Doğada Bulunan Darbe Sönümleme Sisteminin Yapısal Analoji Yoluyla Geri Tepme Mekanizmasına Entegre Edilmesi

Öz

Bu çalışmada ateşli silahlarda gerçekleşen geri tepmenin kullanıcı tarafından deneyimlenen etkisini azaltabilecek nitelikte biyomimetik tabanlı bir çözüm önerisi geliştirilmiştir. Bu bağlamda, ağaçkakanların kafa yapısında bulunan darbe sönümleme sisteminin ana bileşenleri yapısal analoji yöntemi ile Remington 870 model ateşli silahın kabza tasarımında kullanılmıştır. Halihazırda kullanılan orijinal kabza modeli ile biyomimetik yaklaşım kullanılarak tasarlanan modeller karşılaştırılıp, eksenel ve toplam deformasyon, reaksiyon kuvveti ve gerilme değerleri birlikte değerlendirilmiş ve silahlarda geri tepmenin en aza indirilebilmesi için kabza tasarımı ile ilgili bazı öneriler getirilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• ateşli silahlar
• darbe sönümleme
• biyomimetik
• geri tepme dinamiği

Integration Of The Impact Damping System Found In The Nature To The Recoil Mechanism Through Structural Analogy

Öz

In this study, a solution based on the biomimetic design approach to the recoil in the firearms that users are exposed to is proposed. In this context, main shock absorption principle of the woodpecker's head was investigated and used as a source of inspiration in the handle design of the Remington 870 model firearm by using the structural analogy method. Axial and total deformation, reaction force and stress values were assessed together by comparing the original pistol grip model currently used with the models designed using the biomimetic design approach, and suggestions were brought for grip scanning to minimize the recoil in firearms.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• firearms
• impact damping
• biomimetic
• recoil dynamics

Kaynakça

1. [1] Hall, M.J., “Measuring felt recoil of sporting arms”, International Journal of Impact Engineering 35: 540–548, (2008).
2. [2] Tuncer D.G., Alli H., “Ağır Silahların geri tepme mekanizmalarının tasarımında iç balistik modelinin olusturulması ve kama kuvvetinin hesaplanması”, 2. Ulusal Tasarım İmalat ve Analiz Kongresi, Balıkesir, 413-425, (2010).
3. [3] Yalamanchili R., “New Concepts in Recoil Mechanism”, Large Caliber Weapon Systems Laboratory US Army Armament Research and Development Command, Pg:425-427.
4. [4] Lonzi B., Martarelli M., “Measurement of firing impulse force in rifles”, Proceedings Of Isma2014 Includıng USD2014, Pg: 2066-2075, (2014).
5. [5] Yuan K.C., Lee Y.H., “Effects of rifle weight and handling length on shooting performance”, Applied Ergonomics, 28:2, 121-127, (1997).
6. [6] Sekulova K. C., Bures M., “Ergonomic Analysis of a Firearm According to the Anthropometric Dimension”, Applied Ergonomics Procedia Engineering, 100: 609 – 616. (2015).
7. [7] Thielen M., Schmitt1 C.N.Z., Eckert S., Speck T., Seidel R., “Structure–function relationship of the foam-like pomelo peel (Citrus maxima)—an inspiration for the development of biomimetic damping materials with high energy dissipation.”Bioinspiration& Biomimetics 8(2):025001
8. [8] https://asknature.org/strategy/spines-work-as-shock-absorbers/

9. [9] Nayeon L., Zhen L., Sungkwang M., Johnson K.L., Horstemeyer M.F., “The Function of Horn Ridges for Impact Damping”, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3322822 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3322822
10. [10] Wang L, Lu S, Liu X, Niu X, Wang C, Ni Y, Zhao M, Feng C, Zhang M, Fan Y., “Biomechanism of impact resistance in the woodpecker's head and its application.” Sci China Life Sci. 56:8, 715-719. 2013.
11. [11] Ulaş, E. C. , Başak, H. & Akkurt, A., “Araç Koltuğu Sırt Desteğinin Biyomimetik Tabanlı Tasarımı ve Analizi.” Politeknik Dergisi, 2022. DOI: 10.2339/politeknik.1056314
12. [12] Akter A.Y., Basak H., “Design and analysis of biomimetics based excavator bucket and tooth.” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering. 236:3, 1167-1175, 2022.
13. [13] Jung Y.E., Naleway S.E., Yaraghi N.A., Herrera S., Sherman V.R., Bushong E. A, Ellisman M.H., Kisailus D., McKittrick J., “Structural Analysis of Tongue and Hyoid Apparatus of Woodpeckers”. Acta Biomaterialia 37: 1-13, (2016).
14. [14] Zhu, D.Z., Ma. G.J., “Numerical Study of the Impact Response of the Woodpecker’s Head.” AIP Advances, 042173. (2012).
15. [15] Gibson L.J., “Woodpecker pecking: how woodpeckers avoid brain injury”, Journal of Zoology. 270: 462-465 (2006).
16. [16] Fan Y., etc. “Biomechanism of impact resistance in the woodpecker’s head and its application”, Science China Life Sciences, 56: 715-719. (2013).
17. [17] Wang L., Cheung J.T., Pu F., Li D., Zhang M., Fan Y., “Why Do Woodpeckers Resist Head Impact Injury: A Biomechanical Investigation”, PlosONE,6:10, 1-8, (2011).
18. [18] Vincent, J. F. V., Sahinkaya, M. N., O'shea W. “A woodpecker hammer”. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 221:10, 1141-1147, (2007).
19. [19] Liu Y. Qui, X., “Response of Woodpecker’s Head During Pecking Process Simulated by Material Point Method”, PlosONE, 10:4, 1-8. (2015).