Academic Motivation Levels of Secondary School Students and Their Attitudes Towards a Social Studies Course

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2, 156 - 185, 30.04.2020

Melike Faiz , Emine Karasu Avcı

https://doi.org/10.33403/rigeo.693769

Öz

The present study aims to reveal the motivation levels of secondary school students and their attitudes towards a Social Studies course. This study employed a mixed method approach. The quantitative data were collected through the use of an “Academic Motivation Scale” and an “Attitude Scale for a Social Studies Course”. The qualitative data were obtained through a structured interview. Four hundred and forty-three secondary school students participated in the quantitative part of the study, while fourty-five secondary school students participated in the qualitative part of the study. The results of the quantitative section are given in two separate parts: a motivation scale, and an attitude scale. A significant difference was observed in the Introjected Extrinsic Motivation levels of male secondary school students. The scores for Identified Extrinsic Motivation and Amotivation were in favor of female students. There was no difference in the motivation scores according to the socio-economic levels of the students. However, the motivation levels of the students decreased as the grade level increased. The attitudes of participants towards the Social Studies course did not differ according to both gender and grade level of the participants. According to the school variable, a difference was observed between schools with a low socio-economic status and those with high socio-economic status. The qualitative data revealed a majority of students had positive attitudes towards the Social Studies course. Furthermore, the factors that enhance student motivation towards the Social Studies course were found to be related to the study of History, having an interest in the course, and the way the course is taught.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Academic Motivation, Attitude, Secondary School, Social Studies, Student

