Using Four-Tier Diagnostic Tests to Understand the Conceptions Held by Pre-Service Primary School Teachers about Sea Pollutant Migration

Öz

The territory of Indonesia is dominated by vast oceans. Therefore, Indonesian citizens should be equipped with a deep understanding about sea currents and sea pollution. This study aims to identify the conceptions held by pre-service primary school teachers about both sea currents and sea pollutant migration. The study also aims to identify whether pre-service primary school teachers see a relationship occurring between those conceptions. The study involved 147 pre-service primary school teachers from one of Indonesia’s teacher training institutions. Four-tier diagnostic tests were used to gather data about the conceptions of pre-service primary teachers. The data were interpreted and analyzed in a descriptive quantitative method. The results showed that pre-service primary school teachers’ conceptions about sea currents and sea pollutant migration were mostly in the category of ‘misconception’ and ‘have no conception’. The correlation test about the ability of pre-service primary school teachers to explain the concepts of and relationships between sea currents and sea pollutant migration was also not significant. The results of this study indicate a need to improve the quality of teaching and learning for pre-service primary school teachers about convection by linking it to sea currents and sea pollutant migration.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sea Currents,Sea Pollutant Migration,Convection,Rour-Tier Diagnostic Test,Pre-Service Teacher Education

Kaynakça

1. Ahi, B., Balci, S., & Alisinanoğlu, F. (2017). Exploring Turkish preservice teachers’ mental models of the environment: Are they related to gender and academic level? The Journal of Environmental Education, 48(3), 182–195.
2. Ainsworth, S., Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2011). Drawing to learn in Science. Science, 333(6046), 1096–1097.
3. Aksan, Z., & Çelikler, D. (2015). Evaluation of the knowledge and misconceptions of Science teacher candidates in Turkey regarding the greenhouse effect through the use of drawings. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(13), 112–120.
4. Anderson, J. L., Ellis, J. P., & Jones, A. M. (2014). Understanding early elementary children’s conceptual knowledge of plant structure and function through drawings. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13(3), 375–386.
5. Arslan, H. O., Cigdemoglu, C., & Moseley, C. (2012). A three-tier diagnostic test to assess pre-service teachers’ misconceptions about global warming, greenhouse effect, ozone layer depletion, and acid rain. International Journal of Science Education, 34(11), 1667–1686.
6. Bahar, M., Ozel, M., Prokop, P., & Usak, M. (2008). Science student teachers’ideas of the heart. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 7(2), 78-85.
7. Bahk, C. M. (2010). Environmental education through narrative films: Impact of medicine man on attitudes toward forest preservation. The Journal of Environmental Education, 42(1), 1–13.
8. Bernard, H. R., & Bernard, H. R. (2013). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Singapore: Sage Publications, Inc.

