İŞLETME/YÖNETİMİ PERSPEKTİFİNDEN ÜRÜN TASARIMI LİTERATÜRÜNÜN BİBLİYOMETRİK ANALİZ YÖNTEMİYLE İNCELENMESİ

Öz

Günümüz rekabet koşullarında, ürün tasarımının önemi her zamankinden daha fazla öne çıkmaktadır. Hızla değişen pazar talepleri, artan tüketici beklentileri ve yoğun küresel rekabet, firmaların yalnızca işlevsel ve kaliteli ürünler sunmalarını değil, aynı zamanda estetik, yenilikçi ve sürdürülebilir ürünler geliştirmelerini de zorunlu kılmaktadır. Ürün tasarımı ile ilgili çalışmaların özellikle 2010 yılı itibariyle artış göstermesi ve ulusal literatürde konu ile ilgili sınırlı sayıda yayın olması; ayrıca ürün tasarımı ile ilgili bibliyometrik analiz çalışmalarının uluslararası yazında oldukça sınırlı olması, Türkçe yazında ise hiç bulunmaması nedeniyle bu çalışmada, ürün tasarımı literatürünün tarihsel süreçteki gelişimini ortaya koymak üzere ürün tasarımının uluslararası alan yazında “işletme” ve “yönetim” (İşletme/Yönetimi) çerçevesinden bibliyometrik analizi gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışma, ürün tasarımı alanındaki bilgi birikimini sistematik olarak sunması ve belirli kriterler doğrultusunda gerçekleştirilen analizlerin bulgularını görselleştirerek mevcut durumu ortaya koyması ve gelecekteki araştırmalara yön vermesi açısından büyük önem taşımaktadır. Ayrıca, ürün tasarımı konusunda Türkçe literatürde yapılan ilk bibliyometrik çalışma olması nedeniyle de ayrı bir öneme sahiptir. Bu çalışma, alandaki önemli boşlukları doldurmanın yanı sıra hem araştırmacılar hem de iş dünyasındaki profesyoneller için farkındalık yaratma hedefi taşımaktadır. Araştırmanın gerçekleştirilmesi için Web of Science (WoS) veri tabanından alınan 1406 makale VOSviewer programı ile analiz edilmiştir. Yapılan bu bibliyometrik analiz performans analizi ve bilimsel alan haritalama olmak üzere iki bölümde sunulmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ürün
• Ürün Tasarımı
• Bibliyometrik Analiz
• VOSviewer.

A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF THE LITERATURE ON PRODUCT DESIGN FROM A BUSINESS/MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVE

Öz

The importance of product design in today's competitive environment is more significant than ever. Rapidly changing market demands, increasing consumer expectations, and intense global competition compel companies to offer functional high-quality products and develop innovative, aesthetically pleasing, and sustainable solutions. This study focuses on the notable increase in product design-related research, especially since 2010, and addresses the limited number of publications on this topic in the national literature. A bibliometric analysis in international literature was conducted to examine the historical development of product design in the context of "business", "management" (Business/Management) disciplines. This study's importance lies in its systematic presentation of the accumulated knowledge in the field of product design, using specific criteria to analyze and visualize the findings. Doing so reflects the field's current state and offers guidance for future research. As this is the first study using bibliometric analysis in Turkish literature on product design, it fills a critical gap in the field and is expected to raise awareness among researchers and industry professionals. The bibliometric analysis was conducted using 1,406 articles retrieved from the Web of Science (WoS) database using the VOSviewer software. The results are presented in two sections, ie., performance analysis and scientific field mapping.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Product
• Product Design
• Bibliometric Analysis
• VOSviewer.