Kaynakça

• Adıgüzel, A. (2012). The validity and reliability study about school attitude scale. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(40), 30-45.
• Akbaşlı, S., Kubilay, S., & Durnalı, M. (2017). Investigation on the future expectations and academic motivations of students attending associate degree. Journal of Human Sciences, 14(4), 4678-4693.
• Akman, H. (2011). The diversification of gender and organizational statuteininternal and external motivations:The research on the engineers and the technicians in Türk Telekomünikasyon A.Ş. Non-thesis master project, Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta.
• Aktaş, N. (2016). Motivation resources and decision making strategies of high school students. Unpublished master’s thesis, Adnan Menderes University, Aydın.
• Akpınar, M. (2006). The effects of students? Attitudes towards physics courseson students? Academical acconplishment in physics courses. Unpublished master’s thesis, Gazi University, Ankara.
• Altıntaş, S. (2005). The 7th grade primary school student's attitute towards social science subject. Journal of Celal Bayar University Institute of Social Sciences, 3(2), 1-12.
• Altun, F., & Yazıcı, H. (2010). Öğrencilerin okul motivasyonunu yordayan bazı değişkenler. An oral presentation of International Conference on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, Antalya.
• Arıkıl, G., & Yorgancı, B. (2012). Öğretmenlerin, öğretmen adaylarının ve öğrencilerin motivasyonu algılama farklılıkları retriverded from http://kongre.nigde.edu.tr/xufbmek/dosyalar/tam_metin/pdf/2389–30_05_2012–15_25_14.pdf. Date of access: 15.09.2019.
• Arslan, A. (2006). The attitude scale toward making computer supported education. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversity Journal of Education, I1 (II), 24-33.
• Aytaç, B. (2006). A study about the motivation of the boarding students. (Unpublished master’s thesis, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli.
• Balantekin, Y., & Bilgin, A. (2017). The effect of ARCS motivational model on motivational level, attitudes and academic success of the students. Elementary Education Online, 16(1), 161-177. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17051/io.2017.04081
• Baykara-Özaydınlık, K., & Aykaç, N. (2014). Motivation resources and problems of candidate teachers of social studies. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Educaiton, 9(3), 41-55.
• Bektaş, M., & Karagöz, Ş. (2017). Invenstigation of attitudes and motıvation levels of teacher candidates in terms of some variables. International Journal of Academic Value Studies, 3(15), 154-164.
• Bloom, S. (1995). Creating sanctuary in the school. Journal for a Just and Caring Education, 1(4), 403-433.
• Canbay, F. (2016). An investigation of the relationship between academic motivation and emotional intelligence levels of ELT students at a university in Turkey. Unpublished master’s thesis, Çağ University, Mersin.
• Ceylan, E., Sağırekmekçi, H., Tatar, E., & Bilgin, İ. (2016). Investigation of middle school students’ science course achievementaccording to their curiosity, attitude, and motivation levels. Uşak University Journal of Social Sciences, 9(1), 39-52. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/202560 Coşkun, S. A. (2009). The effect of caricatures on academic achievement, motivation and attitude in science teaching. Unpublished master’s thesis, Süleyman Demirel University, Burdur.
• Cronbach, L. J. (1990). Essentials of psychological testing (5th Edition). New York: Harper Collins.
• Çakır, E. (2006). Depression and motivation levels of students who are educating in Anatolian teacher training figh schools. Unpublished master’s thesis, Sakarya University, Sakarya.
• Çelen, A. (2014). (Examination of sixty and seventy grade students' attitudes towards social studies (Malatya sample)) Unpublished master’s thesis, İnönü University, Malatya.
• Çıngı, H. (1994). Örnekleme kuramı. Ankara: H.Ü. Fen Fakültesi Yayınları.
• Çiçek, D. (2005). Motivation and quality of work life (qwl) in organizations: A research about by determining the motivation level of managers in public organization and developing their qwl. Doctoracal thesis, Çukurova University, Adana.
• Çokluk, Ö. S., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, S. (2012). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: Spss ve lisrel uygulamaları. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
• Çolak, E., & Cırık, İ. (2015). Analysis of motivational orientation of secondary school students. Elementary Education Online, 14(4), 1307-1326. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17051/io.2015.08906
• Çöllü, E. F., & Öztürk, Y. E. (2006). Örgütlerde inançlar-tutumlar tutumların ölçüm yöntemleri ve uygulama örnekleri: Bu yöntemlerin değerlendirilmesi. Journal of Selçuk University Social Sciences Vocational School, 9(1-2), 373-404.
• Das, S. K., Halder, U. K., Mishra, B., & Delnath, D. (2014). Study on relationship between attitude towards education and academic achievement in secondary level minority students. Indian Streams Research Journal, 4(10), 1-6.
• Dawson B., & Trapp R. G. (2001). Basic & clinical biostatistics (3rd Edition). Langemedical Books/McGraw-Hill Medical Publishing Division.
• Demir, A. (2010). he relation between the attitudes of the Students from the Second level primary school education towards social sciences and their academic success. Unpublished master’s thesis, Harran University, Şanlıurfa.
