ÇEVRECİ SATIN ALIM KARARLARINI BELİRLEYEN FAKTÖRLER: İÇ VE DIŞ CEPHE BOYALARININ SATIN ALIMI BAĞLAMINDA BİLECİK İLİNDE BİR UYGULAMA

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı; tüketicilerin çevre duyarlılıkları, çevreyi koruma konusundaki inançları, oluşturmak istedikleri çevreci imajları, sosyal normları ve çevreci tutumlarının yapı marketlerde satılan iç ve dış cephe boyalarının satın alma kararları üzerindeki etkilerini ortaya koymaktır. Bu amaçla, Makul Davranış TRA ve Planlı Davranış TPB Teorilerinde öne sürülen inanç, tutum ve davranışsal eğilim zincirini temel alan teorik araştırma modeli oluşturulmuştur. Teorik modelde; duyarlılık, inançlar ve sosyal normlar dışsal değişkenler; tutum ile satın alma eğilimleri ise içsel değişkenler olarak ele alınmıştır. Araştırmada gözatım yöntemi benimsenmiş ve oluşturulan anket formu yardımıyla, Bilecik’te faaliyet gösteren bir yapı marketin müşterilerinden kolayda örnekleme yöntemiyle 240 katılımcıdan veri toplanmıştır. Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi PLS-SEM kullanılarak yapılan analizler sonucunda; tüketicilerin çevre duyarlılıklarının çevre dostu boyaları satın alma eğilimlerini olumlu yönde etkilediği ancak söz konusu boyaları satın almalarına karşı tutumları üzerinde anlamlı etkisinin bulunmadığı tespit edilmiştir. Tüketicilerin çevreyi koruma konusundaki inançlarının ise, çevre dostu boyaları satın almaya karşı tutumları üzerinde olumlu yönde etkiye sahip olduğu görülmüştür. Katılımcıların çevreci olma konusunda yarattıkları kişisel imajın, çevre dostu boya satın almaya karşı tutumları üzerinde olumlu yönde etkisi olduğu ve katılımcıların satın almaya karşı tutumlarının, satın alma eğilimleri üzerinde olumlu yönde etkiye sahip olduğu yapılan araştırmalarla ortaya konulan diğer sonuçlardır

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Çevreci tüketim davranışı,çevre duyarlılığı,makul davranış teorisi TRA,planlı davranış teorisi TPB

Öz

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the effects of consumer environmental sensitivities, environmental beliefs, environmentalist images, social norms and environmentalist attitudes on the purchase decisions of interior and exterior paints sold in construction markets. For this purpose, a theoretical research model based on the beliefattitude-behavior chain posited by Theory of Reasoned Action TRA and Theory of Planned Behavior TPB has been formed. In the theoretical model; sensitivity, beliefs and social norms are exogenous variables; attitude and purchasing tendencies are considered as endogenous variables. In this study, the browsing method was used and the data were collected with the help of a questionnaire form from a sample of 240 the customers of a building market in Bilecik. The research model was tested on the collected data using Partial Least Squares PLS-SEM technique. As a result of the analysis; It was determined that consumers’ environmental sensitivities had a positive effect on their tendency to buy environmentally friendly paints, but they did not have a significant effect on their attitudes towards purchasing these paints. Consumers’ belief in protecting the environment has a significant positive effect on their attitude towards buying environmentally friendly paints. The results of the research show that the personal image created by the participants on the environment has a positive effect on their attitudes towards buying environmentally friendly paint and the attitudes of the participants towards the purchase have a significant and positive effect on the purchasing tendencies

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Environmental consumption behavior,environmental sensitivity,theory of reasonable action TRA,theory of planned behavior TPB

Kaynakça

1. Agapito, D., Valle, P. O. ve Mendes, J. C. (2013). The Cognitive-Affective- Conative Model of Destination Image: A Confirmatory Analysis. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 30(5): 471-481.