Kaynakça

1. Aaker, D. A. (1991). Managing brand equity: Capitalizing on the value of a brand name. The Free Press.
2. Amankwah-Amoah, J., Khan, Z., Wood, G., & Knight, G. (2021). COVID-19 and digitalization: The great acceleration. Journal of Business Research, 136, 602–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.011
3. Anderson, E. W., Fornell, C., & Rust, R. T. (1997). Customer satisfaction, productivity, and profitability: Differences between goods and services. Marketing Science, 16(2), 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.16.2.129
4. Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. W. (2009). Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science, 20(4), 696–717. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0406
5. Archambault, É., Campbell, D., Gingras, Y., & Larivière, V. (2009). Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(7), 1320-1326. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21062
6. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
7. Avci, I., Koçan, M., & Kirmizibiber, A. (2024). Evaluation of consumers' use of smart robotic vacuum cleaners under extended expectation-confirmation model. Market-Tržište, 36(1), 25-42. https://doi.org/10.22598/mt/2024.36.1.25
8. Bacaksız, P. (2013). Ürün tasarımının tüketicinin ürüne yönelik tutumları üzerine etkisi: A markası tüketicileri üzerine bir uygulama [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Anadolu University.

9. Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139-168. https://doi.org/10.1086/209154
10. Berkowitz, M. (1987). Product shape as a design innovation strategy. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 4(4), 274-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/0737-6782(87)90031-2
11. Bloch, P. H. (1995). Seeking the ideal form: Product design and consumer response. Journal of Marketing, 59(3), 16-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299505900302
12. Bloch, P. H. (2011). Product design and marketing: Reflections after fifteen years. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(3), 378-380. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00805.x
13. Bloch, P. H., Brunel, F. F., & Arnold, T. J. (2003). Individual differences in the centrality of visual product aesthetics: Concept and measurement. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(4), 551-565. https://doi.org/10.1086/346250
14. Baudrillard, J. (1998). The consumer society: Myths and structures (C. Turner, Trans.). Sage Publications. (Original work published 1970)
15. Brown, T. (2009). Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. Harper Business.
16. Büyükpilavcı, C. (2014). Kitlesel fonlamanın ürün tasarımcıları için sunduğu fırsatlar: Türkiye'deki kitlesel fonlama platformları üzerine bir inceleme [Unpublished master's thesis]. Istanbul Technical University.
17. Çelik, B., Schwarz, J. A., & Tan, B. (2024). New product introductions with selection of unique and common features in monopoly markets. Omega, 125, Article 103018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2023.103018
18. Chai, K.-H., & Xiao, X. (2012). Understanding design research: A bibliometric analysis of Design Studies (1996–2010). Design Studies, 33(1), 24-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.06.004
19. Chen, C., Ibekwe-SanJuan, F., & Hou, J. (2010). The structure and dynamics of co-citation clusters: A multiple-perspective co-citation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(7), 1386-1409. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21309
20. Chitturi, R., Raghunathan, R., & Mahajan, V. (2008). Delight by design: The role of hedonic versus utilitarian benefits. Journal of Marketing, 72(3), 48–63. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.72.3.48
21. Clark, K. B., & Fujimoto, T. (1991). Product development performance: Strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry. Harvard Business School Press.
22. Creusen, M. E. H., & Schoormans, J. P. L. (2005). The different roles of product appearance in consumer choice. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22(1), 63-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0737-6782.2005.00103.x
23. Crilly, N., Moultrie, J., & Clarkson, P. J. (2004). Seeing things: Consumer response to the visual domain in product design. Design Studies, 25(6), 547-577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2004.03.001
24. Cross, N. (2008). Engineering design methods: Strategies for product design. John Wiley & Sons.
25. Desmet, P. M. A., & Hekkert, P. (2007). Framework of product experience. International Journal of Design, 1(1), 57-66. https://www.ijdesign.org/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/66/15
26. Di Crosta, A., Ceccato, I., Marchetti, D., La Malva, P., Maiella, R., Cannito, L., Cipi, M., Mammarella, N., Palumbo, R., Verrocchio, M. C., Palumbo, R., & Di Domenico, A. (2021). Psychological factors and consumer behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLOS ONE, 16(8), e0256095. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256095
27. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
28. Eisenmann, M. (2013). Understanding aesthetic innovation in the context of technological evolution. Academy of Management Review, 38 (3), 332-351. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0262
29. Erdem, S. (2018). Gelişmekte olan ekonomilerde gıda sektöründe yeni ürün tasarımı ve teknoloji transferi [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Cukurova University.