9. Bolscho, D., & Hauenschild, K. (2006). From environmental education to education for sustainable development in Germany. Environmental Education Research, 12(1), 7–18.
10. Boo, H. K. (2005, November). Teachers’ misconceptions of biological science concepts as revealed in science examination papers. Retrieved from https://repository.nie.edu.sg//handle/10497/4403
11. Bosschaart, A., Schee, J.V.D., & Kuiper, W. (2016). Designing a flood-risk education program in the Netherlands. The Journal of Environmental Education, 47(4), 271–286.
12. Çelikler, D., & Aksan, Z. (2014). Determination of knowledge and misconceptions of pre-service elementary Science teachers about the greenhouse effect by drawing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 136, 452–456. Chaniarosi, L. F. (2014). Identifikasi miskonsepsi guru Biologi SMA kelas XI IPA pada konsep sistem reproduksi manusia. Jurnal Edubio Tropika, 2(2), 187-250.
13. Chittleborough, G., & Treagust, D.F. (2007). The modelling ability of non-major Chemistry students and their understanding of the sub-microscopic level. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(3), 274–292.
14. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Singapore: Sage publications.
15. Einarsdottir, J., Dockett, S., & Perry, B. (2009). Making meaning: Children’s perspectives expressed through drawings. Early Child Development and Care, 179(2), 217–232.
16. Etobro, A. B., & Banjoko, S. O. (2017). Misconceptions of genetics concepts among pre-service teachers. Global Journal of Educational Research, 16(2), 121–128.
17. European Commission’s Directorate-General Environment. (2011). In-Depth Report Plastic Waste: Ecological and Human Health Impact. University of the West of England. (Bristol).
18. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2011). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw-Hill Humanities/Social Sciences/Languages.
19. Glynn, S., & Muth, K. D. (2008). Using drawing strategically. Science and Children, 45(9), 48–51.
20. Haney, W., Russell, M., & Bebell, D. (2004). Drawing on education: Using drawings to document schooling and support change. Harvard Educational Review, 74(3), 241–272.
21. Hussein, H. (2018). A critique of water scarcity discourses in educational policy and textbooks in Jordan. The Journal of Environmental Education, 49(3), 260–271.
22. Informasi Kinerja Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup Daerah Provinsi Jawa Timur. (2017). Laporan Utama. Environmental Agency of East Java Province. (Surabaya).
23. Kaltakci-Gurel, D., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2015). A review and comparison of diagnostic instruments to identify students’ misconceptions in science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(5), 989–1008.
24. Kaltakci-Gurel, D., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2017). Development and application of a four-tier test to assess pre-service physics teachers’ misconceptions about geometrical optics. Research in Science & Technological Education, 35(2), 238–260.
25. Kasimov, N., Malkhazova, S., & Romanova, E. (2002). The role of environmental education for sustainable development in Russian Universities. Planet, 8(1), 24–25.
26. Kurniawan, B. (2013). Water pollution control in Indonesia. Retrieved from http://wepa-db.net/activities/2014/20141127/pdf/1_4_WEPA-THAILAND-BUDI.pdf
27. Liu, S.-C., & Lin, H. (2015). Exploring undergraduate students’ mental models of the environment: Are they related to environmental affect and behavior? The Journal of Environmental Education, 46(1), 23–40.
28. Liu, S.-Y., Yeh, S.-C., Liang, S.-W., Fang, W.-T., & Tsai, H.-M. (2015). A national investigation of teachers' environmental literacy as a reference for promoting environmental education in Taiwan. The Journal of Environmental Education, 46(2), 114–132.
29. Lukmanudin. (2017). Penguasaan konsep IPA dan kemampuan menjelaskan fenomena perpindahan zat pencemar melalui pembelajaran RADEC. (Masters, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia). Retrieved from http://repository.upi.edu
30. Mahasneh, R. A., Romanowski, M. H., & Dajani, R. B. (2017). Reading social stories in the community: A promising intervention for promoting children’s environmental knowledge and behavior in Jordan. The Journal of Environmental Education, 48(5), 334–346.
31. Martinus, Y., Astono, W., & Hendrawan, D. (2018). Water quality study of Sunter River in Jakarta, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 106, 012022. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/106/1/012022
32. McDermott, L. C. (1991). Millikan Lecture 1990: What we teach and what is learned—Closing the gap. American Journal of Physics, 59(4), 301–315.
33. Meilinda, M., Rustaman, N., Firman, H., & Tjasyono, B. (2017). Development climate changes lecturer in Earth Science and Space Course and Environmental Course for pre-service Science teachers: 2nd Asian Education Symposium, 161–166. https://doi.org/10.5220/0007300401610166
34. Meng, M. D., & Trudel, R. (2017). Using emoticons to encourage students to recycle. The Journal of Environmental Education, 48(3), 196–204.
35. Murakami, C. D., Su-Russell, C., & Manfra, L. (2018). Analyzing teacher narratives in early childhood garden-based education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 49(1), 18–29.
36. Nazir, J. (2016). Using phenomenology to conduct environmental education research: Experience and issues. The Journal of Environmental Education, 47(3), 179–190.