2. Akehurst, G., Afonso, C. ve Gonçalves, H.M. (2012). Re-Examining Green Purchase Behaviour and the Green Consumer Profile: New Evidences. Management Decision, 50(5): 972-988.
3. Alsmadi, S. (2007). Green Marketing and the Concern Over the Environment: Measuring Environmental Consciousness of Jordanian Consumers. Journal of Promotion Management, 13(4): 339-361.
4. Anderson, J. C. ve Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural Equation Modelling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3): 411–423.
5. Ando, K., Ohnuma, S. ve Chang, E. C. (2007). Comparing Normative Influences as Determinants of Environmentally Conscious Behaviours Between The USA and Japan. Asian Journal Of Social Psychology, 10(3): 171-178.
6. Andreoni, J. ve Bernheim, B. D. (2009). Social Image and the 50–50 Norm: A Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of Audience Effects. Econometrica, 77(5): 1607–36.
7. Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behaviour. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Process, 50(2): 179-211.
8. Aracıoğlu, B. ve Tatlıdil, R. (2009). Tüketicilerin Satın Alma Davranışında Çevre Bilincinin Etkileri. Ege Akademik Bakış, 9(2): 435-461.

9. Asyraf, W. M. ve Afthanorhan B. W. (2013). A Comparison Of Partial Least Square Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) and Covariance Based Structural Equation Modeling (CB-SEM) for Confirmatory Factor Analysis. International Journal of Engineering Science and Innovative Technology (IJESIT), 2(5): 198-205.
10. Babin, L.A. ve Burns, A.C. (1998). A Modified Scale for the Measurement of Communication Evoked Mental Imagery. Psychology & Marketing, 15(3): 261-278.
11. Baca-Motes, K., Brown, A., Gneezy, A., Keenan, E. A. ve Nelson, L. D. (2013). Commitment and Behavior Change: Evidence From the Field. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(5): 1070-1084.
12. Bartels, J. ve Onwezen, M. C. (2014). Consumers’ Willingness to Buy Products With Environmental and Ethical Claims: The Roles of Social Representations and Social Identity. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 38(1): 82-89.
13. Bator, R. ve Cialdini, R. (2000). The Application of Persuasion Theory to The Development of Effective Proenvironmental Public Service Announcements. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3): 527-542.
14. Bhattacharya, C. B., Rao, H. ve Glynn, M. A. (1995). Understanding the Bond of Identification: An Investigation of Its Correlates Among Art Museum Members. The Journal of Marketing, 59(4): 46-57.
15. Bartels, J. ve Reinders, M. J. (2010). Social Identification, Social Representations, and Consumer Innovativeness in an Organic Food Context: A Cross- National Comparison. Food Quality and Preference, 21(4): 347-352.
16. Black, J. S., Stern, P. C. ve Elworth, J. T. (1985). Personal and Contextual Influences on Househould Energy Adaptations. Journal Of Applied Psychology, 70(1): 3-21.
17. Bohlen, G., Schlegelmilch, B. B. ve Diamantopoulos, A. (1993). Measuring Ecological Concern: A Multi-construct Perspective. Journal of Marketing Management, 9(4): 415-430.
18. Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R. ve Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct: Recycling the Concept of Norms to Reduce Littering in Public Places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6): 1015-1026.
19. Cialdini, R. B., Kallgren, C. A. ve Reno, R. R. (1991). A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct: A Theoretical Refinement and Reevaluation of the Role of Norms in Human Behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24(20): 201-243.
20. Cialdini, R.B. ve Trost, M.R. (1998). Social Influence: Social Norms, Conformity and Compliance. S.T. Fiske and G. Lindzey (Ed.), Handbook of Social Psyhology, New York: McGraw Hill
21. Cialdini, R. B. (2003). Crafting Normative Messages to Protect The Environment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(4): 105-109.
22. Cleveland, M., Kalamas, M. ve Laroche, M. (2005). Shades of Green: Linking Environmental Locus of Control And Pro-Environmental Behaviors. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 22(4): 198-212.