30. Ertaş, E. (2002). Eş zamanlı mühendislik yaklaşımının tasarım ve ürün geliştirme faaliyetlerindeki rolü ve uygulaması [Unpublished master's thesis]. Gazi University.
31. Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal, 22(2), 338-342. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF
32. Fidanoğlu, A. (2021). Kurumsal sürdürülebilirlik oryantasyonun işletme performansına etkisinde sürdürülebilir tedarik ve ürün tasarımının aracılık ile tedarikçilerle entegrasyonun düzenleyici rolü [Unpublished master's thesis]. Hasan Kalyoncu University.
33. Fink, A. (2014). Conducting research literature reviews: From the internet to paper (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
34. Flynn, B. B., Schroeder, R. G., & Sakakibara, S. (1995). The impact of quality management practices on performance and competitive advantage. Decision Sciences, 26(5), 659–691. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1995.tb01445.x
35. Geng, D., Feng, Y., & Zhu, Q. (2020). Sustainable design for users: A literature review and bibliometric analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 27(24), 29824-29836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09283-1
36. Günay, S. (2010). Lüks tüketim eğilimi ve endüstri ürünleri tasarımı etkileşimi [Unpublished master's thesis]. Marmara University.
37. Hargadon, A., & Sutton, R. I. (1997). Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(4), 716–749. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393655
38. Hekkert, P., & Leder, H. (2008). Product aesthetics. In H. N. J. Schifferstein & P. Hekkert (Eds.), Product experience (pp. 259–285). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008045089-6.50013-7
39. Homburg, C., Schwemmle, M., & Kuehnl, C. (2015). New product design: Concept, measurement, and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 79(3), 41-56. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.14.0199
40. Idemen, E., & Elmadag, A. B. (2024). Unpacking product design awards: A qualitative inquiry into consumer perceptions and responses. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 27(5), 705–723. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-02-2023-0027
41. İmamoğlu, O. (2017). Bilgi transfer rotalarının ürün tasarım performansına etkisi [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Istanbul Technical University.
42. Ivanov, D., & Das, A. (2020). Coronavirus (COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2) and Supply Chain Resilience: A Research Note. International Journal of Integrated Supply Management, 13(1), 90-102. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISM.2020.107780
43. Jiang, P., Dieckmann, E., Han, J., & Childs, P. R. N. (2021). A bibliometric review of sustainable product design. Energies, 14(21), Article 6867. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14216867
44. Kafadar, O. (2009). Rekabetçi üstünlüğün sağlanmasında ürün tasarımı: Türk mobilya sektöründen bir uygulama [Unpublished master's thesis]. Dokuz Eylul University.
45. Kara, H. (2011). Ürün tasarım sürecinde çevik üretim yaklaşımı ve ayakkabı sektöründe uygulama [Unpublished master's thesis]. Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University.
46. Karjalainen, T. M., & Snelders, D. (2010). Designing visual recognition for the brand. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(1), 6-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00696.x
47. Keller, K. L. (2003). Strategic brand management: Building, measuring, and managing brand equity (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall.
48. Kitapçı, H. (1997). Ürün tasarımı ve geliştirmede farklı yaklaşımlar ve bir otomotiv işletmesinde uygulama [Unpublished master's thesis]. Gebze Institute of Technology.
49. Kolko, J. (2015). Well-designed: How to use empathy to create products people love. Harvard Business Review Press.
50. Kotler, P. (1967). Marketing management: Analysis, planning, and control. Prentice Hall.
51. Kotler, P. (2003). Marketing management (11th ed.). Prentice Hall.
52. Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing management (15th ed.). Pearson.
