dimensional crises that have shaken the epistemological and subject-centered design paradigms and focusing on the associated ontological debates. Architectural approaches that move beyond symbolic interpretations and emphasize the material autonomy of objects, aligning with the ideas of theoreticians like Graham Harman, Manuel DeLanda, and Karen Barad, are examined through the lens of design methodology. Through concepts such as tool-being, intra-action, and assemblage, the study defines multi-layered, resilient, and agentic ontological realms of objects of architecture that go beyond functionality and formalism. Architecture is thus positioned as an ontological becoming situated between object actors, grounded in a realist infrastructure that transcends human experience. In this context, the recent works of architects like Takaharu Tezuka, Sami Rintala, and Alejandro Aravena, who are considered to articulate this framework, are analyzed. As a result, the theoretical framework of new realism in architecture is constructed as a design methodology that reconsiders design processes in-between philosophy and design methodology, and prioritizes being-in-interaction with nature.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Architectural Theory
• New Realism
• New Materialism
• Graham Harman
• Manuel DeLanda
• Karen Barad

Kaynakça

1. Ağın, B. (2022). Spread the word: mattertext as bio-art. European Journal of English Studies, 26(3), 439–461.
2. Aravena, A. (2014). My architectural philosophy? Bring the community into the process [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0I0Poe3qlg
3. Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831. https://doi.org/10.1086/345321
4. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
5. Barad, K. (2014). Diffracting diffraction: Cutting together apart. Parallax, 20(3), 168–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2014.927623
6. Baudrillard, J. (1993). The transparency of evil: Essays on extreme phenomena (J. Benedict, Trans.). Verso. (Orijinal eser 1990’da yayımlandı.)
7. Betsky, A. (2017). Architecture matters. Thames & Hudson.
8. Blagojević, L. (2014). Architecture – Utopia – Realism: Thematic framework. Serbian Architectural Journal, 6(2), 138–145.