23. Cordano, M., Welcomer, S., Scherer, R., Pradenas, L. ve Parada, V. (2010). Understanding Cultural Differences in The Antecedents of Pro- Environmental Behavior: A Comparative Analysis of Business Students in The United States and Chile. The Journal of Environmental Education, 41(4): 224-238.
24. Compeau, D. R. ve Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure Initial Test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2): 189-211.
25. Chin, W. W. ve Gopal, A. (1995). Adoption Intention in GSS: Relative Importance of Beliefs. ACM SigMIS Database, 26(2-3): 42-64.
26. Çabuk, B. ve Karacaoğlu, Ö. C. (2003). Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Çevre Duyarlılıklarının İncelenmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 36(1-2): 189-198.
27. Çabuk, S., İnan, H. ve Südaş, H. D. (2010). Gıda Perakendecilerinin Çevre Duyarlılığı Üzerine Bir İnceleme. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10(3): 1-10.
28. Çelik, H. (2011). Influence of Social Norms, Perceived Playfulness and Online Shopping Anxiety on Customers’ Adoption of Online Retail Shopping: An Empirical Study in the Turkish Context. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 39(6): 390-413.
29. Çelik, H. (2016). Customer Online Shopping Anxiety Within the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use Technology (UTAUT) Framework. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 28(2): 278-307
30. Çifci, S. ve Şakacı, B.K. (2015). Çevre Bilinçli Tüketicilerin Firmaları Ödüllendirme ve Cezalandırma İsteklilikleri: Kadın ve Erkek Tüketiciler Arasındaki Farklılıklar. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 10(1): 287-296.
31. Dagher, G. K. ve Itani, O. (2014). Factors Influencing Green Purchasing Behaviour: Empirical Evidence From The Lebanese Consumers. Journal Of Consumer Behaviour, 13(3): 188-195.
32. Diamantopoulos, A., Schlegelmilch, B. D., Sinkovics, R. R. ve Bohlen, G.M. (2003). Can Socio Demographics Still Play a Role in Profiling Green Consumers? A Review of the Evidence and an Empirical Investigation. Journal of Business Research, 56(6): 465-480.
33. Fishbein, M. ve Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, Reading.
34. Dembkowski, S. ve Hanmer-Lloyd, S. (1994). The Environmental Value- Attitude-System Model: A Framework to Guide the Understanding of Environmentally-Conscious Consumer Behaviour. Journal of Marketing Management, 10(7): 593-603.
35. Deutsch, M. ve Gerard, H. B. (1955). A Study of Normative And Informational Social Influences Upon Individual Judgment. The Journal Of Abnormal And Social Psychology, 51(3): 629-636.
36. Diekmann, A. ve Preisendörfer, P. (1998). Environmental Behavior: Discrepancies Between Aspirations and Reality. Rationality and Society, 10(1): 79-102.
37. Dıraz, T. (2006). Inorganik – Organik Hybrit Polysiloksan Boyalar. Boya/Paint Konferansı. https://www.academia.edu. Erişim Tarihi: 28.05.2019
38. Doğan, O., Bulut, Z. A. ve Çımrın, F. K. (2015). Bireylerin Sürdürülebilir Tüketim Davranışlarının Ölçülmesine Yönelik Bir Ölçek Geliştirme Çalışması. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 29(4): 659-678.
39. Eskildsen, J., Kristensen, K., Juhl, H.J. ve Ostergaard, P. (2004). The Drivers of Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty: The Case of Denmark 2000-2002. Total Quality Management, 15(5/6): 859-868.
40. Fishbein, M. ve Ajzen, I. (1977a). Attitude-Behavior Relations: A Theoretical Analysis and Review of Empirical Research, Psychological Bulletin, 84(5): 88-918.