53. Kotler, P., & Rath, G. A. (1984). Design: A powerful but neglected strategic tool. Journal of Business Strategy, 5(2), 16-21. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb039054
54. Krippendorff, K. (2006). The semantic turn: A new foundation for design. CRC Press.
55. Krishnan, V., & Ulrich, K. T. (2001). Product development decisions: A review of the literature. Management Science, 47(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.47.1.1.10668
56. Kumar, A., & Noble, C. H. (2016). Beyond form and function: Why do consumers value product design? Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 613-620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.05.017
57. Kunisch, S., Menz, M., Bartunek, J. M., Cardinal, L. B., & Denyer, D. (2018). Feature topic at Organizational Research Methods: How to conduct rigorous and impactful literature reviews? Organizational Research Methods, 21(3), 519–523. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428118770750
58. Lamb, C. W., Hair, J. F., & McDaniel, C. (2000). Marketing (5th ed.). South-Western College Publishing.
59. Lawson, B. (2006). How designers think: The design process demystified (4th ed.). Architectural Press.
60. Leydesdorff, L. (1998). Theories of citation? Scientometrics, 43(1), 5-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458391
61. Leydesdorff, L., & Rafols, I. (2009). A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(2), 348-362. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20967
62. Li, X., & Hitt, L. M. (2008). Self-selection and information role of online product reviews. Information Systems Research, 19(4), 456–474. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0154
63. Liedtka, J., & Ogilvie, T. (2011). Designing for growth: A design thinking toolkit for managers. Columbia University Press.
64. McCarthy, E. J. (1964). Basic Marketing: A Managerial Approach. Irwin.
65. McCracken, G. (1986). Culture and consumption: A theoretical account of the structure and movement of the cultural meaning of consumer goods. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(1), 71-84. https://doi.org/10.1086/209048
66. Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5
67. Mugge, R., Schoormans, J. P. L., & Schifferstein, H. N. J. (2008). Product attachment: Design strategies to stimulate the emotional bonding to products. Design Studies, 29(3), 331-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008045089-6.50020-4
68. Norman, D. A. (2004). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic Books.
69. Norris, M., & Oppenheim, C. (2007). Comparing alternatives to the Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences' literature. Journal of Informetrics, 1(2), 161-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2006.12.001
70. Orth, U. R., & Malkewitz, K. (2008). Holistic package design and consumer brand impressions. Journal of Marketing, 72(3), 64-81. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.72.3.064
71. Oruç, E. (1999). Ürün tasarım yönetimi ve Arçelik A.Ş.'de orbital tasarım uygulamasının incelenmesi [Unpublished master's thesis]. Anadolu University.
72. Pado, G. (2015). Açık inovasyonun müşteri entegrasyonu ve yeni ürün tasarım sürecinde ürün farklılaşma stratejisine olan etkisi ile sürdürülebilir stratejik rekabet üstünlüğü üzerine bir araştırma [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Istanbul Arel University.
73. Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J., & Grote, K.-H. (2007). Engineering design: A systematic approach. Springer.
74. Pandey, N., Patwardhan, A. A., & Rao, S. (2019). Four decades of new product development research: An integrative review. International Journal of Product Development, 23(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPD.2019.098385
75. Parker, G. G., & Van Alstyne, M. W. (2005). Two-sided network effects: A theory of information product design. Management Science, 51(10), 1494–1504. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0400
76. Petersen, K. J., Handfield, R. B., & Ragatz, G. L. (2005). Supplier integration into new product development: Coordinating product, process and supply chain design. Journal of Operations Management, 23(3-4), 371–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2004.07.009
77. Pilditch, J. (1976). Talk about design. Barrie & Jenkins.
78. Rahmanov, F., Mursalov, M., & Rosokhata, A. (2021). Consumer behavior in digital era: Impact of COVID-19. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 2, 243–251. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2021.2-20
79. Robinson, D. E. (1958). Fashion theory and product design. Harvard Business Review, 36(November/December), 126–138.
80. Sanchez, R., & Mahoney, J. T. (1996). Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171107
81. Schivinski, B., & Dabrowski, D. (2016). The effect of social media communication on consumer perceptions of brands. Journal of Marketing Communications, 22(2), 189-214. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2013.871323
82. Schmitt, B., & Simonson, A. (1997). Marketing aesthetics: The strategic management of brands, identity, and image. Free Press.