• Demir, S. B., & Akengin, H. (2010). Sosyal Bilgiler dersine yönelik bir tutum ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. e-International Journal of Educational Research, 1(1), 26-40.
• DeVellis, R. F. (2012). Scale development theory and application (3rd Editon). Sage Publications, Inc.
• Dolunay, A. G. (2010). Segmenting Turkish university students according to lifestyle and analyzing their perception, motivation and attiude towards visual arts. Unpublished master’s thesis, Marmara University, İstanbul.
• Durmaz, A., & Kiriş-Avaroğulları, A. (2016). The effect of activity practices in social studies course on students’ motivation. Turkish Studies, 11(3), 995-1010.
• Ergin, A. (2006). Elementary students attitude towards social science. Unpublished master’s thesis, Pamukkale University, Denizli.
• Ergin, A., & Karataş, H. (2018). Achievement-oriented motivation levels of university students. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 33(4), 868-887. doi: 10.16986/HUJE.2018036646
• Ergül, E. F. (2005). Motivasyon ve motivasyon teknikleri. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 4(14), 67-79.
• Eryüksel, G. N. (1996). Ana-baba ve ergen ilişkilerinin problem çözme iletişim becerileri, bilişsel çarpıtmalar ve aile yapısı açısından incelenmesi. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Ege University, İzmir.
• Fidan, M., & Altay, E. (2017). Relationships between the profiles of middle school students’ attitudes towards Turkish course and motivations for education. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 32(2), 480-493. doi: 10.16986/HUJE.2017024892
• Gay, L. P. (1987). Educational research competendes for analysis and applieation. Columbus: Merrill Publishing Comp.
• Giannakaki, M. S. (2005). Using mixed-methods to examine teachers' attitudes to educational change: The case of the skills for life strategy for improving adult literacy and numeracy skills in England. Educational Researchand Evaluation, 11(4): 323-348. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610500110687
• Gopala, V., Bakar, J. A. A., Zulkifli, A. N., Alwi, A., & Mat, R. C. (2017). A review of the motivation theories in learning. The 2nd International Conference on Applied Science and Technology’nda sunulmuş sözlü bildiri, Kedah, Malaysia. Gömleksiz, M. N., & Kan, A. Ü. (2012). A study of validity and reliability of an attitude scale on social studies course. Fırat Üniversitesi Journal of Social Sciences, 23(2), 139-148.
• Gömleksiz, M. N., & Serhatlıoğlu, B. (2013). Prospective teachers’ perceptions of academic motivation levels. The Journal of Turkish Social Research, 17(3), 99-127.
• Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation ve Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255-274. doi: 10.2307/1163620
• Karacelil, S. (2013). The importance of motivation in religious education. Uşak University Journal of Social Sciences, 6(4), 182-207.
• Karagöz Bolat, N. (2007). Motivation and success levels of 6th and 7th grade students in science and technology course at primary education with respect to learning styles. Unpublished master’s thesis, Osmangazi University, Eskişehir.
• Karakaya, A., & Ay, F. A. (2007). Factors affecting the motivation of employees: A study for health employees. Journal of Celal Bayar University Institute of Social Sciences 31(1), 55-67.
• Karakuş Tayşi, E., & Özbay, M. (2016). The development of listening attitude scale for secondary school students: Study on the validity and reliability. Journal of Mother Tongue Education, 4(2), 187-199.
• Kaya, M., & Nazıroğlu, B. (2008). Some factors affecting onthe levels of professional motivation and manner of imams. Ondokuz Mayıs Unıversity Review of the Faculty of Divinity, 30, 25-53.
• Kazazoğlu, S. (2011). The effect of attitudes towards mother tongue and foreign language courses on academic achievement. Doctoracal thesis, Ankara University, Ankara.
• Kepçeoğlu, M. (1995). Psikolojik danışma ve rehberlik. Ankara: Özerler Matbaası.
• Köse, A. (2010). The relation between sel efficacy beliefs, learning and studying strategies and learning styles of science teacrher candidates (ÇÖMÜ sample). Unpublished master’s thesis, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale.
• Kulaksızoğlu, A. (2004). Ergenlik psikolojisi (6th Edition). İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.
• Lukow, J. E. (2002). Learning style as predictors of student attitudes toward theuse of technology in recreation courses. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Indiana University, Indiana.
• Meriç, G. (2014). The effect of concept cartoons in science and technology course on students' level of conceptual understanding, motivation and attitude. Unpublished master’s thesis, Celal Bayar University, Manisa.
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd Edition). London: Sage Publications. Oğur, M. (2009). A research about behavıours of sıxth and seventh grade students on socıal scıences course. Unpublished master’s thesis, Pamukkale University, Denizli.
• Oppenheim, A. N. (1966). Questionnaire design and attitude measurement. New York: Basic Books, Inc.
• Özçelik, D. A. (1992). Eğitim programları ve öğretim (Genel Öğretim yöntemi). Ankara: ÖSYM Yayınları.
• Özdamar, K. (2001). SPSS ile biyoistatistik (4th Edition). Eskişehir: Nisan Yayınevi.
• Özgüven, İ. E. (1994). Psikolojik testler. Ankara: Yeni Doğuş Matbaası.
• Özgüven, İ. E. (1998). Bireyi tanıma teknikleri. Ankara: Sistem Ofset.