41. Fishbein, M. ve Ajzen, I. (1977b). Attitudes and Opinions. Annual Review of Psychology, 23, 487-544.
42. Follows, S. ve Jobber, D. (2000). Environmentally Responsible Purchase Behavior: A Test of a Consumer Model. European Journal of Marketing, 34(5): 723-746.
43. Fraj, E. ve Martinez, E. (2007). Ecological Consumer Behaviour: An Empirical Analysis. International Journal of Marketing, 31(1), 26–33.
44. Gedik, T., Kurutkan, M. N. ve Çil, M. (2014). Yeşil Pazarlama Algısı ve Yeşil Satın Alma Davranışı: Düzce Üniversitesi Örneği. Ormancılık Dergisi, 10(1): 1-13.
45. Gefen, D. ve Straub, D. (2005). A Practical Guide To Factorial Validity Using PLS-Graph: Tutorial And Annotated Example. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16(1): 91-110.
46. Goldstein, N. J., Cialdini, R. B. ve Griskevicius, V. (2008). A Room With a Viewpoint: Using Social Norms to Motivate Environmental Conservation in Hotels. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3): 472-482.
47. Goldstein, N. J. ve Cialdini, R. B. (2009). Normative Influences on Consumption and Conservation Behaviors’, Psyhology of Consumer Behavior’. Michaela Wanke (Editör), New York: Taylor and Francis Group.
48. Gonçalves, H. M., Lourenço, T. F. ve Silva, G. M. (2016). Green Buying Behavior and The Theory of Consumption Values: A Fuzzy-Set Approach. Journal Of Business Research, 69(4): 1484-1491.
49. Göckeritz, S., Schultz, P., Rendón, T., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J. ve Griskevicius, V. (2010). Descriptive Normative Beliefs and Conservation Behavior: The Moderating Roles of Personal Involvement and Injunctive Normative Beliefs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(3): 514-523.
50. Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M. ve Van den Bergh, B. (2010). Going Green to Be Seen: Status, Reputation, and Conspicuous Conservation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98 (3): 392–404.
51. Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M. ve Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2): 139-152.
52. Harland, P., Staats, H. ve Wilke, H. A. (1999). Explaining Proenvironmental Intention and Behavior by Personal Norms And The Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(12): 2505-2528.
53. Harland, P., Staats, H. ve Wilke, H. A. (2007). Situational and Personality Factors as Direct or Personal Norm Mediated Predictors of Pro-Environmental Behavior: Questions Derived From Norm-Activation Theory. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 29(4): 323-334.
54. Hines, J. M., Hungerford, H. R. ve Tomera, A. N. (1987). Analysis and Synthesis of Research on Responsible Environmental Behavior: A Meta-Analysis. The Journal of Environmental Education, 18(2): 1-8.
55. Henseler, J., Dijkstra, T. K., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Diamantopoulos, A., Straub, D. W., ve Calantone, R. J. (2014). Common Beliefs and Reality about PLS: Comments on Rönkkö and Evermann (2013). Organizational Research Methods, 17(2): 182-209.
56. Henseler, J., Hubona, G., ve Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS Path Modeling in New Technology Research: Updated Guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(1): 2-20.
57. Kalafatis S, Pollard M, East R. ve Tsogas M. (1999). Green Marketing and Ajzen’s Theory of Planned Behaviour: A Cross-Market Examination. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 16(5): 441–460.
58. Kerr, N. L., Garst, J., Lewandowski, D. A. ve Harris, S. E. (1997). That Still, Small Voice: Commitment to Cooperate as an Internalized Versus a Social Norm. Personality And Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(12): 1300-1311.
59. Kilbourne, W. ve Gregory P. (2008). How Materialism Affects Environmental Beliefs, Concern, and Environmentally Responsible Behavior. Journal of Business Research, 61(9): 885-893.
60. Kim, Y. ve Choi S. (2005). Antecedents of Green Purchase Behaviour: An Examination Of Collectivism, Environmental Concern and PCE. Advances in Consumer Research, 32: 592–599.