9. Boyacıoğlu, C., Çakaloğulları, Ş., & Kütükçü, S. A. (2025). Mimari emek ve sosyo ekolojik araştırma. YAPI Dergisi, (496), 62–65. https://yapidergisi.com/mimari-emek-ve-sosyo-ekolojik-arastirma/
10. Bryant, L. (2011). The democracy of objects. Open Humanities Press.
11. Calvi Rollino, A. (2025, April 16). New realism for architects. Rethinking Space and Place. https://rethinkingspaceandplace.com/2025/04/16/new-realism-for-architects/
12. Coleman, N. (2005). Utopias and architecture. Routledge.
13. Curti, C. (2010). Material(ism) for Architects: A conversation with Manuel DeLanda [Interview by C. Curti]. http://www.cluster.eu/v4/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/material_ism_for_architects.pdf
14. DeLanda, M. (2009). A new philosophy of society: Assemblage theory and social complexity. Continuum.
15. DeLanda, M. (2016). Assemblage theory. Edinburgh University Press.
16. Deleuze, G. (2006). Kıvrım: Leibniz ve barok. Bağlam Yayınları.
17. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.
18. Derrida, J. (1968). Différance. In J. Derrida, Margins of philosophy (A. Bass, Trans., 1982). University of Chicago Press. (Originally presented in 1963)
19. Derrida, J. (1978). Writing and difference. University of Chicago Press.
20. Doğan, Ç., Morkoç, E. İ., & Sarıbay, S. A. (2025). Modern dünyanın çoklu krizlerine holistik düşünce üzerinden bakış. Reflektif Journal of Social Sciences, 6(1), 13–35. https://doi.org/10.47613/reflektif.2025.200
21. Dündar, A. Y., & Boyacıoğlu, C. (2024). Ludic architecture: An agency beyond ready-made narratives. ITU A|Z: Journal of the Faculty of Architecture. https://doi.org/10.58278/0.2025.70
22. Eisenman, P. (2004). Written into the void: Selected writings, 1990–2004. Yale University Press.
23. Elemental. (2011). Sustainable post-tsunami reconstruction master plan. Holcim Foundation. https://www.holcimfoundation.org/projects/sustainable-post-tsunami-reconstruction-master-plan
24. Ferraris, M. (2009). Documentalità: Perché è necessario lasciar tracce. Laterza.
25. Ferraris, M. (2012). Manifesto del nuovo realismo. Laterza.
26. Ferraris, M. (2013). Documentality: Why it is necessary to leave traces (R. Davies, Trans.). Fordham University Press.
27. Foster, H. (1996). Return of the real. MIT Press.
28. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Pantheon Books.
29. Gage, M. (2015). Killing simplicity: Object-Oriented philosophy in architecture. Log, 33, 95–106. https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2017-1-176-192
30. Guattari, F. (2000). The three ecologies. The Athlone Press.
31. Han, B. C. (2015). The transparency society. Stanford University Press.
32. Harman, G. (2002). Tool-being: Heidegger and the metaphysics of objects. Open Court Publishing.
33. Harman, G. (2011). The quadruple object. Zero Books.
34. Harman, G. (2017). Object-oriented ontology: A new theory of everything. Pelican Books.
35. Harman, G. (2022). Architecture and objects: Art after nature. University of Minnesota Press.
36. Harman, G., & Bedford, J. (2020). Is there an object-oriented architecture? Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.
37. Harman, G., & DeLanda, M. (2017). The rise of realism. Polity Press.
38. Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). Harper & Row.
39. Heidegger, M. (1967). Bauen wohnen denken. Vorträge und Aufsätze.
40. Heidegger, M. (1971). Poetry, language, thought. Harper & Row.
41. Kant, I. (2000). Critique of the power of judgment (P. Guyer, Ed.; P. Guyer & E. Matthews, Trans.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1790)
42. Kousoulas, S. (2022). Architectural technicities: A foray into larval space. Routledge.
43. Latour, B. (2018). Down to earth: Politics in the new climatic regime. John Wiley & Sons.
44. Lynn, G. (1993). Folding in architecture. Academy Editions.
45. McKim, J. (2014). Radical Infrastructure? A new realism and materialism in philosophy and architecture. Bloomsbury Academic.
46. Menşur, T. (2023). Kıvrım geometrisi ve felsefesi: Bir türev olarak mimarlık [Master’s Thesis, İstanbul Technical University].
47. Merleau-Ponty, M. (2012). Göz ve tin (Çev. A. Soysal). Metis Yayınları. (Özgün eser 1964’te yayımlanmıştır.)
48. Morton, T. (2013). Hyperobjects: Philosophy and ecology after the end of the world. University of Minnesota Press.
49. Morton, T. (2021). All art is ecological. Penguin Books.
50. Norberg-Schulz, C. (1980). Genius loci: Towards a phenomenology of architecture. Rizzoli.
51. Pallasmaa, J. (2005). The eyes of the skin: Architecture and the senses. Wiley.
52. Rossi, A. (1984). The architecture of the city. MIT Press.
53. Seamon, D. (2018). Architecture and phenomenology. In The Routledge companion to contemporary architectural history.
54. Sharr, A. (2009). Can architecture lie? On truth, knowledge and contemporary architectural theory. Architectural Theory Review.
55. Tan, G. Ö. (2025). Çoklu krizler çağında kesişimsel bir inceleme: Demokrasi ve cinsiyet eşitliği krizleri. Reflektif Journal of Social Sciences, 6(1), 37–58. https://doi.org/10.47613/reflektif.2025.20
56. URL-1. Aravena, A. (2014). My architectural philosophy? Bring the community into the process [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0I0Poe3qlg
57. URL-2. Calvi Rollino, A. (2025, April 16). New realism for architects. Rethinking Space and Place. https://rethinkingspaceandplace.com/2025/04/16/new-realism-for-architects/
58. URL-3. Curti, C. (2010). Material(ism) for Architects: A conversation with Manuel DeLanda [Interview]. http://www.cluster.eu/v4/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/material_ism_for_architects.pdf
59. URL-4. Heritage Dialogues. (2023, November 29). Climate inspiration from wooden architecture [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VTiTOZGp4hM
60. URL-5. Rintala Eggertsson Architects. (2014). SALT Festival Installations [Photograph]. ArchDaily. https://www.archdaily.com/540981/salt-festival-installations-rintala-eggertsson-architects/53fc05adc07a80388e00088e-salt-festival-installations-rintala-eggertsson-architects-photo
61. URL-6. Saad-Filho, A. (2024). Neoliberalizmin çoklu krizleri (B. Ceylan, Röportaj Yapan). https://textumdergi.net/neoliberalizmin-coklu-krizleri/
62. URL-7. Tezuka, T. (2013, May). Nostalgic future | Takaharu Tezuka | TEDxMeieki [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGIXo2tMfg8
63. URL-8. Tezuka, T. (2014, November). Building towards the future [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QvSZ1MtaXME
64. URL-9. Tezuka Architects. (n.d.). Fuji Kindergarten. http://www.tezuka-arch.com/english/works/education/fujiyochien/
65. URL-10. Thale’s Well. (2022). On architecture with Graham Harman [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=77AuDFVH4SM
66. Weir, S. (2021). Object-Oriented Ontology and Architectural Darkness. Odyssey.
67. Wigley, M. (1993). The architecture of deconstruction: Derrida’s haunt. MIT Press.