Kırgızca ve Rusça sözcük çağrışımlarının karşılaştırılması

Öz

Zihindeki bir duygu, düşünce veya imgenin bir diğerini akla getirmesi durumu olarak açıklanabilen çağrışım kavramı 2000 yılı aşkın bir geçmişe sahiptir. Sözcükler bütün duygu, düşünce veya imgeleri karşılama işlevine sahip olduğu için çağrışım kavramının temel öğeleri olarak kabul edilir. Ancak sözcükler zihinde sözlüklerde yer aldığı gibi alfabetik sıraya göre dizilmemektedir. Zihindeki dizilimde her sözcüğün kendi anlamsal bağlarının, bireysel ve toplumsal deneyimlerin, toplumların dünya görüşlerinin etkisi görülür. Bu nedenle sözcüklerin çağrışım ağları bireyden bireye, kültürden kültüre ve dönemden döneme farklılık gösteren dinamik bir yapıya sahiptir. Bu çalışmada 1975 yılında L. N. Titova tarafından hazırlanan Kirgizsko-Russkiy Assotsiativnıy Slovar' “Kırgızca-Rusça Çağrışım Sözlüğü” adlı eserde yer alan bazı sözcüklerin çağrışımları arasındaki benzerlikler ve farklılıklar sosyolinguistik açıdan incelenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Çağrışım
• serbest çağrışım
• zihinsel sözlük
• dil içi dünya görüşü
• dilsel görelilik

Cross-cultural comparison of word associations in Kyrgyz and Russian

Abstract

The concept of association, which can be explained as a situation where an emotion, thought or image in the mind brings to mind another, has a history of more than 2000 years. Since words have the function of meeting all feelings, thoughts or images, they have considered as the fundamental components of the concept of association, but the words have not arranged in alphabetical order in the mind as in dictionaries. In the sequence in the mind, the effect of each word’s own semantic ties, individual and social experiences, and world views (weltansicht) have seen. Therefore, the association networks of words have a dynamic structure that differs from individual to individual, culture to culture and period to period. In this study, the similarities and differences between the associations of some words in the Kirgizsko-Russkiy Assotsiativnıy Slovar' “Kyrgyz-Russian Association Dictionary” prepared by L. N. Titova in 1975 have been analyzed sociolinguistically.

Keywords

• Association
• free association
• mental lexicon
• intralingual world view
• linguistic relativity

Kaynakça

1. Aksan, D. (2009). Her Yönüyle Dil Ana Çizgileriyle Dilbilim. Ankara: TDK.
2. Berry, E. M., Kelly, D., Canetti, L. and Bachar, E. (1998). Word Association Test and Psychosexual Cues in Assessing Persons with Eating Disorders. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 86, 43-50.
3. Büyükkantarcıoğlu, N. (2006). Toplumsal Gerçeklik ve Dil. İstanbul: Multilingual.
4. Dawson, M. R. W. (2004). Minds and Machines: Connectionism and Psychological Modeling. Oxford: Blackwell.
5. De Deyne, S. and Storms, G. (2008). Word Associations: Norms for 1,424 Dutch Words in A Continuous Task. Behavior Research Methods, 40(1), 198-205.
6. Fitzpatrick, T., Playfoot, D., Wray, A. and Wright, M. J. (2013). Establishing the Reliability of Word Association Data for Investigating Individual and Group Differences. Applied Linguistics, 36(1), 23-50.
7. Heller, S. (2005). Freud A to Z. New Jersey: Wiley.
8. Jenkins, J. J. and Russell, W. A. (1960). Systematic Changes in Word Association Norms: 1910-1952. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 60(3), 293–304.

9. Keene, C. M. (1951). Commonality of Response on A Word-Association Test: A Study of Standardization Procedures and An Attempt to Forecast Moderate Emotional Maladjustment. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Stanford University.
10. Kent, G. H. and Rosanoff, A. J. (1910). A Study of Association in Insanity. American Journal of Insanity, 67(1), 37-96.
11. Kurcz, I. (1966). Inter-Language Comparison of Word-association Responses. International Journal of Psychology, 1, 151-161.
12. Leontyev, A. A. (1977). Slovar’ Assotsiativnıh Norm Russkogo Yazıka. Moskva: İzdatel’stvo Moskovskogo Universiteta.
13. Levy, M. (1949). An Analysis of the Influence of Two Different Cultures on Responses to the Rosanoff Free Association Test. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, University of Chicago.
14. Maki, W. S. (2008). A Database of Associative Strengths from the Strength-Sampling Model: A Theory-Based Supplement to the Nelson, McEvoy, and Schreiber Word Association Norms. Behavior Research Methods, 40(1), 232-235.
15. Mandler, G. (2007). A History of Modern Experimental Psychology: From James and Wundt to Cognitive Science. Cambridge: MIT Press.
16. Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L. and Schreiber, T. A. (2004). The University of South Florida Free Association, Rhyme, and Word Fragment Norms. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(3), 402–407.
17. Nelson, D. L. and Zhang, N. (2000). The Ties That Bind What is Known to the Recall of What is New. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 7(4), 604-617.
18. O’connor, J. (1928). Born That Way. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
19. Rosenzweig, M. R. (1957). Etudes sur L'association des Mots. Annee Psychologique, 57, 23-32.
20. Rosenzweig, M. R. (1970). International Kent-Rosanoff Word Association Norms Emphasizing Those of French Male and Female Students and French Workmen. In L. J. Postman and G. Keppel (Eds.), Norms of Word Association, (pp. 95–176). Cambridge: Academic Press.
21. Russell, W. A. and Jenkins, J. J. (1954). The Complete Minnesota Norms for Responses to 100 Words from the Kent-Rosanoff Word Association Test. USN Technical Report, No. 11, ONR N8 66216, University of Minnesota.
22. Russell, W. A. and Meseck, O. R. (1959). Der Einfluss der Assoziation auf das Erinnern von Worten in der Deutschen, Franzosischen, und Englischen Sprache. Zeitschrift für Experimentalle und Angewandte Psychologie, 6, 191-211.
23. Schellenberg, P. E. (1930). A Group Free-Association Test for College Students. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Minnesota.
24. Shamdasani, S. (2003). Jung and the Making of Modern Psychology: The Dream of A Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Simonton, D. K. (2002). Great Psychologists and Their Times: Scientific Insights into Psychology’s History. Washington: American Psychological Association.
26. Sorabji, J. (1972). Aristotle: On Memory. Providence: Brown University Press.
27. Stacy, A. W., Ames, S. L. and Grenard, J. L. (2006). Word Association Tests of Associative Memory and Implicit Processes: Theoretical and Assessment Issues. In R. W. Wiers and A. W. Stacy, (Eds.), Handbook of implicit cognition and addiction (pp. 75-90). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
28. Taylor, A. E. (1960). Plato: The Man and His Work. London: Methuen & Co.
29. Titova, L. N. (1975). Kirgizsko-Russkiy Assotsiativniy Slovar’. Frunze: Mektep.
30. Tresselt, M. E., Leeds, D. S. and Mayzner, M. S. (1955). The Kent-Rosanoff Word Association: II. A Comparison of Sex Differences in Response Frequencies. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 87, 149-153.
31. Warren, H. C. (1921). A History of the Association Psychology. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
32. Wertheimer, M. and Puente, A. E. (2020). A Brief History of Psychology. New York: Routledge.
33. Woodrow, H. and Lowell, F. (1916). Children’s Association Frequency Tables. The Psychological Monographs, 22(5), i-110.
34. Woodworth, R. S. and Schlosberg, H. (1961). Experimental Psychology. London: Methuen & Co.