61. Kollmuss, A. ve Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind The Gap: Why do People Act Environmentally and What are the Barriers to Pro-Environmental Behavior?. Environmental Education Research, 8(3): 239-260.
62. Kristensen, K., Martensen, A. ve Gronholdt, L. G. L. (1999). Measuring the Impact of Buying Behaviour on Customer Satisfaction. Total Quality Management, 10(4/5): 602-614.
63. Kuduz, N. ve Zerenler, M. (2013). Yeşil Pazarlama. Ankara: Nobel
64. Lee, J. A. ve Holden, S. J. S. (1999). Understanding the Determinants of Environmentally Conscious Behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 16(5): 373-392.
65. Lee, K. (2008). Opportunities for Green Marketing: Young Consumers. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 26(6): 573-586.
66. Lee, K. (2010). The Green Purchase Behavior of Hong Kong Young Consumers: The Role Of Peer Influence, Local Environmental Involvement, and Concrete Environmental Knowledge. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 23(1): 21-44.
67. Mainieri, T., Barnett, E. G., Valdero, T. R., Unipan, J. B. ve Oskamp, S. (1997). Green Buying: The Influence of Environmental Concern on Consumer Behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, 137(2): 189-204.
68. Matthies, E., Selge, S. ve Klöckner, C. A. (2012). The Role of Parental Behaviour For The Development of Behaviour Specific Environmental Norms–The Example of Recycling And Re-Use Behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(3): 277-284.
69. McCarty, J.A. ve Shrum, L. J. (1993). Structural Equation Analysis of The Relationships of Personal Values, Attitudes and Beliefs About Recycling, and The Recycling of Solid Waste Products. Advances in Consumer Research, 20(1): 641-646.
70. McKenna, B., Tuunanen, T., ve Gardner, L. (2013). Consumers’ Adoption of Information Services. Information & Management, 50(5): 248-257.
71. Nigbur, D., Lyons E. ve Uzzell D. (2010). Attitudes, Norms, Identity and Environmental Behaviour: Using an Expanded Theory of Planned Behaviour to Predict Participation in a Kerbside Recycling Programme. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49(2): 259-284.
72. Nyborg, K., Howarth, R. B. ve Brekke, K. A. (2006). Green Consumers and Public Policy: on Socially Contingent Moral Motivation. Resource and Energy Economics, 28(4): 351-366.
73. Okun, M. A., Karoly P. ve Lutz R. (2002). Clarifying the Contribution of Subjective Norm to Predicting Leisure-Time Exercise. American Journal of Health Behavior, 26(4): 296-305.
74. Öndoğan, E. N. (2018). Hazır Giyim Sektörü ve Yeşil Pazarlama. Ç.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 27(2), 97-110
75. Özer, L., Kement, Ü. ve Gültekin, B. (2015). Genişletilmiş Planlanmış Davranış Teorisi Kapsamında Yeşil Yıldızlı Otelleri Tekrar Ziyaret Etme Niyeti. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 33(4): 59-85.
76. Pickett-Baker, J. ve Ozaki, R. (2008). Pro-environmental Products: Marketing Influence on Consumer Purchase Decision. Journal Of Consumer Marketing, 25(5): 281-293.
77. Rahbar, E. ve Wahid, N. A., (2010). The Malaysian Consumer and The Environment: Purchase Behavior. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal, 2(4): 323-336.
78. Roberts J. (1996). Green Consumers in The 1990s: Profile and Implications For Advertising. Journal of Business Research, 36(3): 217–231.
79. Rigdon, E. E. (2016). Choosing PLS Path Modeling as Analytical Method in European Management Research: A Realist Perspective. European Management Journal, 34(6): 598-605.
80. Ritter, A. M., Borchardt, M., Vaccaro, L. R. ve Pereira, G. M. (2015). Motivations for Promoting the Consumption of Green Products in an Emerging Country: Exploring Attitudes of Brazilian Consumers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106: 507-520.