83. Şekerefeli, B. (2014). The effect of social CRM on product design: Case of marketing campaign design in retail businesses [Unpublished master's thesis]. Yeditepe University.
84. Sharma, A., Adhikary, A., & Borah, S. B. (2020). COVID-19′s impact on supply chain decisions: Strategic insights from NASDAQ 100 firms using Twitter data. Journal of Business Research, 117, 443–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.035
85. Small, H. (1999). Visualizing science by citation mapping. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(9), 799-813. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:9<799::AID-ASI9>3.0.CO;2-G
86. Türk Ticaret Kanunu (6102 Sayılı Kanun). (2011). Resmî Gazete (Sayı: 27846). Erişim adresi: https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr
87. Ulrich, K. (1995). The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Research Policy, 24(3), 419-440. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(94)00775-3
88. Ulrich, K. T., & Eppinger, S. D. (2004). Product design and development (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
89. Ulrich, K. T., & Eppinger, S. D. (2012). Product design and development (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
90. Verganti, R. (2008). Design, meanings, and radical innovation: A metamodel and a research agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(5), 436-456. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00313.x
91. Veryzer, R. W. (1995). The place of product design and aesthetics in consumer research. ACR North American Advances. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:168335914
92. Veryzer, R. W. (1999). A nonconscious processing explanation of consumer response to product design. Psychology & Marketing, 16(6), 497-522. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(199909)16:6<497::AID-MAR4>3.0.CO;2-Z
93. Veryzer, R. W., & Borja de Mozota, B. (2005). The impact of user-oriented design on new product development: An examination of fundamental relationships. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22(2), 128-143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0737-6782.2005.00110.x
94. Veryzer, R. W., & Hutchinson, J. W. (1998). The influence of unity and prototypicality on aesthetic responses to new product designs. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 374–394. https://doi.org/10.1086/209516
95. Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), xiii-xxiii. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4132319
96. Wheelwright, S. C., & Clark, K. B. (1992). Revolutionizing product development: Quantum leaps in speed, efficiency, and quality. The Free Press.
97. White, H. D., & Griffith, B. C. (1981). Author co-citation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32(3), 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630320302
98. Yalçın, D. (2020). Ürün tasarım sürecinde iş antropolojisinin girdi olarak kullanılması: Endüstri 4.0 ile ürün/hizmet üreten işletmeler üzerine bir uygulama [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Marmara University.
99. Yalçın, S. (2005). Müşteri odaklı yeni ürün geliştirme aracı olarak hedef maliyetleme ve kalite fonksiyon yayılımının mobilya sektöründe uygulanabilirliğinin analizi [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Dumlupınar University.
100. Yang, X., & Suhaily, S. S. (2024). An overview of decade-long product design sustainability studies: Regional overviews through a bibliometric lens. Journal of Electrical Systems, 20(7s), 2369–2379. https://doi.org/10.52783/jes.3986
101. Yang, X., Majid, A. Z. A., Tiantian, M., & Guangyu, Z. (2021). Ten decades of research on sustainability of product design: A bibliometric analysis of trends across regions. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 25(6), 1-18. https://www.abacademies.org/articles/ten-decades-of-research-on-sustainability-of-product-design-a-bibliometric-analysis-of-trends-a-cross-regions-12842.html
102. Yılmaz, H. (2009). Optimization of the product design through quality function deployment (QFD) and analytical hierarchy process (AHP): A case study in a ceramic washbasin [Unpublished master's thesis]. Izmir Institute of Technology.
103. Yolaçan, K. B. (2007). Tasarımda tasarruf [Unpublished master's thesis]. Marmara University.
104. Zan, B. U. (2019). Doğrudan atıf, ortak atıf ve bibliyografik eşleşme yaklaşımlarına dayalı olarak araştırma alanlarının değerlendirilmesi. Sosyal Bilimler Araştırma Dergisi, 14(2), 501–516. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/sosbilder/issue/50832/662490
105. Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298805200302
106. Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629