• Özkal, N., Güngör, A. & Çetinöz, D. (2004). Teachers' ideas about the social studies course and students' attitudes towards the course. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 40, 600-615
• Öztürk, Ö., & Kalyoncu, N. (2014). Development of an attitude scale towards sixth grade music lesson. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 25(I), 235-248. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.9761/JASSS2197
• Öztürk, C., & Baysal, A. G. N. (1999). The 4th and 5th grades students' atti̇tudes towards soci̇al studi̇es. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 6(6), 11-20.
• Papanastasiou, C. (2002). School, teaching and family influence on student attitudes toward science: Based on TIMSS data for Cyprus. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 28, 71-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-491X(02)00013-5
• Patton, M. Q. (2014). Nitel araştırma ve değerlendirme yöntemleri (Translation from 3rd Edition). Çev. Edt. Mesut Bütün, Selçuk Beşir Demir, Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
• Sardarov, E. (2012), Attitude and behavior, Unpublished master’s thesis, Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir Seker, S. E. (2015). Motivation theory. YBS Ansiklopedisi, 2(1), 22-26.
• Selen, U. (2016). Evaluation of awareness and opinions overview of employees to internal and external motivation techniques; Example of local administration. Doctoral thesis, Namık Kemal University, Tekirdağ.
• Seyis, S. (2011). Relationship between high school students' motivation, emotional intelligence and academic achievement. Unpublished master’s thesis, Karadeniz Teknik University, Trabzon.
• Sidekli, S. (2010). İlköğretim beşinci sınıf öğrencilerinin 2004 programı doğrultusunda Sosyal Bilgiler dersine yönelik tutumları. Turkish Journal of Social Research, 3, 1-23.
• Stirling, D. (2013). Motivation in education. Aichi Universities English Education Research Journal, 29, 51-72. Şekerci, H., Doğan, M. C., & Kabapınar, Y. (2018). An investigation of the effectiveness of the storyline approach based activities in the primary school social studies lesson. Dicle Üniversity Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 33, 57-69. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14582/DUZGEF.1881
• Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Ullman, J. B. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. MA: Pearson.
• Tahiroğlu, M., & Aktepe, V. (2015). Validity and reliability study on the motivation scale form designed for 4th and 5th grade social studies course. Turkish Studies, 10(3), 907-932.
• Tay, B., & Akyürek Tay, B. (2006). The effects of attitude on success in social sciences courses. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(1), 73-84.
• Taşkın, Y. O. (2015). The relationship between pre-service teachers' value orientation and academic motivation. Unpublished master’s thesis, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale.
• Tohidi, H., & Jabbari, M. M. (2012). The effects of motivation in education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 820-824.
• Türk, C., Kalkan, H., Semercioğlu, M., & Bolat, M. (2017). Developing students’ motivation and attitudes towards science with a nature education project. Journal of Research in Educaiton and Teaching, 6(3), 334-341.
• Türk, A. (2018). Investigation of academic motivation and cyber bullying for 6 th and 7 th grade students. Unpublished master’s thesis, Toros University, Mersin.
• Tütüncü, Ö., & Küçükusta, D. (2007). Organizasyonlarda bireyler: tutum, davranış ve motivasyon. Retrieved from http://web.deu.edu.tr/kalite/dosyalar/ulusal_bildiri/EkD.doc
• Vallerand, R. J., Blais, M. R., Brière, N. M., & Pelletier, L. G. (1989). Construction et validation de l’Échelle de Motivation en Éducation (EME). Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement, 21, 323–349.
• Vatansever Bayraktar, H. (2015). Student motivation in classroom management and factors that affect motivation. Turkish Studies, 10(3), 1079-1100. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.7788
• Vero, E., & Puko, E. (2017). The importance of motivation in an educational environment. Formazione & Insegnamento, XV(1), 57-66.
• Wilkesman, U., Fischer, H., & Virgillito, A. (2012). Academic motivation of students-the German case. Technische Universitat, Dortmund.
• Yavuz, F. (2006). School motivation assessment scale arrangement and reliability. Unpublished master’s thesis, Marmara University, İstanbul.
• Yavuz, H. (2014). Student opinions on effectiveness of student services and motivation levels at open education vocational high school. Unpublished master’s thesis, Fatih University, İstanbul.
• Yetim, E., Demir, Y., & Erduran İlker, G. (2014). Motivation in physical education: The predictive effect of attitude and motivational strategies. Spormetre the Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 12(2), 139-146.
• Yılmazer, A., & Demir, S. B. (2014). An investigation into the relationship between learners’ academic achievement and their attitudes towards social studies lesson and the teacher. Turkish Studies, 9(2), 1705-1718.
• Yöyen, İ. (2008). Comparison of the level of motivation and depression of the students within for improving professional and technical training. Unpublished master’s thesis, Beykent University, İstanbul.
• Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Yurt. E., & Bozer, E. N. (2015). The adaptation of the academic motivation scale for Turkish context. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 14(3), 669-685.