81. Rivis, A., Sheeran, P. ve Armitage, C. J. (2006). Augmenting the Theory of Planned Behaviour with the Prototype/Willingness Model: Predictive Validity of Actor Versus Abstainer Prototypes for Adolescents’ Health-Protective and Health-Risk Intentions. British Journal of Health Psychology, 11(3): 483- 500.
82. Rönkkö, M., McIntosh, C. N., Antonakis, J., VE Edwards, J. R. (2016). Partial Least Squares Path Modeling: Time for Some Serious Second Thoughts. Journal of Operations Management, 47: 9-27.
83. Sawitri, D. R., Hadiyanto, H. ve Hadi, S. P. (2015). Pro-environmental Behavior from a SocialCognitive Theory Perspective. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 23: 27-33.
84. Schlegelmilch, B. D., Bohlen, G. M. ve Diamantopoulos, A. (1996). The Link Between Green Purchasing Decisions and Measures of Environmental Consciousness. European Journal of Marketing, 30(5): 35-55.
85. Schwartz, S. H. (1973). Normative Explanations of Helping Behavior: A Critique, Proposal, and Empirical Test. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9(4): 349-364.
86. Schultz, P. W. (1999). Changing Behavior With Normative Feedback Interventions: A Field Experiment on Curbside Recycling. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21(1): 25-36.
87. Stern P. (2000). Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behaviour. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3): 407–424.
88. Stolley, K. S. (2005). The Basics of Sociology. Connecticut: Greenwood Press,.
89. Tariq, M. Z. (2015). Impact of Green Advertisement and Green Brand Awareness on Green Satisfaction with Mediating Effect of Buying Behavior. Journal of Managerial Sciences, 8(2): 275-289.
90. Tenenhausa, M., EspositoVinzi, V. ve Chatelin, Y. M., Lauro C. (2005). PLS Path Modeling. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 48(1): 159-205.
91. Terzis, V., ve Economides, A. A. (2011). The Acceptance and Use of Computer Based Assessment. Computers & Education, 56(4): 1032-1044.
92. Thİgersen, J. (2006). Norms for Environmentally Responsible Behaviour: An Extended Taxonomy. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26(4): 247- 261.
93. Tsarenko, Y., Ferraro, C., Sands, S. ve McLeod, C. (2013). Environmentally Conscious Consumption: The Role of Retailers and Peers as External Influences. Journal Of Retailing And Consumer Services, 20(3): 302-310.
94. Urien, B. ve Kilbourne, W. (2011). Generativity and Self-Enhancement Values in Eco-Friendly Behavioral Intentions and Environmentally Responsible Consumption Behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 28(1): 69-90.
95. Van der Werff, E., Steg L. ve Keizer K. (2013). The Value of Environmental Self- Identity: The Relationship Between Biospheric Values, Environmental Self-Identity and Environmental Preferences, Intentions and Behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34: 55-63
96. Yeniçeri, T. (2008). Çevre Dostu Ürün Satın Alma Davranışına Yönelik Bir Modelin Test Edilmesi. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2(1): 1-24.
97. Yeniçeri, T. ve Güner, K. (2013). Tüketicilerin, Enerji Verimli Ürünleri Satın Alma Niyetini Belirlemeye Yönelik Bir Araştırma. 18.Ulusal Pazarlama Kongresi, 193-203.
98. Yılmaz, V., Çelik, H. E. ve Yağızer, C. (2009). Çevresel Duyarlılık ve Çevresel Davranışın Ekolojik Ürün Satın Alma Davranışına Etkilerinin Yapısal Eşitlik Modeliyle Araştırılması. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(2): 1-14.
99. Zhu, B. (2013). The Impact of Green Advertising on Consumer Purchase Intention of Green Products. World Review Of Business Research, 3(3): 72-80. http://www.turkcoat-paintistanbul.com (Erişim Tarihi: 31.12.2018)