37. Nurmalasari, R. (2016). Analisis representasi siswa SMP pada tema kalor dalam perubahan wujud zat (Masters, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia). Retrieved from http://repository.upi.edu
38. Ojala, M. (2015). Hope in the face of climate change: Associations with environmental engagement and student perceptions of teachers’ emotion communication style and future orientation. The Journal of Environmental Education, 46(3), 133–148.
39. Payne, P. G. (2016). The politics of environmental education. Critical inquiry and education for sustainable development. The Journal of Environmental Education, 47(2), 69–76.
40. Pridmore, P., & Bendelow, G. (1995). Images of health: Exploring beliefs of children using the ‘draw-and-write’ technique. Health Education Journal, 54(4), 473–488.
41. Prodjosantoso, A. K., Hertina, A. M., & Irwanto. (2019). The misconception diagnosis on ionic and covalent bonds concepts with three tier diagnostic test. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 1477–1488.
42. Punch, K. F. (2013). Introduction to Social Research: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. Singapore: SAGE.
43. Purba, N. P. (2017, October). Sampah dan solusi untuk kesehatan laut. Youth Marine Debris Summit, Jakarta, 24th - 29th 2017. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.32905.34406
44. Quillin, K., & Thomas, S. (2015). Drawing-to-learn: A framework for using drawings to promote model-based reasoning in Biology. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 14(1), 1-16.
45. Radcliffe, C., Parissi, C., & Raman, A. (2016). Valuing indigenous knowledge in the Highlands of Papua New Guinea: A model for Agricultural and Environmental Education. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 32(3), 243–259.
46. Rebolj, N., & Devetak, I. (2013). 15 and 16 years-old students’ understanding of factors that influence water pollution. Energy and Environment Research, 3(1), 106-114.
47. Rooy, W. V. (2017). Early preservice teachers’ experiences of the environment: A case study of participation in a community outdoor event. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 33(2), 81–96.
48. Sammel, A., McMartin, D., & Arbuthnott, K. (2018). Education agendas and resistance with the teaching and learning of freshwater and extreme freshwater events. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 34(1), 18–32.
49. Schwarz, C. V., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Kenyon, L., Achér, A., Fortus, D., . . . Krajcik, J. (2009). Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 632–654. Smith, J. A. (2004). Reflecting on the development of interpretative phenomenological analysis and its contribution to qualitative research in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1(1), 39–54.
50. Soloviev, A., & Klinger, B. (2001). Open ocean convection. In Encyclopedia of Ocean Sciences (pp. 2015–2022). https://doi.org/10.1006/rwos.2001.0118
51. Sopandi, W., Kadarohman, A., Rosbiono, M., Latip, A., & Sukardi, R. R. (2018). The courseware of discontinuous nature of matter in teaching the states of matter and their changes. International Journal of Instruction, 11(1), 61–76.
52. Stavridou, H., & Marinopoulos, D. (2001). Water and air pollution: Primary students’ conceptions about “itineraries” and interactions of substances. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 2(1), 31–41.
53. Sukardi, R. R., Widarti, H. R., & Nurlela, L. (2017). Primary School Students’ Submicroscopic Representation Level on Greenhouse Effect at Urban Educational Area: 2nd Asian Education Symposium, 178–183. https://doi.org/10.5220/0007300701780183
54. Surata, S. P. K., & Vipriyanti, N. U. (2018). The subak cultural landscape as environmental education: Knowledge, attitudes, and experiences of Balinese teachers, student teachers, and students. The Journal of Environmental Education, 49(1), 59–70.
55. Syahdan, U. A. (2017). Identifikasi miskonsepsi guru Biologi di Kota Makassar pada konsep Sel dengan menggunakan metode CRI (Certanity Respon Index (Masters, Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Makasar). Retrieved from http://eprints.unm.ac.id/4391/
56. Synthesis Report of the Ministry of Maritime Affairs. (2018). Kajian Cepat Laporan Sintesis: Hotspot Sampah Laut Indonesia. Ministry Coordinator of Maritime Affairs in Collaboration with World Bank Group, Embassy of Denmark, and Royal Norwegian Embassy. (Jakarta).
57. Tolppanen, S., & Aksela, M. (2018). Identifying and addressing students’ questions on climate change. The Journal of Environmental Education, 49(5), 375–389.
58. Tugurian, L. P., & Carrier, S. J. (2017). Children’s environmental identity and the elementary science classroom. The Journal of Environmental Education, 48(3), 143–153.
59. Valeiras, N., & Godoy, L. A. (2007). Understanding environmental pollution concepts: A case study using school students in Argentina and Puerto Rico. International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 31(3/4), 342-358.
60. Warner, B. P., & Elser, M. (2015). How do sustainable schools integrate sustainability education? An assessment of certified sustainable K–12 schools in the United States. The Journal of Environmental Education, 46(1), 1–22.
61. Williams, S., McEwen, L. J., & Quinn, N. (2017). As the climate changes: Intergenerational action-based learning in relation to flood education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 48(3), 154–171.